{"id":143462,"date":"2008-07-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008"},"modified":"2016-04-03T14:14:19","modified_gmt":"2016-04-03T08:44:19","slug":"shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Ravi R.Tripathi<\/div>\n<pre>  \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n \n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/869520\/2008\t 4\/ 6\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 8695 of 2008\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:\n \n\n  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI\n \n\n\n \n \n=================================================\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=================================================\n \n\nSHINOD\nBABU MATHUNNI - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nTHE\nDISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER &amp; 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR DEVANG VYAS for Petitioner. \n\n \n\nMr.SUNIT\nSHAH, GOVT PLEADER for respondent no. 1. \nMr.HEMANG RAWAL FOR Mr.AD\nOZA for Respondent(s) : 2, \nMR CHETAN K PANDYA for Respondent(s) :\n3, \n=================================================\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 23\/07\/2008 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n<p>\tLooking<br \/>\nto the question involved in the matter, at the request of the learned<br \/>\nadvocate for the petitioner and with the consent of the learned<br \/>\nadvocates for the respondents,  the petition is taken up for final<br \/>\nhearing and disposal today.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tRule.\n<\/p>\n<p>  Service of rule is waived by Mr.Sunit Shah, learned Government<br \/>\nPleader for respondent no.1; Mr.Hemang Rawal for Mr.A.D. Oza, learned<br \/>\nadvocate for respondent no.2; and Mr.Chetan Pandya, learned advocate<br \/>\nfor respondent no.3.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tThis<br \/>\npetition has been filed praying for following reliefs :\n<\/p>\n<p> (A)\tThis Hon&#8217;ble<br \/>\nCourt be pleased to issue writ of mandamus, certiorari or any other<br \/>\nappropriate writ, order or direction directing Gujarat Higher<br \/>\nSecondary Education Board to correct the mark sheet and certificate<br \/>\nof Standard 10th by writing his name in the correct<br \/>\nsequence as SHINOD BABU MATHUNNI.\n<\/p>\n<p>(B)\tPending hearing<br \/>\nand final disposal of this petition, the Hon&#8217;ble Court may be pleased<br \/>\nto direct the Asia English School to produce record with regard to<br \/>\nthe name of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>(C)\tThis<br \/>\n\tHon&#8217;ble Court may be pleased to pass such other order or orders as<br \/>\n\tthis Hon&#8217;ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and<br \/>\n\tcircumstances of the case as well as in the interest of justice.\n<\/p>\n<p>(D)\tThis<br \/>\n\tHon&#8217;ble Court may be pleased to award cost of this petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tBrief<br \/>\nfacts  necessary for consideration to decide the matter  are that the<br \/>\npetitioner is a student.  It appears that the petitioner appeared at<br \/>\nthe Secondary School Certificate Examination and on clearing the<br \/>\nexamination a mark-sheet came to be issued by the respondent-Board.<br \/>\nThe said mark-sheet bears the name &#8216;Babu Shinod Mathunni&#8217;.  The case<br \/>\nof the petitioner is that the correct name is &#8216;Shinod Babu<br \/>\nMathunni&#8217;.  It is further stated by the petitioner that even in<br \/>\npassing certificate  same error is committed.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tOn<br \/>\nthe basis of  various documents like certificate of registration<br \/>\nissued by Department of Panchayat, State of Kerala, the petitioner<br \/>\nmoved  the  respondent Board  for necessary corrections. According to<br \/>\nthe petitioner the respondent Board  did not respond, hence the<br \/>\npetition.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tOn<br \/>\nbehalf of respondent No.2, it is stated that the Board has not<br \/>\ncommitted any error in mentioning the name  of the petitioner either<br \/>\nin the mark-sheet  or in the passing Certificate issued to the<br \/>\npetitioner because these documents are issued on the basis of the<br \/>\ninformation\/ details furnished by the concerned school and the<br \/>\nstudent. The respondent-Board placed reliance on the Regulations,<br \/>\nmore particularly Regulation No.12-A(6), to submit that no change is<br \/>\npossible in the record, once the student has left the school.<br \/>\nAdmittedly, the petitioner had left  the Secondary School, as<br \/>\nrespondent No.3 &#8211; School has already issued School Leaving<br \/>\nCertificate.  The regulation in question is framed with a view to<br \/>\nensure that  illegalities  and malpractices  are curbed  and<br \/>\nunscrupulous persons do not  take undue  advantage  by getting<br \/>\nentries corrected in the record  subsequently.  Another ground<br \/>\npressed into service is that, prior to  appearing at the  S.S.C.