{"id":141831,"date":"2011-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011"},"modified":"2018-07-18T14:32:34","modified_gmt":"2018-07-18T09:02:34","slug":"smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011<\/div>\n
                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                            Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                 Tel: +91-11-26161796\n                                                          Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002292\/15898\n                                                                  Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002292\nRelevant facts emerging from the Appeal:\n\nAppellant                            :     Smt. Chitta Kumari\n                                           C\/o Milan General Store,\n                                           Bird Line, Kalicut Post Office,\n                                           Prathrapur Village,\n                                           Port Blair,\n\nRespondent                    (1)    :     PIO<\/pre>\n
                                           Andaman & Nicobar Administration
\n                                           O\/o the Chief Secretary
\n                                           Port Blair,
\n                                           Andaman & Nicobar Island<\/p>\n
                              (2)    :     Public Information Officer
\n                                           Andaman & Nicobar Administration
\n                                           Directorate of Tribal Welfare
\n                                           Secretariat, Port Blair,
\n                                           Andaman & Nicobar Island<\/p>\n
                              (3)    :     Mr. Yogesh Pratap
\n                                           Public Information Officer & ADM
\n                                           Andaman & Nicobar Administration,
\n                                           O\/o The Dy. Commissioner,
\n                                           South Andaman District,
\n                                           Port Blair-744101.\n<\/p>\n
                              (4)    :     Mr. Hussain Ali\n                                           PIO & Assistant Director (Admin)\n                                           Andaman & Nicobar Administration,\n                                           Public Works Department\n                                           South Andaman District,\n                                           Port Blair-744101.\n\n                              (5)    :     Mr. B. Krishnan\n                                           Assistant Secretary (AR) & PIO\n                                           Andaman & Nicobar Administration,\n                                           Administrative Reforms Department\n                                           South Andaman District,\n                                           Port Blair-744101.\n\nRTI application filed on             :     14\/03\/2011\nPIO replied on                       :     11\/04\/2011\nFirst Appeal filed on                :     25\/04\/2011\nFirst Appellate Authority order of   :     06\/05\/2011\nSecond Appeal received on            :     26\/07\/2011\n                                                                                       Page 1 of 4<\/span>\n<\/pre>\n
 The information sought: The date wise action taken by A&N Administration on my application date 1st
\nDecember, 2010 submitted before the Hon’ble it. Governor and the chief Secretary of A & N
\nAdministration (Xerox copy enclosed for your ready reference).\n<\/p>\n
1. Indicate the writing reason for not reverting to one Executive Engineer ( C )and three Assistant
\n   Engineer ( C ) from the Executive Engineer (C) to Assistant Engineer ( C ) and from the Assistant
\n   Engineer ( C ) to junior Engineer ( C ) respectively as they are not belongs to schedules tribes of A &
\n   N Islands and their caste or tribes\/ tribal Community is not specified in constitution ( A & N Islands )
\n   Scheduled Tribes Order,1959 vide GSR No. 504 dt. 31.03.1959. Please refer my application referred
\n   in above Sl No. 1.\n<\/p>\n
2. Indicate the writing reason for not filling up the reserved posts of scheduled castes in promoti0on
\n   from feeder cadre to promotion quota of various posts like, Group ‘D’ Group ‘C’ Group ‘B’ and
\n   Group ‘A’ in the various deportment of A & N administration.\n<\/p>\n
The PIO reply:\n<\/p>\n
   1. PIO, Assistant Commissioner was given reply to the Appellant as under:\n<\/p>\n
   1. The matter regarding employment for the post of Surveyor pertains to District Office, South
\n   Andaman.\n<\/p>\n
   2. The matter regarding reversion of one Executive Engineer and three Assistant Engineers pertains to
\n   APWD.\n<\/p>\n
   3. No Scheduled Caste has been declared in A & N Islands and hence Scheduled Caste reservation is
\n   not followed in this UT.\n<\/p>\n
    2. PIO, Assistant Director was given reply to the Appellant as under:\n<\/p>\n
Sl.                           Information\/documents sought for                                     Reply\n1. The date wise action taken by A&N Administration on my application date 1                 Not pertained to\n     December, 2010 submitted                                                                this department\n<\/pre>\n
     Before the Hon’ble Lt. Governor and the Chief Secretary of A&N Administration
\n     (Xerox copy enclosed) for your ready reference.\n<\/p>\n
2. 3. Indicate the writing reason for not reverting to one Executive Engineer ( C )          Queries do not
\n          and three Assistant Engineer ( C ) from the Executive Engineer (C) to              come      under
\n          Assistant Engineer ( C ) and from the Assistant Engineer ( C ) to junior           section 2(f) of
\n          Engineer ( C ) respectively as they are not belongs to schedules tribes of A & N   the RTIAct.
