{"id":140037,"date":"2011-09-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011"},"modified":"2015-06-06T21:35:25","modified_gmt":"2015-06-06T16:05:25","slug":"mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                    at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                         File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2009\/001144\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a019,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a019,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Rajkumar\u00a0Yadav\n           Amodhpur\n           PO\u00a0-\u00a0Mughalsarai\n           Chandauli\u00a0232\u00a0101\n           Uttar\u00a0Pradesh\n\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Mughalsarai\u00a0Division\n           Mughalsarai\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0S.C.Srivastava,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Sr.DPO\n                                     Shri\u00a0Bansh\u00a0Narain\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Sr.DEN\/Coord,\u00a0Dhanbad\n                                     Shri\u00a0L.K.Rai,\u00a0Ch.O.S\n\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner         :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                     In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                   at\n                                            New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                           File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2009\/001144\n\n\n\n                              Adjunct\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0CIC\u00a0Order\u00a0dt.1.7.11\n\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.    The\u00a0\u00a0decision\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0\u00a0order\u00a0is\u00a0reproduced\u00a0below:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      5.       Accordingly,\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0Sr.Divisional\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(Coord)\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0pay\u00a0a\u00a0sum\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.25000\/\u00ad \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      u\/s\u00a020(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act..\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0recover\u00a0the\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.25,000\/\u00ad \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      from\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0payable\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0Sr.Divisional\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(Coordination)\u00a0by\u00a0way\u00a0of\u00a0Demand\u00a0Draft \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      drawn\u00a0in\u00a0favour\u00a0of\u00a0&#8216;PAO\u00a0CAT&#8217;\u00a0in\u00a05\u00a0equal\u00a0monthly\u00a0installments.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0first\u00a0installment\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the \u00a0<br \/>\n                         th                                                         th<br \/>\n      Commission\u00a0by\u00a010 \u00a0August\u00a02011\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0last\u00a0installment\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0by\u00a010 \u00a0December\u00a02011.\u00a0\u00a0The \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      Demand\u00a0Draft\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0sent\u00a0to \u00a0Shri \u00a0G.Subramanian, \u00a0Under \u00a0Secretary \u00a0&amp;\u00a0Deputy \u00a0Registrar, \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0Club\u00a0Building,\u00a0Old\u00a0JNU\u00a0Campus,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0067.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>2.    The\u00a0Commission\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.1.8.11\u00a0from\u00a0Shri\u00a0B.N.Singh,\u00a0Sr.Divisional\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(Co\u00adord.),\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Dhanbad.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0he\u00a0prayed\u00a0for\u00a0exoneration\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0penalty\u00a0imposed\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      him\u00a0\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0explanation:\n<\/p>\n<p>      i)\u00a0\u00a0     As\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.17.11.08\u00a0issued\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ,\u00a0Smt.Rakesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      Roshan,\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0was\u00a0nominated\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0Mughalsarai\u00a0Division.<\/p>\n<p>      ii)      The\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager\u00a0designated\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.DE(Co\u00adord)\u00a0as\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0DE(I)\u00a0as\u00a0APIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      for\u00a0matters\u00a0concerning\u00a0to\u00a0Engineering\u00a0Department\u00a0on\u00a03.6.09\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0circulated\u00a0by\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0cum\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      PIO\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.3.6.09.\n<\/p>\n<p>      iii)     Shri\u00a0B.N.Singh\u00a0was\u00a0transferred\u00a0and\u00a0handed\u00a0over\u00a0the\u00a0charge\u00a0to\u00a0Shri\u00a0V.K.Pandey,\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      Sr.Divisional\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(Coord)\u00a0on\u00a017.4.09\u00a0which\u00a0clearly\u00a0indicates\u00a0that\u00a0at\u00a0no\u00a0time\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0PIO.<\/p>\n<p>      iv)      The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.27.12.08\u00a0was\u00a0forwarded\u00a0by\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0&amp;\u00a0PIO\u00a0on\u00a031.12.08\u00a0to\u00a0Sr.DPO,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      Sr.DEN(Co\u00adord)\u00a0and\u00a0DEN\/I\n<\/p>\n<p>        v)         Sr.DPO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a05\/7\u00ad1\u00ad09\u00a0to\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0cum\u00a0PIO\u00a0who\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0forward\u00a0this\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Complainant\u00a0nor\u00a0asked\u00a0for\u00a0extension\u00a0of\u00a0stipulated\u00a0period\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0has\u00a0just\u00a0passed\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0other\u00a0officers\u00a0and\u00a0never\u00a0asked\u00a0again\u00a0our\u00a0put\u00a0up\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0to\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       for \u00a0 non\u00adcompliance \u00a0 till \u00a0 1.5.09 \u00a0 when \u00a0 he \u00a0 (Shri \u00a0 B.N.Singh) \u00a0 has \u00a0 already \u00a0 been \u00a0 transferred \u00a0 from\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Mughalsarai.\n<\/p>\n<p>       vi)        The\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0on\u00a027.5.09\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Rakesh\u00a0Raushan,\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       on\u00a0the\u00a0basis\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0Sr.DE(Co\u00adord)\u00a0Shri\u00a0V.K.Pandey\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.27.5.09.