{"id":140753,"date":"2008-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008"},"modified":"2014-07-18T20:46:14","modified_gmt":"2014-07-18T15:16:14","slug":"noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORiE*.[\n\nDATED THIS THE 6TH DAY 01+\" NOVEMBER  ~ \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A S'BO'\u00a7?AN'PJA\"   F\"\n\nNOOR MOHAMME \n\nAGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. '  H\n\nS,'O.LA'E'E ABDULNABI sAiAA3,.   .\n\nRESIDING AT No.27\/15, OPPOSI_'FEf : ,  _.\nl'v'IA1'<"IS'\\r'v'Al"vi'I'MUTT,'-ALBERT'Vi~C"f'ORROf3!.)'_, A \nKALASIPALYAM,:E%A!sJCvALORE7O2..'      APPELLANT\n(By Sri: MUsm'A'Q..AHr;\u00a51\u00a73'D;IA.:\u00a7v;)'__   '\n\nAND :\n\n1' A BASHEER KHAN  '  ..\n\nAGED=.ABOU'T"---58"YEARS.\n\nS\/OABDUL KAREEMSAHAB,\n\nRETIRED SUuB'-'INSPECTOR OF' POLICE\n\n "QRESENTLY R','A_..Cj.'vO.MUNNA SHOCK ABSORBERS\n- A REPAIRER SHOP No.27\/3, OPP. MARlSWAMY MUT\n\u00bb f -. _VALBER'i'.vvI~::ToR ROAD, KALASIPALYAM,\n" V , B.A__mc3ALOR_Eg.560 002\n\n2 ' , THE_COF\u20acPORATION CITY OF' BANGALORE;\n'"'--CORPORATION OFFICES,\nJ .C. ROAD ,\n[ BANGALORE-O2  RESPONDENTS\n\n\u00ab  T: '(?13'y YOGA NARASIMHA, ADV. FOR' C\/R1 85\n\n Sri: T}_1AYAPRAK_A.-SH, ADV. FOR R2}\n\n-1'!\n'2.\n\n\n\nTHIS APPEAL IS FILED U\/S.96 OF CFC AGAINST \nJUDGI'v'{EN'I' AND DEGREE DT\/$6.99 PASSED  \nO.S.NO.10757\/86 BY THE XIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL  *\n\n3\n\nBANGALORE, DIS 188! G THE SUIT FOR ENJUNL "1"!  "  -5\n\nThis Appeal coming on for hea1*ing;""this; d\u00e9ay. '\u00a2\u00a2ur%.i'.\n\ndelivered the foilowing : \nJuDoMEN*r1f\n\nThis appeai is \ufb01ied    pi--'--.ea\u00b0 in\nO.S.No.10757\/86. _"1'--h.\u00a2 p1aihtiff::igvs1sA.I\u00a7e_fb1;e  'Court below\nseeking for a  dec;ee._\u00ab*of \ufb01eii\ufb01shent injlmction\nmstrajningV_the '1\ufb01\u00a7'V"de:"e_:1dax1t_:e;}ofoaching or damaging\nthe 1" se11edu1eVVVj:irop\u00bbe1*ty"'of'vvintetfer\ufb01ng with the peaceful\n\npossession  seenjoyIfi.e nt\u00bb4't.I1e same and for grant of\n\nVmandatory i11ju11c'1:ir)_V_1Vi c1i1ve's:ting the 1" defendant to remove\n\n?.t...e co11s.,.".1!:'iio1ia_fput up by hi... on tJ.-e fmt \ufb02oor -f the 1"\n\n\n\nt '1\n\n.-\n\n;.....1 ..\n.u.\n\nNo.27\/15, Opp. Mariswamy Mutt. Albert 'victor R{jT(V$._.'\ufb02J]. :1\nportion of the property bearing No.27\/3 of Ranoji\nKalasipaylyam, Bangalore. The details   \nsale transaction under which  it\npurchased is also avened intlie  'I'heV..'17'--*?*.V L\u00bb\n\n"J the owner of the adjacent  bearing  portion\n,0!" 31.1 .5; Pnnopen.   _    \n'i 1.4.'? iI1@E}No.27]3,h%vhich t11e\u00a7east._Vof"'t.1'ie property belonging\n\nu\\au.....s.-I-\n\nXpy ""' 'E d -="~_*'-'4'4=f;_ t'w1'ii_.1. ip'-V.\ufb01";g.'npconstruction on his site\n\n4...\n\nhad viela'-d.;'ti:.e sanctio'*a,e6;----r-1a.x= for such. construction and\n\nas :;suoh"w.7rii._1e \n\n' ~--.--- 51-'   \n1 an.-\n\nabutted into -- V.-'neiongmg to me plan ...... .\n\nL\n\nfarther oontended ithatithe placing of windows  me 111\n\n  effect the privacy of the plaintiff and\n\nV  Vi  "-"his family who are Paxdenashin and Pious\n\nI 'dc' 'WW :5\/='r\u00b05 A  V a . \u00bb\n- Mm ' m we n1a_i_ti_\ufb01'.V The @e\u00a7'rance_'niVad.-e.Vo'at~the plaint is that\n\ni ' ,_1VIuslitn'1adies.\n\n"    =   '2. "' e defendants on being noti\ufb01ed *' me 5.1 h..v.\n\n1. I4'\n\n0\nya .\n1-!-\nI\n\nV "appeared and \ufb01led their separate written statements. The 1\n\nI!\nH'\n\n"I'\\\n\ndefendant has denied the case put fortil 'by the p1ainti1'?f. 1\n\n3:!'