{"id":14230,"date":"2009-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009"},"modified":"2014-08-11T23:41:20","modified_gmt":"2014-08-11T18:11:20","slug":"mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 24654 of 2008(I)\n\n\n1. MOHAMMED MUNEER, (RETIRED\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE COMMISSIONER, LAND REVENUE,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.D.BABU\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :16\/09\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.\n                     ================\n                 W.P.(C) NO. 24654 OF 2008 (I)\n                 =====================\n\n         Dated this the 16th day of September, 2009\n\n                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner joined as Lower Division Clerk in the Revenue<\/p>\n<p>Department on 6\/8\/1969.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.   On an application made in terms of the rules then<\/p>\n<p>prevailing, he was granted leave without allowances for taking<\/p>\n<p>employment abroad for 15 years from 26\/3\/1979.         On expiry of<\/p>\n<p>the leave, petitioner ought to have rejoined on 25\/3\/1994.<\/p>\n<p>According to him, he applied for extension of leave, but however,<\/p>\n<p>though it was rejected, the decision was not informed to him. Be<\/p>\n<p>that as it may, petitioner remained on unauthorised absence and<\/p>\n<p>disciplinary proceedings were initiated. Memo of charges were<\/p>\n<p>issued on 28\/12\/95 and written statement was filed by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner on 30th of December, 1995 itself.<\/p>\n<p>      3.   While so, by Ext.P1, District Collector allowed the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to rejoin duty subject to the concurrence of the Board of<\/p>\n<p>Revenue. Accordingly, the petitioner joined duty on 13\/3\/96 and<\/p>\n<p>retired from service as per Ext.P2 order w.e.f. 30\/6\/96. Board of<\/p>\n<p>Revenue did not concur with the step taken by the District<\/p>\n<p>WPC 24654\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                :2 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Collector, as a result thereof, disciplinary action continued. It is<\/p>\n<p>stated that by order dated 7\/12\/96, he was informed of the<\/p>\n<p>provisional decision taken by the authorities to terminate his<\/p>\n<p>services. That order was confirmed as per Ext.P3 dated<\/p>\n<p>5\/12\/2000.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.   Ext.P3 order was challenged in OP NO.16513\/01, which<\/p>\n<p>was disposed of directing to consider his representation against<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P3 and also his request for minimum pension. That was<\/p>\n<p>rejected by Ext.P4 order, which again was challenged in WP(C)<\/p>\n<p>NO.2624\/02. The writ petition was dismissed and thereupon the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner filed WA NO.273\/05. Writ appeal was disposed of as per<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5 judgment. A reading of Ext.P5 judgment shows that<\/p>\n<p>although validity of termination was one of the issues in dispute,<\/p>\n<p>petitioner confined his prayer for minimum pension for the<\/p>\n<p>services rendered by him during the period 6\/8\/69 to 26\/3\/1979.<\/p>\n<p>The Division Bench finally directed that though the services<\/p>\n<p>rendered by the petitioner was for less than 10 years, still his<\/p>\n<p>services could be reckoned as 10 years service for pensionary<\/p>\n<p>benefits in terms of Rule 57 of Part III KSR.        On this basis,<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was allowed to make a         representation to the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>WPC 24654\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  :3 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent and the 2nd respondent was directed to consider the<\/p>\n<p>same.\n<\/p>\n<p>       5.   Accordingly, representation was made and that was<\/p>\n<p>considered and rejected by the 2nd respondent as per Ext.P6. In<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6, it is stated that since the service of the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>terminated and therefore, he is not eligible for pension in terms of<\/p>\n<p>Rule 5(a) of Part III KSR. It is challenging Ext.P6, the writ petition<\/p>\n<p>is filed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       6.   Although argument was addressed against the validity<\/p>\n<p>of Ext.P3 order terminating the service of the petitioner, I am not<\/p>\n<p>inclined to consider the same for the reason that a reading of<\/p>\n<p>judgment in WA No.273\/05 shows that though validity of<\/p>\n<p>termination was one of the issues raised in that case, the<\/p>\n<p>contentions were given up and the petitioner confined his prayer<\/p>\n<p>only to grant of pension. Thus, the contentions against Ext.P3<\/p>\n<p>having been given up on an earlier occasion, the petitioner cannot<\/p>\n<p>now be allowed to re agitate the same in a subsequent<\/p>\n<p>proceedings.\n<\/p>\n<p>       7.   Then the only issue that arises for consideration is the<\/p>\n<p>validity of Ext.P6. Rule 5(a) Part III KSR provides that no pension<\/p>\n<p>WPC 24654\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                :4 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>may be granted to an employee dismissed or removed for<\/p>\n<p>misconduct. Therefore, if the case of the petitioner is accepted as<\/p>\n<p>one of dismissal for a misconduct, he is ineligible for pension in<\/p>\n<p>terms of the aforesaid rule. However, counsel contends that even<\/p>\n<p>in Ext.P3 order of punishment, he was shown to have been<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;terminated&#8217; from service and not &#8216;dismissed&#8217; from service. It is<\/p>\n<p>contended that termination is not a punishment even, and<\/p>\n<p>therefore, the said termination cannot deprive the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>atleast the minimum pension, which he is eligible for.<\/p>\n<p>      8.   True, as contended by the counsel for the petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>the word used in Ext.P3 is termination. However, fact remains that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner was proceeded against in a disciplinary proceedings<\/p>\n<p>for a misconduct that he committed. It was in such proceedings<\/p>\n<p>that punishment was imposed resulting in premature cessation<\/p>\n<p>of employment, which in my view, is nothing less than dismissal<\/p>\n<p>from service, although the word used is termination. That apart<\/p>\n<p>even if this contention affecting the validity of Ext.P3 was<\/p>\n<p>available to the petitioner that ought to have been urged by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner atleast when this Court considered WA NO.273\/05.<\/p>\n<p>      9.   Therefore, in effect and for all purposes, the<\/p>\n<p>WPC 24654\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   :5 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>termination effected by Ext.P3 is nothing less than dismissal and<\/p>\n<p>if that be so Rule 5(a) of Part III KSR applies to his case rendering<\/p>\n<p>him ineligible for pension. I am not in a position to take a view<\/p>\n<p>different from what is taken by the 2nd respondent in Ext.P6.<\/p>\n<p>      Writ petition fails and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE<br \/>\nRp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 24654 of 2008(I) 1. MOHAMMED MUNEER, (RETIRED &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent 2. THE COMMISSIONER, LAND REVENUE, For Petitioner :SRI.K.D.BABU For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-11T18:11:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-11T18:11:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":823,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-11T18:11:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-11T18:11:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-11T18:11:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009"},"wordCount":823,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009","name":"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-11T18:11:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-muneer-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-16-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mohammed Muneer vs The State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}