{"id":140352,"date":"2009-01-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2"},"modified":"2017-03-03T21:44:23","modified_gmt":"2017-03-03T16:14:23","slug":"anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Criminal Appeal No.731-DB of 2006                                        -1-\n\n\n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.\n\n\n\n\nAnup                                                 APPELLANT\n\n\n                          VERSUS\n\n\nThe State of Haryana                                 RESPONDENT\n\n\n\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHTAB S.GILL\n        HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L.N.MITTAL\n\n\n\nPresent:-    Shri Vinod Ghai, Advocate for the appellant.\n\n             Mrs.Ritu Punj, D.A.G. Haryana.\n\n\n\n\nMEHTAB S.GILL, J.\n<\/pre>\n
             This is an appeal against the judgment\/order dated 25.8.2006 of<\/p>\n
the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat whereby he convicted Anup<\/p>\n
son of Baljit under Section 302\/34 I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo life<\/p>\n
imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2000\/-, or in default, to further undergo<\/p>\n
RI for one year.\n<\/p>\n
 Criminal Appeal No.731-DB of 2006                                          -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
             The other accused Kaptan son of Baljit was declared a<\/p>\n
proclaimed offender, when the trial of Anup was taking place before the<\/p>\n
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat. He could not face trial at that<\/p>\n
time, but now as per the learned counsel for the appellant, he has been arrested<\/p>\n
and his trial is now proceeding in the Court of learned Additional Sessions<\/p>\n
Judge, Sonepat.\n<\/p>\n
             The case of the prosecution is unfolded by the statement of Prem<\/p>\n
Singh son of      Siri Chand Ex.PE, given to SI\/SHO Police Station Sadar,<\/p>\n
Sonepat, on 6.5.2004 at 6.15 p.m. at Mehra Turn in the area of Village<\/p>\n
Badswani. Prem Singh stated that he is a labourer. He has two daughters and<\/p>\n
four sons.   His eldest son Neetu was missing since 5.3.2004.         His elder<\/p>\n
daughter Meena remains sick and was staying with him. Younger to Meena,<\/p>\n
was Reena, then Sonu, Rani and Bunti. Marriage of his daughter Reena was<\/p>\n
performed on 13.3.2004 with Sandeep son of Dharampal. For the last 15 days<\/p>\n
Reena had come to his house. The houses of Kaptan and Anup son of Baljit<\/p>\n
are adjacent to his house. About 6\/7 days prior, Kaptan and Anup asked Prem<\/p>\n
Singh that he is unnecessarily blaming them for the missing of Neetu and he<\/p>\n
will be taught a lesson. At this his daughter Reena stated that it is they<\/p>\n
(Kaptan and Anup) who were responsible for the missing of their brother<\/p>\n
Neetu and they would make a complaint to the police in this regard. Kaptan<\/p>\n
and Neetu stated that before making any complaint to the police, they would<\/p>\n
finish her. On 6.5.2004 at about 2 p.m. Prem Singh along with his wife Savitri<\/p>\n
and wife of Neetu were sitting in the house. Reena went to the Gher on the<\/p>\n
back side of the house to feed the buffaloes. They heard the shouts of Reena
\n Criminal Appeal No.731-DB of 2006                                          -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
for help. All of them rushed to save Reena and saw that Kaptan was inflicting<\/p>\n
injuries with a knife on Reena. Reena was lying on the Gher and Anup was<\/p>\n
standing in front of his house and saying not to leave her and exhorted Kaptan<\/p>\n
not to leave her alive. Within their sight more injuries were inflicted on Reena<\/p>\n
on her neck and forehead. Thereafter Kaptan on seeing them fled away. Reena<\/p>\n
died at the spot. On the basis of this statement F.I.R. Ex.PE\/2 was recorded on<\/p>\n
6.5.2004 at 6.50 p.m.     Special report reached the A.C.J.M., Sonepat on<\/p>\n
6.5.2004 at 8.30 p.m.<\/p>\n
             The prosecution to prove its case, brought into the witness-box<\/p>\n
