{"id":13965,"date":"2007-12-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007"},"modified":"2014-06-02T20:32:41","modified_gmt":"2014-06-02T15:02:41","slug":"c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007","title":{"rendered":"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP No. 2000 of 1999(A)\n\n\n\n1. C.SAHADEVAN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. THE STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :07\/12\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                                                     K.T. SANKARAN, J.\n\n                             ...................................................................................\n\n                                              C.R.P. No.  2000   OF  1999\n\n                           ...................................................................................\n\n                                         Dated this the 7th December, 2007\n\n\n\n\n                                                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>           Proceedings  were initiated against  the  revision petitioners   for  determination of<\/p>\n<p>the ceiling area   in respect of the lands held by them,   in L.B. 85 of 1973 on the file of<\/p>\n<p>the  Taluk   Land   Board,   Palakkad.     By   final   order   dated       18.01.1984,   the   Taluk   Land<\/p>\n<p>Board held that the declarant is   liable to surrender an extent of  11 acres and 4.5 cents<\/p>\n<p>of   land     as   excess   land.     Possession   of   an   extent   of     6   acres     and   41.5   cents   was<\/p>\n<p>assumed from the declarant.  The balance extent to be surrendered  by him  was  4.63<\/p>\n<p>acres.   The Taluk Land Board directed the petitioner\/declarant to surrender an extent of<\/p>\n<p>50 cents in Sy.No. 487\/4 and 4.13   acres in Sy.No. 487\/2, the total extent being   4.63<\/p>\n<p>acres.  The 4th respondent filed  a claim petition under section 85(8) of the  Kerala Land<\/p>\n<p>Reforms Act claiming that he has tenancy right in respect of 50 cents of land in Sy.No.<\/p>\n<p>487\/4.   The   claimant   contended   that     the   declarant   is     not   in   the   possession   of   the<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid   extent     of  50     cents     and  that  the   declarant   has     no  right,   title  and   interest<\/p>\n<p>over the said item of  land as on 01.01.1970.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>           2.   The Taluk  Land   Board   did  not decide as to   whether the claimant   under<\/p>\n<p>section 85 (8)  of the Act has established  any tenancy right.   It was also not verified by<\/p>\n<p>deputing an authorised officer as to whether the declarant was  in actual possession of<\/p>\n<p>the   said   extent   of   land   as   on   01.01.1970   .     Instead,   the   Taluk   Land   Board,     by   the<\/p>\n<p>present impugned  order,      made a short cut   and directed the declarant    to surrender<\/p>\n<p>the same extent of   4.63 acres in Sy.No.487\/2  alone.  The extent  of  50 cents claimed<\/p>\n<p>by  the   claimant   was   taken   out   of   the   items   of   lands   to   be   surrendered     but   the   said<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P. No.  2000   OF  1999<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>extent  was not deleted from the ceiling account of the declarant.<\/p>\n<p>         3.  The method adopted by the Taluk Land Board  in disposing of the case, after<\/p>\n<p>entertaining   an application under section 85(8) of the Land Reforms Act is not a legal<\/p>\n<p>and proper  method.    Once  a claim  put forward by the  claimant  is accepted,    the  said<\/p>\n<p>extent of land so proved to be held by the claimant  shall be excluded from the account<\/p>\n<p>of  the   declarant.  If   it  is so  excluded ,  necessarily, the  total  extent  of  land  held by the<\/p>\n<p>declarant   would   be   less   by   the   said   extent   of   land     which   is   allowed   in   favour   of   the<\/p>\n<p>claimant.  In such a case, the declarant does not stand to lose  since the extent claimed<\/p>\n<p>by the claimant   and upheld by the Taluk Land Board   will go out of the purview of the<\/p>\n<p>total extent   held by the declarant.   Necessarily,  after fixing the ceiling area applicable<\/p>\n<p>to the declarant, there will be  consequent reduction in the extent to be surrendered  by<\/p>\n<p>him.       In   the   case   on  hand,  if  the   claim   made  by the   claimant   is  to   be accepted,  the<\/p>\n<p>declarant   need  surrender   only  an  extent  of  4.13   acres     instead  of     4.63  acres   .   The<\/p>\n<p>Taluk   Land     Board,   though   granted   the   benefit   of     excluding   the   land  claimed   by  the<\/p>\n<p>claimant  out of the items of lands to be surrendered   as excess land,  did not exclude<\/p>\n<p>that  extent of land   from the total extent held by the declarant.  Instead, the Taluk Land<\/p>\n<p>Board   directed   that   the   extent   of   50   cents     should   be     taken   from   another   survey<\/p>\n<p>number   belonging   to   the   declarant.     The   necessary   consequence   of   a   claim   being<\/p>\n<p>allowed   is       corresponding     reduction   in   the   total   extent   from   the   account   of   the<\/p>\n<p>declarant.         