{"id":141906,"date":"2010-08-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010"},"modified":"2017-09-28T19:10:29","modified_gmt":"2017-09-28T13:40:29","slug":"mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0No.CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001098\n                                                                                        Dated:\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a030,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                 :    Mr\u00a0Rajeev\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Rastogi\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0Appellate\u00a0\u00a0Authority                         :    Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a023.1.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a05\u00a0points\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0two\u00a0specific\u00a0files,\u00a0including\u00a0seniority\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0Senior\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Section\u00a0Engineers\/works\u00a0at\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Division,\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0for\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0clearance\u00a0from\u00a0Dedicated\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Freight\u00a0Corridor\u00a0Corpn.\u00a0etc.\u00a0 \u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        9.3.10.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a017.3.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0had\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        answered\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a05.2.10.\u00a0he\u00a0enclosed\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0reply\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        point\u00a0wise\u00a0information\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\u00a0\u00a0Still\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a030.4.10.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0August\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        30,\u00a02010.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      Shri\u00a0Mohar\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.P.\u00a0Mahi,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.<\/p>\n<p>4.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.\u00a0     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0complained\u00a0about\u00a0not\u00a0having\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Seniority\u00a0list\u00a0which\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0had\u00a0inadvertently\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0enclosed\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        his\u00a0reply\u00a0dated\u00a05.2.10.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        31st\u00a0September,\u00a02010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.       With \u00a0 regard \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 names \u00a0 of \u00a0 all \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 designated \u00a0 officials \u00a0 not \u00a0 available \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 website, \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              Commission \u00a0 directs \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 to \u00a0 ensure \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 is \u00a0 updated \u00a0 on \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>              website\u00a0at\u00a0regular\u00a0intervals\u00a0in\u00a0\u00a0compliance\u00a0with\u00a0Section\u00a04(2)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     7.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.<\/p>\n<p>                      \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                      Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\n     Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     (G.Subramanian)<br \/>\n     Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>     Cc:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              Shri\u00a0Rajeev\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Rastogi<br \/>\n              H.No.\u00a01093\/2,\u00a0Scheme\u00a0No.7<br \/>\n              Shastri\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n              Meerut\u00a0(UP)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>1.            The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer,<br \/>\n              Northern\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n              DRM&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n              State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road<br \/>\n              New\u00a0Delhi.\u00a0      \u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>     3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n              Northern\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n              DRM&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n              State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road<br \/>\n     \u00a0        New\u00a0Delhi.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.       Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0No.CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001098 Dated:\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a030,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Mr\u00a0Rajeev\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Rastogi Name\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0Appellate\u00a0\u00a0Authority : Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi. Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a023.1.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0 seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a05\u00a0points\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0two\u00a0specific\u00a0files,\u00a0including\u00a0seniority\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0Senior\u00a0 Section\u00a0Engineers\/works\u00a0at\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Division,\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0for\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0clearance\u00a0from\u00a0Dedicated\u00a0 Freight\u00a0Corridor\u00a0Corpn.\u00a0etc.\u00a0 \u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a0 9.3.10.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a017.3.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0had\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0 answered\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a05.2.10.\u00a0he\u00a0enclosed\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0reply\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0 point\u00a0wise\u00a0information\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\u00a0\u00a0Still\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0 with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a030.4.10.\u00a0\u00a0 2. The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0August\u00a0 30,\u00a02010. 3. Shri\u00a0Mohar\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.P.\u00a0Mahi,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority. 4. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Decision 5.\u00a0 During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0complained\u00a0about\u00a0not\u00a0having\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0 Seniority\u00a0list\u00a0which\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0had\u00a0inadvertently\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0enclosed\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0 his\u00a0reply\u00a0dated\u00a05.2.10.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0by\u00a0 31st\u00a0September,\u00a02010.\u00a0\u00a0 6. With \u00a0 regard \u00a0 to \u00a0 the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-28T13:40:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-28T13:40:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":320,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-28T13:40:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-28T13:40:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-28T13:40:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010"},"wordCount":320,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010","name":"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-28T13:40:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-kumar-rastogi-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rastogi vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=141906"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141906\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=141906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=141906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=141906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}