{"id":140231,"date":"2009-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2"},"modified":"2019-02-16T20:42:30","modified_gmt":"2019-02-16T15:12:30","slug":"smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre>Q3\/ \n\nCCC P~Ec&gt;.2\u20ac}(}4 of 2{}{)9\n\n114' THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA;*\ufb01; \" %\nCIRCUIT BEING}-I AT  V   '  T 1 L\nDATED THIS THE 3%  \nPREsEN':*'   \" % \"  2\n\nTHE HOIPBLE \nTHE I~1ON'BLI.\u00a7 \n\n \u00a7,_\u00a7;;C.';C_4_NQ.*2;\u20ac\u00a7O4f\u00a7i(30.\u20ac?'1\u00abiiiv\ufb02}\n\nBETWEEIE; \n\nSmt. sheshuba:.;'a%g1;ga1vT,i%~\nW \/ :3 late: Narayan~-.Y31ig:ai; '\"\nAged abcut 80 yeaI*:5_,\" \n\nR\/ C: 'Uriakeri,-.  \"Bai1h0I3.ga1,\n\n -  Di'$\u00a7:t $_\u00a2':ig;\u00a7m.m.\"  %%%%% -4 \u00bb ...COMPL.AJNAN'}'\n\n '  Dharigenci, Acivocate)\n\n1.  Rehaman,\n\n .. ,Th\u20ac'--State cf Kagmataka,\n\n_ 'By its Un\u00e9er Secretary,\n @331; of D.P.A.R. {political Pension)\nM.S.BuiidiI1g,\nBa;:1ga}0re~ L\n\n\n\nCCC N0.2{)04 of 2009\n\n2. Dr. J.Rav:isha11kar,\nThe Deputy Commissioner,\nBdgat\ufb01m District,  '   % T. _ * * \nBelgaum. '~\"\"'.~..,'EV\ufb01CC;USE@ ~ \n\n(By Sri. K.E3.Adhyapak, Add}. Gc}3:eI1:zi;%:I;i't_$4\u00a3iif;-}4'  5 ' ~ 7\n\nThis CCC is \ufb01led un\ufb01er \"\"SecT,im:1 171\u00ab,a11d 12 of tha\nContempt of Court z\ufb01gtt, prayitig \"t-r1 under the State Goverrzment\n\n  W113 had been so granted {ha pension, on\n\n  'of complainant being satisfiad, by the\n\nG\u00e9\ufb01iemmcrzi and having been gven such pension as per\n\n   sr\u00e9\u00e9r date\ufb01 20.05.1992. The pensien, thmzgh was\n\n  '\ufb01alzied 0:} 20.95. 3992, was with effect fmm 22.11.1930\n\n'  \"at \u00a3113 rates that prevailed at the reievant point sf tinge.\n\nM\"-\n\nV\n\n\n\nCCC No.20E)4 of2\u20ac}09\n\n2. It appears that the State Government\":\nthe entire scenario of gafltiiilg freedom  \nand having found that there  '\nthe claims made by the    L\u00bb\n\ufb01ghters, the Government  'to'. 1*e*.?\u00a7i&lt;\u00a7&#039;+;?\u00e9,*:.V:i:1e \u00e9&#039;;EeViVtVr,V1,:&#039;LatioI:V\nand had issued notiees_    freedom\n\ufb01ghte\ufb01s pension to   the authority\nand to protiltgee  or version.\n\n   _&#039;    had appeared\nbefore-the&quot; of the district and had\n\nasserted &quot;  pension and had further\n\n . \u00e9_ izifiieated \u00a7t1af&quot;a\u00a7l.t.hevsupporth1g documents had already\n\n &#039;bee:1  However, the Deputy Commissioner\n\nappears&#039; &#039;::of_ have recemmended to the Govemme\ufb01i for\n\n eanee\ufb02efien of pension to the eemplaizzant. The\n\nAil&quot; fk\ufb01emment cancelled the pension after such\n\n fecommendation as per the order dated G1,O4.20O().\n\n&#039;4 Afier the complainant&#039;s efforts to seek restoration of\n\nx;\/\n\n\n\nsee 310.2004 M2009\nthe complainant to attend 1.:I&#039;15\u20ac:\u20ac\u00a7I}q1}.iI&#039;}7 personally, which\nthe complainant attended on 16.09.2008 \nDeputy Secretary, Department of  \nAdministrative Reforme, and gave her &quot;\nthereafter, the orders having 11:\nconsiderable length of time   \nwithout pension, pre.seI1te;1o.-t-3E1ie&#039;v-(::on}:eoti1\u00a7t-ipetiiiion, and\nnotice had been issueo\u00e9&#039; petition to the\n\nrespo;1de11ts.Vo2:i 0.3.O{};\u00e9C(}\u00a73.   