{"id":139818,"date":"2009-07-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-03-23T14:57:32","modified_gmt":"2016-03-23T09:27:32","slug":"col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information &#8230; on 24 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information &#8230; on 24 July, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>CM? %&amp;o.:\u00a7%g:i2\u00a7a9<\/p>\n<p>EN &#8216;THE H18}! ceum&#8217; OF&#8217; KARNATAKA EXT BANGA&#8217;;bRg;&#8212;.I: f  _<\/p>\n<p>BATES TE-HS THE 24%: my o%\u00a7fMwLY<br \/>\nBEFORE   &#8216; N<br \/>\nTHE H\u20ac}N&#8217;BLE1 9;: Jz;3T:c\u00a7:&#8217;;T&#8217;:&lt;.&#039;_,_ BH$&#039;.&#039;:0\u00a7;\u00a7<br \/>\nCo1.V.&#8217;\u00a5&#8221;.Xfe}:1ka$esh {Ret\u00a7.}<br \/>\n208 Palm Court, <\/p>\n<p>Ga1&#8217;z:ie11Estate,<br \/>\nJakkuir, Bangalo:je..-+..56\u00a3}v_Q64.&#8217;\u00ab_   in &#8216; \\..PE&#8221;17&#8217;1&#8243;I&#8221;iONER<\/p>\n<p>(B3; &#8216;<br \/>\nfor Mf.\u00a7.ALMT&#8217;i;::g\u00a721,,Ar13zss:}___ _ &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>\u00a3\u00a73&#8217;~\u00a7B:<\/p>\n<p>83193356 Enf\ufb01zma\ufb01bn T\u00a2ci1n\u00e9iogies<br \/>\nPrivate Limited&#8217;, &#8221;   _<br \/>\nE*\u00a5.e.-45, E &#8216;F?Zc}Gi?;&#8221;&#8216;.Sa;::key Re\u00e9\u00e9,<br \/>\nPQ}_ac;:\u00a7~V:3&#8217;:3V{3\u00bb.T. _ &#8216; &#8216;,<\/p>\n<p> L\u00bb Rey\u00bb. by i:s,%~Fm::i:i:r~;:g41a CEO. ..,RESm:=~:mzx:*:&#8217;~<\/p>\n<p> (33.5 S:i.1% \u00e9;mesi1.P,&#8217;i\u00a7u\u00a7}\u00a7a:11i, Ark.)<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u00a7&#8221;h.*l$ \u00a2:r\u00a74.p is rim &#8220;:1\/$.11 (5; of Kim \ufb01grhitratian an\ufb01<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; .&#8217;_VV \u20ac3&lt;3:ix:%Vi,Eia7\u00a337\u00e93_1 Act, 1996, praying that this Han\ufb01i\ufb01 Cant&#039;: may &#039;ha<br \/>\n };i\u00a7: aS\u00e9&amp;&#039;_i fxjappf\ufb02int any Retimd Qistrict Ju\u00e9ge msidini at Bangalam<br \/>\nflag the} S\u00e9i\ufb01 Azbitratar in respect of the \u00e9isputes hatixzarsis \ufb01za<\/p>\n<p>Pg\ufb01tioner mm \ufb02ii\ufb01 Rcgpozad\u00e9xzri arising umi\ufb01r I316 agreement dated<\/p>\n<p>4&#039;  .{_}.?\u00a7f\u00bb&#039;\u20ac)=f\u00a5~2G08 and refer the disputes &#039;:0 the said Arbitrator am\ufb01 alsca<br \/>\n&quot;=.__\u00a7\u00a7aSs such G\ufb02l\ufb01i&quot; dimctians ix; 1311:: fgntergsi \ufb01fju\ufb01ti\u00e9i\ufb01i,<\/p>\n<p>This C.I*f\u00a3.P coming 9:: for admission, this day, the \u00a7{}&quot;\u00a31}1&quot;\u20ac<br \/>\nmade the: fc:11a\u00a7x?i&quot;{1g:&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>{EEVEP r\u00a7.a,.V\u00a7&#8217;:\u00bb%g;~2e09<\/p>\n<p>QREBER<\/p>\n<p>The petitienar 13 beibr\ufb01 this C&#8217;;re 3.3  so1:\u00e9&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7s3*};;.i&#8217;i129;1L:o\u00a7&#8217;VA \u00a7E_:&gt;11T:<\/p>\n<p>resczlmtian of the dispute hetweaza \ufb01i\u20ac.. \u00a7jsc\ufb01$i9:ri\u00e9r  r\ufb01\u00e9gpoa\u00e9ent in<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7&#8217;t1I&#8217;SK1\u00a3L\u00a71C\u20ac f M.f3.1\u00a7 dated&#8217;  ~ <\/p>\n<p>2. Learned 4=::A{3iu_;1s\u20ac\u00a7&#8221;VV&#8217;ii\u00a7i\u00a7t?  z_V:pgVtitiG\u00a7;\u00a2\u00e9i&#8221; submits that in<\/p>\n<p>pursuasac\ufb01 of   i4&#8217;H\u00a7\u00a7f NLQEE and by iegai<\/p>\n<p>natice \ufb01azieci   &#8216;H3, &#8220;aha E\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb02\ufb01fl\ufb01\ufb01ikt was<br \/>\nizgziimated u :0 M &#8220;-.t\u00a7&#8221;\u00ab5ippoi1&#8242;;&#8217;i\u00a3 Sr}..M.N,Sha11kar Bhat, a<\/p>\n<p>mt\u00e9fe\ufb01 \u00a7\u00a7&#8211;iSt:i&lt;:t&quot;&#039;;}=:;:V&amp;g\u20ac.,.v&quot; B\u00e9;?1g\u00e9iG:&#039;\u20ac:} as 33:}. Arbiwaier 3:: his Eaehaif<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;tha Aireispaizziaz\ufb01t :\u00a5e\u00e9\u00e9&#039; &lt;fa}l\u20acd 113303 ta appeiz\ufb01 3:: \ufb01;.rb\u00a7;ira&#039;\u00a5:r as<\/p>\n<p>;:3\u00a7&#8217;;,.3if_ iigg\ufb01j  the Arbitla\ufb01on anti Seaciiiaiisn Acts 1996. It<\/p>\n<p>  is f\ufb01rifl\u00e9r   in the Evan&#8217;: of respsndent :10? naming 13:3<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab,i&#8221;;&#8217;*\u00a33;&#8221;\u00a7;)}:\u00a7I&#8221;3310I*,V fhE Ar\ufb01itratm&#8217; app\ufb01itif\ufb01d by the petitiaiier siialfi becoms<\/p>\n<p>  \u00e9f\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9mier for adfu\u00e9ica\ufb01ail Crf Eh\ufb01 disyuts&#8217; &#8216;Eb this iegai natice,<\/p>\n<p>   ;mspc:&gt;::d6:1t, hy repiy \u00e9ate\u00e9 i&lt;2.G1,2\ufb018\u00a7, \u00e9i\ufb01ii\ufb01fiilg cartain<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a7e;&#039;-\u20ac311t\u20ac11tio113 mgar\u00e9ing the \u00e9ispui\ufb01, has siaied \ufb01m: the I\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01ii\ufb01\ufb01lit<\/p>\n<p>was agpainf\u00e9ng Sri.S.\u00a7m1s3h  o\u00a7* as. his Arb\u00e9tzater.<\/p>\n<p>{A5<\/p>\n<p>CM? \u00a7&#039;sf.f&gt;~\u00a7:;&#8221;~?;\u00a3}G*;}<\/p>\n<p>3. The p3x:s\u20ac11t peiitisn was \ufb01ie\u00e9 an 88.84-.20f}9. *&#8221;&#8221;* \u00ab&#8217;  A&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>4. The ccsntention of the 16311166 caunsei fe_r*&#8217;\u20ac}1e:{}p\u00a2ii{ioae1*&#8217;v<\/p>\n<p>that since the I&#8217;\u20acSpO;Z1(i\u20ac:I}:1t zriid not <\/p>\n<p>pr\u00e9sumed that the dispute shou1ci,\u00a5;&gt;:24__dec\u00a7(\u00a3f::i'&#8221;by 1133 45  L.<\/p>\n<p>sale Arbitrator.\n<\/p>\n<p>5, Lcalned counsel ih\ufb01fi s11bV1v;\u00a7AiitL\u00a7; that &#8216;$116<br \/>\narbitza\ufb01en clause prgvides  &#8216; \u00e9i;fv}b::;iirators and not<br \/>\narbitratizm by so1e\u00a7~vg;:\ufb01s\u00a7%rat::)%   \ufb01at S1&#8243;i.S.Gam=:sh<br \/>\nShenoy,  jag Arbitratzsr an &#8216;aaiaaif 0f ihe<br \/>\nrespozz\u00e9en\u00e9. . A&#8217; b 1<\/p>\n<p>6.  :\ufb01::;\u20aci\u00a5&#8217;\u00a3}70I1 that as per Clause Pi af the<br \/>\n  {Ivv%&#8217;::Zi&#8221;iSjL\u00a7)&#8221;i3.fIE or claim zmising out 0:5 9:&#8217; in<\/p>\n<p>m1a9iiU:3\ufb01tQ f\u00a5:f1\u00e9:&#8217;::;\u00a7:\u00e9:\u00a3\u00a3}0rsiI;dum; 0f tmderstanding shaii be fegoiveci 133:<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9;:hi?;:&#8217;ati\u00a3;&#8217;\u00bb\u00ab?.3 cgs\u00e9zxsiiicted by such uumber sf 2&#8243;:1f&#8217;b\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;iI3&#8217;\u00a3.{)1&#8217;S as is<\/p>\n<p>W &#8221; &#8216;T afgra\u00e9ed upon and \u00a335: aacer\u00e9arxce wiikl {E16 Endian<\/p>\n<p> and Cenci\ufb01miierz Act, 199%, Th\ufb01refere, it Shez\ufb02d be<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; %3&#8217;s:2\u20aci\u00a71f$%&#8217;\u00a393ci that {he irztentie\ufb01 Gf the }C3a}:&#8221;E&#8221;i\u20acS is far arhitratisn sf<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;di\ufb01fpute by thgvee arbitratasrs 3.116. mm: by a 3316 \ufb01rbiiyator. This<\/p>\n<p>L\/<\/p>\n<p>.312.\n<\/p>\n<p>CM? No.,5%\u00bb,\u00a34:i2QQ9<\/p>\n<p>peti\ufb01on\ufb01r and the r\ufb01spozzdent have named the\ufb01zi 1?