{"id":139602,"date":"2008-12-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008"},"modified":"2016-08-18T11:39:00","modified_gmt":"2016-08-18T06:09:00","slug":"dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Dinakara Parameshwara … vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dinakara Parameshwara … vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
xx THE HIGH COURT 0:? KARNATAKA cmcurr  .\n\nAT DHARW&.D\nDated this the 1*\" day of Drscembeg  V \n\nBEFORE \n\nTI-IE Honrsm nm.V.Jt1_sT1\u00a2z*:_  Kumzui \"   '\n\nWrit Pcttition No. 3 12O79\u00bb. 5\u00a3rz00s  {\u20ac'3Ni\u00ab \nBetween: '  ' K V\n\nDinakam Parameshwara  \" V \nS\/0 i3ar:amcshwara   V\nAged about 35      \nAdvocate    ' '\n\nR'\/o Mundaha]1j_..'   '\n\nTal: Ehatigai    3 = --  ,\nDis\ufb011'ct'Utt\"a'ra ii\ufb01axxziizida   \"  Peti\ufb01oncr\n\n\" ._ V   Advocate)\n\n =  _1 ._ \u00e9  State \n\n_  Byits Secretary to Departxnent\n _ V ofVSa3ciaI\"W'eifam\n E-.'I S-.._'Bu\ufb01?ii_isg\n 'Bangszloiis? 1\n\n~V 2  'I'\u00a3\u00a3\u00ab\u20ac::.L3'i{ara Kannada District\n\nCa:-i1='e.c Ve\ufb01\ufb01catien Committee\n, By its Chairman.\n' -*'I'1:1e Deputy Comntxissioner\nUttxara Kannada District\n\nKarwar K L\n\n\n\n3 Member Secretary Caste and\n\nIncome Veri\ufb01cation Committee\n8:. the Uttara Kannada District .\u00ab  \"  ff   V.\nSocial Welfare Officer  Respondents \"<\/pre>\n
(By Sri K B Adyapak, :f’&GA*for  1) _:    V.<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition. is \ufb01led tmde”1\u00a7A11;ie1es 2:26 and i.3f2′?,of_
\nthe Constitution of india, praying to quash th=e”egedorse;:11e11t
\ndated 15-10-2008 as per  ‘ issue\u00e9i May’ the ”
\nrespondent\ufb02 by the issue of W19i’z, of cert:io1-mfitor such other
\nwrit, direction or order as in  \u00a2irc\ufb01:nst,anees._.this Honfbie
\nCourt deems fit. 1    _   ,  s<\/p>\n
This Writ Peti\ufb01on oo\ufb01i_11g’   this day, the
\nCourt made the foEiow:’z1g:”‘   1 .t <\/p>\n
men e R. ”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The  he s    petition for quashing
\nthe endo;’se:ne\ufb01tV”iiz{1tedt  issued as per Annexure*G<\/p>\n
informing the * pe\ufb01t’.ioi;e1=  he is not entitled. to Caste<\/p>\n
 ._   :’\u00abV”fI_Tvi%_1eV~:;1′,’>e1:i’e’:}ner claims that he belongs to Moger<\/p>\n
V ” _caste’;”1wh;:.e’h~:5″a scheduled caste. It is inciuded at S1.No.78 in<\/p>\n
” ”  Sehetioied Caste and Scheduieci Tribe (Amendment) Act,<\/p>\n
   respect of Kantzataka State. His name is shown. as<\/p>\n
VA  ‘V..?sffog\u00a7er in all school records. The certificate issued by the Head<\/p>\n
  ~ “tmaster, Government Composite Higher Secondary School,<\/p>\n
‘X\/.\n<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
Mogerakori, Mundaih, Bhatkal, shows mat she beloggs to
\nMoger caste. Even the transfer certi\ufb01caie issued by.
