{"id":141768,"date":"2010-10-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010"},"modified":"2014-05-03T03:42:06","modified_gmt":"2014-05-02T22:12:06","slug":"sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 23 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 23 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n<pre> k HASSAN.\n\n--.  \"OI;-I THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR\n THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE ABOVE CASE\nAND QUASH THE AWARD DTD 8.1.10 IN I.D.NO.L 67\/1997\n\n \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, .v  M\n\nDATED THIS THE 2.-3RD DAY C)IfA'MVOC'{'(_).'\u00a3\";.c\u00a3Ii\u00a7I.~ .,2I&lt;)[1o% I _z \nBEFOREIIIII I I I&#039; II\nTHE HON&#039;BLE MR.JUsTIc!\u00ab;_   I\nWRIT PETITION No.29(I&#039;7T&#039;I7..I&quot;OFf 2O1O_&quot;:[i;i-TI\u00a7R)III\n\n1. SR1 R DASAPPA SHE&#039;ITY , , \nS\/O LATE SIR  SHETTYA\nAGED AI3OUIf 60   \nR\/A sU(,.1G,IK.\u00a3;L.ROAD  _ V .\nFORT     E. &quot;\nCHICKNIAOALIIR. _  &quot; &#039; &quot;\n\nV I     PETETIONER.\n(By M\/S SUBBARAQ62: CO&#039;;-ADVS.)\nAND I I I I I\n1.  KARNA_&#039;I&#039;Ais:A \u00a7.=.&#039;I&#039;ATE ROAD TRANSPORT\n &#039;(2O:R__I=O%RATION._ ..... &lt;4 .\n_ &quot;REPRESEN&#039;I&quot;ED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR\n  1K.IEI_.4ROAD;.sHAN&#039;I&#039;INAGAR.\n BANGALQ~RE--27\n\n2. A -.fI*HE~ DNISIONAL CONTROLLER\nKSRTC; HASSAN DIVISION,\n\n RESPONDENTS.<\/pre>\n<p> &#8220;ITHIS PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &amp; 227<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>M2,-\n<\/p>\n<p>ON THE FILE OF&#8217; THE HON&#8217;BLE LAE\u00bb{}URfvpCOUR&#8217;f,O_&#8217;  &#8216;<br \/>\nCFHKMAGALUR (MARKED AT ANNfE3X!H)\u00abT() &#8216;l&#8217;.;I~l.E&#8221;<br \/>\nOF&#8217; DENiAL or 50% OF BACK  As T\u00a3i&#8217;E<br \/>\nSUFFERS FROM SERIOUS _ ERRORS w%r+::Cr\u00ab1&#8217;~ ARE <\/p>\n<p>APPAREINT FORM THE FACE O1\u00a7&#8221;T1giE RE-CORD,  <\/p>\n<p>THIS PETITION COMING FOR,\u00bb PRL.rlEARI_l\u00a7lG THIS<br \/>\nDAY, THE COURT MADE THE _FOLL{)Wl&#8217;i\\?G: &#8221; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The    depict that the<br \/>\nPetitioner   conductor in the<br \/>\nrespor1:dent&#8217;_A   Corporation and<br \/>\nissued   on 30.01.1989 alleging<\/p>\n<p>that,;&#8217;he_along lcthver Colleagues abused the then<\/p>\n<p> Thljirectorulllof the Corporation by using filthy<\/p>\n<p>tried to Inanhandle him wile threatening<\/p>\n<p>thelsaidl &#8216;o&#8221;f1&#8243;cer of dire Consequences in his chambers.<\/p>\n<p> led.&#8217; to a disciplinary proceedings and a report<\/p>\n<p>.l  holding the charges established followed by order dated<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;3l9.199&#8217;7 dismissing the petitioner from service. That<\/p>\n<p>order was challenged before the Labour Court,<\/p>\n<p>Chikmagalur by invoking Section 10~4[A} of the<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>ICl3IIV<\/p>\n<p>Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 whence it was <\/p>\n<p>as I.D.No.67\/199&#8217;? and the parties entered  H<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01led their respective claim and&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;c&#8217;ount&#8217;er .;stat.ernenrts7,<\/p>\n<p>whereafter the Labour Court passed_zan  &#8216;~<\/p>\n<p>31.12.1998 holding the  eaqu.:rytasVVl&#8221;&#8216;f\u00a7iif&#8221; and<br \/>\nproper following  an<br \/>\naward dated l3.v09.200:0_  The<br \/>\npetitioner, agg\ufb01erted the award, filed a<br \/>\nwrit petition:   Judge, by order<br \/>\ndated  award, directed<br \/>\nreinstatve&#8217;r:re&#8217;rit  The respondent &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Public&#8217; ~ _   Transport Corporation filed<\/p>\n<p> V.  when rejected by order dated<\/p>\n<p> carried the matter to the Apex Court in<\/p>\n<p> _ Civil. Appeal&#8217; No.24l4&#8211; 15\/ 2008 whence the proceeding<\/p>\n<p>rerrranded for fresh consideration by order dated<\/p>\n<p> On remand, a learned Single Judge, by order<\/p>\n<p>0  &#8216;dated 27.08.2009 quashed the order on validity of the<\/p>\n<p>0. domestic enquiry and the award recording a finding that<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>3. I am afrald, the contention of  .<\/p>\n<p>Counsel does not merit aeceptahjee<\/p>\n<p>observations of the Apex Cohort. in    <\/p>\n<p>EDUCATION 8: RESEZARCI-I,__4_l:  RAJ<br \/>\nKUMAR1 following&#8217;  l\u00e9iireoedents namely<br \/>\nHINDUSTAN &#8216;IfI;~\u00e9      EMPLOYEES<br \/>\n(1979 (2)\u00a7,l?Ai{ooB vs. K.S.\n<\/p>\n<p>Vltiia6.ii:iaSet?4V77), PGI or ME. &amp;<br \/>\n  V.    vs. SOMA<br \/>\n{C.A.No.i2Ei58\/1&#8217;9\ufb01\u00a33&#8217;tC\u00a7}&#8217;,OF&#8217; ME. &amp; RESEARCH,<\/p>\n<p>  VINOD KRISHAN SHARMA<\/p>\n<p>(cg; 1&#8217;2\u00e9ii1,\/:1ai92) A\ufb01o RATAN SINGH vs. UNION or<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;iND&#8217;1A&#8221; (ei\u00e9\u00a79,??