{"id":138975,"date":"2010-01-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010"},"modified":"2016-01-19T15:46:58","modified_gmt":"2016-01-19T10:16:58","slug":"union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.Gopalagowda And A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>?\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OE KARNATAKA AT I3AI\\I(IAI.oHE\nDATED THIS THE 38*\" DAY OF JANUARY 2010\nPRESENT\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE v. GOPAI,AGOW1.T)::A..V\n\nAND  ~   _\nTHE H0I\\rI31,E MRJUSTICE A.S.B_Q_P }'x.I:\\}N\u00a7Z_\u00a7'~ \n\nWRIT APPEAL NO. 4442,{26O'9\u00ab I   \n\nBFIIVVEEN:\n\nI UNION OF INDIA \" \nREP. BY ITS CABINET SEcI\"<I>EI;HI--I 19 ()U1._\n\n2 OFFECER IC IIEc;AI, cI1;I;II.\"'    _  \nFOR S'1'A'E'IQN COMAIVIANQEVR  * \n\nAim-'QI2\"\u00ab:;E S'*;:AIS'I'RIC'I'\n BANGA.I,()RiZ A 560 009  R.f\u00a3SI'(}NIDErlN'i'.'55\n\n%  ..  .(\u00a73Y SR1 R G I__3:i;\u00a5.I..I:'l(:.'l;_]{CCe\n\nthis day, B01-\"ANNA.J., delivered the f'()11(&gt;\\vi;',i:g:2; :V.\n\nJUDGME1s;_1~  2 \"\n\nThe 1'\n\naccompanying the applicat.idi'1\u00bb\u00ab.V:i11.V'  HEZKLVBO\/2009\nare accepted. The de.!;;iy_o13_  filing the Etpp\ufb01\u00e9ll\nis eoncioned. The merite1fjit,selp1*\u00ab,ei's\"  Lip for disposal}\nafter hearing\u00a7-.t.hCE1Ve.;11'~11'e&lt;j 1&#039; CV0u.;i1V\u20acsie!  I pelrties.\n\n &#039;The   No. 1 and 2 in\n\nVV.P.NO.55i-4~4&quot;&#039;\/20.09 Aa.f&#039;e&#039;~.-}Ln5ei&quot;()1&#039;e this Court. 21ssai1ing the\n\n  Oi:&#039;O9--.--23009 passed by the 1&lt;?aI&#039;I&#039;1(:?d Sixaglt?\n\n  011361&#039;, the learned Si1&#039;1gle Jmige has\n\ndispesed .e&#039;)&#039;i&#039;:&#039;itV&#039;11}e w1&quot;i*i petition holding tthat. the f'pri*me inip.( \"t\u00bbai'.1ec:=;. 'Et~l\"1('T3'.u\n\naccordirigly. the notifieati0'i1:\"dat.ecl.  at\n\nArmexure--G was p1zbl'is_hedlVAb\u00a7* '\\.-ir:h.ile'l'iA.eerteiih\"ree.Iriet:i(&gt;ris\nwere imposed on the   vieii'1it..y oi the\nland bel0ngiQg:lhj-   tip eoiistmtttioii.\nIn this   I1\"S'\u20acl for the appellmit\nalso  E:-iiQhewev()nt',ai1'1ed in Se('Iio1'1s 3\nand Qef Act. 1903. {for short the\n\n'Aet.'}.. .. H\u20acIl(,f3_. l'l_\".~VV\u00e91$7(T(lT1t'.\u20acI1CfCd by the 1e2,1rned Cmmsel\n\n \"-fer\"*the3~.\u00e9ip;\ufb01ellani.th\u00e9it the learned Single Judge was not\n\n Sn' MR. Naik. leameel senior eoimsel\n\n\"ifepi*e\u00a3-seating the first resptiridentz however S()\u00a3,l\u00a7._\u00a7h{. to\n\n.t _\u00a7:__fst.ify the decision of the learned -Si1']gl(3.Jl1(igC. in this\n\nit\n\n\n\nregard. it was pointed out by the l\u20ac'c1l'i'1\u20acCl senior c..*_o__i11'1sel\n\nthat the contesting respondent: hereiri could =1-amff:-;;ms<\/pre>\n<p>been singled out. It was further pointed onf&#8217; tel-ialtV&#8217;i-tl&#8217;1el_re <\/p>\n<p>are several eo1&#8217;1stmet1&#8217;o1&#8217;1s in 1l~12iti&#8217;&#8211;aiIfe\u00a3i_. 21I_.