{"id":1400,"date":"2009-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2"},"modified":"2015-06-12T03:40:29","modified_gmt":"2015-06-11T22:10:29","slug":"t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite &#8230; on 9 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite &#8230; on 9 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 11401 of 2009(O)\n\n\n1. T.C.VARGHESE, S\/O.CHACKO,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. K.K.BABY, S\/O.KURIAN, KOMBANAL HOUSE,\n3. V.K.POULOSE, S\/O.KURIAN,\n4. SAJI PAUL, S\/O.PAILY,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. MAR YUHANON EHIDIO JACOBITE SYRIAN\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. REV. FR. MATHEW,\n\n3. A.P.PAUL, S\/O.PAILY,\n\n4. M.K.GEORGE, S\/O.KURUVILA,\n\n5. THE RECEIVER, MAR YUHANON EHIDIO\n\n6. P.U.KURIAKOSE KATHANAR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.J.KURIACHAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :09\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n          -----------------------------\n            W.P.(C).No.11401 OF 2009\n           --------------------------\n       Dated this the 9th day of July 2009\n     -------------------------------------\n\n\n                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>        The  writ   petition   is  filed   by   the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff in O.S 51\/2003 pending on the file     of<\/p>\n<p>First Additional District Court, Ernakulam.     The<\/p>\n<p>suit has been filed in a representative capacity by<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiffs after getting permission from the<\/p>\n<p>court under Order 1 Rule 8 of Code of Civil<\/p>\n<p>Procedure.   The disputes involved in the suit<\/p>\n<p>pertain to a church over which rival claims are<\/p>\n<p>made  by  two  factions,  known  as  Jacobite   and<\/p>\n<p>Orthodox.  After the entire evidence was recorded<\/p>\n<p>in the case, the plaintiff moved for withdrawal of<\/p>\n<p>the suit seeking permission to file a fresh suit.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 is the copy of that application.      Taking<\/p>\n<p>note that the suit was instituted after getting<\/p>\n<p>permission under Order 1 Rule 8 of Code of Civil<\/p>\n<p>Procedure, as contemplated by the Rule, the court<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).No.11401 OF 2009     2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>directed    the    plaintiff  to  give  notice  of  the<\/p>\n<p>withdrawal      by    publication.  Pursuant  to   such<\/p>\n<p>publication the respondents 9 and 10 in the present<\/p>\n<p>petition     appeared     and  sought  permission   for<\/p>\n<p>substituting them in the place of the plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>and to continue prosecution of the suit.            The<\/p>\n<p>petitioners\/plaintiffs         objected     to     such<\/p>\n<p>substitution contending that the persons who are<\/p>\n<p>seeking    substitution belong to the rival faction,<\/p>\n<p>of   the   contesting    defendants.    The  contesting<\/p>\n<p>defendants also filed a counter affidavit opposing<\/p>\n<p>the withdrawal of the suit. Both these petitions,<\/p>\n<p>the   application      moved  by   the plaintiffs   for<\/p>\n<p>withdrawal, and also the other moved by the persons<\/p>\n<p>who   sought     for   substitution  in the   place  of<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs, were jointly considered by the learned<\/p>\n<p>District Judge and a common order was passed.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6 is the copy of that order.       The petitioners<\/p>\n<p>who sought substitution were permitted to proceed<\/p>\n<p>with    the   case    from  the   state on   which  the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs moved for its withdrawal.        However the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).No.11401 OF 2009      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>request of those petitioners for their substitution<\/p>\n<p>in   the   place     of  plaintiffs  striking  out  the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs     from    the  party  array  was  rejected.<\/p>\n<p>Propriety     and    correctness   of   that  order   is<\/p>\n<p>challenged      by     the   plaintiffs   invoking  the<\/p>\n<p>supervisory jurisdiction vested with this court<\/p>\n<p>under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p>     2.    I heard the counsel on both sides.       From<\/p>\n<p>the facts and circumstances presented and also the<\/p>\n<p>submissions made by the learned counsel on both<\/p>\n<p>sides   with    reference    to  Ext.P6  order  and the<\/p>\n<p>materials tendered with the writ petition,       I find<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6 order cannot be sustained for more than one<\/p>\n<p>reason.     If Ext.P6 order is allowed to stand then<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs would continue as such in the suit, but<\/p>\n<p>with two more strangers as additional plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>along   with    them,    the  persons  who  applied for<\/p>\n<p>substitution     as    plaintiffs in   the  suit.   The<\/p>\n<p>persons who sought for substitution are granted<\/p>\n<p>permission     to   prosecute   the  suit  keeping   the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).No.11401 OF 2009     4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>original plaintiffs in the party array as such,<\/p>\n<p>andboth    now continue with conflicting interests as<\/p>\n<p>masters of the suit.        