\n3\n\n \n\n\n\nthat  was df:Vi'Ef!0I1'iiT)i11 e s\n\n1" defendant contends that the construction is being putjnp\n\nby him in accordance with the sanctioned plan  "\n\nregard, he has also contended with   '  H\n\nmeasurement of the property which is stated in theiiiwtritterie' \n\nF5 \n\nstatement Further, t..- 1*" d.e.end.a_..t_C:2n.en..s--.t1'1__.t'~ -\nauegation of "ie p'i.m"it:iff th-t Wi';1i"v--'COI1$h"iJC"\ufb01\ufb02g the 'irst\n\n\ufb02oor he had demolished a poxrtiont'of'  whicheisto the\neast of the suit schedule pI"e1ni_s'es  feet X 15 feet\nis not true. The _2r:-d:"s;i'uthot'ities have\nalso \ufb01led    defendant has\ncontended that had,..b'een sanctioned a plan\nfor puttingup  the inspection of the\nA V  N J '01 it was 13. t; ed.\n\n";0\ufb01"ic'ia1_Vs _V of  2'15 de"e11dant have issued notice with\n\n portion of the building in order to\n\nV .demo1ish  It is further stated by them that the\n\n is at the \ufb01nishing stage. They also contend that\n\n'_'_'c'thongh"'appIop1'iate action for deviation has been taken as\n\nI'\n\nJL\n\n":4\n\n--.=.."\u00ab.\n\n\n\nper the provisions of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation\n\nAct (for short the 'Act'), the further proeeedingst...isJ"V"' \n\ncompleted in due course.\n\n3. The Court below    \n\ncontentions framed \ufb01ve issues'iVfo1j its j'eonside1':41;tio.ii,._, wfhiehi\n\nreads as hereunder;\n\n"i} Whether the ;45Iai;1tifie..;2\u00a7i'o:vee\u00a3&' "he is the\n\nAAA--_ _ __ _ _._._.._' _;~ - " ..u\nf. .\n\n'Wt'1E1' ' 1d i\ufb01 in pO3\ufb01.t:a:n:TIt1'U\n\nE:\n\nii] V" "lithe  'hiprroves that the\ndefen_tianVt.VNo:'.1,.has _e'nci"cach_ed  the suit property\nand put up;'ooneVtrnctibn_' to the extent of 1 1"t.X15 ftf?\n\niii} 'whether "the i ""--n1aintiff proves that the\n_defendant _No;1 is intending to put windows towards\n_" '5'auit_LApropertjk "affecting privacy?\n\n. it iv! the defendant proves that he has put\n"up co-natfuction as per sanctioned plan in his\n\n~-- property?\n\nit  Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of\n\n"mandatory injunction and permanent injunction 'P\n\nJ!\n\n\n\n4. In order to discharge the burden cast onjthe\n\nparties by the said issues, the parties have let " \n\nThe plainti\ufb01 examined himself as P.W.1  \n\nwitness Sri Ijahid Pasha as P.W.2  inaxked \n\nP16. The de end!"-t evmmm-d 111""-self as 'D. N. 1  mar1'a*e<i.\n\n\\.rI.I.l. l\\bL|.I.I.J..LJ.\\.- J. .l.J-hhl\n\n5. The Court    the rival\ncontentions       t11e evidence\ntendered in     issue No.1 in the\na1\ufb01rmative.~--'vIss'ue   been held in the negative.\nConsequently';    "the plajnti\ufb02" is dismissed.\n\n nd .4 F A + +\n..owever, 11u$I"t.'y'.11aS,1'..'\u20acf.11v'I'.F.S\u20acI'JEd to the '2 ueienuant us\n\n(I 1\n\n_. _ take Ef?gp113pi'iatE actioll against the 1" de enaant  regard\n\n";_to _Vunv-tautholised constxuctionl deviation made by the 1"\n\ndefendant up construction of the ground \ufb02oor,\n\nit .f'1rst2n'1 \ufb02oor in the property in question. The\n\nn    to be aggrieved by the said judgment dated\n\n 1'9\u00a79 is before this Court in this appeal.\n\n--\n<\/pre>\n
2′:-I<\/p>\n
6. I have heard Sri Musthaq Ahmed. learned counsel<\/p>\n
for the appellant and the leamed counsel appeaIing.”Ib;t__’_ita*:e” <\/p>\n
respondents.\n<\/p>\n
7. Having heard the reepeetrive .<u,;Le
\nperused the judgment passed   i_3:eiow.'– as
\nthe oral and documentary evidenee'  "before the
\nCourt below and re-appreeietedt *vthe::Vsa'1ne\u00a7A_'.ew.ineofar as issue
\nNo.1, which had   ioelow, the same
\nis with   s:1e;it.Ve.c11edule_t 1" property
\nto which"t11e..  \ufb01to"be"%owne1'. Insofar as the
\npmpextpwvto   own_.rs_ah_ip, 'r_h,ere is n-<\/p>\n
1 1  "\n<\/p>\n
A 4-\n<\/p>\n
38110113 ui\ufb01\ufb01ll\ufb01. .\n<\/p>\n