\nMaster, New English School, Bhatka} shows that;
\nto Mogor community. Petitioner is  D\ufb01dvwdaddte   ”
\nBhatka}. He is qualified to he   Vgisaggigg
\nJunior Division and he has aiopl\ufb01ed  ‘$16    L
\nreserved category. He is seiected”‘  Judge
\n{dzt\ufb01n}. As the pe1:itiot1e\u00a3:*’.1eodd_V: bene\ufb01t by
\nproducing the Caste  Tahsildar, the<\/p>\n
matter was refei*re’\u00a7L’:o  seeond”1esponrient for the issuance<\/p>\n
of   ._;)ot:itioner has produced all the
\ndocuments Soci.-33 Welfare O\ufb01cer to Show<\/p>\n
that”  belongs.  Moger Caste. The second respondent<\/p>\n
  imgg held a mee\ufb01ng on 30.08.2003 and without<\/p>\n
 to’v.i.he petitioner the impugned endorsement at<\/p>\n
V V’ Annex1zre’~L}0:=am_e to be issued.<\/p>\n
    \ufb01ule 6 of the Karnataka Scheduled Caste and<\/p>\n
  So\ufb01heduled Tribe and Qther Backward Ciasses (Reservation of<\/p>\n
 Appommonm, Etc) Rules, 3.992 provided that every person<\/p>\n
“\/0<\/p>\n
., 4 ..\n<\/p>\n
elaiming reservation either for appointment or for admission,<\/p>\n
shall submit an application in Form No} for ve\ufb01\ufb01ea\ufb01ot1~..of<\/p>\n
Caste or Caste and Income claims to the Caste.<\/p>\n
Committee in case he claims to belong to Sc.hed’uied1’Ce$te  ” ‘V ‘V<\/p>\n
Scheduled Tribes, to the Caste and:’.I4ncomAe3 <\/p>\n
Caste Veri\ufb01cation under R11le.6-A sh\u00e9ill fefer 1-..”nV;e’VV\u00abaf}p}ic_;atto1: <\/p>\n
for issue of Caste Validity V’ to  tE):is1:eict Social
\nWeifane {)fi:’1cer ooncernectzof the   Delnertlnent in
\nthe ease of persons be_io\u00a7tt;gir1.tgV   Caste and<\/p>\n
Scheduled T:ib3es%:3;\u00a7\u00a7’ ‘vexiecaedn  after hokiing local<\/p>\n
enquir\u00a7e$.  on a reference made under
\nRule 6-A, the Caste  Committee and the Caste and<\/p>\n
Income ‘V ‘\\Je1’i\ufb01cei1i0ti tlonizmittee shall hold an enquiry under<\/p>\n
  ‘giving an opportunity to the parties concemed.
\n  examine School reconis, birth registration<\/p>\n
 _ oetti\ufb01cate’  and such. other relevant materials and may
\n  any other person who has the knowledge of the
\n  of the apialieant. In case of an applicant who
\n  _,b\u00a7\u00a71ongs to Scheduied Tzibes, the Committee may also examine<\/p>\n
 the anthmp;olo\u00a7’ca1 and ethnologicai traits, deity, rituals,<\/p>\n
\\\/<\/p>\n
customs, mode of maxriage, dmth ceremonies,
\nburial of dead bodies and other such }Ci3x8’i’\u00a36I’S..~_ :'{f;  ‘
\nenquiry, the Committee \ufb01nds that .\ufb02:m_    ” ”
\ngenuine, it may issue the c:=:r1:i.ficatE:1<\u00abs;<jV.:'__'_1'[g.'1":;t ']V;}'5;,:\u00ab
\nbut where the committee $16  '
\nthe Caste Certi\ufb01cate of   V_:(v.\ufb02.'\u00a7I'F{\ufb01C\u00a2':"l'[fi by
\nmaking a false repmse\ufb01tat-L\u00e9hxz,   an order Itjccijng
\nthe application  :".tiv}*.L::V:re;{'{31" for such
\nIefusai.    of the Ve\ufb01\ufb01cation
\n .%\u00a7:1VV\u00e9ppea1 to the Divisional
\n g\u00e9venue Division. New 111$
\nOf\ufb01ce oftxg\u00e9  being abolished, the<\/p>\n
said ap;pcja1  the (iax\ufb01missioner of Social Weifare. This is<\/p>\n
 'i;\u00a71t;=:V' A.pmvic\u00ablV\u00e9<'i Vby the lagzisiaturc in the matter {if<\/p>\n
 = Certi\ufb01cattt.\n<\/p>\n
    w A perusal of the impugned endoxsemcnt at<\/p>\n
   shows that $113 authorities constituted under the<\/p>\n
  …R}1.1}es anti the Act are compictely ignorant about the<\/p>\n
procecium to be followed when such a zequest is made. in the<\/p>\n
i3\/’<\/p>\n
– 5 –\n<\/p>\n
endorsement he has stated that when such a request is made<\/p>\n
