{"id":140063,"date":"2010-08-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2"},"modified":"2018-10-31T14:24:23","modified_gmt":"2018-10-31T08:54:23","slug":"master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
m MFA 4344 OF_ ado;   ~  1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED was THE lo-nz mu? OF AUGUST, 2o1o  \n\nFRESENT\n\nTm: I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE 1) v  3\n\nAND\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICEVKN  \n\nMiscellaneous P'irstAppeal  of\nMiscellaneous First Appeqz $12002 [MV]\n\nBETWEEN\n\n1.\n\nMASTER    . _\ns\/0 LATE B RAVI-~ .V  '-\nAGED ABOUT 7 YEARS   \n\nKUM %PmyAm~-ALLOWTNO THE CLAIM PETITION\nFOR cOM1$ENSAT1ON\"7f_jSEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF\nOOMPENSATTONAND  \" \n\n 'h\\ni*Av-\u00e9:\u00a7i:5*45\\.O\u00a7>at>._ 2002\" '  ---------- A =\n\n _ 1. \"MASTER'AAI)IV'1;'=YA\n\nS\u00bb\/_O LATE \"S. RAVI\nAO'ED\"AEOUT 7 YEARS\n\n  A KUM PRTYANKA\n\n _D\/'(_) LATE B RAVE\n _ AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS\n\n   BEEMAIAH NAIDU\n\nAGED ABOUT 70 YEARS\n\n\n\n4. SMT RUKMINI\nW] O BEEMAIAH NAIDU\nAGED ABOUT 65 YEARS\n\nSINCE PETITIONERS NO.1 81 2\n\nARE MINORS REP. BY NEXT\n\nNATURAL GUARDIAN\n\nSMT N RATHNA\n\nW\/O MANJUNATI-I _A _\n\nAGED ABOUT 38 YEARS\nALL ARE RESIDING AT\n\nN0.450, 8TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR ,   ._ _ A_ \nI-3ANGALORE--\u00ab<\u00a30     APPELLANTS \n\n{By Sri K Venkatasudhe\u00e9r; \n\n1. SR! TI-IIRU I-3 BADRA REDDY\n\n(OWNER), V   A\n\nS\/O CHIKKA BADEEA REDDY . A\nBELLORVILLAGF-3, _--     ~ \nA'I'I'IBELE POST,    * \nANEKALTALUK,       .\nBANGALORE Ea:  'DIS'I'R1C'1';.. \n\n2. THE UNITED INDIA '1NSu.RIaNL:E CO.\nMOTOR D,O.~IV NW0, '19--"1.9\/ 1,\nSOUTH END ROAD ._ * ' ~~\nBASAVANAGU-D1 \nB\/ADEGALORE -~ 4;  AAAAA 14 .  RESPONDENTS\n\n Hegde Mulkhand, Adv. for R2]\n\nA'-ii'HISDV"Mi?A 'i\u00e9iI;ED U\/S 173(1) OF' MV ACT AGAINST THE\n\n_  'JUDGM'ENTv.'AND.7~"AWARD DATED: 16.1.2002 PASSED IN MVC NO.\n\n1.  236,1\/99 ONfI":~1E FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT--3, COURT OF SMALL\n BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETmON\nV 4':4'OR_"'\u00bbc.OMPENSA'I1ON AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF\n ----OOMEENSATION AND ETO,\n\nTHESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING. THIS\nDAY, KTESHAVANARAYANA. J.. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
IN MFA No.4844 of 2002:\n<\/p>\n
In an unfortunate accident that  V’<\/p>\n
27.6.1999. the father and mother-\u00a5”of*-\u00abthey   it<\/p>\n
claimants who were proceeding on  ._
\nfather and mother being pillion  died-. at as a it
\nresult of scooter hitting   which
\nstopped suddenly. This led’. petitions, one in
\nrespect of death   in respect of<\/p>\n
father of the    :\n<\/p>\n
2. The area’ of   this appeal \ufb01led by the<\/p>\n
claimants forvV”enhancement:_’of compensation with regard to<\/p>\n
the’ death  ‘ their riiot.1f1_\u00a2r is that the multiplier adopted by<\/p>\n
the ‘   is incorrect since the appropriate<\/p>\n
 \u00bb,___._rnulti.’plier is the deceased was aged thirty years. The<\/p>\n
.”_–\u00ab.phdediiction.  50% of the monthly income of the deceased<\/p>\n
  personal expenses is contrary to law and the<\/p>\n
it  -deduction should have been oniy one~third. Further<\/p>\n
deduction of 40% of the total compensation determined<\/p>\n
” towards contributory negligence on the part of the rider of<\/p>\n
g<\/p>\n
Tribunal is justified in deducting 40% of the “total<\/p>\n
compensation determined towards contributory negligenc.e’.”–V_<\/p>\n
