{"id":143359,"date":"2008-11-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008"},"modified":"2014-05-06T05:02:49","modified_gmt":"2014-05-05T23:32:49","slug":"ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
WP No.l9926i200'I\n\nnu THE HIGH count or !{ARllATA_.'Eii&\" 44 :1    \n\ncmcurr amen  V '-- 1i7.j   \"\n\nmvmn nus mg 2013 an (S1? n\u00a73*ar*7'saAmm~1r.:,\"2ooa ' \n\nmoan  \nTHE uomzm Mmazfs\u00e9bxcg  \n\n \n\nwan' Pm:r:oz\u00a7;.mo.'i9\u00a7;_g:61s-ans;\n\nI_3.;..et.._:_<2..e.n;;      \n\nRaxnudu, \u00a7 v  . , .... ..\nAged about .3:4"j,?\u00e9:a_1's'..,..---':V--_  \nS\/0 late Smt\u00a7?_'e(i<_i\u00e9gkkai'8a  \nWorking' as    --\n\nAt Ward No.2; V "V -. "   ~ ' '\nBellary Mah%a1'a \u00ab_ " " < . "\nBe1L'a1y--583 "10 1 anti _rcaki.=I.ng\n\nAt Smexampuiaxzi Cxxionjz, \n\n__Bc11ar3\u00ab_':i}583 101." _  PETITTOHER\n\n   , for\n    Advs)\n\n_--__.......u--- ,\n\n  .   '   I  . ,\n\n .. _Be11a1y-533 101,\n V' 'By its Commissioner.\n\n   Director of Mumc' ipa1Admm1' 'strat:ion,\n\nBangaiorc-560 001.  RESPOHDENTB\n\n A"   Sri.T.H.Rnghupathy. Adv for R1.\n\nm.n.x.mu:ti, scan\u00bb for R2) \n\n\n\n ' Q\n\nWP No.l992&f2G\u00a3)'7\n\nThis petition is \ufb01led under arms' 16 226 of   \nof India praying to quash vide dt.2'7.8.2007  eri~.Ai1neXurc-- '*\n\nAD issued by the R2 and order (it. 1;9.2o\u00a2o7'e\nnotice dt. 20.09.2007' vide Anncxure--Y, botbhiesued .by- thefR_1\n\nissue of a Writ in the nature of  'eu_1d~\neonsequentiai bene\ufb01ts including  '\u00a3316 pe'ii!"io;1er as in _ V w\n\neon\ufb01nuous as if the 0rd of s;_ispensic"m._ tit,  '\n\n2907 and the proceedings puzsaant to 'tb.e n'oI:ice dt.20*h\nSeptember 2007 were never in....e;\u00a7\u00a7Zstex;ee with.  service\nbene\ufb01ts including fail bael_m.:age:s' agd  . _\n\nThis petition coming oe  hearing in 'B'\ngroup, this day, the \n\n      \n1. The  in % this wn't petition\n   the Commissioner of Bellaxy\n ._Ps.1\u00a71<\u00a2  petitioner under suspension\npending,   tee 'gonad that he has obtained\n\n=e %%\u00a2mp1oyn$cntee  fhbricated documents, Annexure-Y\n\n to appear before the Enquiry O\ufb01ccr\n\n'  \u00aband  order passed by the 2"' respondent to<\/pre>\n
   and for appropriate action against the<\/p>\n
_    case of the petitioner is that his mother
\n‘SiI\u00a7tPeddakka wa sworking as a Ponra Karmike in the 1″<\/p>\n
V’ respondent-Municipal Corporation. She dim on 2o.o7.1932.A<\/p>\n
WP No.I9926J2G0?\n<\/p>\n
Anncxure-A is the death certi\ufb01cate. The
\napplication for appointment on\u00bb   9 T
\nRespondent No.1 being satis\ufb01ed
\npetitioner appointed him as  ‘   dutjf V
\nand was working as  .’ A\ufb01szr V2 years,
\ndisciplinaqr cnquixy wasm on the ground
\nthat he has obtained basis of fabricated
\ndocuments.     is not the son of
\nSmt. Pcdtiakl;a,,   initiated on the basis
\nof a  by one Adeppa who claims to
\nbe the  {at  The petitioner initiated<\/p>\n
O.S.No_.4,95\/   tiic I” respondent, the Tahsildar and<\/p>\n
  t’he  as wall as  “””  authozi\ufb01cs seeking for a declaration<\/p>\n
 V’ T.   of Smt.Peddakka and for an injunction<\/p>\n
  suit declaring that he is the son of Smt.Pe<idakka.<\/p>\n
 ___"'f.'I:1e \u00ab:leii=:3:1dants I and 2 have not chalknged the said order. On<\/p>\n
 contraxy, the moactaxy bene\ufb01ts had been pa\ufb01 to the<\/p>\n
petitioner in pursuance to the smld order. 'When things stood<\/p>\n
Ex\/4<\/p>\n
WP N"o.I9926\/2307<\/p>\n
thus. these impugned orders are issued Keeping
\nhim under suspension ordering enquiry againgi
\nis served on him to appear _'_befQ_Ie
\nTherefore, the petitioner is
\nseeking for quashing of ma? Qid-…\u00b0\u00a5'dei3;-  V  V  v\u00e9 <\/p>\n
3. The I” respondent   contend
\nthat While the civil dgesggga  as the son of
\nSmtPeddakka,     them fmm
\nproceeding    On the contrary,
\nit  eespondent as a statutory
\nauthtnity an enquixy to go into the
\nallegations?  that the petitioner secured<\/p>\n
 _ emp\u00e9gpfment ” fabricated documents and therefom<\/p>\n
A they  the action initiated by them is legal and valid<\/p>\n
 ani..’.—-.doVv from any illegaiity which cans for interference<\/p>\n
‘ hyi*m’s <\/p>\n
  “:. \u00a2\u00a7~,  I\/earned counsel for the peiitioner assaiizh g the