Constable Inder Pal PW-1, HC Chander Singh PW-2, ASI Virender Singh<\/p>\n
PW-3, HC Telu Ram PW-4, HC Puran Singh PW-5, Rajesh Kumar<\/p>\n
Photographer PW-6, Dr.R.N.Tehlan PW-7, Shavitri PW-8, Prem Singh PW-9<\/p>\n
and ASI Satbir Singh PW-10.\n<\/p>\n
             Learned counsel for the appellant has argued, that F.I.R. No.79<\/p>\n
Police Sadar,Sonepat Ex.PC, was recorded in which it has been stated that son<\/p>\n
of the petitioner Natwar Singh alias Neetu was missing since 5.3.2004. In this<\/p>\n
F.I.R. the name of appellant Anup is not mentioned, but only the name of<\/p>\n
accused Kaptan is mentioned. This F.I.R. is dated 25.5.2004. The name of<\/p>\n
appellant Anup not being mentioned shows that Anup was not a party in any<\/p>\n
way with the commission of the offence. It is only in F.I.R. Ex.PE\/2, in the<\/p>\n
present case, that the name of Anup is mentioned, though this F.I.R. had been<\/p>\n
registered on 6.5.2004. Learned counsel has further argued, that as per F.I.R.<\/p>\n
Ex.PC, the motive turns out to be only for accused Kaptan to commit the<\/p>\n
murder of Reena with whom he was having an affair.            Similarly, in the
\n Criminal Appeal No.731-DB of 2006                                             -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
disclosure statement Ex.PJ of Kaptan, nowhere the name of appellant Anup is<\/p>\n
mentioned. Similarly, in the memo of demarcation Ex.PJ\/5, again the name of<\/p>\n
Anup is not mentioned.\n<\/p>\n
              If we go through the site plan Ex.PA, the house of appellant<\/p>\n
Anup is not shown. If his house was not near the house of the deceased, then<\/p>\n
he could not have exhorted accused Kaptan to extinguish the life of Reena.<\/p>\n
              In fact, as per the suggestion put to the witnesses, it is Surjit the<\/p>\n
husband of Reena and family members of Reena who had committed the<\/p>\n
murder of deceased Reena as they saw her in a compromising position with<\/p>\n
accused Kaptan.\n<\/p>\n
              Learned counsel for the State has argued that F.I.R. No.79 Police<\/p>\n
Station Sadar, Sonepat Ex.PC, is regarding dis-appearance of Natwar Singh<\/p>\n
alias Neetu, the brother of deceased Reena. Though it does not mention the<\/p>\n
name of Anup, but that does not mean anything, as it is appellant Anup and<\/p>\n
accused Kaptan who had threatened Reena and thereafter extinguished her life.<\/p>\n
Going through the F.I.R. Ex.PE\/2 i.e. the present F.I.R. in this case, it has been<\/p>\n
clearly stated that both appellant Anup and accused Kaptan had come to the<\/p>\n
house of Prem Singh father of Reena to say that the family members of Prem<\/p>\n
Singh were unnecessarily blaming them of taking away Neetu son of Prem<\/p>\n
Singh. It is at this that Reena told both of them that they were responsible for<\/p>\n
the disappearance of their brother Neetu and they would complain to the police.<\/p>\n
This incident had taken place about 6\/7 days prior to 6.5.2004, the day of<\/p>\n
murder. On the day of the murder, both appellant Anup and Kaptan who was<\/p>\n
armed with a knife came to the house of Reena, but Reena had gone out to
\n Criminal Appeal No.731-DB of 2006                                         -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
throw fodder into the Gher for the cattle. It has been mentioned in the F.I.R.<\/p>\n
Ex.PE\/2 that the house of appellant Anup and accused Kaptan are adjacent to<\/p>\n
each other. Appellant Anup was standing in front of his house and he exhorted<\/p>\n
Kaptan to kill Reena. Going through the statements of the eye-witnesses i.e.<\/p>\n
Savitri PW-8 and Prem Singh PW-9, both mother and father of the deceased<\/p>\n
who are natural witnesses as the occurrence had taken place in their house,<\/p>\n
F.I.R. Ex.PE\/2 gets corroboration from their statements. In fact, both these<\/p>\n
witnesses also corroborate each other inter se. The non-mentioning of the<\/p>\n
name of appellant Anup in Ex.PJ, the disclosure statement of Kaptan or in the<\/p>\n