\u00e9s:.;ja:2QTti*&#8217;:;_::f  .<\/p>\n<p>Arbitrators as per the arbitration clause.<\/p>\n<p>7. In the result, {ha patitioli is:&#8221;:.dis; {\u00a7c\u00a7\u00a7\u20acd&#8217;T[&#8216;~0\ufb01&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>S1&#8217;i.M.N.Sha11ka: Bhat, I\ufb01tiztd   ,,,\u00a7\u00a5&#8217;%\u00e9)\u00a26}.&#8221;V~ <\/p>\n<p>Judges&#8217; Layout, Sanjay P\u00e9agag,  B \u00e9::ga;1.\u00a7=1*\u00a7:_-:356G G\u00a74,<br \/>\nas Arbitxatar an behalf of  S.&#8217;Ga11esh Shane}:<br \/>\nNr11er_ Apargmz\u00e9gig,  Roa\u00e9, 8.9.0,<br \/>\nSada$hiva::1agar,    on be11a}f (bf $16:\n<\/p>\n<p>respencziant.\n<\/p>\n<p>Pa1*tieS&#8221;arz\u00e9 \u00a7ii:\u00a3&#8221;vc:-::ie&#8217;s:i &#8220;{(;:1:a:f\u00e9i1:f{};.$ir own Costs.<br \/>\nThe jRegis3;:*j;. is d_i1&#8242;;ve&lt;:t$d &#039;~&#039;\u00e90 smzd. copy nf this o:r{i\u20ac:::: to ::h::~:<\/p>\n<p>ifs\u00e9axn\ufb01\u00e9   &quot;a3=;:&#8211;2&#039;s\u20ac:vic&amp; of {he Sama, iha Arbitfamrs<\/p>\n<p>&#039; SE51};&#039;pfd%2s\u00a2\u00a3E.:\u00e9~:$gp\u00a7\u00e9\u00a711t third !\u00a7rbit:&lt;&#039;atm~ ix&quot;: accmdazzcc with i\ufb01wz<\/p>\n<p>501\/ -E \\<br \/>\nFUDGE,<\/p>\n<p>V I &#039; ~ _ <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information &#8230; on 24 July, 2009 Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala CM? %&amp;o.:\u00a7%g:i2\u00a7a9 EN &#8216;THE H18}! ceum&#8217; OF&#8217; KARNATAKA EXT BANGA&#8217;;bRg;&#8212;.I: f _ BATES TE-HS THE 24%: my o%\u00a7fMwLY BEFORE &#8216; N THE H\u20ac}N&#8217;BLE1 9;: Jz;3T:c\u00a7:&#8217;;T&#8217;:&lt;.&#039;_,_ BH$&#039;.&#039;:0\u00a7;\u00a7 Co1.V.&#8217;\u00a5&#8221;.Xfe}:1ka$esh {Ret\u00a7.} 208 Palm Court, Ga1&#8217;z:ie11Estate, Jakkuir, Bangalo:je..-+..56\u00a3}v_Q64.&#8217;\u00ab_ in &#8216; \\..PE&#8221;17&#8217;1&#8243;I&#8221;iONER [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-139818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information ... on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information ... on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-23T09:27:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information &#8230; on 24 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-23T09:27:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":809,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information ... on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-23T09:27:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information &#8230; on 24 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information ... on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information ... on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-23T09:27:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information &#8230; on 24 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-23T09:27:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009"},"wordCount":809,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009","name":"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information ... on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-23T09:27:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-v-t-venkatesh-retd-vs-gnostice-information-on-24-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Col V T Venkatesh (Retd.) vs Gnostice Information &#8230; on 24 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139818"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139818\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}