3 ~  &#039;\n\n * The    have \ufb01led their courlter\n\naf\ufb01davitu bei&#039;ore&#039; ms elem on 29.o5.2oo9, and it is\n\n    the affidavit, that the Case of the\n\n  vcoinpiajfiei\ufb01had been re\u00ab\u00abexamir1ed as per the direction\n\n.o:&quot;&#039; ihis_  but due to adn1inistrative reasons, the\n\n o;&#039;der o(:I.21d not be passed promptly&quot; and that the order\n\n&quot;ii  to be passed on i22.05,2\u20ac}()9, copy of which is\n\n&quot;  grodueed as Annexure\ufb01i to the a\ufb01i\u00e9avit, rejecting the\n\nclaim for the freedom \ufb01ghtefs pension by the\n\n\n\nCZCC NOQQG4 of 2009\n\ncomplainant for the reason that the statement\ufb02\nthe complainant before the Deputy   \neffect that she had undergone  inen\u00a3h&#039;s  &#039;\nwhereas the certificate issued   e\nindicated that she was a   from&#039;\n14.12.1942 to 23.e3v,n ;9_43  mm than\nthree months and  to suspicion,\nthe aumorigi\ufb01ei&quot;e:n:.&#039;\u00a7m\\e--_lFi earlier action of\ncanee\ufb02a\ufb01ee   ehe complainant and\n\nthe  eension stands rejected.\n\n8.   learned counsel appearing\n\n &#039;_ feIj~&#039;\u00a3he_:con1piei1&quot;1e.{11:.submits that the order passed is\n\n *ne&#039;:..Va--v,_Vbo&#039;:1a&quot;&quot;\ufb01de order; that no order was passed\n\n  Government after the Begmty Secretary\n\n hea\ufb01i. ehehvnzatier and recorded the statement; that the\n\nV&#039; *ee\u00a7&#039;f;%_fieate an\u00e9 the statement both did eenfirm that the\n\n eemplainant had undergone imprisonment in\n\n&#039;4 Connection with the freedom struggle; that there is,\n\n\n\nCCC N02064: of 2009\n\nabsoluteiy, no justification in passing the orgieiiiiie\norder is passed only after the notice   it \ncontempt jurisdiction just to \nfor compliance and that the or(ier\u00bb:iei.noti.,\u00e9i.\ufb02ier&#039; \nfide exercise of power or a  erxdeixi   Vi  S &#039;V\n\n9. Shri .cou\ufb01s\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9.ppearmg\nfor the aceu\u00a7ed\u00abre$&#039;pQ:1*iifiei:i_te;iL   other hand,\nsubmits   &#039;--.---i-gave obeyed the\n\ndireetiens ,is\u00a3:}.1J\u20aci&#039;:d 13}:   and therefore, there is\n\nno fuiihef  jurisdiction and that the\n\nquality f\ufb01\u00a51eVer:ier&quot;e;%i2n0t be examined in contempt\n\n   iiiii \n\n   :V&quot;&quot;}ff1ei;gI1 we are irzclineci to accept \ufb01he\n\n.js?._i:i?3\u20ac:x;is;s;iei; ef the learned Gevemment Advocate that it\n\n is netffery appropriate fax&#039; us :0 examine the quaiity 91&#039;\n\n&quot;ii  order passed by an autherzity in contempt\n\n   jurisdiction, anti the ques\ufb01on is conflned as to whether\n\nciireetiorz of this Court has been eemplied or not, we\n\n\n\nCCC NO,20{)4 of 2009\n\nmust exyress our consi\u00e9exable \ndisapproval of the manner in V&#039; \nGovernment functions in the  . c$&#039;f \nciaims for grant of freedom \ufb01\u00e9rlf%f&#039;g  \n\nmanner of disposa} of those&#039; &#039;;\u20act\u00a7:\u00a7;}E:lica.ti(51:?5\u00a7&quot;&#039;T \n\n13.. In \u00a31118 veI;y&quot;&#039; satis\ufb01ed at\nail that the Qtgigzr,   to the\ncourzter     \ufb01de one. We\nsay so for  p.oi}1ted out by the learned\ncauns\ufb02 my  it is not oniy passed in a\n\nhaste er\ufb02yf. fm\u00e9ixgmg of the notice in contempt:\n\n . \u00e9_  but  \u00abrespondents appear to be searching for<\/pre>\n<p> &#8216; :\u00a7t:e%% \ufb02im4Sy:V&#8217;gf\u20ac:3.1nd or the other to reject the claim rather<\/p>\n<p> {&lt;3 a{i\u00a72_\u20ac\u00a3f1V\u00e9e the object eff 1:133 scheme and 1:23 acccrd<\/p>\n<p> g_ f\u00a3gh*;.er&#039;s pension to a freedam \ufb01ghter in an<\/p>\n<p>A ~ If &quot; h\u00e9iiourabie marmer.\n<\/p>\n<p>12. We find it is more disgacefu} to harass and<\/p>\n<p>hzzmiliat\u00e9 the fmedom \ufb01ghters in this mazmer than<\/p>\n<p>CCC NOQOO4 of 2909<\/p>\n<p>conferring on them any &#8216;samman&#8217; or giving them &#8216;s$i:sife:1ance.