<\/p>\n<p>       vii)       Shri\u00a0B.N.Singh\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.C.Srivastava,\u00a0Sr.DPO\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.14.11.10\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       misrepresented\u00a0and\u00a0given\u00a0wrong\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0CIC\u00a0and\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0letter\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       his\u00a0knowledge\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0correct\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>       viii)      Shri\u00a0B.N.Singh\u00a0also\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.C.Srivastava,\u00a0Sr.DPO\u00a0has\u00a0wrongly\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       that\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0PIO.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0fact,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0real\u00a0PIO\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Application\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0provided\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0on\u00a027.5.09.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       ix)        Shri\u00a0B.N.Singh\u00a0further\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0given\u00a0an\u00a0opportunity\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0his\u00a0case\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0Commission\u00a0nor\u00a0the\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0notice\u00a0was\u00a0forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0PIO.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>3.     It\u00a0is\u00a0clear\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0on\u00a0record\u00a0and\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0that\u00a0Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       B.N.Singh,,\u00a0\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0Sr.DEN\u00a0(Coord)\/Mughalsarai\u00a0has\u00a0nothing\u00a0to\u00a0do\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0case\u00a0since\u00a0he\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       was \u00a0 already \u00a0 transferred \u00a0 to \u00a0 Dhanbad \u00a0 Division \u00a0 on \u00a0 17.4.09 \u00a0 whereas \u00a0 the \u00a0 order \u00a0 nominating\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Sr.DEN(Coord)\u00a0as\u00a0PIO\u00a0came\u00a0much\u00a0later\u00a0i.e.\u00a0on\u00a03.6.09.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0this,\u00a0the\u00a0penalty\u00a0proceedings\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       initiated\u00a0against\u00a0Shri\u00a0B.N.Singh\u00a0are\u00a0\u00a0hereby\u00a0\u00a0being\u00a0set\u00a0aside.<\/p>\n<p>4.     The\u00a0Commission\u00a0also\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0then\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0response\u00a0dated\u00a05\/7\u00ad1\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>       09\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.\u00a0DPO(who\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0deemed\u00a0PIO\u00a0)\u00a0but\u00a0had\u00a0failed\u00a0to\u00a0forward\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       same\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0penalty\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0him\u00a0 u\/s\u00a020(1)\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0responding\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       scheduled \u00a0 time \u00a0 period. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 He \u00a0 is \u00a0 directed\u00a0 to \u00a0 submit \u00a0 his \u00a0 written \u00a0 response \u00a0 \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0 Commission \u00a0 by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       27.10.11.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.     The\u00a0present\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0forward\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0at \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0time\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.27.12.08\n<\/p>\n<p> 6.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0ordered\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                       \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                               Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<br \/>\n Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.    Shri\u00a0Rajkumar\u00a0Yadav<br \/>\n      Amodhpur<br \/>\n      PO\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Mughalsarai<br \/>\n      Chandauli\u00a0232\u00a0101<br \/>\n      Uttar\u00a0Pradesh<\/p>\n<p>2.    Shri\u00a0B.N.Singh<br \/>\n      Sr.Divisional\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(Co\u00adord.)<br \/>\n      East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n      Dhanbad\u00a0Division<br \/>\n      Dhanbad<\/p>\n<p>3.    Shri\u00a0S.C.Srivastwa<br \/>\n      Sr.Divisional\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n      East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n      Mughalsarai\u00a0Division<br \/>\n      Mughalsarai<\/p>\n<p>4.    The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n      East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n      Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n      Mughalsarai\u00a0Division<br \/>\n      Mughalsarai<\/p>\n<p>5.    Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2009\/001144 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a019,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a019,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Rajkumar\u00a0Yadav Amodhpur PO\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Mughalsarai Chandauli\u00a0232\u00a0101 Uttar\u00a0Pradesh Respondents East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office Mughalsarai\u00a0Division Mughalsarai Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0S.C.Srivastava,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Sr.DPO Shri\u00a0Bansh\u00a0Narain\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Sr.DEN\/Coord,\u00a0Dhanbad Shri\u00a0L.K.Rai,\u00a0Ch.O.S Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2009\/001144 Adjunct\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0CIC\u00a0Order\u00a0dt.1.7.11 Background 1. The\u00a0\u00a0decision\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0\u00a0order\u00a0is\u00a0reproduced\u00a0below: 5. Accordingly,\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0Sr.Divisional\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(Coord)\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0pay\u00a0a\u00a0sum\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.25000\/\u00ad \u00a0 u\/s\u00a020(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act..\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0recover\u00a0the\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.25,000\/\u00ad \u00a0 from\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0payable\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0Sr.Divisional\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(Coordination)\u00a0by\u00a0way\u00a0of\u00a0Demand\u00a0Draft \u00a0 drawn\u00a0in\u00a0favour\u00a0of\u00a0&#8216;PAO\u00a0CAT&#8217;\u00a0in\u00a05\u00a0equal\u00a0monthly\u00a0installments.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0first\u00a0installment\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-06T16:05:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-06T16:05:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":791,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-06T16:05:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-06T16:05:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-06T16:05:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011"},"wordCount":791,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011","name":"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-06T16:05:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajkumaryadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Rajkumaryadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140037\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}