  Iegaid”–Vto_____tfne same has been accepted by the<\/p>\n
Vbe,1:_ow%  the sale deed in zespect of the ownership<\/p>\n
haveheexn  by the Court below and the said issue<\/p>\n
V –has \u00bbh’een”—-‘heid.;in the a\ufb01irmative rcgmdixlg the ownership of<\/p>\n
2 t   propefty.\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
‘M3<\/p>\n
8. With negald to Issue Nos. 2 to 4, they are <\/p>\n
issues, which arise for consideration. In this IegaId\u00ab,~-so  toi” <\/p>\n
notice the allegation of violation of sanctionedhplant   <\/p>\n
been
\nalso a”po*’*1t”d during the pen of  ‘vesuit  the
\nCommissioner has tendered _ffAholi1igih”‘objections
\nhave been \ufb01led to the report  Qommissioner,
\nin fact the said  to the fact
\nof   Having said so,<\/p>\n
what requires ‘to,he’:’1noticed’–insofar..as issue No.4 is that the<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
burden had’– :1″ defendant to prom. as t<\/p>\n
 iiegative defendant No. 1. The \ufb01nding on the said<\/p>\n
issue.-has”  \ufb01nality insofar as the 1.” defendant not<\/p>\n
_having questioned the same. Further, the 2″‘ defendant in<\/p>\n
 wu ‘tte11: statement itself has contended that there has<\/p>\n
 a.beeVn’–deviation from the sanctioned plan while putting up<\/p>\n
,1 ‘gH””””””‘<\/p>\n
construction and appiopriate action is also being initiated<\/p>\n
the Corporation in that regard. Themfom, once  ” <\/p>\n
relating to the violation of the sanctioned plan   T’  i<\/p>\n
the lat defendant and the same 1:35   <\/p>\n
ne”a…ve, tli action m be taken against the 1″ _;*.iei\u00b0en…a.nt ,<\/p>\n
naturaiiy wouid have to he done    is
\nthe authority which is re’quiIed,Al’to action as per the
\nprovisions of the Act. Lot’-the judgment
\nof the Court below  on the said
\nissue would theiicourt below has “left
\nliberty to with regard to the<\/p>\n
unaauthoizisediconistiitctioniadeviation by the lat defendant.<\/p>\n
 “‘i”ne Ho-n.”o_ie Supreme Conn. in the case of<\/p>\n
 JAN snap swan -93-\n<\/p>\n
 reported in 2006(8) sec 590,<\/p>\n
–wh\ufb02eii.oonaide1ing the issue relating to the deviation of the<\/p>\n
it  ~44″‘aancftioned”  and the consideration of the same by a Civil<\/p>\n
 had come to the conclusion that the authorities would<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
JUN<\/p>\n
7.<\/p>\n
–up Wi\ufb02dovife On \ufb0113,,____1f?\ufb0100r facing the building of 1:’:<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
have to take action in this regard. Hence, if these aspects<\/p>\n
are kept in view, the Court below was justi\ufb01ed  <\/p>\n
reserving liberty to the 2nd defendant to takd. <\/p>\n
t- the eo11st11_1_._.i_i:_i, vv1;’:c.h*<.is ~:p11t 'tinin' <\/p>\n
dev"'"ti"n to the sanctien-ed pian, and nc-__o'd1erjud'\u00e9'nem* :3-.nd' '<\/p>\n
10. Having co11sideIed;_ matter and
\nhaving noticed    heid come to the
\nconclusion that   the liberty to take<\/p>\n
action had”heenA”ieft. tt1e–2I*<1 'defendant, the question would<\/p>\n
"'.p1ainti\ufb02'. ,As 'noticed, in the plaint as well as the evidence<\/p>\n
tendered  the grievance is that, the 1'"<\/p>\n
— defendant\ufb01vhiie constructing the 1″ \ufb02oor has demolished a<\/p>\n
\ufb02por-tion oifsthe Wall which is to the east of the 1″ schedule<\/p>\n
 and there is encroachment of 1 feet X 15 feet<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
IL<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
I1<\/p>\n
belonging to the plaintiff. If the issue relating to the action<\/p>\n
to be taken by the 2″” defendant–Corporation is V”<\/p>\n
such action to be taken by the 2nd defellti\ufb01tiif\u00e9\ufb01. t?);fseek <\/p>\n