\n          Islands and their caste or tribes\/ tribal Community is not specified in
\n          constitution ( A & N Islands ) Scheduled Tribes Order,1959 vide GSR No. 504
\n          dt. 31.03.1959. Please refer my application referred in above Sl No. 1.\n<\/p>\n
3. Indicate the writing reason for not filling up the reserved posts of scheduled castes     As stated in the
\n      in promoti0on from feeder cadre to promotion quota of various posts like, Group        point 2 above
\n      ‘D’ Group ‘C’ Group ‘B’ and Group ‘A’ in the various deportment of A & N
\n      administration.\n<\/p>\n
   3. PIO, Assistant Director was given reply to the Appellant as under:\n<\/p>\n
S.No.                  Information\/documents sought for                                    Reply\n1.     The date wise action taken by A&N Administration on my application         The information asked\n       date 1 December, 2010 submitted                                            for does not pertain to\n       Before the Hon'ble Lt. Governor and the Chief Secretary of A&N             the department.\n       Administration (Xerox        copy enclosed) for your ready reference.\n2.      4. Indicate the writing reason for not reverting to one Executive         The information asked\n           Engineer ( C )and three Assistant Engineer ( C ) from the              for is pertains to\n           Executive Engineer (C) to Assistant Engineer ( C ) and from the        APWD and not related\n           Assistant Engineer ( C ) to junior Engineer ( C ) respectively as      to the Department.\n<\/pre>\n
           they are not belongs to schedules tribes of A & N Islands and
\n                                                                                                Page 2 of 4<\/span>
\n               their caste or tribes\/ tribal Community is not specified in
\n              constitution ( A & N Islands ) Scheduled Tribes Order,1959 vide
\n              GSR No. 504 dt. 31.03.1959. Please refer my application referred
\n              in above Sl No. 1.\n<\/p>\n
3.        Indicate the writing reason for not filling up the reserved posts of   No Government servant has
\n          scheduled castes in promoti0on from feeder cadre to promotion quota    been appointed in the
\n                                                                                 department under schedule
\n          of various posts like, Group ‘D’ Group ‘C’ Group ‘B’ and Group ‘A’     caste quota. Hence question
\n          in the various deportment of A & N administration.                     of promotion of schedule
\n                                                                                 caste dose not arise.\n<\/p>\n
Grounds for the First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
The appellant was received an unsatisfactory reply from the PIO.\n<\/p>\n
Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\n<\/p>\n
In order to dispose of the appeal, the records of the case like RTI application, reply furnished by the
\nP10\/Assistant Secretary (AR), the appeal application of the appellant and the relevant portion of the RTI
\nAct have been gone through and it is observed that the information sought by the appellant in her
\napplication dated 14.03.2011 is not held by the PIO\/Assistant Secretary (AR) which is in fact scattered
\nwith more than one other public authorities. Therefore the PIO\/Assistant Secretary (AR) explained that he
\nhad already transferred the RTI application dated 14.03.2011 to other public authorities concerned under
\nintimation to the appellant to her given address vide letter No. 3-38\/201 0-AR(PF)\/59 dated 01.04.2011.
\nHe further mentioned that in response to Admn’s letter dated 01.04.2011, the other public authorities i.e.
\nthe Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare has furnished reply in respect of item 3 of annexure to RTI
\napplication date 14.032011 to the appellant to her given address. Similarly the Assistant Director (Admn)
\nof APWD also furnished reply to item 2 annexure to RTI application dated 14.03 .201 to the appellant.
\nHowever the reply to item 1, shall be furnished by Deputy Commissioner, South Andaman.\n<\/p>\n
        In view of the above I am of the considered opinion the appeal is left now without any substance
\nand the same is therefore dismissed. However, if the appellant still feels aggrieved on any point ,she may
\nseek a personnel hearing from The undersigned.\n<\/p>\n
Ground of the Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
The applicant is not satisfied with the PIO reply and unsatisfactory order was passed by the First
\nAppellate Authority.\n<\/p>\n
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n
The following were present
\nAppellant : Smt. Chitta Kumari on video conference from NIC-Port Blair Studio;
\nRespondent : Mr. Yogesh Pratap, Public Information Officer & ADM; Mr. Hussain Ali, PIO & Assistant
\nDirector (Admin); Mr. B. Krishnan, Assistant Secretary (AR) & PIO on video conference from NIC-Port
\nBlair Studio;\n<\/p>\n
        The information regarding query-1 has not been provided since the officials in the Administration
\nappears to be completely incompetent to understand where this information would be. The Commission
\ntherefore directs the PIO of the Chief Secretary’s Office to provide the information on the Action on the
\nAppellant Complaint of 01\/12\/2010 in the following format:\n<\/p>\n
       Date on which         Name and designation of Action taken Date on which forwarded to
\n       Complaint received The officer receiving it.                    Next officer\/office.<\/p>\n
          *there will be as many rows as the number of officers who handled the complaint.<\/p>\n
     Attested photocopies of all letters and notings will be provided.
\n                                                                                                Page 3 of 4<\/span>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
 The PIO states that there is no reason on record for query-2.\n<\/p>\n
As regards query-3 PIO\/AC Directorate of Tribal Welfare is directed to provide the information after
\nobtaining it if necessary under Section 5(4) and provide it to the Appellant before 20 December 2011<\/p>\n
Decision:\n<\/p>\n
The Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
      The PIO office of the Chief Secretary is directed to provide the information on
\nquery-1 as directed above to the Appellant before 20 December 2011.\n<\/p>\n
      The PIO of Directorate of Tribal Welfare Department is directed to provide the
\ninformation on query-3 to the Appellant before 20 December 2011.
\nThis decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                        Shailesh Gandhi
\n                                                                                              Information Commissioner
\n                                                                                                     24 November 2011
\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (HA)<\/p>\n
                                                                                                              Page 4 of 4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002292\/15898 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002292 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Smt. Chitta Kumari C\/o Milan General Store, Bird Line, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-18T09:02:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-18T09:02:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1199,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-18T09:02:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-18T09:02:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-18T09:02:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011"},"wordCount":1199,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011","name":"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-18T09:02:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chitta-kumari-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-24-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt.Chitta Kumari vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 24 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=141831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141831\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=141831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=141831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=141831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}