{"id":143592,"date":"2008-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-07-17T15:24:12","modified_gmt":"2017-07-17T09:54:12","slug":"state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
: 1 : g \nIN THE HIGH mum of? xARNA'rA1<A..j  ..\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD'  "  ' 'f  *' \n\nDATED THIS THE 1973 DAY.JDF_2\u00a7OVEMB.E_i3  4 \n\nBswo\u00e9g Q % &\nTHE HOWBLE MR.;.tgsTi'C1si 5; .\n  \nBETWEEN:     H N\n\nState ofKarnata_ka,   A\nTmoughoharwaarawn\u00e9  .  \nPolice Sta\ufb01oig. 1212* _ _     "  ...Ap-pcllant\n\n\u00abBy  Hem\nA1~m:'g_ * "  T' \n\n1.  H Rajcsh. v \n  Rq\u00a7h',, """ \n13-! 6- Ifiinsaw Katagi.\n_ _V A.ge;31.ycars,\nR5 R3.\n\n" _ $1.} 0 Nmi Kaagi,\nAge:45 years,\nOcc:A\ufb01aendcr,\n\n ;3. Smt\ufb02inia Kean Ningappa Katngi,\n\nAge:67 yams,\nGoo: Housework.\n\n4. Smt\ufb01angawwa @ Savitha,\nS\/0 Basappa I{at5mani,\n\n\n\nAllan: r\/o Boosappa Kata,\n\nAgc:36 years,\nOoczl-Iouscwork.\n\nDharwad. V   \n\n(By srwivck Mehta, Adm,    \nSri.Madan'Mohw1 M.Khanm,u',  '\n\nThis PE'!'I'l'iOFi    378(1) and (3)\nCr.P.C. praying to grant _T]ea've; ?t;1 \ufb01 le.&n against thc\njudgment dt. 18.10.%)QQ  1.. -Addl. Civ\ufb01 Judge\n(Jr.Dn.) and (34151,  in\u00ab\u00ab.C.C.Ne,4*95\/1996 aoqnitting\nthe respond\u00a3\u00a7nt$:mc1i3ctifi}r  oifcnmt 11] 3 4923-9. IPC mad\nu\/s 3   "    V .\n\n    this day, the Conn\ndc\ufb01vmd  &  \n\n\n\n % This a\ufb01pegigg\ufb01med against the judgment of acquittal\n\n\u00bbA  1998 on the \ufb01le of the I Add}. Civil\n\n ._    C-JM at Dhamm. Respondents 1 to 4 were<\/pre>\n
   for o\ufb01ieznccs p1mxshab’ k under seem as<\/p>\n
 AA 4948-A” and Sections 3 and 4 of the mwry \ufb01oh\ufb01iiion
\n% ‘._ AciiL Thercibrc, the seam is before this Court. 7 <\/p>\n
X<\/p>\n
we” 5%<\/p>\n
:3:<\/span><\/p>\n
2. In an appeal against judgment of  ”<\/p>\n
ccurt could reverse the judment~oz31y   ‘ _ <\/p>\n
aPPmC1a’ tion of evkience by ‘Hal’  3′; Ci   <\/p>\n
3. I have heard
\nappearing for the   Sfi\u00a7VivE:k Mcham,
\nlearned advocate appeanfgg’  I have hem<\/p>\n
taken     judment.\n<\/p>\n
 V  is whether them are
\nsubstantial and jmtcrferc with the<\/p>\n
impuged judmeIi”n,_o f   ” ‘-._  ‘ ‘ ‘ .<\/p>\n
  ‘ gt\u00e9\u00e9ppmcaa’ tion ofev1d’ cnoe, itis
\n   facts.\n<\/p>\n
T’ nQ_..i~  compiainant viz. Prema. Before<\/p>\n
  in love; the marriage was not an<\/p>\n
V  = _  ; the maxnag’ e was 1mm’ tercd in the O\ufb01oc<\/p>\n
for ‘V:\u00a73t1?$:}R_c;\u00a7st1*ar of Mi at Dhmwad. ‘I’herea\ufb01\u00a3r<\/p>\n
 maniage was performed in a Kalyana Manmp at<\/p>\n
mm ad.\n<\/p>\n
PW.l has deposed that her  <\/p>\n
took place on 18.4.1990.\n<\/p>\n
Ganapa\ufb01 Temple situated near
\nmama’ ge was registered
\nDhazwad. During   her
\nmaifiagc with  \u00a7 ‘ . Before
\nmarriage slgc jvas   colony and I.\n<\/p>\n
accused     colony.\n<\/p>\n
 5, : TV   1 war: i-accused is an inm-
\ncaste   to consider evidence of PW. 1
\nt1m–  PW1 to bring money of<\/p>\n
%  .%’gs\u00a7m;mo,%\u00a2 or  She should quit me houaejwith mas<\/p>\n
 of Rs.10,.000[- fmm PW.1 or her pamcnts<\/p>\n
‘=\u00bb.Ain\u00a2ep\u00a7;:muonwithhismauiagnwnh P’W.1. Etimnotthc<\/p>\n
 of PW.1 that after w\ufb01 accused were<\/p>\n
demancfmg PW.1 to bring dowxy. Such a s\u00e9tua\ufb01on an?<\/p>\n
tobchighlyimpmbablcinviewofthcfactthatthemauiaga<\/p>\n
bctwsen P’W.1 and i-accused was not an arranged <\/p>\n
[\\;’ C&;\\'”‘9″‘””\n<\/p>\n
: 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n
Thcyharlfailen inlovcbeforc thcirnxantiagc.
