{"id":140881,"date":"2009-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2"},"modified":"2018-03-23T23:04:24","modified_gmt":"2018-03-23T17:34:24","slug":"a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 1096 of 2001()\n\n\n\n1. A.C.JOSE\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SMT.DHANYA P.ASOKAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :03\/06\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                          THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n               = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                            CRL. R.P. NO.1096 of 2001\n                = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                Dated this the    3rd     day of June,      2009\n\n                                   O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>\n      Respondent No.2 remains absent though served. I heard learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for     petitioner and Public Prosecutor who appeared for<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1<\/p>\n<p>      2.    This revision is in challenge of the acquittal of respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.2 for offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal<\/p>\n<p>Code (for short, &#8220;the Code&#8221;), under Section 248(1) of the Code<\/p>\n<p>Criminal Procedure. Case is that respondent No.1 pledged M.O.1, a<\/p>\n<p>fake gold double chain making P.W.1 believe that it is pure gold and<\/p>\n<p>received Rs.7,000\/- on 21.10.1995. Later it was revealed that it was<\/p>\n<p>not gold but      is a silver chain plated with gold.             Police after<\/p>\n<p>investigation charge-sheeted         respondent      No.2    for the   offence<\/p>\n<p>punishable    under Sec.420 of the Code.               Prosecution examined<\/p>\n<p>P.Ws.1 to 9 and proved Exts.P1 to P8 and M.O.1. Learned magistrate<\/p>\n<p>observed that what is produced in court is not the chain which is<\/p>\n<p>stated to have been pledged with P.W.1 and accordingly acquitted<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.2. It is contended by learned counsel that the acquittal<\/p>\n<p>is not legal or proper. According to learned counsel M.O.1 is the chain<\/p>\n<p>which respondent No.2 had pledged with P.W.1.<\/p>\n<p>CRL. R.P. No.1096 of 2001<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      3.    Learned magistrate observed in paragraph 9 of the<\/p>\n<p>judgment that though as per Exts.P2 and P6 weight of the chain<\/p>\n<p>allegedly pledged with P.W.1 is 34 gms. M.O.1 weighed only 24 gms.<\/p>\n<p>That discrepancy was not explained by the prosecution.         A further<\/p>\n<p>observation is that records produced by the prosecution would show<\/p>\n<p>that the length of the chain is 33 cms. but M.O.1 is actually having a<\/p>\n<p>length of 66 cms. Learned magistrate      observed that it is not shown<\/p>\n<p>that M.O.1 is the ornament which was pledged by respondent No.2<\/p>\n<p>with P.W.1.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.    In Ext.P6, mahazar for seizure it is stated that the chain in<\/p>\n<p>question is a double chain having a length of 33 cms. and weight of 34<\/p>\n<p>gsm. Exhibit P2, receipt and Ext.P5, mahazar for register also state<\/p>\n<p>the weight of chain as 34 gms. It is not clear how learned magistrate<\/p>\n<p>observed that weight of the chain as only 24 gms.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    Learned magistrate then observed that the locket attached<\/p>\n<p>to the chain is not produced. P.W.1, Managing Partner of the firm has<\/p>\n<p>given evidence that respondent No.2 produced M.O.1 with a locket<\/p>\n<p>attached to it for pledging. Locket was of gold. But it is seen that the<\/p>\n<p>police had not seized the locket and produced the same in court. That<\/p>\n<p>however, did not affect the case of the prosecution.<\/p>\n<p>CRL. R.P. No.1096 of 2001<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      6.     Then coming to the length of the chain allegedly pledged<\/p>\n<p>and seized by the police, Exts.P5 and P6 state the length of the chain<\/p>\n<p>as 33 cms. Learned magistrate observed that length of M.O. 1, chain<\/p>\n<p>is 66 cms. Counsel for petitioner explains that the chain pledged by<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.2 having a length of 33 cms. and produced in court is a<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;double chain&#8221; and that is why the length appeared to the learned<\/p>\n<p>magistrate as 66 cms. That explanation prima facie appears to be<\/p>\n<p>correct.   Learned magistrate has acquitted respondent No.2 for the<\/p>\n<p>reason that it is not shown that M.O.1 is the chain he had pledged with<\/p>\n<p>P.W.1. The order of acquittal therefore is not legal or proper and is<\/p>\n<p>liable to be set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Revision therefore succeeds. The acquittal of respondent No.2<\/p>\n<p>is set aside and case is remitted to the Court of Judicial First Class<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate-II, Thrissur for fresh disposal after considering the evidence<\/p>\n<p>on record untrammelled by any of the observations contained in this<\/p>\n<p>order. Parties shall appear in the trial court on 30.6.2009.<\/p>\n<p>                                              THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>vsv<\/p>\n<p> THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>===================<br \/>\n CRL. R.P. NO.1096 OF 2001<br \/>\n===================<\/p>\n<p>        O R D E R<\/p>\n<p>      3RD JUNE, 2009<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1096 of 2001() 1. A.C.JOSE &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SMT.DHANYA P.ASOKAN For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH Dated :03\/06\/2009 O R D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-23T17:34:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-23T17:34:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":641,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2\",\"name\":\"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-23T17:34:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-23T17:34:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-23T17:34:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2"},"wordCount":641,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2","name":"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-23T17:34:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-c-jose-vs-state-of-kerala-on-3-june-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A.C.Jose vs State Of Kerala on 3 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140881"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140881\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}