{"id":143631,"date":"2008-12-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-02T22:49:34","modified_gmt":"2018-09-02T17:19:34","slug":"anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Deepak Verma K.Ramanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN 'THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 19*!\u00bb my op' DECEMBER,  ._\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HOWBLE MR.JUSI'ICE\u00bb{)EEP!\u00a7f&lt;i\u00a7E\u00a7\u00a7v$\u00a7L&quot;   \n\nTHE HOPFBLE MR;L;\u00a5_ifSf\u00a3&#039;ICf:i&quot;KV:RAMA;l&#039;\u00a7\u00a5i&#039;~!\u00a7i&#039;--v  \nmm 1$&#039;c3.&#039;.?V&quot;_r&#039;+&#039;__#f:{A}&#039;,{.2s*;3;t,v_3*_&#039;\u00a7    J\n\n\u00a7....-&#039;l&#039;3T.._&#039;Y\u00a7&#039;...Ii3.E--&#039;3...lE.;\n\nI Anugmha 1&#039;, V\nVVS\/b1a$&quot;\u00a2.Ja\u00e9\u00a2&#039;b  --.\n2 Dilsarp\n26 yrs. . _ \n&#039; 310 lateqaczcb &#039;-\n\n\u00bb  lain Jacob\n-.-  r\/o ofCyn&#039;l Compound\n.   Rakshapura,\n&#039;  * Hassan 573 201\n\n(By Smt Bhushani Kumar, Adv.)\n\n1 %1a\u00a7.i\nBalajiTra11aprt Co.\n\n\n\n10\"' Cmss, Ashak Nayr\n'I'umkur\n\n2 The Oriscntai Insurance Co.Ltd\nB.H.Road,'I'iptur  '  \nP.No.1997\/5'72 Valid upto 14\/8\/97  \n\n3 K V Mensa Shankar\nS\/0 K C Krishnappa\nKRS  , B.M.Rt&gt;$s1.i\nKunigal '  \n(owner of Car MFG] 3880} \n\n4 The National  \nBranch O\ufb01oc \" % ' 1 '  V-\n\nVivekananda Road   \n\n M    Rcspandcnts\n\n' _ '(By  Y'i~\u00a7g:\"gr__lc M , Adv for R-2\n'=Sr'i  Adv for R~3\n- Sri AN 'Kfishnaswamy, Adv for R-4\nV \" \" ' R---1 served}\n\n~  appeal'  led under Section 173(1) A of MV Act\n\n  _fh:\u00e9\"j1_z&amp;g,1nez1t and award dated 25-6-2004 passed in\nMxrc No.&lt;?31 ;:9? on the file of the AddI.Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) as\n\nA:i~d1.miAc:&#039;r;&#039; &#039;I&#039;u1nkur pamy allowing the claim pctiticm for\n\n Aocmgictgisa\ufb01on and seeking enhancement of campcnsation.\n\n This appeal having been imaxd and mscrvod, coming\n\n&#039;  V &quot;\u00a3311 for pronouncement this day, RAMANNA d., ticlivcred the\n\nfoikrwing:\n\n \n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>The appellant\/claimants have come up <\/p>\n<p>appeal seeking enhancement of <\/p>\n<p>the Addl.Civil Judge (Sr.Dn..}    &#8216;in  <\/p>\n<p>MVC.781[1997, clatsd 25-06-2004;  X T<\/p>\n<p>2. Brief facts of the   iht; who-\n<\/p>\n<p>am the brothers and fsistcr 9f:   Alish.<br \/>\nhave filed claim&#8217;   T_rih1ma.1 clamun&#8217; &#8216; g<\/p>\n<p>compensation fervthc   brother, who<\/p>\n<p>died \ufb01n   that took place on 14-07-1997<br \/>\nwhile tm_ve1nn&#8217;g.\ufb01xm    2 : K&#8211;u:n&#8221;&#8221;1&#8217;g&#8217; .al to &#8216;I&#8217;umkur a\ufb02rr his office<br \/>\nhmfxs in   TRcgn.No.MEG~383O which coiludcd<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   Eiis  &#8216; g&#8217;vv&#8221;}\u00a7{$.KA-O6-9996 near Snkan&#8217; taxahna&#8217; palya<\/p>\n<p>    :.v_t,T1&#8217;g  at 6.30 pm. The Tribunal after &lt;:oz1sidem1g&#039;<\/p>\n<p>tA1:1r;__V  cv\ufb02dcncc placed before it awarded a<\/p>\n<p> Aoomgia\ufb01\u00e9a\ufb01on of Rs.l,78,40()[&#8211; to the appellants, with<\/p>\n<p>K &#039; *  int\ufb01itst at 6% p.a.