&#8217;1c{*i&#8217;i_ is.fm&#8217;1ly<\/p>\n<p>insofar as the contesting resp(in\u20ac}ei11&#8211;_is c:(&gt;n;%e&#8217;r&#8217;r1e-&#8216;~(i,Veslueli,<\/p>\n<p>restriction was imposed wh.e&gt;4h.\u00bbl1e had  l&#8217;o1&#8217; No<\/p>\n<p>Objection Certeifica1.e_.~.._Eve;1&#8243;&#8221;o&#8217;tl.ieriiri.se. it&#8217;l&#8221;\\}vas pointed<br \/>\nout that the provision lco.1&#8217;l1&#8217;talinecil in.._ll&#8217;he.Vsaid Act. had not<br \/>\nbeen eomplied&#8217;\u00abwi&#8217;_&#8217;t.h by  a&#8217;p;l5ellil:;1nt:f\u00e91i1d therefore the<br \/>\nlearned   .  V<\/p>\n<p> In the has been (:ontendecl, the<\/p>\n<p>only point to beioonsi-delred is as to whether the learned<\/p>\n<p> Judge urasl}Listif&#8217;ied in coming to the conclusion<\/p>\n<p>.,.th&#8217;r1.&#8217;\u00a7VV&#8221; &#8221; llV&#8221;i.1_otific:ation published barring such<\/p>\n<p>c:c)ns_trL1_oL~ion= by the land owners in the vi(:1&#8217;_nity had not<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;&#8221;w__l&#8221;&#8216;been extended beyond 18 months. The faict that. the<\/p>\n<p> _ eontesting respondent. hereiri is the owner of the land<\/p>\n<p>\u00bb..measuring 20 gi1n1;as in_Sicledahal1i village.<\/p>\n<p>Yashwanthapura Hobh, Ba11g2iI()a*e North T.2&#8217;1Iuk an___(.i the<\/p>\n<p>same is situate on the southern side of the -p&#8221;i&#8217;-oj3e&#8217;i&#8221;&#8216;i.y<\/p>\n<p>beloliging to the Airforee  not in dispuie.   V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>regard. the contesting responcierrr&#8217; had i&#8217;or.fiNE;&#8211;.<\/p>\n<p>Objection Certificate&#8217; for putting up isoi&#8217;ist.n.:c:fi&#8221;i1i&#8217;\u00e9\u00a2!&#8217;iVe&#8217;._<\/p>\n<p>property. The permission &#8216;wEi~s c1enie_d&#8217;by&#8221;v_the Ai&#8217;;*i&#8221;c)1&#8242;(&#8220;e V<\/p>\n<p>authorities by plaeingsirelianee&#8217;  \ufb02r1ot.Ai&#8217;f&#8217;i(&#8216;:atitv)\u00a7n dated<br \/>\n15.02.2007. Since   had been<br \/>\nreferred to  &#8216;lthe  the ieamed<br \/>\nSingle Judge  vseei\ufb01ii-:not:ifieat,ion in the light.<br \/>\nof the   &amp;S_&#8217;ee&#8217;t:i:oI1 9 of the Act and on<br \/>\nrightly ..~~peri0d of 18 rnonths as<\/p>\n<p>eonten1_pIai:e&#8217;ei V_VLi:1,de1&#8217;A&#8221;\u00bb_9V{\u00e9{J of the Act: had lapsed, as<\/p>\n<p> by\/A. thei\u00e9\u00e9ippeilants herein had Come to the<\/p>\n<p>eo&#8217;11QIuAsi&#8217;o\u00bbnh &#8216;vfh&#8217;a:t;&#8221;j.as on the date when the &#8216;no objeeiion<\/p>\n<p>eerii.fie.21tr:7 _W&#8217;2&#8243;iS sought. the notification was moi in<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A ~&#8217;a &#8216;operat;i.oni.:&#8217; Hence. the Ai1&#8217;fo1&#8217;ee ;1ut:hori1.ies could not.<\/p>\n<p> j &#8216;h._et-we _1fei&#8217;used permission.\n<\/p>\n<p>A<\/p>\n<p>7\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n<p>(3<\/p>\n<p>6. In this 1&#8243;(-:ga1&#8243;Cl. on noticing the provision in the<br \/>\nsaid Act, we are also of the View that&#8221;. the not.ificat.ion<br \/>\nwas not in siibsistence and themfrire, the learned Single<\/p>\n<p>Jricige was justified in coming to such a c:onelt_1sion.