{"id":143434,"date":"2010-10-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010"},"modified":"2015-03-23T12:10:03","modified_gmt":"2015-03-23T06:40:03","slug":"smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late … vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late … vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n
6. Sri.A Sendil Velan, Major\nS\/o late Arumugam\nNo.18, Chendil Niiaya  \" \nRajanna Garden, Eehind BTS Garage  _  '\nVijaynagar, Bangalore -- 40   '\n\n(By Sri:C Puttaswamy, Adv for.:,,C%R1--S)  V   \n\nMFA l\\lo.1438\/2009\u00ab.Es filed.vU\u00abnd.e'r*.,Section 173(1) of\nMV Act against the Judgrnent\"ari'd;Awa_rd,d~ated 04.11.2008\npassed in MVC No.915\/goose on the-\"'*fivle'~.oVf_iX Addl. Judge,\nCourt of Small C:au.ses,fMe'm~ber,'Mi.A,CT~~7,, Bangalore, partly\nallowing the %:lai;\u00a7n='petition\"for\"'compen.sation and seeking\nenhanceme_n\"to.f '<:ornpen_s.aVt~i.Qn;."  V\n\nMFA' 'N0,.5265'\u00a7\/20'G9"'is fil_e'd"LJnder Section 173(1) of\nMV Act,,_ag._ainst'*'th~e, and Award dated 04.11.2008\npassed 'in MVC.No..[9.15,'.20Q48.~ on the fiie of IX Addi. Judge,\nCourt of'=_Smal|"- C'aus-es'-,._ Member, MACT--7, Bangalore,\nawarding a'compgeinsa-tio'n" of Rs.4,37,000\/~ with interest at\n8\u00b0\/qpelr iannun\ufb01 -from the date of petition tiil realisation.\n\n are coming on for Hearing this day, the\n\n  C0l._Jl't. n":4aVda"it.t}e--vfollowing:\n\nCOMMON JUDGMENT\n\n~~\u00a53o;th these appeals have arisen from the same\n\nA '*:l."_J).u:d'g*\u00abment and Award dated 04.11.2008 passed in MVC\n\n  l\\So.915\/2008 by the learned Judge, Court of Small Causes\n\nand Member, MACT, Bangalore (SCCH 7) (hereinafter\n\nreferred to as 'Claims 'fa-ibunal' for short).\n\n......_\u00a7'~v"*~***"~*\n\n\n\n2. MFA No.1438\/2009 is filed by the s:lai.tr;\u00abaT:nt'4\n\nbios: to 5 and MFA No.2659\/2009 is filed \n\nNo.2 namely the Oriental Insurance  'Au\n\nwhich the motor cycle bearing reigistration:i'\u00bb\u00a3o;i(i\u00a2\u00ab \n\n5204 which was involved in thg;"a_ccider1t_t'hat'-.occij'ri'ed: on " 0\n\n15.10.2008<\/pre>\n
 was insured…’ Thye-~’i’n.sL_u.r\u00e9rs’.has “c’h~a.lle.n\u00a7ged the
\ncorrectness of the impdgned Valndvaward only on<\/p>\n
the factum of_n.egl.i_gen:’ce’ilorii: the\u00ab.:part’- the rider of the
\nsaid motor”  .0 ‘V~._C|a_ini_ants have sought for
\nenhancei’i–1e\ufb02:f”j:Rolf’:’ii;corfi.4P’\u00a7ns’atio.n~5 awarded under the<\/p>\n
impugned towards the death of the<\/p>\n
deceased u’iHar:vurna_ia’h,”the husband of claimant No.1,<\/p>\n
  fatheir Qf.Clairn’a”n.tAN.Q_’S’\\.2 to 4 and the son of claimant No.5<\/p>\n
 ‘in’the cI_ai~ntvpe’t.ition.\n<\/p>\n
 3,__=’  R Ravishankar, learned Counsel for the<\/p>\n
K””‘~..VV””insure.r;…tthe appellant in MFA No.26S9\/2009, strongly<\/p>\n
  rcontelnds that the claimants failed to establish that the said<\/p>\n
 ..,.accident was due to sole negligence on the part of the<\/p>\n
rider of the said motor cycle inasmuch as no eye witness<\/p>\n
\u00a2—._(“”‘-*x.—\n<\/p>\n
8<\/span>
\ndeserves to be modified. He aiso contends that the<\/p>\n
compensation awarded under other conventionalfhea’ds7i,S<\/p>\n
aiso not adequate and as such the same deserves’  <\/p>\n
enhanced.\n<\/p>\n
5. I-‘W1 is the wife of th:\u00e9odece’aseid’; <\/p>\n
she did not witness the occu-rirenyce oi’ t__he_Vaccid._eht~.~ ‘\u00b0It ism<\/p>\n
