{"id":139571,"date":"2008-09-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-08-09T08:26:58","modified_gmt":"2017-08-09T02:56:58","slug":"porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Akil Kureshi,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/11040\/2008\t 4\/ 4\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 11040 of\n2008 \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\nPORBANDAR\nDISTRICT PANCHAYAT &amp; 1 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nBHARAT\nJ KHODA - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance : \nMR\nHS MUNSHAW for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. \nNone for\nRespondent(s) :\n1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 05\/09\/2008 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>Petitioners<br \/>\n\thave challenged various orders passed by the Courts below. However,<br \/>\n\tthe main challenge is to an order dated 1.8.2008 passed by Principal<br \/>\n\tDistrict Judge, Porbandar passed in Civil Misc. Application No.1 of<br \/>\n\t2008 by which the said application of the petitioners came to be<br \/>\n\tdismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tlitigation has a longish history. Respondent herein is an employee<br \/>\n\tof the erstwhile Junagadh District Panchayat. He had filed a Civil<br \/>\n\tSuit seeking regularization employment being Regular Civil Suit<br \/>\n\tNo.76 of 1987, After the suit was dismissed, the employee filed<br \/>\n\tRegular Civil Appeal No.15 of 1989 before the appellate Court which<br \/>\n\tdisposed of appeal in following terms:\n<\/p>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p> The<br \/>\n\tpresent appeal is hereby partly allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe respondents<br \/>\n\tare hereby ordered to give opportunity of being selected though due<br \/>\n\tprocedure to the plaintiff and till the compelition of said<br \/>\n\tprocedure they shall not terminate the services of the plaintiff.<br \/>\n\tThe respondents are hereby ordered to regularize the services of the<br \/>\n\tplaintiff after following due procedure.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tJudgment and<br \/>\n\tdecree passed by the learned trial Judge is modified accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tParties to bear<br \/>\n\ttheir own costs of this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tDecree be drawn<br \/>\n\taccordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tPronounced in<br \/>\n\topen Court to day this 12th day of April, 1991 at<br \/>\n\tPorbandar .\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt is not in<br \/>\n\tdispute that the above directions of the appellate Court have so far<br \/>\n\tnot been implemented. The employee, therefore, preferred execution<br \/>\n\tproceedings and his execution application No.7 of 1993 came to be<br \/>\n\tdisposed of by an order dated 10.2.2005 passed by learned Principal<br \/>\n\tSenior Civil Judge, Probandar. On the said application learned Judge<br \/>\n\tpassed an order dated 10.2.2005 and directed the appellants herein<br \/>\n\tto file a report whether the judgment has been complied with or not.<br \/>\n\tUltimately, the learned Judge passed an order dated 30th<br \/>\n\tSeptember, 2005 and gave following directions:\n<\/p>\n<p>\tORDER<\/p>\n<p>\t The<br \/>\n\tapplication Exh.13 is hereby allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe defendants<br \/>\n\tare directed that earlier this Court has given the direction on<br \/>\n\t10.2.2005 to the defendants to follow same strictly as well as the<br \/>\n\tdirection given by the Appellate Court in R.C.Exe.No.15 of 1989<br \/>\n\twithin three months from the date of this order and the defendants<br \/>\n\tare also directed to produce his compliance report before this Court<br \/>\n\ton or before 31.12.2005 in view of above.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tYadi be sent to<br \/>\n\tthe defendant.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tNo order as to<br \/>\n\tcost of this application.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tPronounced in<br \/>\n\topen Court today .\n<\/p>\n<p>\tAgainst the said<br \/>\n\torder dated 30th September, 2005, the petitioners herein<br \/>\n\tpreferred Special Civil Application No.25844 of 2006 in which<br \/>\n\tinitially while issuing notice on 12th December, 2006,<br \/>\n\tstay also came to be granted in favour of the petitioners. The<br \/>\n\tpetition, however, came to be disposed of by an order dated<br \/>\n\t27.11.2007. The petitioners were permitted to withdraw the petition<br \/>\n\tfor availing alternative remedy and petitioners were directed to pay<br \/>\n\tcost of Rs.5,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4.1\tUpon this<br \/>\n\tCourt disposing of Special Civil Application No.25844 of 2006 in<br \/>\n\tabove manner, the petitioners preferred Civil Misc. Application No.1<br \/>\n\tof 2008 before the District Court which came to be disposed of by<br \/>\n\tthe impugned order dated 1.8.2008 and by the said order, the<br \/>\n\tDistrict Court while rejecting the application of the petitioners<br \/>\n\trequired that the execution be proceeded expeditiously. At that<br \/>\n\tstage, the petitioners have approached this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt is not in<br \/>\n\tdispute that the order passed by the appellate Court on 12th<br \/>\n\tApril, 1991 in favour of the respondent herein has become final and<br \/>\n\twas never challenged. Thus, since 1991, the respondent was directed<br \/>\n\tto be considered for regularization and it was provided that he<br \/>\n\tshall be regularized in service after following due procedure.<br \/>\n\tAdmittedly, so far these steps have not been taken by the<br \/>\n\tpetitioners. On behalf of the petitioners it was, however, contended<br \/>\n\tthat earlier for want of vacancy and thereafter, on account of ban<br \/>\n\tfrom the Government, the petitioners have not undertaken any<br \/>\n\trecruitment process. Therefore, the directions could not be complied<br \/>\n\twith.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tDuring the<br \/>\n\tpendecy of the above proceedings, the new district of Porbandar has<br \/>\n\tbeen created and it is not in dispute that certain vacancies have<br \/>\n\tarisen. Even otherwise, it was impossible to believe that it was not<br \/>\n\tpossible to comply with order for a period of nearly 18 years, and<br \/>\n\tthere were no retirements, termination, resignation or dismissals.<br \/>\n\tUpon reading the directions of the appellate Court, it is clear that<br \/>\n\tregularization of the respondent herein was not linked necessarily<br \/>\n\twith the petitioners undertaking regular selection. The case of<br \/>\n\tregularization of the respondent was to be taken up as directed by<br \/>\n\tthe Court and if it was necessary, the petitioners should have done<br \/>\n\tso separately. Insofar as the defence of the petitioner for not<br \/>\n\tcomplying with the directions of the appellate Court is concerned, I<br \/>\n\ttherefore see no validity. The impugned order dated 1.8.2008,<br \/>\n\ttherefore, suffers from no illegality. The petition deserves to be<br \/>\n\tdismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tLearned advocate<br \/>\n\tfor the petitioners, however, submitted that Courts below are<br \/>\n\tpressing hard for execution of the orders. He, therefore, prayed<br \/>\n\tthat sometime be granted to the petitioners to comply with the<br \/>\n\tdirections. This request is accepted. The petitioners shall have<br \/>\n\ttime upto 31st December, 2008 to complete the procedure<br \/>\n\tand fully comply with the directions of the Courts below.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe petition is<br \/>\n\tdisposed of accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>(AKIL KURESHI,<br \/>\nJ.)<\/p>\n<p>ashish\/\/<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008 Author: Akil Kureshi,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/11040\/2008 4\/ 4 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11040 of 2008 ========================================================= PORBANDAR DISTRICT PANCHAYAT &amp; 1 &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus BHARAT J KHODA &#8211; Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-139571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-09T02:56:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-09T02:56:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":861,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-09T02:56:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-09T02:56:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-09T02:56:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008"},"wordCount":861,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008","name":"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-09T02:56:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/porbandar-vs-bharat-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Porbandar vs Bharat on 5 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139571\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}