by the petitioner, they sought for a report \ufb01ozii the
\nSuperintendeznt of Poiiee, Civil Rights Enforeef\ufb02ent<\/p>\n
iZ)iIec’\u00a3orate. The said Directorate after enquiry seeiiis’  .<\/p>\n
submitted a report that the petitioiie:  iieioiig  “~ ii<\/p>\n
Scheduled Caste. The said reportgis ,m1;\u00e9;i;\u00a7a.:;~:’*-c\u00a7:*’  <\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner Who is aieo the  ilaste it ;<\/p>\n
Venifieation Committee and  op. t}ie–   has
\ndirected his Secretary *j.g;su\u00a7e  *\u00abii:ef)’ugned endorsement.
\nTherefore, it is clear’ thetV_vth.e  Committee<\/p>\n
constit\u00a3;f\u00a2ed_  abdicated its duty and has
\nsought  Liossietaiiee’  police o\ufb01cer attached to the<\/p>\n
Siieetoiate of GiViI’I;ibei”ties. Without independent application<\/p>\n
aVof3i1:\u20ace.\u00a2_.a Poei:;{)\ufb01ee acting on the said report: the<\/p>\n
A *io1p;u.g’1ie,V\u00e9” \u00abeeiidorsement is issued.<\/p>\n
    The question before the Committee was whether<\/p>\n
  j  eiaimant who belong to Moger Community of Uttaxa<\/p>\n
  -K:-innada is a person belonging to the Scheduled Caste as<\/p>\n
V mentzionec\u00e9i in item No.?8 of the schedule to the Scheduied<\/p>\n
Caste and Scheduled Tzibe (Amendment) Act,  7oi*e1\u00a7;is% –<\/p>\n
dispute is no more res integra. A Division Bench’-of’   <\/p>\n
in the case of seem  x<\/p>\n
oommmna’ or xammmxa i\ufb01._.t?AeF.}Vo;43’16:9\/03i\u00a7;:”‘ _<\/p>\n
held as uader:\n<\/p>\n
“This Court
\nhas held that  \ufb01\ufb02foger’ caste
\nin any part ofthe State of  entitied
\nto seek ieeites\ufb01zte  \u00a3313: —$?eey belong to
\nScktedi-j’Iec_?”   of any area
\n   SHIVARAY
\n  _ .n’1smrc*1* ELECTION
\n   held that the person
\nbeIoreg\u00a3’\ufb01g’v to “__Moger.’1.”~’:commur1ify are enti\ufb02ed to<\/p>\n
..    belonging to Scheduled Caste.\n<\/p>\n
  ggfpoye  She learned Single Judge was
\n3 ‘V ‘  Division Bench also, ‘<\/p>\n
 ” _ _ i~ Therefoxe, cmce it is established by the petitioner<\/p>\n
 t}1at i1e belongs to Moger community, then, in View of the<\/p>\n
V’  a\ufb01sresaid pronouncement of this Court, it is a Scheciuieci<\/p>\n
u Caste as de\ufb01ned under entry T8 of the scheduie. This is What<\/p>\n
the Committee was expected to adgixdicate upon. In order to<\/p>\n
la\/’<\/p>\n
– 3 ..\n<\/p>\n
come to the said conclusion, what the Committee is expected<\/p>\n
to see is the school records of the petitioner, birth registietion
\ncerti\ufb01cate and any other relevant material and
\nother persons who has the knowledge of the  ~
\napplicant. it cannot base its \ufb01nding .QI1_ the _– it ”
\nby a police ot\ufb01cer, which report is
\n<33" the petitioner. When the iI;+te'aest -tkte
\nto be a\ufb02ected, the petitioner     They
\nhave to issue him at V i:no:I*iee,5_1  to Ataro\u00e9uce the
\ndocuments in hisVpossessioit-.Vto'V.esitai'$Iishi':ii.ti3tit he belongs to<\/p>\n
Moger ..thereafter the committee has to
\nconsider t2'1e4_matei'iai" 'before it and take a independent<\/p>\n
decisiori in aeconiaiice with iaw. As the said exercise has not<\/p>\n
been \ufb01che' aQ"{i\u00ab,_t11e ettdorsement is issued purely based on the<\/p>\n
A  the yoiice of\ufb01cer, it is not an order gassed<\/p>\n
rejec'$ing.__'thei\u00ab:CAaste Validity Certi\ufb01cate as contemplated under<\/p>\n
 Vi  1' Therefore, the question of petitioner preferring<\/p>\n
  appeal would not arise. More so, when this Court<\/p>\n
