{"id":140681,"date":"2008-11-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-07-23T22:26:39","modified_gmt":"2018-07-23T16:56:39","slug":"pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>CWP NO.11235 of 2008                        -1-\n\n\n        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n                     AT CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                                     CWP NO.11235 of 2008\n                                     Decided on : 06.11.2008\n\n\nPawan Kumar\n                                                               ....Petitioner\n\n                              VERSUS\n\n\nState of Haryana &amp; others\n                                                           ....Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE M. M. KUMAR<br \/>\n        HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH<\/p>\n<p>Present:-   Mr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate<br \/>\n            for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Addl. A. G., Haryana<br \/>\n            for respondent No.1.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Mr. Sanjay Vashisht, Advocate<br \/>\n            for respondents No.2 to 4.\n<\/p>\n<p>1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?yes\n<\/p>\n<p>2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? yes\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? yes<\/p>\n<p>M. M. KUMAR J.\n<\/p>\n<p>1.          The petitioner is aggrieved by the show-cause-notice dated<\/p>\n<p>23.05.2008 sent by the Chief Revenue Officer, Housing Board, Haryana,<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.3 regarding showing cause as to why allotment of Lower<\/p>\n<p>Income Group (LIG) Flat in the Housing Board Colony, Dharuhera be not<\/p>\n<p>cancelled (Annexure P-4). A further prayer for issuance of direction to the<\/p>\n<p>respondents prohibiting them from cancelling the allotment of Flat which he<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> CWP NO.11235 of 2008                          -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is legally entitled to retain, has also been made.<\/p>\n<p>2.           Brief facts of the case are that the Housing Board, respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.2 invited applications for allotment of different categories of Flats<\/p>\n<p>situated at Dharuhera, Sector 6 (Part-II) apart from other places.<\/p>\n<p>3.           The categorization of plots was made on the basis of income of<\/p>\n<p>the applicants. For allotment of LIG Flats (Ground floor &amp; First floor), the<\/p>\n<p>brochure stipulated that an applicant is required to have monthly income of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2,501\/- to 5,500\/- and for MIG Flats (Ground floor &amp; First floor) the<\/p>\n<p>income was fixed for Rs.5,501\/- to 10,000\/-.         The petitioner had filed<\/p>\n<p>application in respect of LIG Flats in the draw of lots held on 30.01.2008.<\/p>\n<p>He succeeded and was allotted a Flat in Sector 6 (Part-II), Dharuhera. On<\/p>\n<p>14.02.2008, intimation in that regard was given to the petitioner by Oriental<\/p>\n<p>Bank of Commerce, Panchkula and the Housing Board also sent a letter<\/p>\n<p>dated 29.02.2008 confirming the allotment of LIG Flat in Sector 6 (Part-II),<\/p>\n<p>Dharuhera to the petitioner. According to the intimation sent by the Housing<\/p>\n<p>Board on 29.02.2008 (Annexure P-2), it was expressly required by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to disclose his monthly income at the time of registration in the<\/p>\n<p>month of June, 2007 (Gross income of the family viz., of an individual,<\/p>\n<p>spouse, dependent relatives including unmarried minor children from all<\/p>\n<p>sources). It is appropriate to mention that applicant had applied under the<\/p>\n<p>reserved category. The petitioner had deposited the installment for his Flat<\/p>\n<p>on 24.03.2008. However, on 23.05.2008, a show cause notice was issued to<\/p>\n<p>him alleging that his family income was Rs.5,717\/- p.m. and he was not<\/p>\n<p>eligible to apply for allotment of a Flat in LIG category. The petitioner had<\/p>\n<p>submitted his salary certificate dated 27.04.2005 alongwith his application<\/p>\n<p>form clearly showing that he was withdrawing gross salary of Rs.5,717\/-<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> CWP NO.11235 of 2008                        -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and the net salary claimed was Rs.4,712\/-. He has further claimed that in<\/p>\n<p>whole State of Haryana there was no employee who was withdrawing salary<\/p>\n<p>lesser than 5,717\/- .\n<\/p>\n<p>4.           The petitioner has asserted that he has truly disclosed all the<\/p>\n<p>facts. The cancellation of plot would be unwarranted.<\/p>\n<p>5.           In the written statement filed by the Secretary, Housing Board,<\/p>\n<p>Haryana, respondent No.4, the stand taken is that the petitioner submitted<\/p>\n<p>his application form and also furnished a certificate deposing therein that he<\/p>\n<p>had carefully gone through the terms and conditions of the scheme and<\/p>\n<p>undertook to abide by the same. He further solemnly affirmed that the<\/p>\n<p>information disclosed in the application was true and correct to his<\/p>\n<p>knowledge and then stated that he fulfilled all the conditions laid down in<\/p>\n<p>the scheme. He further declared that his name might be considered for<\/p>\n<p>registration and allotment without verification of his eligibility by the<\/p>\n<p>Housing Board and if he was ineligible at any time, then his<\/p>\n<p>registration\/allotment was liable to be cancelled without notice. The entire<\/p>\n<p>amount deposited by him was to be verified by the Board.                  