{"id":141597,"date":"2009-12-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3"},"modified":"2018-09-17T03:22:59","modified_gmt":"2018-09-16T21:52:59","slug":"ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3","title":{"rendered":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n
3\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DI{ARWAI)\n\nDATED THIS THE 1 1\"' DAY OF DECEMBER. \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE  \n\nCRLIMINAL PETITION nfo. :\u00a76sj3\/20059:\"   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nI .\n\n\" E.  \u00a7\\jfAGi\u00ab:1\\zDRA NAIK &\n\n. \"ITARKAN NA_Dg'j\\\u00a7 58 1 320.\n\nM\/S. SHIVANI LAB'O.RATGRIE3L\u00a7,j'  ._\nNO. 57*; B, sH1RALz,1,%\"m_58_13,54  '\nUTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT\". \n\nsANJA'{E.c:, RE'\u20acmNKAR, _\nS\/.0. (_:-.IxNA1:7,\u00a2:T1'vR\u00a3;vA-M-\n\n3. RAJENDRA\nS \/O. MANOHAR ANVEKAR.\nKAMAT COMPOUND, ' \"\nMAVINKATTA.\n\nEENORE VILLAGE.\nBHATKAL TALUKA';'   I\nUTTARAKANNADA D ISTI{IC\"i'; ;\n\n4. RS. RAIKAR.._  '\nCHEMIS1',    I \nS.P. COE\\\/i_PO'I;JND,.v  \nNHM I;-7,  _  \nU'm'ARAI{ANAIAD';I; I)I'STI2I'C'*I*_ \n\n RESPONDENTS\n_ T V (COMMON)\n{I3Y'SARI'. P.H;vv.OOfI*I\ufb02ii'I.I\u00a7IjI. H.C.G.P. FOR R-1]\n\n(R-2 \u00abS: E~4'vI\\IO'IfICIa; 'OISI>EI\\ISEO;\n\n CR_L.P IS FILED U\/S. 482 CR.P.C BY THE\n\n '--..AO.VO.CATE~II%=OIz THE I>ETITIOI\\IER PRAYING TO QUASH THE\n\nPROI:E'EI3'I'AI:vOSC\".I'-IN C.C. NO. 443\/2006 ON THE FILE OF\nJUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS. III COURT. HUBLI, SO\nFAR -AS PETTIIIONER IS CONCERNEO AND TO PASS SUCH\n\n ',OT'IIEI<;O.I2IjEIz OR ORDERS AS THIS E~ION'BLE COURT\n FIT IN THE FACTS OF THE CASE.\n\n-  'v.._fIfi';\u00bbIIS PEITITON IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS\n THE COURT MADE TH E FOLLOWING:\n\nT\n\nE\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The 15* petitioner is a licensee to.~-m;in_ui’aet:2.:reV”ab7-<\/p>\n
drug\/medieine by name FRATOUCHZ1  <\/p>\n
sulphane. an ointment or gcream V’ppr’epare(j”‘bAfor exu\u00a7.err1a_1″‘e,<\/p>\n
application. which is a drug  Ignrstxant to
\nthe license the petittionvervies   The
\nmedicine\/drug, which  the petitioners
\nwas got examinethby   per AnneXure–A
\ndid. 02\/02\/\u20aci4\u00e9\u20ac\u00a7i;:5″‘.e_\u00bbi”t”31-.  Vt’t’:13e”‘other two batches the
\npetit.ior1\u00a2g~\u00e9”liettt\u00e9vgtieofiegpg-ojeineed aiu_HCert4ific:at.e to that effect given
\nby the   come true the respondent. the<\/p>\n
Drug Inspe(‘.to::._ who ‘\u00a7_121s=._go~i”Vthe power under Section 23 of The<\/p>\n
‘VL)1*ug’:L_?;:nc1._eCovsnaetiesv~Ae1′., 1940 has seized the said drug and<\/p>\n
.V’–.io:”veej1=ded..4tttto\u00bb  GOV\u20acI’I1I11\u20ac’.I11. AI1a1ysEi under Sec. 25(3) of the<\/p>\n
Aei’.. \u00b0Z’}\u00ab”1ez’eeIiV3t’tjfa’..e:’21 report has been received by the petitioners.<\/p>\n
[which”v.zaVe;,.ana1ysed and signed on behalf of the Government<\/p>\n
 and also Director of Central Drug Laboratory. The<\/p>\n
‘\u00ab\u00abT.’;)<~:t'I:t'.ione1*s have challenged the same on the ground that.<\/p>\n
"~,tn"1oer See. 25(3) Drug ix1spe?\u00a3o1' has to send one portion of the<\/p>\n
seized item to the Government Analyst. but there is no<\/p>\n
provision under Sec. 25(3) to forward the same to t.I"i~e_C"C.ei1tral<\/p>\n
Drug Laboratory. Though the lnspec:tor has <\/p>\n
Government Analyst. it has been anya\u00bblysed–"by"'-thel"Di'rect.or.V <\/p>\n
Central Drug Laboratory. which isV'eont'ra1._r:y   "mid<\/p>\n
(4) of the Drug and Cosmetics Act__,_ 1940-… it is the tjon_tjen_tion <\/p>\n
