{"id":138436,"date":"2000-05-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2000-05-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000"},"modified":"2017-07-14T12:08:50","modified_gmt":"2017-07-14T06:38:50","slug":"leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000","title":{"rendered":"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000<\/div>\n
Author: M Mudgal<\/div>\n
Bench: M Mudgal<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
Mukul Mudgal, J.<\/p>\n
1.     The  petitioner’s  case is that the petitioner who was  originally  in CRPF  on 10.8.84 joined Special Protection Group ( hereinafter referred  to as ‘SPG’) on 10.8.1994 by virtue of the induction letter dated 12.7.94. The petitioner  was  thereafter  posted at the Prime  Minister’s  Residence  on 3.5.1995. The petitioner has pleaded that while in S.P.G. she was  promoted from  S.A. to the rank of Naik and on 22.5.1995 the petitioner shifted  her accommodation outside the S.P.G. Campus to reside with her family.\n<\/p>\n
2.   This petition challenges the Repatriation Order dated 7.4.1999,  repatriating the petitioner from S.P.G. to her parent organization\/C.R.P.F.  On 28.4.1999, this Court has stayed the Order dated 7.4.1999 and on 10th  May, 1999,  the interim Order dated 28.4.1999 was modified and it  was  directed that the petitioner need not be posted at the Prime Minister’s residence.\n<\/p>\n
3.   The petitioner has pleaded that she has an unblemished service  record and the order dated 7.4.1999 Passed was without any legal basis and neither any  charge sheet was issued nor any opportunity was given to her  to  show cause  and is, therefore, illegal, arbitrary and void. The  petitioner  has further  pleaded  in  her writ petition that she had  a  totally  innocuous
\nsocial interaction with two Afghan students in the neighbourhood which  may be the basis for the impugned action against her.\n<\/p>\n
4.   In  the counter-affidavit it is pleaded on behalf of  the  respondents that  the S.P.G. is comprised of outstanding officers who are alert,  agile and  vigilant  and only the personnel who are extremely  fit,  sincere  and committed  only are retained in the organisation. Those who are  not  found suitable are returned\\repatriated to their parent organisation without  any blemish on their career or record or any pecuniary loss. It has been stated that the letter dated 12.7.1994 containing the terms and conditions of  the petitioner’s  service  with S.P.G. clearly provided in Para 3(v)  that  the period of deputation may ordinarily be six years but the officers would  be liable to be repatriated to their parent cadre at any time without  assigning  any  reasons. It is further stated that ordinarily the  deputation  to S.P.G.  is  for six years but there are many instances  when  personnel  on deputation  to  S.P.G.  have been repatriated to their  parent  cadre  even before  the completion of the abovementioned six years period. Such  orders of  repatriation  are not intended to cast any stigma on the  person  being repatriated  to  the parent cadre nor do the amount to  infliction  of  any penalty.\n<\/p>\n
5.   The respondents have filed a list of officers who have been on deputation  to  S.P.G.  for a period less than six years.  The  respondents  have further  submitted  that they are only replying to averments  in  the  writ petition regarding the petitioner’s interaction with Afghan  internationals and the repatriation of the petitioner was not intended to nor in fact cast any  stigma  on the career profile of the petitioner. There  were  specific intelligence reports of threats from Afghan militants. It is submitted that due  to  the petitioner’s interaction with Afghan nationals  and  a  threat perception  to the security of the P.M. the petitioner was not found  suitable  for continuation in S.P.G. The induction of the petitioner to  S.P.G. as per the Induction Letter dated 12.7.1994 (Annexure R-I annexed with  the respondents counter affidavit) was on the following terms:\n<\/p>\n
      “The period of deputation will ordinarily be six years.  However, officers on deputation can be repatriated to their parent organisation  at  any time without assigning any reason,  if  they  are found  unsuitable  for  assignments  in  the  Special  Protection  Group.”\n<\/p>\n
6.   I  am of the view that in the light of such clear terms in the  induction letter, it is not open to the petitioner to challenge her repatriation to  her parent cadre of CRPF since the terms of her induction  into  S.P.G. are very clear and no reasons are required to be assigned for the repatriation to the parent cadre. It is very clear that the S.P.G. was conceived to protect  persons who needed very high security cover and in  administrative matters  involving such personnel it is not thus open to the petitioner  to challenge  in a writ court her repatriation in view of the clear  terms  of her Induction Letter dated 12.7.1994. In the counter affidavit it has  been clarified that the impugned order dated 7.4.99 does not cast any stigma  on the petitioner nor does it adversely affect her career profile. It has also been  clarified  by  the respondent that the impugned  order  being  purely administrative in nature and not by way of punishment, neither the said Act nor the terms and conditions of the petitioner’s induction into SPG require a  hearing before the issue of an order of repatriation. Thus a writ  court cannot sit in appeal over an administrative order of  transfer\/repatriation in the light of the above discussion particularly in view of the  sensitive nature  of the assignments relating to security handled by the SPG  personnel.\n<\/p>\n
7.   Furthermore  Section 12 of the Special Protection Group Act gives  the petitioner an alternate and equally efficacious remedy to prefer an  appeal against the impugned order which does not appear to have been availed of by the  petitioner. Even this availability of an alternate remedy would  be  a bar to the exercise of the writ jurisdiction in the facts and circumstances of the present case.\n<\/p>\n
8.   In  the  light of the above, it is not possible to  interfere  in  the present  petition with the impugned order dated 7.4.1999.  Accordingly  the petition is dismissed. All interim orders are vacated.\n<\/p>\n
9.     The  petition and all the pending miscellaneous applications  are  accordingly disposed of.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000 Author: M Mudgal Bench: M Mudgal ORDER Mukul Mudgal, J. 1. The petitioner’s case is that the petitioner who was originally in CRPF on 10.8.84 joined Special Protection Group ( hereinafter referred to as ‘SPG’) on 10.8.1994 by virtue of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nLeelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2000-05-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-14T06:38:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000\",\"datePublished\":\"2000-05-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-14T06:38:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000\"},\"wordCount\":981,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000\",\"name\":\"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2000-05-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-14T06:38:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2000-05-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-14T06:38:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000","datePublished":"2000-05-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-14T06:38:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000"},"wordCount":981,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000","name":"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2000-05-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-14T06:38:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/leelavathy-m-n-vs-special-protection-group-ors-on-8-may-2000#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Leelavathy M.N. vs Special Protection Group & Ors on 8 May, 2000"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138436"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138436\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}