{"id":143002,"date":"2009-02-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-28T13:24:40","modified_gmt":"2018-09-28T07:54:40","slug":"havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth … vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth … vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
IN ?H\u20ac HISH COURT OF KARNATAKA c:R\u00a2$;f73$mga\nR? GULB%\ufb01GA ' . ~.*.\":r\n\nDATED THIS THE 2?\" DR?-OE \u00a7EB\u00e93\u00a7R?;f2@G9 ;'\n\n9Rg\u00e9aN\u00a7\u00b0\"\n\nTag HGN'BLE M\u00a7{3usTic3_v;Q;g\u00a3BHAHi?\n 3N\u00a7_ ' aT  \u00a7\nTHE aoN*3Lg.MR.;33\u00a2\u00a7c\u00a7, AJS}PAC3%A\u00a7URE\n\nWRET A9\u00a7aA;.\u00a7g;ja4322\u00a2e3 (L~TER\u00a7\n\ngaTwE\u00a7N:4f- \"\"\n\nS G HhvaIdar}~' WV' w 5\nAge aho\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01j\u00e9ye\u00e9xs,\nOCQ:;Cat\u00e9:ingpS\u00e9:?iC\u00e9,\nR\/a;Cfo.H_B\ufb01Bjrad\u00e9r;\nAshirwadvguiiazngg\n\nNear BEA $h3V3\ufb01,T\n\nx\u00a7p\u00a7: B D\"\ufb01_off:ce,\nw_ gyiyekmggar {East},\n';3Bijapgr&586 Z09.\n\n_', ;;A\u00a7\u00a7ELLANT\n\n A E\u00a7y S$i:\u00a7apugawda Siddappa, \ufb01dv.)\n\n iu The Management of\n\nMfs.Sangli Bank Lt6.,\nRagresented by its\nHamager, ?ersGnnel and\nDP & V Qepot,\n\n\n\nRa\ufb01wad Chowk, ,'= _T;\nSangli-416 \u00e9l\u00e9 (Maharasht:as$t3t\u00e9h\n\n?. Industriai Credit and_Envestm\ufb01ntxvf;'_\nCerpozation of Indian Bank \u00e9tdjgy, ,_ \nRegd. Qffice, Land Mark} J \" \"\"\nRace Caurse \u20aci:\u00a2le,*  \nVad0dara--390 097k\nReprasented by 1:3\u00bb ._ =9 ;\nManagement. _\" q xx .\u00a2_,.RES?ODENTS\n\n{By 351 Shivaku\ufb01@r S Bad\u00e9\ufb02a\ufb01aqi, Adv. far R2}\n\n?hi$vW.\u00a3. is~fiie\ufb01,undef7Sec:iQn 4 of the\nHigh Coast} Agt\ufb02 \u00ab\u00a7rayi\ufb01q_mio set aside tha\njudqma\ufb01t $\ufb01d~0r\u00a7e\u00a7 \u00a2a:ec,27.9.2oo7 passed by\ntba :ea;ndws:h\u00a7;\u00e9.gudge-3;: W.P.No.2027f2QG3\n{LwTER\u00a7and etc;  *' 3\n\n, :Thi\u00e9 f8\ufb01\u00a7$\u00e93 %coming on for preliminary\nhearing 'today; *$&BHAHIT, J delivered the\nfll':~;~m;:=\u00a7 :\" _ A = \"\n\nH '  _ . . . .  \n\n\"p ?h:\u00a7 \u00e9ppeal \u00a33 filed by the petitionar ix\n\n w.?;\u00a7\ufb01;2G27\/2GG3 baimg aggrieved by the Qxdez\n\n*:,w%efein the Rearmed Singl\u00e9 Judge has cenfirmed\n\n '\u00a3h$ finding sf the Labour Ceurt that the\n\nCharge against the appellant for having\n\n\n\ns\n\nmisapprapriatea the amount off R5;22Q\u00a7\u00a7Of%by\n\nfglsifying tha accau\ufb01ta- in _the% B\u00e9n\ufb01\ufb01 and\"\n\nmodifying the penalty Efrem ,diSmi$saI, sf\n\nservica ta compu1\u00e9Q%y_reE::gme\ufb01: 5&1? fox the\npurpase sf te;mina;~$\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9fi\ufb01s'\ufb01illw\u00e9he date of\ndismissal af Etg\u00a7A \u00a2\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01%\ufb01\u00a7Kea\ufb01d his terminal\nben@fits \"\u00a7nd W\ufb01i\u20aca\u00a7t\u00a7\u00e9 t$\ufb01t hi5 terminal\n\nbenefi\ufb01\ufb01 Be s\u00e9ttl\u00e9\ufb01 in accordance with law.