{"id":140486,"date":"1964-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1964-09-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964"},"modified":"2014-03-20T22:19:44","modified_gmt":"2014-03-20T16:49:44","slug":"abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964","title":{"rendered":"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964"},"content":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court<\/div>\n
Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964<\/div>\n
Equivalent citations: AIR 1965 Pat 344, 1965 CriLJ 236<\/div>\n
Author: K Sahai<\/div>\n
Bench: K Sahai<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
 Kamla Sahai, J. <\/p>\n
 1. The opposite party has filed an application under Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Subdivisional Magistrate at Motihari. Her case is that she was married to the petitioner at Motihari, that she went to live with him at Darbhanga, and that thereafter he came and lived with her at her father’s house in Motihari for about ten flays. The petitioner raised the objection that the Motihari Court had no jurisdiction under Sub-section (8) of Section 488 of the Code to decide the case. The learned Magistrate ordered that this matter would be considered after evidence had been adduced. This application has been filed against that order.\n<\/p>\n
 2. Mr. Sarwar Ali, who has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, has argued that the words used in Section 488 (8) connote some amount of continuity or, in other words, an intention on the part of the couple to reside at a particular place indefinitely they can be held to have resided at that place (sic). I read Sub-section (8) of Section 488:\n<\/p>\n
  ‘”(8) Proceedings under this section may be taken against any person in any district where he resides or is, or where he last resided with his wife, or, as the case may be, the mother of the illegitimate child.”\n<\/p>\n
 There is no doubt that the word ‘resided’ docs not imply just a flying visit; but there is no reason why it should not be held to include temporary as well as permanent residence. Mr. Sarwar Ali has relied upon the decision in Charan Das v. Mt. Surasti Bai, AIR 1940 Lah 449. In that case, their Lordships have laid down that, in a case where the husband has a permanent residence the couple can only be said to have last resided at a different place if they had an intention to stay there for an indefinite period. I may, however, refer to another decision of the Punjab High Court, in Sardari Lal Amar Nath v. Mt. Kaushalya Devi, AIR<\/a> 1957 Punj 84. Kapur, J., sitting singly, referred the case to a Division Bench. In the referring order, he mentioned that it had been laid down in Charan Das’s Case, AIR 1940 Lah 449 that “a temporary residence is not within the meaning of the words ‘last resided together'”. When the Division Bench considered the matter, Kapur, J. himself gave the judgment. He held that the word ‘resides’ implied something more than a mere brief or flying visit but, where the wife resides in a village where her husband, who was residing at another place, visited her and lived with her, they must be held to have resided there within the meaning of Section 486 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A similar question arose before a single Judge in this Court in Dadan Singh v. Smt. Shakuntala Devi, 1957 BLJR 19 his Lordship considered Charan Das’s case, AIR 1940 Lah 449 and several decisions of the Allahabad, Calcutta and Bombay High Courts. The decision of the Calcutta High Court, which he referred to, was that in the case of Mrs. E. 11. Jolly v. St. John William Jolly, 21 Cal WN 872: (AIR 1918 Cal 785) in which it was found that the husband, who lived in Darjeeling, had come to Calcutta and resided there with his wife for eight days from the 16th to the 23rd January, and it was held that this was sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the Calcutta Court to entertain an application under Section 488. In the present case, as I have said, the petitioner is alleged by the opposite party to have last lived with her in her father’s house for ten days. The conclusion which Banerji, J. has reached in Dadan Singh’s case, 1957 BLJR 19 is:\n<\/p>\n
  “Any person who dwells permanently or for a considerable time at a particular place may be said to be ‘residing’ at that place. What should be the length of the period which would attract the provisions of Sub-section (8) has to be decided by a Court with reference to facts of the ease before it. The Court should always try to distinguish whether the period of stay was meant merely for a visit or for the purpose of residence, although of a temporary character,”\n<\/p>\n
 I respectfully agree; with this observation. The learned Magistrate has ordered that he will consider the question of jurisdiction after evidence has been adduced, and I think that this is perfectly right. The point which he will keep in view is that the place in which the petitioner is alleged to have lived with the opposite party for ten days is the house of the opposite party’s father-in-law. He will take this circumstance, along with other evidence adduced in the case, into consideration, and, if he comes to the conclusion that the place must be held to be a place where the parties permanently or temporarily resided, he may hold that he has jurisdiction to decide the case.\n<\/p>\n
 3. Another point which Mr, Sarvvar Ali has raised is that the petitioner has filed a title suit for a declaration that the opposite party is not his legally-married wife; and he has prayed that the proceeding under section 488 should be stayed during the pendency of the suit. The opposite party wants maintenance in this proceeding. The suit and, after it is concluded, the appeal, etc., are likely to take a long time, The opposite party cannot be allowed to be completely without maintenance for all that time. In my opinion, therefore, this proceeding ought not to be stayed. On the other hand, I direct that the learned Magistrate will proceed to dispose of this proceeding as quickly as possible.\n<\/p>\n
 4. No  other\tpoint     has   been  raised.    There being no merit in\tthe application, it is dismissed.  \n\n\n\n \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964 Equivalent citations: AIR 1965 Pat 344, 1965 CriLJ 236 Author: K Sahai Bench: K Sahai ORDER Kamla Sahai, J. 1. The opposite party has filed an application under Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Subdivisional Magistrate at Motihari. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAbdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1964-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-20T16:49:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964\",\"datePublished\":\"1964-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-20T16:49:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964\"},\"wordCount\":960,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964\",\"name\":\"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1964-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-20T16:49:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1964-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-20T16:49:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964","datePublished":"1964-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-20T16:49:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964"},"wordCount":960,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964","name":"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1964-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-20T16:49:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hamid-sadiq-vs-bibi-ashrafunnissa-on-16-september-1964#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abdul Hamid Sadiq vs Bibi Ashrafunnissa on 16 September, 1964"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140486"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140486\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}