6. We have bestowed our serious considera,ti_jons*~.l.:tor_ the  <\/p>\n
submissions made on both sides.\n<\/p>\n
7. There is no dispute that the-v:deseased._wasVl\ufb01lerripioyee ”
\nof APMC on a monthiy  yo’f–“dand~-‘she was
\naged 30 years as on the dateof  death. As
\nper the law iaid -in   case [supra] the
\nappropriate  age of deceased is
\n’17’. Therefore; of ‘dlbllladopted by the Tribunal
\nis not correct’.– V  H proceed to quantify the<\/p>\n
compensation  applying rnultipiier of ’17’.<\/p>\n
 ‘ ;’I”11e  are two minor children. Their father<\/p>\n
  Vrwas alsoeian ea-tniliiig member While the mother was employed<\/p>\n
Therefore, it is reasonable to hoid that she was<\/p>\n
 able  c’ont1’ibute not less than two~third of her earnings for<\/p>\n
V.   welfare of the children. Under these circumstances, in<\/p>\n
  “our opinion, the Tribunal is not justi\ufb01ed in deducting 50% of<\/p>\n
 the earning of the deceased towards her personal expenses.<\/p>\n
Ly<\/p>\n
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n
the deduction towards personal expenses of the der:e’a_sed<\/p>\n
ought to have been only one~third and not  .<\/p>\n
the loss of dependency to the appellants\u00bb has toibe  it ”<\/p>\n
by taking two–third of the income of de_’ceased._:”    <\/p>\n
9. The fact that the accident  on. of the
\nscooter hitting the lorry   ‘regsultylofl the lorry
\nwhich was going ahge-$191  is not in
\ndispute. The.’  admittedly the
\npillion rider_._    out of the death
\nof the pillion   -of composite negligence and<\/p>\n
not a case of Vcopntriotitorynegligence as the deceased in this<\/p>\n
V4.case was not in anyway responsibie for the accident. The<\/p>\n
law’  is well settled and therefore deduction of<\/p>\n
:7’a,_,___40%”of-{hie’cornplensation towards contributory negligence<\/p>\n
‘even inltheacase arising out of death of the pillion rider, is<\/p>\n
  to law. The claimants are entitled to proceed<\/p>\n
  any one of the joint tortfeasors in the case of<\/p>\n
C _3’~&,;’5r63..r<\/p>\n
  accident arising out of the e  negligence of two or<\/p>\n
more tortfeasors. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the<\/p>\n
Tribunal is not justified in deducting 40% of the incorne of<\/p>\n
the deceased towards personal expenses. Therefore the<\/p>\n
of the Tribunal calls for correction and accordinglyllthel ~<\/p>\n
loss of dependency after deducting onew~third_”ofp”‘th.e\u00bb i’r1\u20ac:4_C_>rne_ T”<\/p>\n
towards personal expenses works  <\/p>\n
[2604 M 868 {1\/3\u00ab1 of 2604} =  12 x si71iraessAwa:a = T<\/p>\n
passed by the Tribunal under  heads
\ndoes not call for revision   this extent, the
\nappeal is allowegi..<':l1t_~.is  are
\nentitled for total — as against<\/p>\n
Rs. 1 ,e5.oQo\/it a\ufb01\u00e9gird\u00e9ii   sauna<\/p>\n
10. The  shall carry interest at 6%<\/p>\n
per  from  of the petition till the date of the<\/p>\n
p’-ayinenty.  respondent -\u00bb insurance company shall<\/p>\n
‘Vo,___deposit”the eni1ar;iced compensation within four weeks from<\/p>\n
 the\u00bb date’ of Vthevreceipt of copy of the Judgment.<\/p>\n
  The apportionment and disbursement of the enhanced<\/p>\n
it llcioinpensation shall be in the same ratio as indicated by the<\/p>\n
it Ayvard of the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
IN MFA No.48-45 of 2002:\n<\/p>\n
12. This appeal arises out of the above facts,  3<\/p>\n
of death of father of the minor children who wasllthev   _  <\/p>\n
the scooter.\n<\/p>\n
13. This appeal is for enha11\u00a7en1ent” oI’V_con1p.en~sl.ation. = L’<\/p>\n
Claimants are minor children and~llthe’p.arents-of deceased.