<\/p>\n<p>3. Admittedly, appclhnts were the Legal<\/p>\n<p>rcpmscntativcs and dcpcndanm of the dee\ufb01sxscd Edward<\/p>\n<p>Alish. The accident in question occurred due to the rash and<\/p>\n<p>negligent driving of the bus by its driver. Exs. P. 11<\/p>\n<p>clearly indicate that the accident occurred due ef _<\/p>\n<p>the driver of the bus in ques\ufb01on. Further,   u D\u00bb <\/p>\n<p>nespendent No.2] insurer to pay    <\/p>\n<p>also not in dispute. since _tht_:  <\/p>\n<p>respondent no. 1 owner of the  &#8216;h1_1s    ae on the<br \/>\ndate of accident. No   been \ufb01led<\/p>\n<p>chaucnging the \ufb01ndm&#8217; gg   .b3&gt;fitk\u00a7e&#8217;_&#8217;_*I&#8217;Iihunsl in mm<\/p>\n<p>4;  \u00bb   the compensation awarded<\/p>\n<p>byjzhe   01$&#8221; the lower side and the income of the<\/p>\n<p>  fag  the Tribunal at Rs.1,700\/- gun. to<\/p>\n<p>    of compensation is incorrect So also,<\/p>\n<p>$t&#8217;&#8211;.&#8217;..&#8217;g3  made is also ineoztrect. Hence, sought for<\/p>\n<p>V AAenhaiu:.ement of oompensa\ufb01on.<\/p>\n<p> 5. Acooxtling to appellants, the deceased was a young<\/p>\n<p>   aged about 26 years as on the date of his accidental<\/p>\n<p>death and had tmdergorm: training at various centers as per<\/p>\n<p>Ex.P.5 to 9 and passed National Apprenticeship certi\ufb01cates<br \/>\nsponsored by Ministry of Labour. Govt. of India and<\/p>\n<p>Industrrial Training Institute. He joined as a <\/p>\n<p>Mechanical at H as R Johnsons India <\/p>\n<p>probation and was getting a sum of Rs. 3  <\/p>\n<p>course, during the evidence of   <\/p>\n<p>Tribunal that apart from the\u00bb by \ufb01nytki\ufb01gv. _<\/p>\n<p>in a bar was further carmn&#8217;   r,V<\/p>\n<p>considering the fact thagno-was  on moord<\/p>\n<p>to  ih\u00e9 claim petition, the &#8216;I&#8217;rihun.a1<br \/>\ndcclincii     had taken the income of the<\/p>\n<p> _\u00a7tV&#8221;Rs&#8217;;1,&#8217;i.&#8217;O0\/&#8211; p.m. by relying on Ex.P.5.<\/p>\n<p>   that the deceased was big&#8217; hly quah\ufb01 ed<\/p>\n<p>   undergone various training in several \ufb01clds<\/p>\n<p> thy-at   was working on probation on the date of his<\/p>\n<p>  death, if he would have been alive, he must have<\/p>\n<p>  not Less than R&#8217;s.3,000\/- p.1n., but the Txibzlaai<\/p>\n<p>   to consider this fact. F&#8217;u.3&#8217;thcr the Tribunal erred in<\/p>\n<p>appiying thc multiplier &#8217;17&#8217; by taking into considcratien the<\/p>\n<p>age of the deceased to assess the Loss of dependency of the<\/p>\n<p>appellants. Considering the facts and of the<\/p>\n<p>case, the Tribtmal ought to have taken the age pf .&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>No.3 to assess the \u00a3035 of dependency..dof..Vva&#8217;\u00a7)jse&lt;llaote, <\/p>\n<p>accordingly considering her age es  ye:-ize,&#039;1<\/p>\n<p>of accidental death of Edwaxd  &#039;dthe   e\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>have applied the muI1:ipliet&quot;&quot;e\u00abe.&#039;:1&#039;4&#039; to   of V<\/p>\n<p>dependency. However;  waea Eachebr as<\/p>\n<p>on the date of his    made by<\/p>\n<p>the  of the deceased is pmper and<br \/>\n   the loss of dependency of<\/p>\n<p>ap\u00e9peik.