\n;2.,T\ufb01\u00a7 g@tificn@r~ appellant herain was\n\nwork:g\u00a7Va\u00e9_\u00e91\n\n\n\nDisciplinary \u00a3athar:ty dism:3se\ufb01 Eh@ a\u00a7p\u00e9El\u00a7\u00a7t\n\nfrom service by cmdexmdated ;Q2\u00a7\u00a3998;VW T\ufb01\u00e9W\n\napp\u00a7lla\u00a7t raised a dia\ufb01u\ufb01\u00e9\"$ef\u00a2\u00a7e_th\u00e9T\u20ac\u00e9n:ralA\n\nGovarnmeat lndustfial   ?rib\u00a7n\u00a7l?CumwLab0ur\nCourt, Banqaigre, Vinf-CR  NGQlOi\/S? and the\nLabou; Court \u00a7\u00e9id *:&a:  th$ ki\u00a9mestic enquiry\n\nhel& by the deg\u00e9ft\ufb01eht wag fair and progar and\n\nthe \u00a2ha;@\u00e9_jdfj_$isa$g:opriation against the\n\nappeilani'V\u00a7\u00a7d. \u00a9\u00a2e\ufb01=-\u00a7;\u00a7ved and he had also\nd.s;;;os\u00a7,tVeic:'v.'j'V-,a;\"~,g:;:::s;\"\"-of\" Rs.22,00f3\/- and Ezaving\n\nregard V:d _\u00a3\ufb01e'fEact that the appallant was\n\n_$\u00e9rving  in\u00a2'the Bank. and that the charge of\n\n'x,mi3apgf@priatiQn ayf amaunt and falsification\n\n\"L;f\"t%&_a\u00e9\u00a2Qu\u00a7ts hav\u00e9 been proved, the Gfd\u00e9f sf\n\nE\u00a7is&is$&l wag jugtified. and accerdingiy,\n\n. d:3mis5@d Ehe referance by' ordar dated\n\n'\"3G.\u00a7.2GO2. Eaing agqxieva\u00e9 by{ said $rder\n\npassad by the ?resid:ng Officar Qf the Central\n\nW;\/K\n\n\n\nGovernment Industrial Tribunal\ufb01vand Labcmr\n\nCeurt, Bangalcre, the \u00e9pp@Zlamt &erai\u00a7 iil\u00e9dk\n\nwrit \u00a7etit:on~ W.P;\u00a7Qi$\u00a727f:Q\u00a7B=\"\u00a7%d Rthe\nlearned Single Jud\u00a7&:\u00e9fte\u00a3 h\u00a7a\u00a7in\u00a7 %\ufb01\u00e9s;ea\u00a7\ufb01ed\ncounaei for vthg Qet\u00e9\ufb01i\ufb01heg %\ufb01d\"'%%e iearne\u00e9\naoungel for \u00a3h\u00e9  f\u00a7%\u00a7c\ufb01\u00a7\u00e95\u00a7\u00e9 _held that the\nfindimg.\u00a7f,t\ufb01\u00a7W\u00a2\u00a7\ufb01t%$@ G\u00a7fe;nment Industrial\nTribqA\u00a7\u00a7{\ufb01%\ufb02QQf 31\u20acQ\u00a7\u00a7{k.,that the domestic\nenqa\u00e9\ufb01\u00a7\ufb02x$%$a \u00a7\u00a7i%A \u00e9\u00a3@;3\u00a7f9per and that th@\nc\ufb01arg\u00e9'\u00a7\u00a3 %\ufb01$a\u00a7\u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7riati0n sf Rs.22,GSOf-- and\n\n\u00a7a:s\u00a3~;f:%:;.at'j_g_;y2._;>':%..~\"%:%:e accounts in that be\u00e9wlf\n\n\u00abhad been groye\ufb01 wa$, justified. However, tha\n\n' g\u00a7\u00a7gfH\u20acd 'Si\ufb01gl& Judge msdified tha order of\n\n \u00a7ismiS33l impoged upem the writ petiti$mer and\n\nhgi\ufb01 that having regard to the facta 0f the\n\n\" \u00a73$\u00e9, it wag a fit case far Gompulgary\n\nratirement instemi of dismissai fram service\n\n1?'r~.{ ~\\:{\\,\\a>\\';\");u' V,\nan\u00e9 \u00a33 \ufb01wdifi&\u00a7L\u00e9\u00a7d accordingly, allowed the\n\nL4\n\n\n\nwrit petitiee in part and '\ufb01ieeVei\ufb01ee  ef\n\ndiemieeele ie mo\u00e9ifiedg id \u00bbana:, efV cempulee\ufb01yu\n\nretirement only fer tee eg}ea\u00a7\u00a2gfef\"\u00a7\u00e9:e;ea:\nbenefits :11; they  S of  \u00e9:he\nClaimant and hi? t\u00e9fme\ufb01eihgenefite be settled\nin secerdaece 91:5 gee; \u00e9ee\ufb01g aggrieved by the\nsaid O\ufb01d\u00e9g gf \ufb01e: g\u00a2\u00e9\u00a3:sgW;\u00e91de the order of\n\ndiemiesei \"eQd\"gQ:deeiag. reinstatement, this\n\ns~.\u00ab-\n\nwr t-gppee\ufb01yisViile\ufb02T\"\"\"\n\n*3, We-hexekhear\u00e9 \ufb01he learned ceunsei for\n\n_ \ufb01he agpeiient and the learned ceunsel fer the\n\n wreepeedeete.\n\nv7a4. Tee Eeerned eeuneel for the eppeliaet\n\nA;'vehememiiy argued that the chazge egainet the\n\neppelian: had met been greved and the erder\n\npaeeed by\" the Centre} Gevermment Induetriel\n\nW=m='~\n\n\n\n \n\naccordanca with law which is a\u00e9urave\ufb01  b_1 the\n1.<\/pre>\n