demarcation Ex.PJ\/5 would not have much bearing on the case, when seen in<\/p>\n
its larger context and totality, as it is a case of eye-witness account of two<\/p>\n
witnesses.\n<\/p>\n
             F.I.R. Ex.PE\/2 has been recorded promptly and this itself goes a<\/p>\n
long way in proving the case of the prosecution. The occurrence had taken<\/p>\n
place on 6.5.2004 at 2 p.m., at Village Badswani, Police Station Sadar, Sonepat<\/p>\n
which is about 6-1\/2 kms. away from the police station. Statement of Prem<\/p>\n
Singh, father of the deceased was recorded by Mehar Singh SI\/SHO at 6.15<\/p>\n
p.m. on 6.5.2004 and the F.I.R. Ex.PE\/2 came into existence on the same day at<\/p>\n
6.50 p.m. The special report reached A.C.J.M., Sonepat at 8.30 p.m. The<\/p>\n
distance between Police Station Sadar, Sonepat and the Court of A.C.J.M.,<\/p>\n
Sonepat is about 6 kms. The name of appellant Anup has been categorically<\/p>\n
mentioned in the F.I.R., his role of exhorting his co-accused is also mentioned<\/p>\n
in the F.I.R. Appellant Anup has tried to throw the blame partly on his co-<\/p>\n
accused Kaptan by putting a suggestion to Prem Singh PW-9 that accused
\n Criminal Appeal No.731-DB of 2006                                          -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
Kaptan and Reena were seen in a compromising position and the family<\/p>\n
members of Reena had murdered her. Appellant Anup has unsuccessfully<\/p>\n
tried to pass the buck to accused Kaptan and the family members. In his<\/p>\n
statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C., to Question No.12, the same answer has<\/p>\n
been given by appellant Anup, that it is the husband and family members of the<\/p>\n
deceased who had killed her as they had seen her in a compromising position<\/p>\n
with Kaptan.\n<\/p>\n
               Mehar Singh SI\/SHO could not be produced, as he had died<\/p>\n
before giving his evidence. But his statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and<\/p>\n
other documents and his signatures have been identified by ASI Satbir Singh<\/p>\n
PW-10.\n<\/p>\n
               We do not find any infirmity in the judgment of the learned trial<\/p>\n
Court.\n<\/p>\n
               Appeal is dismissed.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n                                                ( MEHTAB S.GILL )\n                                                    JUDGE\n\n\n\n\n                                                  ( L.N.MITTAL )\nJanuary 15, 2009                                      JUDGE\nGD\n\n\n\n\n               WHETHER TO BE REFERRED TO REPORTER? YES\/NO\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009 Criminal Appeal No.731-DB of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Anup APPELLANT VERSUS The State of Haryana RESPONDENT CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHTAB S.GILL HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE L.N.MITTAL Present:- Shri Vinod Ghai, Advocate for the appellant. Mrs.Ritu […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140352","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAnup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-03T16:14:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-03T16:14:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":1489,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-03T16:14:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-03T16:14:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-03T16:14:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2"},"wordCount":1489,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2","name":"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-03T16:14:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anup-vs-the-state-of-haryana-on-15-january-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anup vs The State Of Haryana on 15 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140352"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140352\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}