{"id":142930,"date":"2009-10-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-25T16:52:20","modified_gmt":"2018-04-25T11:22:20","slug":"anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, H.\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD I \n\nDATED THIS THE 29?\" DAY OF OCTOBER,_ ;20Q9u.'__'___e'  A' \n\nBEFORE\n\nHON' BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VE}I\\IUCfO}?P\u00a3LA'1  \"_ \n\nCRLP. No.7946 of':;:.QO9\n\n1. Anand, S \/ 0 I-Ianuma1\"iLa_ppa:LarI'1a:f1i,V \nAge: 26 years, OCC: AgriCuliure--, if g \"  I\nR\/0 Hosur, Yattinahalli, I  I I\n\nTq: Siggaon, Dist:.vHaveri;* .  I\n\n2. Lokappa, SH\/.Q B;I'1\u00e91ci1'appeL.Laman\u00a3, I \nAge: 52 yearfs, Qec5\"A3gricujt1,1i**e,__ \" _  '\nR\/0 Hosur, Y\u00bbatL\u00bbi.n:;.\u00e9Lha11i;   \u00ab. \n\nTq: Shiggaon,:Dist:\":i;Ia_veri.'=. \"\n\n3. Krishna  Kri-shI1\u00e91ppa.._H'ar'iyappa Lamani,\nAge: 26 years,*OC\u00e9: C'o\u00a7>1:e;\"~--\n\nR \/ 0 Hosur, Yatt'in.ah--.aIIi.,_ ' \"\n\nTq: Sihiggaon, Disjg: Haveri.\n\n I(B}(ISri,\ufb01@I3geId-\ufb01sh Patii, Adv.)  Petitioners\n\n  \n\nTheI\"State bf Karnataka,\n\n Ir__Through 'i;\".'ac1as Police Station,\n  High Court of Karnataka,\n\"\u00ab_V'C-ircuit Bench at Dharwad.\n\n  'ES' Sri. P.H.Gotkhinc1i, HCGP)  Respondent<\/pre>\n
\u00a5\\.)<\/p>\n
This Crl.P is filed 11\/8 439 Cr.P.C praying to direct the
\nTadas Police Station to enlarge the Petitioners (Accused No.1,<\/p>\n
2,3) kon baii in Crime No.37\/2009.\n<\/p>\n
This Crl.P. coming on for Orders this Clay’,””‘\u00a3lti\u00a2V’..(.:’i(‘il7iL2:I\u00a5’t4<\/p>\n
made the following:\n<\/p>\n
0 R D E R_  ..\n<\/p>\n
Sri. Jagadish Patil, learned caounsellabpearing”forlthe.i<\/p>\n
Petitioners has filed a Memo to dismiss the Petition’ in s’0i’farl’–<\/p>\n
as first Petitioner Anand, S\/o.Vg4ll.PI.anumantapi:5a ‘mma\ufb01i is i’<\/p>\n
concerned, stating that the said___l?’etit’ilo_ner hwillvvvorliz out his
\nremedy after the chargershee.t is Vifiie.dv..VviA”*Ix\/Iemo  “placed on
\nrecord. The Petition in  -farlas;\ufb01Vrst.:\\Petit.ioner Anand, S \/ o
\nHanumantappag_:LamaniL by reserving<\/p>\n
liberty to hir_nl_yto the  ‘Court or this Court as<\/p>\n
the case may  the_ilch_arge sheet is filed.<\/p>\n
2. It is’,__see_I1il’frol1Ii’Petition and the statement of<\/p>\n
objections filed,_ ‘thatlone Srnt. Devakka Lamani gave a<\/p>\n
 \u00ab.._Acor’n1:.\u00a7iai.nlt a.lleginlgi’t”nat her daughter viz., Smt.Sharada was<\/p>\n
 given in_”m’arr’ia_ge to Anand, S\/o Hatiumantappa Lamani,<\/p>\n
  After the marriage, her daughter joined<\/p>\n
her-…hus_bani;i..~ and lived in the matrimonial home. Out of the<\/p>\n
li.__wedloel\u00a7:l,}Smt.Sharada gave birth to a female child. It is her<\/p>\n
that, husband and others forced Sharada to bring<\/p>\n
   it was also alleged that Anand, husband of Sharada,<\/p>\n
 siiispected her \ufb01delity at the instance\ufb01 Lokappa, S\/o<\/p>\n
\/77<\/p>\n
14.)<\/p>\n
Bhadrappa Larnani and Krishna @ Krishnappa Hariyappa<\/p>\n
Lamani i.e., Petitioners 2 and 3, who are the senior\ufb01incle<\/p>\n
and son of junior uncle respectively, of Anand. <\/p>\n
that there was ill treatment of Sharada at her.'”matAri’1iri:oniiaE_g0 ~<\/p>\n
house. The complainant received a _p~hon’>_ ‘call.  <\/p>\n
09.08.2009 wherein she was  <\/p>\n
committed suicide by strangulatiion.:’.._i<\/p>\n
message, she went to Yattiniahalli and ‘found; “of; her -. 0’<\/p>\n
daughter in hanging position}a._iSh_e loldge:cl”:a complaint
\nalleging that, Sharada’~1:night”‘lhave:’ corr1rnitted” suicide on
\naccount of the  dowry by her
\nhusband and the othgrvintwoipersons”i\u00a7.ge,”i Lokappa and
\nKrishna @ Krishiiaijpa   or she might have
\nbeen killed  wanted the matter to<\/p>\n
be investigatedi”an;;;l_ her_ice_;i”a” .cogrn]:,i’laint was lodged at 1.00<\/p>\n