d_em_h_Lo1; of the deviated porticitiiiii infotlld. revdi’e-E-s,dthe <\/p>\n
u u – u ‘ ‘. J ‘.\n<\/p>\n
19111131? 1nc:(1 of mg 15 1’|l’\\ 1n_1l-1 \u20acn_b1..\ufb02_1*’I fa<\/p>\n
the wail of the plaintiff aiso”‘-vesiiice arhiie  the
\nconstruction by the 1″? wiefenda\ufb01th in iiiie  the
\nsanctioned plan, the ‘at all into the
\nplainti\ufb01’s propeirtyi  Hence,
\nkeeping these’aspects_V_i3\ufb021   below was justi\ufb01ed
\nin not exe1*cisi.t1:,t.’itsii\ufb02iv\ufb02jijutisdicticii to consider the matter
\nreg   of sanctioned plan. As<\/p>\n
u\\.\u00abJ.1., Ml ii    (‘curt behm was just-“ed m<\/p>\n
_._- _ 1-1. _.4__ A. 1.1-\n<\/p>\n
.v _ dismissing the  aiid teseiving ulue – to e 2 – defe*”da11t<\/p>\n
 tojtalge atapmjoriate action in accordance with the provisions<\/p>\n
  ‘A s ‘_  Having said so, one other aspect which requires to<\/p>\n
  ibe\ufb01oticed and clarified at this stage itself is that the plaintiff<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\nit<\/p>\n
A’
\nI<\/p>\n
G:\n<\/p>\n
before approaching the Court below by \ufb01ling suit had made<\/p>\n
complaints to the 2nd defendant-Corporation <\/p>\n
1111-authorised construction being put up bf  v'”’12’%*t’  —<\/p>\n
defendant. Hence, keeping in view then   <\/p>\n
.1 -~—- –~.r -7′ – ~..~ —– ~-7~ — \u00bb
\nme p1aH1f:if’fii7OU1(‘1 be e’1″”ed to trs.ke part m ttr fJi”‘”C’:\ufb01di1’1\u00a7’S<\/p>\n
wherein the End defendant.e.action  the
\nlat defendant for securing ot’dthe:.sanc\ufb01oned
\nso that the  before the
\nauthorities of  u11-autlmrised
\nconstruction   of the plainti\ufb02 if the<\/p>\n
same is din \u00bbntv41i’epA_.\u00a7-sanctioned plan. Hence, while<\/p>\n
a..1rm…ing t..;e._iud.g.r.r1-,.n-.of .t.’.:-3. C-1.I._rt belmv, 1eservi_n_9 libertv
\n‘ . – .. .~ :3 u
\n‘” th”\u00a7,2I’-‘–‘ defendant to take a”propr1ate steps, at 19. tarther<\/p>\n
 ditected _Vt.hat.:t.he 23\u00a2’ defendant shall issue notice to the<\/p>\n
 pxovide opportunity in the proceedings that<\/p>\n
V . would’be”–.taken against the 1″ defendant.<\/p>\n
\\
\nh<\/p>\n
I
\nIt<\/p>\n
With the above observations. the judgment da?4\u00e9d.T<\/p>\n
4.6.1999 passed by the Court below is affirmed.  ” V.<\/p>\n
is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.<\/p>\n
hrpl bms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORiE*.[ DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY 01+” NOVEMBER ~ BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A S’BO’\u00a7?AN’PJA” F” NOOR MOHAMME AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. ‘ H S,’O.LA’E’E ABDULNABI sAiAA3,. . RESIDING AT No.27\/15, OPPOSI_’FEf […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNoor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-18T15:16:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-18T15:16:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":960,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-18T15:16:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-18T15:16:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-18T15:16:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008"},"wordCount":960,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008","name":"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-18T15:16:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/noor-mohammed-vs-a-basheer-khan-on-3-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Noor Mohammed vs A Basheer Khan on 3 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140753","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140753"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140753\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}