33.. 35 V<\/p>\n
Laban: Coart and the Lgaxnedf Si\ufb01\u00a7lg V\u00a3Q&g\u00e9  has’<\/p>\n
modified the order 3fW dismissal _t$” th\ufb01\ufb01. \u00a2\u00a7A<\/p>\n
cQmpulsQry’ retireme\ufb02\ufb01V \u00a7nl%* for_’\ufb01g\u00e9\ufb02 pur@0ses* cf
\nterminal beaefits frq%V\ufb01he_\u00a7a\u00a7e Q? \u00a7ismis$al of
\nthe claimant a\ufb01$ wh%raf\u00a7f\u20ac{ \u00a7h\u00a7 a\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9liant is not
\nentitied ts any fg\u00a7\u00a3h\u00e9%AfeiE%f;@*;<\/p>\n
B: \ufb02WQr”$av\u00a7\u00a5 g\u00a3\u00a7e\ufb01:u\ufb01gf\u00e9fui consideration t0
\nthe m\u00a3@%\u00a2\u00e9Kgf\u00e9US z\u00e9f \ufb01\u00a7\u00e9W iearned counsel for the<\/p>\n
\u00a7arties’a\u00a7duS:rutinj\u00a7ed the material on r@Cord.<\/p>\n
‘~6. TKe materiai an record wouid cleariy $h0w<\/p>\n
“X3th\u00a7\ufb01x.\u20ac\ufb01\u00e9p appellant was working as a alezk in<\/p>\n
 S\u00a7\ufb01g\u00a7; 3$\ufb01% which is naw merge\ufb01 with ECECE Bank,<\/p>\n
“t\ufb01ag\ufb02re\u00e9gondent NQ.2 in t\ufb01\u00e9 writ getitien.<\/p>\n
TSCru\u20aciny’ 0f the material on record wauld also<\/p>\n
*,3\u00a7ow[ that the domestic enquiry’ was heid after<\/p>\n
affwrding appartani\ufb01y t@ th\u00e9 appeilant in<\/p>\n
accardance with law a\ufb01d tha same has been held ta<\/p>\n
‘ya\/K<\/p>\n
be fair an\u00e9 prmpar by tha Labs\ufb01f V\u20acQ\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01.   Th@<\/p>\n
appellant has depssit\u00e9d_a\u00a7_gm0\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01 \u00e9f R\u00a7,\ufb013,\ufb01QO{~;\u00a2<\/p>\n
which ha %ad misapprogria\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01, “i\ufb01’ view ,df  the<\/p>\n
finding ia the dome\u00e9tig a\ufb01quixy w\ufb01i\u00a2\ufb01~has been up
\nheld by tize Labeur ” fincziing in
\nthe writ peti\u00a3i&n.7i1\u00a7t is :\u00e9lear that the said
\nfinding on the q\u00a7\u00e9\ufb01\u00a7i\u00a7%:o\u00a7,f\u00e9%\ufb01 is, jastified aad<\/p>\n
does nGt’CaIl far iaierfer\u00e9\ufb01ce\u00bb<\/p>\n
. ”” *7,WEHf\ufb01haf; th@ I\u00e9arned Singie Jadge haviag
\nr\u00e9gard ‘to  3\ufb01\u00e9= fac\ufb013 and circumstaaces wf th\u00e9<\/p>\n
ca3e;* has ‘mQd;fi\u00a7\ufb01 the crder of \u00a7enalty from<\/p>\n
_\ufb01ismi3sal”ato Que Qf cGmpuls0ry[ reiirement only<\/p>\n
V” rfn\u00a7  :h\u00e9a purpose Gf terminal benefits till the<\/p>\n
‘ &a\ufb01\u00e9”,ofQ*\ufb02:smissai af the ciaimant and ha\ufb01<\/p>\n
‘dir\u00e9\u00e9te\ufb01 t\ufb01at the tarminal benefits be aettlad i\ufb01<\/p>\n
ac@Qfdance with law. %ai having regard ta the<\/p>\n
xv-\u00ab ‘cued; Qt.-\n<\/p>\n
=_f\u00e9ct that the appaiiant was wcrking and has been
\n\\<\/p>\n
fou\ufb01d guilty of the charge sf misappropriation of<\/p>\n
tE@ amaunt :9 the time of Rs.22,9Q$f~ and there<\/p>\n
\\’\/CW\/g<\/p>\n
ID<\/p>\n
is 3 conaurrent finding and that–\u00a7%vi$\u00a7 ;e\u00a7\u00a7r5 is
