{"id":138568,"date":"2011-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011"},"modified":"2017-07-04T14:54:38","modified_gmt":"2017-07-04T09:24:38","slug":"mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                         File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/001374\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a027,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a027,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0R.K.Roy\n           Janaki\u00a0Niwas\n           Road\u00a0No.2\n           Dwarikapuri\n           Hanuman\u00a0Nagar\n           Patna\u00a0800\u00a0020\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Patna\n\n           Respondents\n\n           The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n           East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Danapur\u00a0Division\n           Danapur\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Dharmatma\u00a0Singh,\u00a0DPO\n                                     Representing\u00a0Shri\u00a0Manojkumar,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Sr.DPO\n                                     \u00ad\u00a0\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Patna\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner             :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                 Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\n                      In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                     at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                             File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/001374\n\n\n                                                   ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.7.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Patna.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0para\u00a01\u00a0of\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0furnished\u00a0under\u00a0RTI\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0dt.18.2.10\u00a0read\u00a0as\u00a0follows:<\/p>\n<p>       &#8216;That\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0schedule\u00a0of\u00a0Railway\u00a0Servant\u00a0(D&amp;A)\u00a0Rule\u00a01968,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Scale\u00a0Officer\u00a0is\u00a0competent\u00a0to\u00a0initiate \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       D&amp;A\u00a0proceeding\u00a0for\u00a0imposition\u00a0of\u00a0major\u00a0penalty\u00a0(i.e.\u00a0Removal,\u00a0Dismissal\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Compulsory\u00a0Retirement) \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       in\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0Railway\u00a0Servant\u00a0in\u00a0Scale\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.5000\u00ad8000&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>       In\u00a0this\u00a0connection\u00a0he\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that \u00a0\u00a0 Para\u00a05\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0 \u00a0letter\u00a0dt.29.3.10\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PA\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       reads\u00a0as\u00a0follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>       &#8216;It\u00a0will\u00a0 be\u00a0 worth\u00a0to\u00a0 mention\u00a0here\u00a0that\u00a0whoever\u00a0may\u00a0have\u00a0approved\u00a0the\u00a0appointment\u00a0of\u00a0particular \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       person\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0Govt.\u00a0servant,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0authority\u00a0which\u00a0actually\u00a0signs\u00a0the\u00a0appointment\u00a0order\u00a0that\u00a0becomes \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0appointing\u00a0authority\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0particular\u00a0person&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>       However,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Railway\u00a0Board\u00a0decision\u00a0reads\u00a0as\u00a0follows:<\/p>\n<p>       &#8216;The\u00a0penalty\u00a0of\u00a0dismissal,\u00a0removal\u00a0or\u00a0compulsory\u00a0retirement\u00a0from\u00a0service\u00a0should\u00a0obviously\u00a0not\u00a0be \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       imposed\u00a0by\u00a0an\u00a0authority\u00a0which\u00a0has\u00a0merely\u00a0issued\u00a0the\u00a0offer\u00a0of\u00a0appointment\u00a0or\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0promotion,\u00a0with \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0appointment\u00a0or\u00a0promotion\u00a0ordered\u00a0by\u00a0a\u00a0competent\u00a0authority\u00a0higher\u00a0to\u00a0that\u00a0authority&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>       In\u00a0this\u00a0context,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0has\u00a0\u00a0deposed\u00a0a\u00a0false\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       statement\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0affidavit\u00a0\u00a0dt.18.2.10.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Shri\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a016.9.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0contents\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0affidavit\u00a0are\u00a0correct.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.24.9.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>Decision\n<\/p>\n<p> 2.       During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0maintained\u00a0their\u00a0position\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0contents\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0affidavit\u00a0they\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         had \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 under \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 are \u00a0 correct \u00a0 . \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Complainant \u00a0 however \u00a0 refuted \u00a0 this \u00a0 statement \u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         maintained\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0position\u00a0that\u00a0contents\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0affidavit\u00a0are\u00a0wrong.<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0have\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         already \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 order \u00a0 and \u00a0 have \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 the \u00a0 required \u00a0 affidavit \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Appellant.\u00a0It\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0\u00a0requires\u00a0interpretation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0rules\u00a0laid\u00a0down\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the \u00a0 Railway \u00a0 Board \u00a0 and \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Public \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 has \u00a0 made \u00a0 every \u00a0 attempt \u00a0 to \u00a0 provide \u00a0 whatever\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         information\u00a0is\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0records.\u00a0\u00a0However,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0advised\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         to\u00a0hold\u00a0\u00a0one\u00a0last\u00a0personal\u00a0hearing\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0to\u00a0clarify\u00a0the\u00a0&#8216;discrepancies&#8217;\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         pointed\u00a0out\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0If\u00a0still\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied,\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0advised\u00a0to\u00a0approach\u00a0an\u00a0\u00a0appropriate\u00a0forum\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         redressal\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0grievance.\u00a0As\u00a0far\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0is\u00a0concerned,\u00a0 \u00a0for\u00a0reasons\u00a0given\u00a0above,\u00a0this\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         case\u00a0is\u00a0closed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                          (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                 Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0R.K.Roy<br \/>\n         Janaki\u00a0Niwas<br \/>\n         Road\u00a0No.2<br \/>\n         Dwarikapuri<br \/>\n         Hanuman\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n         Patna\u00a0800\u00a0020<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Danapur\u00a0Division<br \/>\n         Danapur\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.   Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/001374 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a027,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a027,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0R.K.Roy Janaki\u00a0Niwas Road\u00a0No.2 Dwarikapuri Hanuman\u00a0Nagar Patna\u00a0800\u00a0020 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Patna Respondents The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office Danapur\u00a0Division Danapur Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Dharmatma\u00a0Singh,\u00a0DPO Representing\u00a0Shri\u00a0Manojkumar,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Sr.DPO \u00ad\u00a0\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Patna Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/001374 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.7.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0 Patna.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0para\u00a01\u00a0of\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0furnished\u00a0under\u00a0RTI\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0dt.18.2.10\u00a0read\u00a0as\u00a0follows: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138568","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-04T09:24:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-04T09:24:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":478,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-04T09:24:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-04T09:24:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-04T09:24:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011"},"wordCount":478,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","name":"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-04T09:24:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-k-roy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.R K Roy vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138568","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138568"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138568\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138568"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138568"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138568"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}