<br \/>\nExamination the students are provided  opportunity to correct their<br \/>\nnames,  date of birth and other particulars at the time of  pre-list<br \/>\nand at the time of  issuance of  fee receipt\/hall tickets. That the<br \/>\npetitioner having failed to get such correction at an appropriate<br \/>\nstage, he cannot claim any relief now. That in the circumstances, the<br \/>\npetition requires to be rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tIf<br \/>\nthe question is approached technically, the respondent-Board is<br \/>\ncorrect.  But then, one has to bear in mind the real object behind<br \/>\nenacting  Regulation 12-A(6) of the Regulations.  The said provision<br \/>\nis meant for curbing malpractice and preventing  unscrupulous persons<br \/>\nfrom obtaining  an advantage which such persons do not deserve, the<br \/>\nrespondent Board has also to take into consideration  genuine cases<br \/>\nwherein  errors have occurred. One cannot lose sight  of the fact<br \/>\nthat  when human beings  are involved  in preparation and maintenance<br \/>\nof records there is every likelihood that  an error may occur  by a<br \/>\nslip of pen. Not only that, it is also not possible  for a person to<br \/>\nlocate the error at a given point of time and such a lapse may occur<br \/>\nfor various reasons.  However, for such a lapse  a genuine bona fide<br \/>\ncase  where an error has crept-in,  in the records cannot be thrown<br \/>\nout only on the ground of technicalities.  The respondent- Board must<br \/>\nbear in mind that  rules are meant to render real justice to the<br \/>\npeople.  The rules are not to be followed being unmindful of the<br \/>\nfacts of a given case.  There has to be a scope for application of<br \/>\nmind for distinguishing between  genuine and bona fide case  and<br \/>\ncases involving unscrupulous persons.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tReliance<br \/>\non the procedure  which is adopted  at the stage when the pre-list is<br \/>\nprepared  and the students are issued fee receipts\/hall tickets to<br \/>\nsubmit that the petitioner could have  got necessary correction<br \/>\ncarried out  at that stage may be an ideal situation.  However, mere<br \/>\nfailure to have the necessary correction  carried out at that stage<br \/>\nby itself  cannot dis-entitle  a person from seeking such a<br \/>\nmodification\/correction of the record  only because of such lapse  on<br \/>\npart of such person.  Moreover, a student  who  is preparing  for the<br \/>\nBoard examination  is expected to be under stress and may not<br \/>\ncarefully scrutinies the contents of the application form.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\tIf<br \/>\none examines the certificate of birth, the school leaving<br \/>\ncertificates of Standards III,  VII and XII, prima facie it appears<br \/>\nthat  the petitioner has been able to show that  the record of the<br \/>\nrespondent Board requires rectification. In the circumstances,  the<br \/>\npetitioner is directed to approach respondent No.2  along with all<br \/>\nthe aforesaid documents as well as any other documents which the<br \/>\npetitioner may like to rely on for seeking  necessary correction in<br \/>\nthe name of the petitioner  in relation to record  of  respondent<br \/>\nNo.2.  Upon the petitioner so approaching, respondent No.2  shall<br \/>\ncarry out  necessary correction in the records maintained by<br \/>\nrespondent No.2  including the mark-sheet  and the  examination\/<br \/>\npassing certificate issued by respondent No.2 after verifying  the<br \/>\ngenuineness of the documents presented  before  respondent No.2 by<br \/>\nthe petitioner.  The petitioner shall approach   respondent No.2<br \/>\nwithin a period  of two weeks from today, who in turn shall do the<br \/>\nneedful within next two weeks.  It will be open to respondent No.2<br \/>\nto charge necessary fees, if any, in accordance with  the rules and<br \/>\nregulations on the subject.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.\tThe<br \/>\npetition is allowed. Rule made absolute.  Taking into consideration<br \/>\nthe facts and circumstances it would serve the ends of justice if the<br \/>\npetitioner is directed to pay costs of this petition to  respondent<br \/>\nNo.2 which are quantified at a sum of Rs.250\/- (Rupees two hundred<br \/>\nand fifty only). Direct service permitted.\n<\/p>\n<p>(RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.)<\/p>\n<p>karim<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008 Bench: Ravi R.Tripathi SCA\/869520\/2008 4\/ 6 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8695 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-03T08:44:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-03T08:44:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1134,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-03T08:44:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-03T08:44:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-03T08:44:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008"},"wordCount":1134,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008","name":"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-03T08:44:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shinod-vs-the-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shinod vs The on 23 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143462\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}