\nThe limited area of grievan’ce_’ulrgeid::’ counsel for
\nthe appellants is  the  one–third of
\nthe income of  “personal expenses.\n<\/p>\n
but having  of dependents, the
\ndeduction   one-fourth as laid down by<\/p>\n
the Supreme C’ou_rt. in  VERMA’s case [supra]. It is<\/p>\n
:.’also. lsuibmivsgsionwth’at\u00b0the contributory negligence on the<\/p>\n
 oiitheel: quanti\ufb01ed at 40% by the court below is<\/p>\n
 the   having regard to the manner in which the<\/p>\n
” ” ~  ‘accident occizrred.\n<\/p>\n
   Hegde Mulkhand, learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
 ‘:1-es.p.o\u00a7ndent – insurance company sought to Justify the<\/p>\n
9’ Liiidgment and Award passed by the Tribunal by contending<\/p>\n
gtz<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
that having regard to the law prevailing as on the date of the<\/p>\n
Award, the deduction of one–third of the income’4…of.4:’_’the<\/p>\n
deceased towards his personal expenses is justagrid’ _<\/p>\n
and it does not call for interference_._ \u00a7t””isi:’_’:alsoV’*.hisi ”<\/p>\n
submission that having regard to <\/p>\n
accident occurred, that too thelscooterihaVingl’ihAit:._:th.e.  <\/p>\n
from behind in broad daylightVAs.at:p”‘2. “pin, .the..fi’ribunal is
\njustified in quantifying the negligence on the<\/p>\n
part of the deceased  <\/p>\n
15. We see    the contention of learned
\ncounsel for the ‘regard to the deduction of<\/p>\n
one–third of the mon–th’l;3f’  of the deceased towards his<\/p>\n
4_personal\u00a7gexpensesd:  Apex Court in SARLA VERMA’s<\/p>\n
 held that where the deceased has left<\/p>\n
 V numbering four and more upto six, the<\/p>\n
 deduction towards personal expenses of the deceased is to<\/p>\n
 taken’ at 1\/ 4*”. Admittedly, there were four dependants to<\/p>\n
 theiildeceased. Since this appeal is being disposed of by this<\/p>\n
‘court now we are required to correct the Award of the<\/p>\n
Tribunal by applying the law as it stands today which is<\/p>\n
(7<\/p>\n
\ufb01gz<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
SARLA VERMA’s case [supra]. Therefore, the loss of<\/p>\n
dependency in this case has to be quanti\ufb01ed by ded\u00bbu_ctin.g<\/p>\n
1\/431 of the monthly income of the deceased  T.<\/p>\n
\n\n 35\/,' \n\npersonal expenses.    g\n\n<\/pre>\n
16. There is no dispute that the_ deceased asglfider’l’of’:th;elVKg<\/p>\n
scooter was going behind the in_ubroad:: and
\nrammed the lorry from beliiniel  wavslbrlyought to
\na sudden halt on  encountered
\nby the driver of    as rider of the
\nscooter ought\ufb01toygg  from the heavy
\nvehicle goiizig  -he having not done so, the<\/p>\n
Tribunal, in our vievvil .–i:s’~~.:justified in quantifying the<\/p>\n
c_ontribut}orytlnegligence on the part of the deceased at 40%<\/p>\n
the amount equivalent to 40%, from the<\/p>\n
  v1iabillit}’;.\u00abt,o ‘good by the other tortfeasor. Therefore,<\/p>\n
 We do not reason to interfere with the said finding<\/p>\n
relcfordedgbyll the Tribunal. The award under conventional<\/p>\n
if ‘4’   is just and proper.\n<\/p>\n
   view of the above discussion, this appeal is allowed<\/p>\n
if A  in part. ‘ W<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
18. The compensation towards loss of dependency after<\/p>\n
deducting 40% towards contributory negligence <\/p>\n
deceased is quanti\ufb01ed at Rs.5,18,400\/– [4,500 —  .<\/p>\n
of 4,500) 2 2.700 x 12 x 16]. Thus the _.appe11aznis’  entitled. ‘ at<\/p>\n
to total compensation of —\n<\/p>\n
Rs.4\u00bb,75,000\/– awarded by the tribiiiial. X<\/p>\n
19. The enhanced   carry
\ninterest at 6% per   I,_the petition till
\nthe date of the  p  — insurance
\ncompany    compensation Within<\/p>\n
four weeks,’ fr-_oniV’the_::datei_A:”of_ the receipt of copy of the<\/p>\n
Judgment.\n<\/p>\n
V’;30.” apportionment and disbursement of the enhanced<\/p>\n
 e  i Awardxhof the titbjn\ufb01ai.\n<\/p>\n
compensation sha11_be in the same ratio as indicated by the
\nSd\/~
\nEUDGE<\/p>\n
Sd\/e
\n” JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana m MFA 4344 OF_ ado; ~ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED was THE lo-nz mu? OF AUGUST, 2o1o FRESENT Tm: I-ION’BLE MR. JUSTICE 1) v 3 AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEVKN Miscellaneous […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMaster Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-31T08:54:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-31T08:54:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":1246,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-31T08:54:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-31T08:54:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-31T08:54:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2"},"wordCount":1246,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2","name":"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-31T08:54:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/master-aditya-vs-thiru-b-badra-reddy-on-10-august-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Master Aditya vs Thiru B Badra Reddy on 10 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140063"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140063\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}