\n‘  iizapllmed order conmnds that when once the Civii Court has<\/p>\n
H granted a declaration that he is the son of Smt.Peddakka and<\/p>\n
W? No. I9926J200’?\n<\/p>\n
defendants 1 and 3 fmm proceeding with the
\nfrom disturbing the scmoes of the
\ncategorically stated that defenc;ian’\u00a3%_{      I
\nauthorities have a _hol;ti”   <\/p>\n
\nemployees, if a complaint   is\nobtained on the  and that they\nare at liberty    The saici\njudgment    any of the parties. It\nis    but equa\ufb01y on the\n<\/pre>\n
plain\ufb01\ufb01’s,_  1  -by paying monetaly bene\ufb01ts in
\nterms   acquiesce” in the fact that he is<\/p>\n
the ; sag oi’:  The ques\ufb01on for eonsidera\ufb01on<\/p>\n
.  ” befoevei  is whether the documents on the<\/p>\n
    the piainti\ufb01 claims that he is the son of<\/p>\n
Sxaf.  are fabricated or not. The civii court has made<\/p>\n
 it  it has not gone into the said question and it ‘m<\/p>\n
  to the enquixy o\ufb01oer to go into the said question and that<\/p>\n
R   why it dismissed the suit of the plain\ufb01\ufb01 inso\ufb01r as decree of<\/p>\n
permanent injunc\ufb01imn is concerned. it is in puxsuanee of the<\/p>\n
same, the authorities are pmceeding with the ensquizty.<\/p>\n
xx,\/e<\/p>\n
WP No.19926r’2007<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
acting on the said declaration, all monetary
\npaid to the petitioner, the 1″  3
\n pmceed;n’ gs against
\nrecorded by the trial Court are
\nan\ufb01 therefore he submits    ‘E off:\n<\/p>\n
without jurisdiction  *~then:’f\u00a7#1\u00a7  to\u00e9 <\/p>\n
5. Per conhfa,    the respondents<\/p>\n
supported     2 <\/p>\n
6.  1  has 13% a suit for a
\ndmzaza\ufb01gu that of Smt. Peddakka and also sought<\/p>\n
for   the authorities from holding any<\/p>\n
 V.  – c1i\u00a3;\u20acit’\u00a7,r’ i1″i\u00e9\u00abvgenuincness of the documents which he<\/p>\n
    the time’ of sec1mn’ g exnpiaoyment. The civil’ ‘<\/p>\n
   deemed the suit and has granted a docxaratm<\/p>\n
 that {ICES the son of Smtfedziakka and that he is the younger<\/p>\n
“ii  of defendant No.4. Thc said dcczlaration is grantw on<\/p>\n
V    basis ofthc documents which are pmduced in the case wxi<\/p>\n
marked as exhibits. However, the relief of mis\ufb01t<\/p>\n
injunction sought for by the plainti\ufb01s restraining the<\/p>\n
\\.a\/<\/p>\n
‘W? N0.19926f20G7<\/p>\n
Thcrefom, it cannot be said that initiation  May:<\/p>\n
proceeding with the enquiry, is” (int \u00ab  dif  <\/p>\n
illegal or contraty to the judm<=:;1t_     'A '<\/p>\n
afoncsaxd' cum' '1 suit. in that "of th\u00e9 s:n__.ait:;1V'," :i
\nmerit in this writ pe\ufb01tjqn. ItVAis-i\u00e9coiiiingly <\/p>\n
Sd\/–\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008 Author: N.Kumar WP No.l9926i200’I nu THE HIGH count or !{ARllATA_.’Eii&” 44 :1 cmcurr amen V ‘– 1i7.j ” mvmn nus mg 2013 an (S1? n\u00a73*ar*7’saAmm~1r.:,”2ooa ‘ moan THE uomzm Mmazfs\u00e9bxcg wan’ Pm:r:oz\u00a7;.mo.’i9\u00a7;_g:61s-ans; I_3.;..et.._:_<2..e.n;; Raxnudu, \u00a7 v . , …. .. Aged about .3:4"j,?\u00e9:a_1's'..,..—':V–_ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143359","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRamudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-05T23:32:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-05T23:32:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":681,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-05T23:32:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-05T23:32:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-05T23:32:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008"},"wordCount":681,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008","name":"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-05T23:32:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramudu-vs-bellary-mahanagara-palike-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramudu vs Bellary Mahanagara Palike on 20 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143359","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143359"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143359\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}