\nwas an intcxwcastc marriage. The hot that the
\nperformed in a temple and reghtexad in
\nRegistrar would mk out    K
\nand par\ufb01cipation of cklers    ‘
\nThcmfmt, dmcl for
\ntime ofznarriage can sa\ufb01aly    ‘  <\/p>\n
7. PW.1   and her pazmnts<\/p>\n
  circumstances it looks
\n to 4 had dcmanded.P’W.1 to
\nbring    she heft the house of accused<\/p>\n
‘  to house of her huaband~accustxi no.1, 1111:<\/p>\n
 *  not allow her to enter the houac. The<\/p>\n
 P.W.1 ‘m bereft ofdetm\ufb02s as 139 when she left and<\/p>\n
V”3a:r\u00a7vi6ngstayedinthehouaeofeklcrsis\u00a3erof1″aoct1sed<\/p>\n
 when did she return back to the house of accused and<\/p>\n
which of the accused prevented her fmm entering house of<\/p>\n
accused.   9\/’\/””\ufb02*\u00b0-\n<\/p>\n
: 6 :<\/span><\/p>\n
PWK1 has deposed after 2% years from thc date of
\nmarriage, I~a::cused was employed in po\ufb01ce
\nPW.1 appmachal I-accused and requested
\nwhich he did not heed. PW.1
\ne\ufb01brts to sct–r7ght disputes    i’
\nnot successful and they:\n<\/p>\n
amicably she \ufb01ked a  H H’Vi’hus w\u00e9
\n‘ \ufb01\ufb01vm glaring<\/p>\n
\ufb01nd that the   ‘f1>%.i{.V1. ‘v
\nimpmbabilitics. Igum ‘  _g    V bf ation P\\V.1 has<\/p>\n
.4  the complaint she had am
\ncmappii\u00e9atm u11:i\u00e9r se\u00a7\u00a7fi\u00a3$\u00a7’ 125 Cr. 19.0 in Cr.Misc.No.7]1995.<\/p>\n
W._hc”:n_   statement made in the application<\/p>\n
. V.    she hm mmitted that I-accused<\/p>\n
     nts house by pleading his Blah’ ‘ i\ufb01ty to<\/p>\n
 and he was not employed by then. From the<\/p>\n
 conityfis of application \ufb01led under section 125 Cr.P.C in<\/p>\n
u _C:f,M1sc.7[1995 1t as clear that\ufb02onc yam’ pnor to the date of C7’~:’W”]xi\u00a3i’.s.:{,.
\nQM.\n<\/p>\n
__  complaint parties were living separately.
\nPWJ hasadxzaittcad thatshchad smycdin thehoamc: of<\/p>\n
parents of I-accused hanlly for a period of one month. <\/p>\n
Thereafter she had livw in the house of elder  of
\naccused. in the circumstances, evidence 91′
\naccused had demanded her to bring
\nlooks itnpmhablc.   ”   4%\n<\/p>\n
9. PW. 2 Hamlmavva   ~ $1;\n<\/p>\n
has given evidence about  er   !V-V
\naccused. PW2   “after  I–ae-cused<\/p>\n
took his wife to   sister of Laocused<\/p>\n
was    I accused in the house of
\nhis kemeg’ sisvtja\u00e9gi-Ei’o::14   .01′ two years. Therea\ufb01er, they
\nwere    house situate at Chappmband<\/p>\n
  that whenever her daughter used<\/p>\n
A ; ‘t9Vvi\u00a7A;vit.he\u00e9i\u00b0”‘i19use she was tailing that she is being harassed<\/p>\n
 r  he was pmssurising her to bring dowxy. At<\/p>\n
tiijs  it is relevant to state PW.1 has not deposed that<\/p>\n
 ” r’t_t’_1e  I”–eccused. was demanding her to bring dowiy of<\/p>\n
‘  10,000\/-. Them\ufb01am, evidence of P’W.2 that Ieaocused was<\/p>\n
 demanding Pw.1tobringciow1yappearstohcfalac.
