{"id":141123,"date":"2007-07-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007"},"modified":"2017-05-31T03:43:38","modified_gmt":"2017-05-30T22:13:38","slug":"rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007","title":{"rendered":"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Chattisgarh High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR         \n\n     MAC No. 818 of 2007\n\n     Rajesh Kumar Kaushik \n\n                          ...Petitioners\n\n                             VERSUS\n\n     1.    Tej   Narayan  Singh\n\n     2.    Manager  M\/s. Niroj  Ispat Pvt  Ltd\n\n     3.    The   New  India  Insurance Company\n\n                          ...Respondents\n\n!    Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari, counsel for the appellant\n\n^    None appears for the respondents\n\n     HONBLE SHRI JAGDISH BHALLA Ag C J and  HONBLE SHRI DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH J                \n\n     Dated: 20\/07\/2007\n\n:    Order\n\n      Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor\n      Vehicle Act, 1988 for enhancement of the compensation\n                        amount\n\n\n                      ORAL ORDER\n              (Passed on 20th July, 2007)\n\n      The  following oral order of the Court was passed\n\nby\n\nHon'ble Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. \n<\/pre>\n<p>     Heard.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    The  only point urged by learned counsel for  the<\/p>\n<p>appellant,  a motor-cycle mechanic, in this appeal  for<\/p>\n<p>enhancement of compensation is that in a case where the <\/p>\n<p>claimant  is  alleged  to have suffered  30%  permanent<\/p>\n<p>disability due to fracture near the calf muscle in  the<\/p>\n<p>right leg, the compensation of Rs.1,00,000\/- awarded by<\/p>\n<p>the  learned Tribunal is too low since the Tribunal did<\/p>\n<p>not  take  into consideration the extent  of  permanent<\/p>\n<p>disability suffered by the claimant.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    It  is not in dispute that the claimant  did  not<\/p>\n<p>examine  the  doctor  issuing the permanent  disability<\/p>\n<p>certificate.   Learned counsel for the appellant  could<\/p>\n<p>not  substantiate whether the certificate filed  before<\/p>\n<p>the  M.A.C.T.  was of the Medical Board.  The  claimant<\/p>\n<p>had  admitted  before  the M.A.C.T.  that  he  did  not<\/p>\n<p>possess  a  driving  licence  and  had  sustained   the<\/p>\n<p>fracture  while  he  was riding a  motor-cycle  due  to<\/p>\n<p>collision   with  an  oncoming  car.   No   documentary<\/p>\n<p>evidence was led by the claimant to show his income.<\/p>\n<p>4.    Time and again, this Court has reiterated that in<\/p>\n<p>order  to  prove permanent disability the  claimant  is<\/p>\n<p>under  an obligation to examine the doctor issuing  the<\/p>\n<p>certificate of permanent disability.  In Sudhir  Bhuiya<\/p>\n<p>Vs. National insurance Company Ltd., &amp; another 2005 ACJ  <\/p>\n<p>509, it was observed as under:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>           &#8220;If  the appellant really wants support<br \/>\n     from  the  opinion of any doctor or board  of<br \/>\n     doctors, the Insurance company and the  owner<br \/>\n     of the vehicle, against whom the said opinion<br \/>\n     will  be used, should be given an opportunity<br \/>\n     to   cross-examine  those  persons  for   the<br \/>\n     purpose  of ascertaining the truth  of  their<br \/>\n     opinion contained in the certificate;  it  is<br \/>\n     preposterous   to  suggest   that   by   mere<br \/>\n     producing a certificate showing that a person<br \/>\n     had   become  disabled,  he  can  force   the<br \/>\n     Insurance Company or the owner of the vehicle<br \/>\n     to pay compensation though the genuineness of<br \/>\n     the  document is not proved and they are  not<br \/>\n     in a position to cross-examine the person who<br \/>\n     has allegedly given such opinion.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>5.    We  are  in  complete agreement  with  the  above<\/p>\n<p>observation and would further like to add that  a  duty<\/p>\n<p>is  cast  on  the  M.A.C.T. to ensure that  process  is<\/p>\n<p>issued  to the doctor concerned issuing certificate  of<\/p>\n<p>permanent disability and his attendance secured in  the<\/p>\n<p>Court.   Under the Motor Vehicles Act, the M.A.C.T.  is<\/p>\n<p>under  an  obligation  to  award  just  and  reasonable<\/p>\n<p>compensation  and  can not shirk its responsibility  by<\/p>\n<p>taking shelter of the fact that the claimant had failed<\/p>\n<p>to  examine  the  doctor  issuing  the  certificate  of<\/p>\n<p>permanent  disability.   In  most  of  the   cases   in<\/p>\n<p>Chhattisgarh,  the  claimants are illiterate  and  poor<\/p>\n<p>villagers   and  sometimes  illiterate  widows,   minor<\/p>\n<p>children  etc. The Presiding Judge of the  M.A.C.T.  in<\/p>\n<p>such  cases  should take pains to see that  process  is<\/p>\n<p>issued  to the doctor concerned, his attendance secured<\/p>\n<p>in  the  Court and the insurer is given opportunity  to<\/p>\n<p>cross-examine the doctor.  The Presiding Judge  of  the<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.T.  being under an obligation to award  just  and<\/p>\n<p>reasonable  compensation should  not  remain  a  silent<\/p>\n<p>spectator during the proceedings.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    In  view of the facts and circumstances mentioned<\/p>\n<p>in paragraph 3 (supra), since in our considered opinion<\/p>\n<p>the   compensation   awarded   by   the   M.A.C.T.   is<\/p>\n<p>commensurate with the injury suffered and  the  learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel  for  the appellant has also not been  able  to<\/p>\n<p>submit  whether the appellant had filed any certificate<\/p>\n<p>of  the  Medical  Board in support  of  the  disability<\/p>\n<p>suffered  by  him, we find no reason to interfere  with<\/p>\n<p>the  impugned  award in this appeal.  Accordingly,  the<\/p>\n<p>appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission itself.<\/p>\n<p>7.    A copy of this order be sent to all the Presiding<\/p>\n<p>Judges  of  the  Motor  Accidents  Claims  Tribunal  in<\/p>\n<p>Chhattisgarh for their guidance and strict compliance.<\/p>\n<p>Ag Chief Justice<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chattisgarh High Court Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 818 of 2007 Rajesh Kumar Kaushik &#8230;Petitioners VERSUS 1. Tej Narayan Singh 2. Manager M\/s. Niroj Ispat Pvt Ltd 3. The New India Insurance Company &#8230;Respondents ! Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141123","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chattisgarh-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-30T22:13:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-30T22:13:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007\"},\"wordCount\":650,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Chattisgarh High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007\",\"name\":\"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-30T22:13:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-30T22:13:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007","datePublished":"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-30T22:13:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007"},"wordCount":650,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Chattisgarh High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007","name":"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-30T22:13:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-kumar-kaushik-vs-tej-narayan-singh-on-20-july-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajesh Kumar Kaushik vs Tej Narayan Singh on 20 July, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141123","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=141123"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141123\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=141123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=141123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=141123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}