not in dispute that the rideVAr.\u00ab—of”L’t_he..LAmohtor*Cycle dashed
\nagainst the deceased   was in the road
\nand conse\u20acil%@.nt2y_  injuries and
\nsuccumbed S-_ahi’ej_.–.._i_1’E.uVrt.hef.i3themciaimants have not
\nied any–.e–vid’Ae~ncelV’:*o;f  as to the occurrence of<\/p>\n
the said a’cCidevnt{f-~.:y:’l  it<\/p>\n
 “Thye’in’sui*’er”aiso has not led any evidence.<\/p>\n
‘ Ex”.irP;i,2,\/the'”motor\u00abvehicies accident report, which is not in<\/p>\n
 that the said accident was not due to<\/p>\n
any__Vme.cha”n–icVal defect in the said motor cycie. Therefore,<\/p>\n
 it is clear that there was negligence on the part of the rider<\/p>\n
 motor cycle and consequently the accident occurred.<\/p>\n
  __Since there is no oral evidence placed on record by either<\/p>\n
:’___.\u00a3”””‘~”‘Vsa.._—–4<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
west. Thus it is clear that motor cyciist was ridirig.f”–th”e’<\/p>\n
motor cycie at a distance of 8 feet form his left’ it<\/p>\n
It could be seen further from the said s_ketc’_h it<\/p>\n
deceased covered the distance of<\/p>\n
northern edge of the road forlgoingg toA\\&ards_south;e’rn.. side, * L’<\/p>\n
he was dashed against by theeymoitor ‘<:~,-iclist'.   <\/p>\n
8. If the   to be very
\ncautious as  p\u00e9er:”s;on”‘ the road, the
\npedestrian:s.ha_4l_’l}a.lV.s:o’  crossing the road.\n<\/p>\n
When    than half the width of
\nthe  his left side to see that no<\/p>\n
vehicle. could conie’ and dash against him before he could<\/p>\n
-r-:*–&u(<\/p>\n
. .\u00b0*reVa’ch’ the other sildei\u00e9of the road. If the deceased been<\/p>\n
1’\\..\n<\/p>\n
 extent, he could have avoided the<\/p>\n
acc–i.den_t.~ ‘_;I..tAlis the settled iaw that when there is no<\/p>\n
 “*evidence:’of any eye witness to the occurrence of accident<\/p>\n
 -.a’s.._t_o.–‘ its cause, the principle of “res ipsa loquitor” is to be<\/p>\n
   _,applied to the facts of this case.\n<\/p>\n
r-~J”””””‘<\/p>\n
1’)<\/p>\n
and<\/p>\n
business at Byatarayanapura in Bangaiore City <\/p>\n
earning income of Rs.8,000\/- per month. <\/p>\n
Tribunai has taken his income at\u00bbR’s\u00bb.3,5C%_ti\/atl\ufb01eyr\u00e9 mo’n_th’i;._V it<\/p>\n
Since it is not in dispute that the deceifased hast <\/p>\n
‘”3<\/p>\n
the famiiy consisting of hims\u00e9if_, his” wife,’lVt1nci..;’;:”~m:inor * L’<\/p>\n
children and mother and he yiia-s:t,h_e”‘o,nly.eam.i,ng,f\u00a7memi:Jer
\nin the family, and that'”th_et  in the year
\n2008 and also ‘maintaining his
\nfamily in llthellllconsidered opinion
\nthat  e$iad:eh’ce:d.,dr,\u00bbiiow1 that the deceased
\nwas   per month does not<\/p>\n
deserve a’cceptance4,’iltheiiiiaims Tribunal was not justified<\/p>\n
 in theV.”s*aid_ ____ income at Rs.3,500\/– only. In my<\/p>\n
‘cons,ide_re>d*o;\u00a7inion, the Claims Tritiunai should have taken<\/p>\n
ltheincomej-.of::.the deceased at the minimum of Rs,5,000\/-<\/p>\n
 peru”mo”nth,”u Further, as laid down by the it-ion’ble Supreme<\/p>\n
  Court, in the case of Smnsarala Verma and Others Vs<\/p>\n
higelihfi Transport Corporation and another reported in<\/p>\n
 “‘”2oo9(6) sec 121, if the family consists of the deceased,<\/p>\n
his wife, children and parents, the deduction of 1\/3″‘ of the<\/p>\n
 \u00abf*’3<\/p>\n
 to “t’heV____extent of 25% towards occurrence of
\n ‘i;.h’e –.acc_i4deiV1t.:”‘annual dependency of Rs.6,30,000\/– has to