<\/p>\n<p>13. A lady cf 80 years  aggf,<br \/>\nimprisonment more than 50 years:&#8217;\u00bb,bar;k\u00ab,<br \/>\nremember the precise durati03&#8243;i, 0\u00a7   age<br \/>\nand in her condition, thgugh   many elderly<br \/>\npeople to have sharp    &#8216;4 ..\n<\/p>\n<p>14. The   as to whether the<br \/>\npension can   material and I10{ as to<br \/>\nwhether  &#8221;  V\u00e9mnly defeats the object of the<\/p>\n<p>scheme.  &#8220;the complainant and the C\u20ac1&#8217;tifiz1xc-:rTc1id confirm with the factum 0f having<\/p>\n<p>  in this state of affairs, the Crovemment<\/p>\n<p>sfi\ufb01g\ufb02\u00e9.  restored the pensien but that is 1101; the<\/p>\n<p>V ar\u00e9eri.\n<\/p>\n<p>    Be that as it may. As observ\u00e9d, aariier in this order, it<\/p>\n<p>V. &#8211;. 1&#8242;:i1ay not be proper to \u20acX\u00a31II1iI1\u20ac the correctness or otherwise of the-:<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ~.  Ezrrdar in ccmtempi: jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p>CC-C N02004 of 2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">: 10 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>16. While iibefty ie reserved to  to<\/p>\n<p>independently question the Va1idit_y~-sf et-he :\u00a7rdef&#8217;;e~Twe&#8221;e\u00a7{presS <\/p>\n<p>dismay about the way the  {}e1ie1&#8242;: im..e\u00a3;t&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>pax\ufb01cx\ufb01ariy, in the matter of   of  fI&#8217;f3\u00a73(\u00a7Q\ufb01\u00a7_: \ufb01g\ufb01tere&#8217; pe\ufb01eion,<br \/>\nand the least we eat: do,i&#8217;s.__t:o cei:ipe:;e\u00e9:.t.e t11e\u00abe&#8217;om15iainant for the<br \/>\nconsiderable harassment ~e u\ufb01&#8217;ered by her because<\/p>\n<p>of these proceedi13&#8217;g\u00a7$V.&#8217;Vj&#8217;~<\/p>\n<p>_ {he  petition, we impese coat of<br \/>\nRs. 10,000 on  -&#8216;:20 he paid te the eotnpiainant<\/p>\n<p>within four wee,%1&lt;sf:4e;::  If the Cost is not paid within the<\/p>\n<p>5;-\ufb01pulateifi Vvtime,  _&lt;;9;:.=.p}a.i:1eI1t can move for revival ef the<\/p>\n<p>ed-nteii1&#039;pt pet\u00a7ti&#039;::{1:i;\u00bb <\/p>\n<p>Sd\/~<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/~<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n<p>L n &quot;I&lt;I.i1&#039;1s*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana Q3\/ CCC P~Ec&gt;.2\u20ac}(}4 of 2{}{)9 114&#8242; THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA;*\ufb01; &#8221; % CIRCUIT BEING}-I AT V &#8216; T 1 L DATED THIS THE 3% PREsEN&#8217;:*&#8217; &#8221; % &#8221; 2 THE HOIPBLE THE I~1ON&#8217;BLI.\u00a7 \u00a7,_\u00a7;;C.&#8217;;C_4_NQ.*2;\u20ac\u00a7O4f\u00a7i(30.\u20ac?&#8217;1\u00abiiiv\ufb02} BETWEEIE; Smt. sheshuba:.;&#8217;a%g1;ga1vT,i%~ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-16T15:12:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-16T15:12:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":364,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-16T15:12:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-16T15:12:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-16T15:12:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2"},"wordCount":364,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2","name":"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-16T15:12:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sheshubai-yaligar-vs-abdul-rehaman-on-3-june-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Sheshubai Yaligar vs Abdul Rehaman on 3 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}