\n,\\_pL~.~ – ‘C.\n<\/p>\n
:8:<\/span><\/p>\n
10. During cmaswexamination PW
\nthat the marriage bctwccn I   .
\nperformed; the manna’ ge was no{‘:.pn:ce:u”_’_’T  .<\/p>\n
eldcrs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
11. Evide11c\u00a2:’:   of
\nPW2. Her ev\ufb01encc    She has
\ndeposed w;;as.\ufb02g_n;e   Pw.3 has deposed
\nthat s}:1c:”  :>w.1 to give dowry as
\nd6n%3i1\ufb02t=\u20ac%(.L?:\u00a7\u00a7  appears to be highly
\n  the paxwts of PW.1 we:-e poor
\nand th\u00a2;y’–..g:oultVVViV’  to pay dowry. :=w.:3 has deposed<\/p>\n
  PW-3 that accused and his parents were<\/p>\n
‘  by taking out name of her caste. At \ufb01g<\/p>\n
. ” –. relevant to state neither PW.1 not PW2 has<\/p>\n
 accused were ahusmg’ PW. 1 by takmg’ 12mm: of<\/p>\n
% ‘ mgr < :\u00e9.ste. The nest of the independent  ' v'm., 1=ws.4<\/p>\n
 6 have not supported the case of the pmaeca-hon.'<\/p>\n
? Thercfozt, their evidence is of no avail to  J
\n \ufb02' 'W 01'" y-'tan!<\/p>\n
[V <\/p>\n
: 9 :<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
12. Evidence of PWJ? relates to invcstigatiog of the<\/p>\n
case. Thus to sum up, evidence of P’W.1 and <\/p>\n
improbable. Evidence of PWs.1 am 2 that  <\/p>\n
demanding PW.1 to bring  is <\/p>\n
VL,<\/p>\n
Evidence of PW.1 that  ”\n<\/p>\n
:?w.1 is falsi\ufb01ed fnom hex’ s::yicIc1i<.:e' 'tbat . <\/p>\n
\n\nhardly for a period of one     parents of\namused. Evidence  I    P'W.1\n<\/pre>\n
by taking out name or   learned trial<\/p>\n
Judge   $1′ cvicicnoe has new that the
\nP     that co _<\/p>\n
O\ufb02\ufb01lict  ‘  seem)’ n 498-A of IPC ma\ufb01 w\ufb02h’<\/p>\n
 A’    \u00ab  3″a’nd 4  pmra\ufb01biutan Am.
\n.’  of the decree pmsed in M.C.No.73\/2005 from<\/p>\n
the~eer;tentsofwhi<:hwc\ufb01ndthatthecasewas1e&ned\u00a7o<\/p>\n
  L\u00e9kAdalatandboththepa1't1e' 5 had agpreedibrdissoiutan-' not'
\n fme1IiagebyadccrecofdivcIee.PW.1hadagecdtn1eceived<\/p>\n
" a sum of Rs.70,00(}\/- as pcecxnt alimony. This concluct<\/p>\n
of PW .1 would demonstrate that though maniage between<\/p>\n
N x .4 if '  h'\\-\n<\/p>\n
JL<\/p>\n
:10:<\/span><\/p>\n
accused and PWJ was a love marriage <\/p>\n
WBB\u00a7SOOI1 after marfgage and ther_s.m_c_:re  \u00bb _ <\/p>\n
them for innocuous masons. Ii;   –
\nare neither substantial not
\nwith the impugned  \u00ab. . 1  <\/p>\n
Accordingly the  <\/p>\n
   .  2   .  ., <\/p>\n
  Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008 Author: N.Ananda : 1 : g IN THE HIGH mum of? xARNA’rA1<A..j .. CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD' " ' 'f *' DATED THIS THE 1973 DAY.JDF_2\u00a7OVEMB.E_i3 4 Bswo\u00e9g Q % & THE HOWBLE MR.;.tgsTi'C1si 5; . BETWEEN: H N State ofKarnata_ka, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143592","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-17T09:54:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-17T09:54:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":993,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008\",\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-17T09:54:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-17T09:54:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-17T09:54:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008"},"wordCount":993,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008","name":"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-17T09:54:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-rajesh-raju-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Karnataka vs Rajesh @ Raju on 19 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143592"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143592\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}