ii  ..  been consistently taking the View that iaerson belonging to<\/p>\n
it Moger community whether he is a resident of Uttara Kannada<\/p>\n
or Qakshina Kannada, he is the person
\nSchedulttd Casts, it seems the authorities in  '
\nthe said orders passed by tltxis Co11;'tH6r"ig,t;d–ring"  V
\ndecisiyn and acting on mesa pqiice
\nbehind the back of the  pgss\u00e9glg   Frxns" ' L'<\/p>\n
is not what is expected \u00a7:i'1.,;hem,V""' =  V'<\/p>\n
7. me   for ‘me post of
\nCivii Judge’   Want of Caste Vali\u00e9ity
\nCerii\ufb01cvaiei;Vh\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 i;3\u00a7p\u00a7$\u00a7;i1t1jir\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7;t’is \u00a7;’+aa;g13e1d. if he Ieaily belongs
\nto Mogr\u00e9f  resezvation, any Lielay<\/p>\n
on part offhe’  in issuing the ceml\ufb01cate would<\/p>\n
” ‘   g3\u00a7cg\u00e9i\u00a3.V;\u00a5.x1}n$\ufb01ce…to\u00ab the petitioner.<\/p>\n
8f  V.  these crircrzzrrzstanmss, the authorities are<\/p>\n
V’-\u00bb.::iirec:1\u00e9:.f\u00a3V__i\u00a3) conduct enquiry and consider hrs request within 15<\/p>\n
\ufb01am today. The petitianer is directed to appear before the<\/p>\n
K  Cfaste Ven\ufb01m\ufb01on Committee an 4″‘ December 2008 at 1 I am<\/p>\n
withaut waiting for any notice, The respondents are ciirecfeci to<\/p>\n
mmmenoe the enquiry on the very same day and pass<\/p>\n
+\/<\/p>\n
$19-\n<\/p>\n
appropriate orders on or before 1??” December <\/p>\n
petition is accordingly allowed.\n<\/p>\n
ksp,”  ._<\/p>\n
     _ <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dinakara Parameshwara … vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008 Author: N.Kumar xx THE HIGH COURT 0:? KARNATAKA cmcurr . AT DHARW&.D Dated this the 1*” day of Drscembeg V BEFORE TI-IE Honrsm nm.V.Jt1_sT1\u00a2z*:_ Kumzui ” ‘ Writ Pcttition No. 3 12O79\u00bb. 5\u00a3rz00s {\u20ac’3Ni\u00ab Between: ‘ ‘ K V Dinakam […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-139602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDinakara Parameshwara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dinakara Parameshwara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-18T06:09:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dinakara Parameshwara … vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-18T06:09:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1442,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Dinakara Parameshwara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-18T06:09:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dinakara Parameshwara … vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dinakara Parameshwara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dinakara Parameshwara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-18T06:09:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dinakara Parameshwara … vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-18T06:09:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008"},"wordCount":1442,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008","name":"Dinakara Parameshwara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-18T06:09:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinakara-parameshwara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dinakara Parameshwara … vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139602"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139602\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}