In a case where a suit is<\/p>\n<p>filed in a representative capacity and      permission<\/p>\n<p>is   accorded     to   proceed with  the  claim  in  a<\/p>\n<p>representative capacity, but, later the court finds<\/p>\n<p>that    the   persons    who  had  been  granted  such<\/p>\n<p>permission do not prosecute the suit with due<\/p>\n<p>diligence it may substitute in their place some<\/p>\n<p>other having the same interest in the suit.       Such<\/p>\n<p>substitution is covered by Clause (5) of Rule 8<\/p>\n<p>Order (1) of the         Code of Civil Procedure.  So,<\/p>\n<p>the first question that emerges for consideration<\/p>\n<p>is when such substitution invoking the above rule<\/p>\n<p>is sought for by a person and a challenge is made<\/p>\n<p>by the plaintiffs that the party seeking such<\/p>\n<p>substitution is not having identical interest in<\/p>\n<p>the suit the       court is expected and duty bound to<\/p>\n<p>conduct an enquiry over that matter.     Plaintiffs in<\/p>\n<p>their counter affidavit specifically contended that<\/p>\n<p>the persons who sought for substitution belong to a<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).No.11401 OF 2009     5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>different church and they are not the followers of<\/p>\n<p>their faction.         Whatever be the merit of such<\/p>\n<p>contention, once such a challenge is raised a<\/p>\n<p>preliminary finding that they have an identity of<\/p>\n<p>interest in the cause shown by the plaintiff in the<\/p>\n<p>suit is imperative before passing any order of<\/p>\n<p>substitution.       If at all any substitution is made,<\/p>\n<p>then also, the plaintiffs should have been removed<\/p>\n<p>from the party array when some other person is<\/p>\n<p>allowed to represent the faction which have filed<\/p>\n<p>the suit for the reliefs claimed thereunder; that<\/p>\n<p>was also not followed in the present case.         The<\/p>\n<p>learned    counsel     for  the contesting   defendants<\/p>\n<p>urged before me that the withdrawal of the petition<\/p>\n<p>does not satisfy the mandatory requirements covered<\/p>\n<p>by Order 23 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure in<\/p>\n<p>the sense that the plaintiffs have no case that<\/p>\n<p>suit is bound to file on account of any formal<\/p>\n<p>defect or for any other sufficient cause.         I do<\/p>\n<p>not want to express any opinion on that point since<\/p>\n<p>the court below has not considered that aspect at<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).No.11401 OF 2009     6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>all.   At the same time it has to be stated what is<\/p>\n<p>sufficient cause is an elastic expression which has<\/p>\n<p>to be considered in the totality of the facts and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances presented in the case.         The court<\/p>\n<p>below without adverting to any of these aspects has<\/p>\n<p>mechanically allowed the impleadment of additional<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs to the suit rejecting the request of the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs     for   its  withdrawal Ext.P6  order   is<\/p>\n<p>liable to be set aside, and I do so. The court<\/p>\n<p>below is directed to examine afresh and dispose the<\/p>\n<p>petitions moved for withdrawal and the other for<\/p>\n<p>substitution in the light of the observations made<\/p>\n<p>above, and, in accordance with law.           The writ<\/p>\n<p>petition is disposed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                          Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,<br \/>\n                                         JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                     \/\/TRUE COPY\/\/<br \/>\n                                     P.A TO JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>vdv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite &#8230; on 9 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 11401 of 2009(O) 1. T.C.VARGHESE, S\/O.CHACKO, &#8230; Petitioner 2. K.K.BABY, S\/O.KURIAN, KOMBANAL HOUSE, 3. V.K.POULOSE, S\/O.KURIAN, 4. SAJI PAUL, S\/O.PAILY, Vs 1. MAR YUHANON EHIDIO JACOBITE SYRIAN &#8230; Respondent 2. REV. FR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-11T22:10:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite &#8230; on 9 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-11T22:10:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":964,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2\",\"name\":\"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-11T22:10:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite &#8230; on 9 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-11T22:10:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite &#8230; on 9 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-11T22:10:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2"},"wordCount":964,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2","name":"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-11T22:10:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-varghese-vs-mar-yuhanon-ehidio-jacobite-on-9-july-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T.C.Varghese vs Mar Yuhanon Ehidio Jacobite &#8230; on 9 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1400\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}