\nH  25% of it. Thus, the annual loss of
\n  comes to Rs.4,72,S00\/– (6,30,000\/- -3
\n  “1,’5″7..,’SV\u00a3i’O\/–) and the same is hereby awarded in favour of
\nliithelclaimants together as against Rs.3,92,000\/– awarded<\/p>\n
V  the Claims Tribunal under this head.<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
income of the deceased would not be justified.
\nas rightly submitted by the learned  ~
\nclaimants, the Claims Tribunal V.–was_  it
\ndeducting 1\/3″; of the income of
\npersonal expenses. This dedluction  13\/4%” = l’
\nof it. If 1\/4″‘ of Rs.5,vC)0z0\/– is–de”d:t1ct–e’d, lthernoynthly loss<\/p>\n
of dependency comes to – 1,250) or
\nRs.45,000\/- per: aynnundw.  ‘dispute as to<\/p>\n
multiplier :ffCla_irn’s Tribunal. If this<\/p>\n
annuai..vl-osvsylyylof. dep_eVnd*’e.r1icy is—multiplied by the multiplier
\n’14’, total’  comes to Rs.6,30,000′ \/-<\/p>\n
(45,000   is found that the deceased<\/p>\n
1″-.t”‘—-“|I<\/p>\n
‘_____~__\u00a7–.\u00bb-\\……..\n<\/p>\n
The impugned Judgment and Award insofar as <\/p>\n
relates to apportionment of compensation and deposit.,s’tQ.:\u00e9o:’V’ <\/p>\n
be made, is ieft undisturbed. No order asto'”costs Tin  <\/p>\n
appeals.\n<\/p>\n
Award shail be drawn accordingif\u00a7i’V\u00bb…_V’\u00bb%’ _V<\/p>\n
Whatever amount is depos’it_e’d cam shail
\nbe transmitted to the_C.|:aims   to *~enab|e the
\nciaimants to withdzjawx”ith\u00e9i~-S\u00a7;\ufb01e\u00ab.:_.,,.__1′ <\/p>\n
Sdf\ufb01<\/p>\n
3EEi\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7<\/p>\n
aagn\/edei di<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late … vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010 Author: Arali Nagaraj 6. Sri.A Sendil Velan, Major S\/o late Arumugam No.18, Chendil Niiaya ” Rajanna Garden, Eehind BTS Garage _ ‘ Vijaynagar, Bangalore — 40 ‘ (By Sri:C Puttaswamy, Adv for.:,,C%R1–S) V MFA l\\lo.1438\/2009\u00ab.Es filed.vU\u00abnd.e’r*.,Section 173(1) of MV […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late ... vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late ... vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-23T06:40:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late … vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-23T06:40:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":979,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late ... vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-23T06:40:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late … vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late ... vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late ... vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-23T06:40:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late … vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-23T06:40:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010"},"wordCount":979,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010","name":"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late ... vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-23T06:40:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-chandrakala-wo-late-vs-sri-sendil-velan-on-26-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt M.Chandrakala W\/O. Late … vs Sri Sendil Velan on 26 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}