pm oniv:i0.Qsi.\ufb01CC9.,__i<\/p>\n
3. Afte”rregiste’r_ing’th,e”‘_ease in Crime No. 37\/2009 on the<\/p>\n
file o;f”i’adas .Po]i_ce’$tation, for offence punishable under Sec.<\/p>\n
  EPC, the investigation has been<\/p>\n
‘c.on1.me–nc’ed’\u00aban’d_the statements of certain persons have been<\/p>\n
0’recordedi”_~Thegphotograph of the dead person was taken. It<\/p>\n
 fou11~d_ ijon the body of the deceased, there was two<\/p>\n
 distant ligature marks. The Petitioners having been taken<\/p>\n
 i”nto,_cus”tody, were remanded to jail. By this Petition, they<\/p>\n
0  seeking enlargrnent on bail. >5’
\n;\/<\/p>\n
is\u00bb<\/p>\n
4. Heard the learned counsei for the Petitioners and the
\niearned HCGP for Respondent. Learned counse} for the
\nPetitioner has taken me through the complaint-.\u00bbgdt.<\/p>\n
10.08.2009 and submitted that the complaint agair1s.t”–\u00ab.t.wo<\/p>\n
Petitioners herein, does not make out a prima faciie” \u00abif-___f _<\/p>\n
their involvement in the alleged crime. It  <\/p>\n
that, the Petitioners are innocent peopietand\u00e9 are ifalsteliy\ufb01<\/p>\n
implicated in the Crime. Since  S’\/0″‘<\/p>\n
Lamani, aged about 352 ye.a’rs___ anditthe 0tt.’t1″eir’utFfetitibnei’ <\/p>\n
Krishna @ Krishnappa Hariyappa\u00bb Laman_i_,\u00b0b.eing; not the
\nfamily members of husband of’t’heig_”deceasedii hvasaiso been
\nimplicated in the crime .ii’unri_ecesvsa’1*iiyAiiand they may be<\/p>\n
enlarged on bail. V<\/p>\n
6. Sri. ieariierIvii’ii{;iCGP for the State<\/p>\n
submitted__thativ–the_case\u00ab._regi_stered against the Petitioners is
\nfor heiri0us* crime.’ iififi”investigation, the prosecution
\nproceeds against Vthe i3eti’ti.oiners, they will have to be tried for<\/p>\n
theofferices piini.shab1e under Sec. 498\u00bbA and 302 r\/W 34<\/p>\n
 xyouid attract the imprisonment of sentence of Eife<\/p>\n
 __iriiprisor1rncn’t.,_and fine and hence the bail may be refused. It<\/p>\n
Was”‘subrri–i–tjteid\u00a7=’that, if the Petitioners are enlarged on bail,<\/p>\n
they  tamper the prosecution witnesses, hamper the<\/p>\n
i”~ir1Vestig.at:1on and\/or may \ufb02ee i.e., jump bail. Hence, the<\/p>\n
P.etit’ion may be dismissed. g<\/p>\n
\/1<\/p>\n
7. In Vl\u20acW of the rival contentions, the point for<\/p>\n
Consideration is:\n<\/p>\n
” Whether the Petitioners can be admitted to_bVcl_tii.<_"?~3'_.<\/p>\n
8. The alleged incident has taken place <\/p>\n
Complainant has filed the Complaint with Police”    P <\/p>\n
on 10.08.2009. Petitioners 2 and 3f’herein_are <\/p>\n
members of husband of the decieaseid.’~’ii Thieyii<\/p>\n
relatives of Petitioner No.1-‘ -‘.I_.’he corn”plainan’t’utherself is <\/p>\n
doubtful about cause for the deathof Shar:a_da.i .VShieV_hais only
\nsuspicion that her dailghtersi-1nList– have been. killed and
\nhanged or she might hiaveiicon1rnii.tted”-sfuic’ide, being not able
\nto bear the harassmentHand._cieimand”~foii\u00e9loiwry. Since the<\/p>\n
Petitioners 2 and\u00ab.i\u00a73″_’herti:in   umelmbers of the family<\/p>\n
of the  cl.eice_ased,– the case sought to be made
\nout in lithe ._co1nplaingt’t’.gigainV$3t the Petitioners prima facie
\nappears tokbe not  The case against the Petitioners<\/p>\n
being’su.spicio13.sV_iini nature, they are entitled to be admitted<\/p>\n
00″\u00bb.,on”~bai15.j’-. “To dispe’I'”the apprehension of the prosecution<\/p>\n
 abioutg  of witnesses, hampering of the<\/p>\n
iiny’o._s_tigati_on, ‘the Petitioners can be put on conditions.<\/p>\n
4’ Henceli, I pass the following:\n<\/p>\n
. _ .QB__12._12._R.\n<\/p>\n
 Petitioners Lokappa S\/o Bhadrappa Lamani and<\/p>\n
it imiirishna  Krishnappa Hariyappa Larnani, shown as<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
\/I7<\/p>\n
Accused 2 and 3 in Tadas Police Station Crime No.37\/2009,<\/p>\n
are hereby directed to be enlarged on bail, on they e>;eccfu”tiing<\/p>\n