( iscc 396} which reads thus:<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; he High Court did not find any error<br \/>\noryerroneous assumption of jurisdiction in<br \/>\n{the matter of declaration of payment of back<br \/>\n&#8216; Nlwages. While the normal rule is payment of<br \/>\nback wages in its entirety, the High Court<br \/>\nwhile recording the normal rule has failed to<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &lt;2&lt;.}&lt;.m 2 see 54 bd\\<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>notice any error apparent with the 1&#8217;\u20acaSC__I21i1Igi.: V&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>of the Tribunal in the matteryof  <\/p>\n<p>restricted back wages.\n<\/p>\n<p>perversity or being earroneodus or not <\/p>\n<p>accordance with law &#8216;shall hav.e&#8217;~t&#8217;o be<\/p>\n<p>recorded with reasons  assaii the<br \/>\nfinding of the  Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>It is not for theVAI~iigh*V.Cou.rt into the<br \/>\nfactual  oi&#8217;._t11&#8217;ernatter&#8217;:.&#8217;and..V:there is an<br \/>\nexistirig  Court to that<br \/>\n   h.o=.v.ever the finding of<br \/>\nfact is   -&#8216;misappreciation of<br \/>\nevidence, &#8216;be deemed to be an<\/p>\n<p>error of law vvhicvhdcan be corrected by a writ<\/p>\n<p>jbfi__certiorari;-. _____ The \ufb01nding of the Labour<\/p>\n<p>A  _VCo:urt&#8211;.cannot be chailenged in a proceeding<\/p>\n<p> i&#8217;_f1&#8243;a:&#8221;&#8221;writx.C&#8217;Voi&#8221;certiorari on the ground that the<\/p>\n<p>A\u00bb&#8230;4__Vreievan:&#8217;tAC and material evidence adduced<\/p>\n<p>before the Labour Court was insufficient or<\/p>\n<p>it &#8220;uinadequate though, however, perversity of<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;the order would warrant intervention of the<\/p>\n<p>High Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>Payment of back wages having a<\/p>\n<p>discretionary element involved in it has to be<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>dealt with, in the facts and circumstan&#8212;\ufb01es   <\/p>\n<p>each case and no straight~ja_(&#8216;.lge_t_ for:&#8217;nui&#8217;a:ca.ri&#8221;\u00bb  ,<\/p>\n<p>be evolved, though, hoiyever..g.fiv  <\/p>\n<p>statutory sanction to dir_ect payn&#8217;ient otiback<br \/>\nwages in its entirety. he decisiongin<br \/>\namtter of back wgages,..iri:&#8217;the&#8217;&#8211;._.instant.._case,<br \/>\nwas taken by V  _gI\u00a7ab2our having<br \/>\nregard to the facts  of the<br \/>\nmatter   of its<br \/>\ndiscre&#8217;tion\u00ab._ &#8221; a _manner which<br \/>\ncan.not&#8221;~b&#8217;uti1&#8211;:;be  nature. There\n<\/p>\n<p>e)s&lt;;ist_s. anf~o&#039;b_1:igation~,v_on the part of the High<br \/>\nCourt&quot; to  the judgment, the<br \/>\nreasoning befodrxed denouncing a judgment of<\/p>\n<p>}inferior&quot;&#8211;tribuna1, in the absence of which,<\/p>\n<p>it  judgment cannot stand the scrutiny of<\/p>\n<p> go  being reasonable.&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>  regard to the aforesaid observations and<\/p>\n<p>it  in mind the fact that the Labour Court<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  exercised its discretion in the matter of awarding 50%<\/p>\n<p>Hbuackwages not shown to suffer from mala\ufb01des or<\/p>\n<p>iiiegality, in my opinion, does not call for judicial review.<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-8-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Writ petition being without rngafit i$&#8221;&#8221;&#8217;ariC:_Qrding1y4L_&#8221; &#8216;* 2<\/p>\n<p>rejected.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 23 October, 2010 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy k HASSAN. &#8211;. &#8220;OI;-I THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE ABOVE CASE AND QUASH THE AWARD DTD 8.1.10 IN I.D.NO.L 67\/1997 IN THE HIGH COURT OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141768","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-02T22:12:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 23 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-02T22:12:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":800,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-02T22:12:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 23 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-02T22:12:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 23 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-02T22:12:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010"},"wordCount":800,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010","name":"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-02T22:12:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-dasappa-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-23-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri R Dasappa Shetty vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 23 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141768","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=141768"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141768\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=141768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=141768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=141768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}