the petitioners that the right.,Cl""-ylhieh  gystilalrlle to the
\nrnanufacturer to prefer "c3.}I.:_1:)\u00a2i'\u00a3\u00a7'tl.l'.l'(;"'F_V'l,l'.1"t3.'SECOIICI opinion is
\nbeing deprived. _S_eCondly…,:.th.e't:lrt;g.'l.l'Wh'i'eit1'lwas sent to the<\/p>\n
Government. for.  refiort.  \u00e9tfterthe expiry date of the<\/p>\n
drug.  b\u00e9sV1tf%.yile;lw yre-qt"i'ivr_es  be interfered by this Court<\/p>\n
under Sec.  c)1"lCr.'Ei'..AC..  it C\n<\/p>\n
2. In s1_.1p’po1ft._oi’-._hi~:\u00a7 submissiorl the learned Counsel<\/p>\n
 ._places*re_l.ieti*i.g:e onllllaij-‘-sdgmezat reported in AIR 2008 SC 1939<\/p>\n
  ‘i.f1\u00bb(i’\u00e9Ct.tC0.mr:l;:li’i*–.Biotech Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Rubina Bose. Drug<\/p>\n
Inspelc-{or}.lxylhjereiii the t\u00bbion’i:>le Supreme Court has held that ~<\/p>\n
‘vVObf.’Ciii’lii?(]l\u00a31’t report” zmoler Section 25(4). which. deprives the right’<\/p>\n
fofal [56-..’.{‘SOI’t to pre_j’er” an appealfor second optmon.<\/p>\n
f<\/p>\n
3. Under Sec. 25(1) the Drug inspector has t.()w~.s_er1d’~V.one<\/p>\n
unit of the seized drug to the Magistrate and after<\/p>\n
report” from the Drug Analyst t.her1_ttnder Fro1~::}\u00a7\u00e9\u00a2L’:1 issued”.<\/p>\n
under Rule 3 of the 1945 Drug Rules, it  to’:;he<\/p>\n
Magistrate. in the instant caste-.,_ it has, not beerr_:s.eynt by theft?<\/p>\n
Magistrate to the Director. Centra1_bDrVug L’aborat’ory. Hence.
\nthe said action also vio!.ates the1-por0′.Ii’s.iont._ Hence, the case
\nwhich is pending in the CAQL1vi”i”‘\u00abbI’:’lVt)v\u00ab\/if is’.’r’ecV1t’iire’d to be interfered<\/p>\n
by setting aside’Vthejy.ientir”c pi’oc’eedi:1_\u00a7g”s’,” ‘ <\/p>\n
 ‘learned’7Cvo’.Iernnienl.. P\ufb02l\ufb02eader has filed statement of
\nobjectionsuthat unde’r:_iSeb(h’.~~\u00e9f\ufb01ii 1:} Drug Inspector has to send the<\/p>\n
sarnp1e_s_ for a”repVo17ii_.j~toA’*th\u00e9’: Government Analyst and in the<\/p>\n
x”\u00ab–it1st.a’,1__it’*  Gover’n”n’ient Analyst who was promoted as a<\/p>\n
o’f”Cer1tra1 Drug Laboratory has issued a report<\/p>\n
in t.he’dcapaci:tLy5oi’ Government: Analyst as a Director. Hence,<\/p>\n
“1_1″1\u20acl’\u20ac  no cont1’avent’io11 of the provisions. \u00a7*”urt.t1er it is<\/p>\n
v~st1bni”i’–t:ted that. CtOV\u20acI’11II1(:’l’1’t of India has issued Notification in<\/p>\n
!<\/p>\n
T<\/p>\n
(‘J<\/p>\n
the year 1985 as per Ar1r1eXure–F-7 notifyirlg one pers(\u00a7’i1V’\u00e9;.\u00a7 a<\/p>\n
Government. Analyst. The said person was appo’ii*1tedj.x’l\u00e9tt’er”on’g<\/p>\n
he came to be promoted as [Director of C_errtr\u00e91’Er..’;L(2ibora:to’fy;lV’<\/p>\n
Hence. there is no report made  h1\u00a7\u00e9CGovle~3_*hn1ent’l <\/p>\n
since he is promoted as a I)i1’ee_to-r._oi’Drt1g Labo.rator31… He 113:3. ‘<\/p>\n
relied upon a judgment 1’_eport.ed___bjr\u00bb.t:_lf1e._lIorrble.Suprerne Court<\/p>\n
in AIR 1979 so 727 betti\/eerr.LR%\u00a71rr1  Misra v. State of<\/p>\n
UP. wherein it 11.9.3   and Cosmetics
\nAct (23 of   by Inspector direct’
\nto Director    13ermtsstbtlity.\n<\/p>\n
5:’–.__’I’h_e–  -the sample has already been
\ntested or    Drug Laboratory clearly<\/p>\n
i11cliea;t.e’s rhat, 2\u00a3;3.e;rtVl”r(>rr1 the mode prescribed in Sec. 25(4) the<\/p>\n
V\u00a7e’~m_1;.V$le  sent for Analyst of the Central Drug Laboratory.<\/p>\n
Therfe  under the Act. or the Rules barring the<\/p>\n
I1″1spe.etorv’tI*orr1 Asendirag sample directly to the Director. Central<\/p>\n
ll  lI3rr.ags l;a;l3:t)1*2a1<31'3;. Section 25(l} and (4) clearly contemplates<\/p>\n