Instead   of   doing   so,   an   easy   method   was   adopted   by   the   Taluk   Land<\/p>\n<p>Board, so that  the claimant would not  have any grievances, but  the  declarant  alone<\/p>\n<p>would be put to prejudice.  When a claim is allowed  under section 85(8)  of the Act, the<\/p>\n<p>declarant would not be entitled to opt  to surrender that land  under Section 85(6) of the<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P. No.  2000   OF  1999<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Act   nor   such   option   could     be   accepted   by   the   Taluk   Land   Board   .     In   case   a   claim<\/p>\n<p>under Section 85 (8)  is allowed in respect of a land, it would  preclude the Taluk Land<\/p>\n<p>Board from accepting the option exercised  by  the declarant in respect of that land.  An<\/p>\n<p>option   can     be   rejected   by   the   Taluk   Land   Board   in   any   of   the   following   three<\/p>\n<p>contingencies mentioned in sub-section (6)  of Section 85 of the Act, viz.:<\/p>\n<p>         (i)  The Taluk Land Board has reason to believe that  the person  whose land  is<\/p>\n<p>indicated to be surrendered  has no good title  to that land; or<\/p>\n<p>         (ii)  the land indicated  to be surrendered  is not accessible ; or<\/p>\n<p>         (iii)   the Taluk  Land   Board  considers    for any other reason to be recorded    in<\/p>\n<p>writing that  it is not practicable  to accept the choice .\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         4.    The  second  proviso    to  sub-section  (6)  of  Section  85  states   that    where  in<\/p>\n<p>determining the   identity of land to be surrendered , the   interest   of other persons are<\/p>\n<p>also likely to be   affected, the Taluk Land Board shall   except in cases where   all the<\/p>\n<p>persons interested have agreed to the choice indicated , afford an opportunity to such<\/p>\n<p>other   persons   to   be   heard   and     pass   suitable   orders     regarding   the   land   to   be<\/p>\n<p>surrendered.       A   person     whose   interest     is   likely   to   be     affected   includes   a   person<\/p>\n<p>whose claim   could be accepted under   section 85(8).   Once his claim is accepted, he<\/p>\n<p>need not   again appear before the Taluk Land Board to answer the exercise of option<\/p>\n<p>by the declarant.   In other words, once   a claim is allowed   under section 85(8) of the<\/p>\n<p>Act, it  goes  out of purview of exercise of option by the declarant  under section  85(6)<\/p>\n<p>of   the   Act.     All   these   provisions   would   clearly   indicate   that     the   Taluk   Land   Board<\/p>\n<p>cannot simply accept the claim of a claimant  and at the same time  include that land in<\/p>\n<p>the total extent of land  held by the declarant.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nC.R.P. No.  2000   OF  1999<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       5.  The order passed  by the Taluk Land Board  is illegal and unsustainable and<\/p>\n<p>it is liable to be set aside.  Accordingly, the order passed  by the Taluk Land Board is set<\/p>\n<p>aside .  The Taluk Land Board shall dispose of the matter afresh in accordance with law<\/p>\n<p>and in the manner indicated above.  No  order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                            K.T. SANKARAN,<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                   JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>lk<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P. No.  2000   OF  1999<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                                   K.T. SANKARAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<\/p>\n<p>                                                  C.R.P. No.   2000 OF 1999<\/p>\n<p>                                           &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>                                            Dated this the 7th December, 2007<\/p>\n<p>                                                              O R D E R<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP No. 2000 of 1999(A) 1. C.SAHADEVAN &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE STATE OF KERALA &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN Dated :07\/12\/2007 O R D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-02T15:02:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-02T15:02:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1050,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007\",\"name\":\"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-02T15:02:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-02T15:02:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007","datePublished":"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-02T15:02:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007"},"wordCount":1050,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007","name":"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-02T15:02:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sahadevan-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-7-december-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"C.Sahadevan vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13965"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13965\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}