<\/p>\n<p>HCHCE. insofar as the learned Sing\u00a71e~Jucige _(:&#8217;oii\u00ab1.ii1g&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>conclusion that the czontesting resp()11d.ei1t.&#8221;&#8216;~.he&#8211;1f\u00e9if1 ls&#8217;  l<\/p>\n<p>entitled to put. up COIlStI&#8221;UCl&#8217;lQI1:..lU:&#8217; lh\u00e9A_lS&#8217;L1bSlStllT1:g.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>situation. we see no error. s&#8221;I&#8217;h_oL1gliA1j,_h&#8221;e l(3a1l&#8221;VI;1&#8243;CVV&#8221;(_&#8217;\u00a3.vCOLlVl~lS\u00e9l <\/p>\n<p>for the appellant relied on  .l.l&#8221;1\u20acvi\u00a7lC8.I&#8217;l1\u20ac(l<br \/>\nSingle Judge of the  High Court: in<\/p>\n<p>the cas\u00e9llloi&#8217; l?i&#8217;o&#8221;rI\u00ab:\u00a3,s {INDIA} LTD AND<br \/>\noas vs,Vo*NioN_o&#8217;1e&#8217;.ilNoirAZ&#8217;mi&#8217;) ores \u00a32009 INDIAN PNH<\/p>\n<p>667], the sain\ufb01\u00e9 v.zo&#8217;ulci&#8217;.iiot be of assistance in the present&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A&#8221;-faC&#8221;i&#8217;s.&#8217; T1&#8242;: the saidlil\u00e9crision. it is no doubt. true that the<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;a&#8211;._;jrovisioi1.s&#8221;oft-the Act. has been consiclered and we also<\/p>\n<p>are-~..(:lear&#8217;al:ioiit the provisions in the Act and the object&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>ll  :'&#8221;ol&#8217; t.hezs..:f&#8217;me to protect, the defence installation. Bui. all<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; _ &#8216; action would have to be taken in accordaiice with the<\/p>\n<p>ii = wizrovisions contained therein. in the instant case, as<\/p>\n<p>l<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010 Author: V.Gopalagowda And A.S.Bopanna ? IN THE HIGH COURT OE KARNATAKA AT I3AI\\I(IAI.oHE DATED THIS THE 38*&#8221; DAY OF JANUARY 2010 PRESENT THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE v. GOPAI,AGOW1.T)::A..V AND ~ _ THE H0I\\rI31,E MRJUSTICE A.S.B_Q_P }&#8217;x.I:\\}N\u00a7Z_\u00a7&#8217;~ WRIT APPEAL NO. 4442,{26O&#8217;9\u00ab I BFIIVVEEN: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-19T10:16:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-19T10:16:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":634,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-19T10:16:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-19T10:16:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-19T10:16:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010"},"wordCount":634,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010","name":"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-19T10:16:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-sri-nagaraj-on-18-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Union Of India vs Sri Nagaraj on 18 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138975\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}