The<\/p>\n<p>aforementioned procedure, according to the Housing Board, was adopted in<\/p>\n<p>order to avoid scrutiny of large number of application forms submitted by<\/p>\n<p>all the applicants and confining the considerations only to such applicants<\/p>\n<p>who succeeded in draw of lots. Respondents have, therefore, claimed that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner was declared successful subject to his eligibility.        The<\/p>\n<p>Housing Board, respondent has also referred to a note which has been<\/p>\n<p>omitted by the petitioner in the intimation sent by the Housing Board to him<\/p>\n<p>on 29.02.2008 (Annexure P-2) stating that he did not mention the income in<\/p>\n<p>his application form and the eligibility was to be checked after receipt of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> CWP NO.11235 of 2008                          -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>documents.        Aforementioned note has now been produced by the<\/p>\n<p>respondents by attaching the complete version of intimation dated<\/p>\n<p>29.02.2008 (Annexure R-2). The salary certificate for the month of June,<\/p>\n<p>2007, which has been submitted by the petitioner (Annexure R-3) would<\/p>\n<p>show that he has been withdrawing gross salary of Rs.7,002\/- and would not<\/p>\n<p>obviously be eligible as his gross salary has crossed the limit of Rs.5,500\/-<\/p>\n<p>per month.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.             We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at a<\/p>\n<p>considerable length and have perused the paper book as well as the brochure<\/p>\n<p>with their able-assistance. For allotment of LIG Flats, the maximum income<\/p>\n<p>stipulated in the brochure is Rs.5.500\/-. The relevant clause and the table<\/p>\n<p>reads thus:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;Income group for eligibility of flat will be as under:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>               Category of flats        *Monthly income\n                LIG GF &amp; FF        From Rs.2501\/- to Rs.5500\/-\n                MIG GF &amp; FF        From Rs.5501\/- to Rs.10000\/-\n                HIG GF &amp; FF             Above Rs.10000\/-\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>               *Monthly Income&#8221; shall mean the aggregate monthly income<\/p>\n<p>               of an individual and that of his\/her spouse and dependent<\/p>\n<p>               relatives including unmarried minor children.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>7.             For LIG (Ground &amp; First floor), the maximum income<\/p>\n<p>stipulated is Rs.5,500\/- and the monthly income was meant to be the<\/p>\n<p>aggregate monthly income of an individual and that of his or her spouse and<\/p>\n<p>dependent relatives etc. The salary certificate dated 27.07.2007 submitted<\/p>\n<p>by the petitioner (Annexure R-3) shows that for the month of June, 2007, he<\/p>\n<p>had gross salary of Rs.7,002\/- which make him completely ineligible. It has<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> CWP NO.11235 of 2008                        -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>come on record that the eligibility of the petitioner was yet to be confirmed<\/p>\n<p>and vide intimation dated 29.02.2008, the Housing Board, respondent No.2<\/p>\n<p>had made it clear by an express note in the letter that the petitioner did not<\/p>\n<p>mention his income in his application form and the eligibility is required to<\/p>\n<p>be checked after receipt of     documents      (Annexure R-2).     In such a<\/p>\n<p>situation, the petitioner can not claim that he should be considered eligible<\/p>\n<p>and the allotment made to him subject to fulfillment of eligibility conditions<\/p>\n<p>should be finalized. There is thus no merit in the petition and the same is<\/p>\n<p>liable to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.          For the reasons aforementioned, this petition fails and the same<\/p>\n<p>is dismissed. However, the amount deposited by the petitioner may be<\/p>\n<p>refunded to him as per provisions of law.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                         (M. M. Kumar)<br \/>\n                                                             Judge<\/p>\n<p>                                                           (Jora Singh)<br \/>\n                                                              Judge<\/p>\n<p>November 06, 2008<br \/>\nashish\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008 CWP NO.11235 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.11235 of 2008 Decided on : 06.11.2008 Pawan Kumar &#8230;.Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana &amp; others &#8230;.Respondents CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE M. M. KUMAR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-23T16:56:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-23T16:56:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1141,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-23T16:56:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-23T16:56:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-23T16:56:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008"},"wordCount":1141,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008","name":"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-23T16:56:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-others-on-6-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana &amp; Others on 6 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}