 e..\u00absr:1"1d_irrg of the sample directly t? the Central Drug Laboratory.<\/p>\n
–~.l<\/p>\n
which is elaborately discussed in para 7 and ll. of the<\/p>\n
judgment. Hence. it is submitted that. in the iristarl.t..Vc’a,se.._the<\/p>\n
Inspector has sent the sample to the Govern_rder1t\u00a7_’Ariai;{st_<\/p>\n
Under Section 25(1) and the Government <\/p>\n
issued report. who was also in Ch;c?\u00a3’I”g\u20ac:-.01? }Direcr,o’r- of VVC,’\u20ac1″}1;v.I7fll<\/p>\n
Drugs I,aborato1’y. Hence thereis no co.r1t’raver11.~\u00a3’o’r;;  <\/p>\n
6. l have heard t1ie,.arugmem.s’.v–.\n<\/p>\n
7. The case of pe1.iti.or:e1-‘sf’i”‘eq_oin\u00a7;;.”an interpretation,<\/p>\n
which may notyvhegpossi\ufb01hlegbilril:t11e\u00b0ci_’*irr1ih\u00e9el Ipetition. If it had<\/p>\n
been rri’ade__ under-\u00abvAi*t.ic’l<?i_V'2.2_6– tinder writ jurisdictiori. there
\nwould ha\\'feu been' 3, sc.o'pe' "l7o_1'"ihte1'p1'et.atior1. Hence under Sec.<\/p>\n
25(3) and {4l)""w1ie1,h\u00a7tr 'e_1er~-e' is contravention it is not for this<\/p>\n
 Cotirtito decide. V I3.utv_the, purpose of the report. under Sec. 25(1)<\/p>\n
  il_–Qt"exar{li:1de'~,_tl1e contents of the drug. It is contemplated<\/p>\n
llduriderVSec},.25("i.}:fthe Drug Inspector has forwarded the drug<\/p>\n
belongs to. t'l1:ei'.,-petitioner to the Drug Analyst. Accordingly Drug<\/p>\n
 -v.__VA.na1yst.”1r1i_rnse1f has examined in the capacity of the Director of<\/p>\n
 Drug Laboratory. Un\u00e9er these circumstances. the<\/p>\n
‘X.\n<\/p>\n
prayer made by petitioner that the respondent has committed<\/p>\n
an error in iorw211’di11g the drug sample all.er the expvil~ryi.date<\/p>\n
and also as to whether the report. issued either 2’Efi[‘3}’of1f is<\/p>\n
for him io make submission before the .1′.\/iagi’strate.\u00ab_  2<\/p>\n
judgment referred by ihe learned co\u00bbunselT Eo1’u’–1h’eApeiit.i’o.ne1:so is
\nnoi. applicable in this case for Vthe\u00e9 reasons”s’ta’red”aboVe. <\/p>\n
Accordingly, Petition is liablezto be rejected.-I<\/p>\n
Petitioner is 1’eserv–eo’ _lAib_eriIy all the materials<\/p>\n
before the C()I.”‘:’l}”\u00a7{‘\u00a7\u20acAlVTl- Co”L\u00a7i:;r*i–. ”<\/p>\n
     Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
        JUDGE<\/p>\n
hfllll\/’~*   ‘<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 Author: L.Narayana Swamy 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DI{ARWAI) DATED THIS THE 1 1″‘ DAY OF DECEMBER. BEFORE THE I-ION’BLE MR. JUSTICE CRLIMINAL PETITION nfo. :\u00a76sj3\/20059:” BETWEEN: I . ” E. \u00a7\\jfAGi\u00ab:1\\zDRA NAIK & . “ITARKAN NA_Dg’j\\\u00a7 58 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-16T21:52:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-16T21:52:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3\"},\"wordCount\":1226,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-16T21:52:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-16T21:52:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-16T21:52:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3"},"wordCount":1226,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3","name":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-16T21:52:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009-3#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=141597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141597\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=141597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=141597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=141597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}