{"id":140201,"date":"2011-05-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011"},"modified":"2015-04-21T09:03:31","modified_gmt":"2015-04-21T03:33:31","slug":"mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                          In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                        at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                            File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000462\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0 :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a019,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a019,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\u00a0\n\n\n\n            Appellant\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n            Shri\u00a0T.N.\u00a0Vijh\n            H.No.\u00a0D\u00ad\u00a0253,\u00a0Anand\u00a0Vihar\n            Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0092\n\n            The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0audio\u00a0conference.\n\n\n            Respondents\u00a0\n\n\n            Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0\n            Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager,\n            State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road,\n            New\u00a0Delhi\n\n         Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0S\u00a0P\u00a0Mahi,\u00a0ADRM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jagjit\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Sr.DMM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0V.D.\u00a0Meena,\u00a0       ACM\/SS\u00a0\nand\u00a0Shri\u00a0N.N.\u00a0Kalia,\u00a0CDMS\n\n\n\n                          Information\u00a0Commissioner           :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                                    Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0\n                  In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                           at\n                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                     File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000462\n                                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.        The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 his \u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 Northern \u00a0 Railway, \u00a0 New \u00a0 Delhi \u00a0 on \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          06.10.2010\u00a0seeking\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0publicity\u00a0contractors\/contracts\u00a0on\u00a0whom\u00a0penalty\u00a0has\u00a0 not\u00a0been\u00a0imposed\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>despite\u00a0late\u00a0payment.\u00a0The\u00a0 PIO,\u00a0on\u00a008.10.2010,\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0standard\u00a0type\u00a0               format,\u00a0like\u00a0check\u00a0list,\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0fall\u00a0         under\u00a0the\u00a0ambit\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0being\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0this,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0   appeal \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 (AA) \u00a0 dated \u00a0 \u00a0 16.11.2010 \u00a0 which,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0 Applicant, \u00a0 had \u00a0 not \u00a0 been\u00a0 replied\u00a0 to\u00a0 by\u00a0 the\u00a0 AA.\u00a0 He,\u00a0 therefore,\u00a0 filed\u00a0 the\u00a0 present\u00a0 appeal \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a014.12.2010\u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0            information.<\/p>\n<p>Decision\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>2.        During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0maintain\u00a0such\u00a0lists\u00a0in\u00a0their\u00a0record\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          and\u00a0that\u00a0therefore,\u00a0in\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0help\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0compiled\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0a\u00a0large\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          number\u00a0of\u00a0files\u00a0 \u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0compiled\u00a0runs\u00a0into\u00a0several\u00a0hundered\u00a0pages\u00a0.\u00a0He\u00a0further\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0 \u00a0accordingly\u00a0obtained\u00a0the\u00a0requisite\u00a0fee\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0as\u00a0well.\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          holder\u00ad of\u00a0the\u00adinformation\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0yet\u00a0supplied\u00a0those\u00a0 documents \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 under \u00a0 the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                    impression\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0would\u00a0come\u00a0for\u00a0inspection\u00a0and\u00a0then\u00a0identify\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0he\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          needed.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0on\u00a0phone,\u00a0\u00a0maintained\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0wants\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0records.<\/p>\n<p>3.        In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0shall\u00a0allow\u00a0\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0records\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0after\u00a0inspection,\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0free\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                    documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0may\u00a0identify\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0inspected\u00a0records.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0directed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          PIO\u00a0shall\u00a0refund\u00a0the\u00a0fee\u00a0collected\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0This\u00a0is\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0completed\u00a0by\u00a0         15.06.2011.<\/p>\n<p>4.        The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                 \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                         Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\n Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.      Shri\u00a0T.N.\u00a0Vijh<br \/>\n        H.No.\u00a0D\u00ad\u00a0253,\u00a0Anand\u00a0Vihar<br \/>\n        Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0092<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n        Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0<br \/>\n        Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager,<br \/>\n        State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road,<br \/>\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0<br \/>\n        Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0<br \/>\n        Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager,<br \/>\n        State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road,<br \/>\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.      Officer\u00a0In\u00adcharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000462 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0 :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a019,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a019,\u00a02011 Parties:\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0\u00a0 Shri\u00a0T.N.\u00a0Vijh H.No.\u00a0D\u00ad\u00a0253,\u00a0Anand\u00a0Vihar Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0092 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0audio\u00a0conference. Respondents\u00a0 Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0 Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager, State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road, New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0S\u00a0P\u00a0Mahi,\u00a0ADRM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jagjit\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Sr.DMM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0V.D.\u00a0Meena,\u00a0 ACM\/SS\u00a0 and\u00a0Shri\u00a0N.N.\u00a0Kalia,\u00a0CDMS Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000462 ORDER Background 1. The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 his [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-21T03:33:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-21T03:33:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":373,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-21T03:33:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-21T03:33:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-21T03:33:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011"},"wordCount":373,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011","name":"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-21T03:33:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-t-n-vijh-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.T N Vijh vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140201\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}