\nthe nature aad gravity3\u00bbGf  t\u00a7%\ufb02 \u00a7$\u00e9;\u00a7a ia$\ufb01 2th\u00a7
\nnature empioymeat sf t\ufb01a \u00a7pp\u00e9iEa\ufb01tE;\u00a7;\u00e9h\u00a7 gawk;
\nit is ciear that  t&\u00a7 \u00e9pp%iian\u00a7 ;QQ3iq} got* be
\nentitla\ufb01 to any fu\u00a7\u00a7h\u00a7:– raiief1La\ufb01\u00a7 the ardef
\npassed by the \u00e9\u00a2ar\ufb01\u00e9dJ\u00a71ggi\u00a7~Qhdge is justified
\nand dwes not 5u\u00a7\u00a7\u00a2;_ff\u00e9\u00a7 3nf %;\u00a7br oz iliegaiity.
\nHence, 3&5 \ufb01re dhk\ufb01 i\u00a7Ci\u00a7\u00a7@\u00a7 \ufb01\ufb01y take 51 different
\nViewii\ufb01\ufb01t\ufb01\u00e9 @a\u00a3f\u00e9$ a\ufb01\u00a7V\u00a7\u00a7d\u00e9rdingly, we hold that
\nthe a\u00a7pea\u20acB;i;%\u00a7de\u00a70\u00a7d \u00a7fw \ufb01erit and \u00a7as3 the
\nf0iiG\ufb01i\ufb01g:cr\ufb02\u00a7\u00a7i}\u00a7 .a W h<\/p>\n
The &ppaai is \ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01issed.\n<\/p>\n
   x  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth … vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009 Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure IN ?H\u20ac HISH COURT OF KARNATAKA c:R\u00a2$;f73$mga R? GULB%\ufb01GA ‘ . ~.*.”:r DATED THIS THE 2?” DR?-OE \u00a7EB\u00e93\u00a7R?;f2@G9 ;’ 9Rg\u00e9aN\u00a7\u00b0” Tag HGN’BLE M\u00a7{3usTic3_v;Q;g\u00a3BHAHi? 3N\u00a7_ ‘ aT \u00a7 THE aoN*3Lg.MR.;33\u00a2\u00a7c\u00a7, AJS}PAC3%A\u00a7URE WRET A9\u00a7aA;.\u00a7g;ja4322\u00a2e3 (L~TER\u00a7 gaTwE\u00a7N:4f- […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143002","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nHavaldar S\/O Gundopanth ... vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth ... vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-28T07:54:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Havaldar S\\\/O Gundopanth … vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-28T07:54:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":499,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Havaldar S\\\/O Gundopanth ... vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-28T07:54:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Havaldar S\\\/O Gundopanth … vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth ... vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth ... vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-28T07:54:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth … vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-28T07:54:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009"},"wordCount":499,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009","name":"Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth ... vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-28T07:54:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/havaldar-so-gundopanth-vs-the-management-of-sangli-bank-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Havaldar S\/O Gundopanth … vs The Management Of, Sangli Bank, on 27 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143002"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143002\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}