personal bonds for a sum of Rs.1,00,000\/~ <\/p>\n
producing 2 local solvent sureties who sha-llV._:exVeC-ute_ the <\/p>\n
bond for the likesum and to theirsatisfactionyof: <\/p>\n
Court.\n<\/p>\n
They shall also execute ant\u00bb.1V:.indertal\u00a7ing”to’: coiriply with<\/p>\n
the following conditions; xx\/iz.,:\n<\/p>\n
1. That they shall not _n.%’:it”1?ter the trial not
\ntamper _theal p_ros{ecutiot1 wit.r:esses’;.\u00ab either directly or<\/p>\n
indirectly. 5′ ii<\/p>\n
2. that  shall’not.comniit”any non bailable offence.\n<\/p>\n
3.  they  the Sessions jurisdiction of<\/p>\n
the Court without prior permission.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘l’=hat’~l.tAhey sh”al’l”imark their attendance in the Taclas<\/p>\n
  7PQllC\u00a2”Si’i[atiOn once in 15 days either on a Saturday or
\n  a”Si;_mt:lay’hetween 08.00 hours to 16.00 hours.<\/p>\n
Libervtjistancis reserved to the prosecution to seek<\/p>\n
 cancellation of the bail, in case, any of the conditions stated<\/p>\n
 .hherelinn are violated or the Accused commit any act, which<\/p>\n
    compels the prosecution to seek cancellation of the bail.<\/p>\n
E\/v<\/p>\n
.- .\n<\/p>\n
It is needless to point out that, the findings or<\/p>\n
observations made herein are only for the purpo.si\u00e9;_of<\/p>\n
considering piea for grant of bail and shall not <\/p>\n
as an expression of opinion on the merits OfFh_e=.ea’se. _ The  i<\/p>\n
Trial Court is free to draw its findings jaindiiAc’one11.asionsj,A’<\/p>\n
based on the evidence which: the pireoseeutionrvand idefi;-nice <\/p>\n
may place on its record and shail decide  Case on its
\nmerits, uninfiuenced b;iy’~~..the_\u00ab’ifindingsVand\/or observations<\/p>\n
made herein.\n<\/p>\n
Petition st.an’ds:’a11owed  of Petitioners 2 and 3.
\nThe FieVtit-ioi;:_ in  the “Petitioner-Amanda S \/o
\nHananziiantaifip-:i;V_.Laniani,Zstands -dismissed as withdrawn.<\/p>\n
Acieordingily,   is disposed.\n<\/p>\n
 ”   aaaaa _ \ufb02: Sd\/..’.\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
1’i’li\u00b0.(C””<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, H. CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD I DATED THIS THE 29?” DAY OF OCTOBER,_ ;20Q9u.’__’___e’ A’ BEFORE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VE}I\\IUCfO}?P\u00a3LA’1 “_ CRLP. No.7946 of’:;:.QO9 1. Anand, S \/ 0 I-Ianuma1″iLa_ppa:LarI’1a:f1i,V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-142930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAnand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-25T11:22:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Anand S\\\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-25T11:22:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1228,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Anand S\\\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-25T11:22:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anand S\\\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-25T11:22:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-25T11:22:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009"},"wordCount":1228,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009","name":"Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-25T11:22:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anand-so-hanumantappa-lamani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anand S\/O Hanumantappa Lamani vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=142930"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142930\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=142930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=142930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=142930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}