-u.1ts 51;\u00bb gun. and Rs. \u00a38,000\/&#8211; p.a. [i.e.,<\/p>\n<p>   applying the proper multiplier &#039;I4&#039;,<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;q R  be entitled to compensation of<\/p>\n<p> towards &#039;lees ofdepcndcncy&#039;.\n<\/p>\n<p>..  The Tribunal awarded only a sum of Rs.5,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;transportation and funezal expenses&#8217;. However, it<\/p>\n<p>   in not awarding any amount towards &#8216;loss of esmie&#8217;,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;loss of Iove and a\ufb01&#8217;ectioI1&#8217;, &#8216;transportation charge&#8217;, &#8216;funeml<\/p>\n<p>cxpmscs and obaoquics&#8217;. Thus, wt: award a_.-global<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.40,000\/ &#8211; under the above  . <\/p>\n<p>7. Accozriingly, appellants am cntifiii\u00e9adri ..%&#8217;.g5a_\u00a7;,<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.2,92,ooo\/&#8211; wi1.a\u00bb.in:cm_s\u00a3\u00a7t&#8217;  % <\/p>\n<p>the date of pc\ufb01\ufb01on till it is   &#8216;iv<\/p>\n<p>8. Accordingly, appcs\ufb02, in  L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>and await! mssod by  11.5&#8242;  to the<br \/>\naforesaid extent   shall deposit that<br \/>\ncompensation   today. Amount<\/p>\n<p>  Respondent No.2 to<br \/>\nbcarth\u00e9ggist of Lama&#8217; &#8216;   out. counsers fee is \ufb01xed<\/p>\n<p>at  <\/p>\n<p>561\/<br \/>\nIudgi<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-9<br \/>\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008 Author: Deepak Verma K.Ramanna IN &#8216;THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 19*!\u00bb my op&#8217; DECEMBER, ._ PRESENT THE HOWBLE MR.JUSI&#8217;ICE\u00bb{)EEP!\u00a7f&lt;i\u00a7E\u00a7\u00a7v$\u00a7L&quot; THE HOPFBLE MR;L;\u00a5_ifSf\u00a3&#039;ICf:i&quot;KV:RAMA;l&#039;\u00a7\u00a5i&#039;~!\u00a7i&#039;&#8211;v mm 1$&#039;c3.&#039;.?V&quot;_r&#039;+&#039;__#f:{A}&#039;,{.2s*;3;t,v_3*_&#039;\u00a7 J \u00a7&#8230;.-&#039;l&#039;3T.._&#039;Y\u00a7&#039;&#8230;Ii3.E&#8211;&#039;3&#8230;lE.; I Anugmha 1&#039;, V VVS\/b1a$&quot;\u00a2.Ja\u00e9\u00a2&#039;b &#8211;. 2 Dilsarp 26 yrs. . _ &#039; 310 lateqaczcb [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-02T17:19:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-02T17:19:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":695,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-02T17:19:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-02T17:19:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-02T17:19:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008"},"wordCount":695,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008","name":"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-02T17:19:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anugraha-vs-balaji-on-19-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anugraha vs Balaji on 19 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143631"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143631\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}