{"id":143733,"date":"2010-04-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010"},"modified":"2016-07-12T17:50:48","modified_gmt":"2016-07-12T12:20:48","slug":"mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                               Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                                        CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000279\n                                                                                                           Dated\u00a0April\u00a026,\u00a02010\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                        :     Shri\u00a0P.P.Baby\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                                 :     M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.24.8.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        seeking\u00a0information\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0seniority.\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.K.Garg,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a023.9.09\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the \u00a0 Applicant&#8217;s \u00a0 earlier \u00a0 representation\u00a0 regarding\u00a0 fixation\u00a0 of\u00a0 seniority\u00a0 in \u00a0 STS\u00a0 grade\u00a0 of \u00a0 IB(E)S\u00a0 was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        received\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0referred\u00a0to\u00a0DoP&amp;T\u00a0for\u00a0advice\u00a0but,\u00a0in\u00a0turn,\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        desired \u00a0 to \u00a0 know \u00a0 whether \u00a0 the \u00a0 de\u00adreservation\u00a0 of \u00a0 posts\u00a0 was \u00a0 formally \u00a0 approved \u00a0 by\u00a0 the\u00a0 Govt.\u00a0 \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        relevant\u00a0file,\u00a0however,\u00a0 \u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0traceable\u00a0despite\u00a0best\u00a0efforts.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0PIo\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0efforts\u00a0are\u00a0being\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        made\u00a0to\u00a0lay\u00a0hands\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0old\u00a0records\u00a0to\u00a0find\u00a0out\u00a0\u00a0whether\u00a0de\u00adreservation\u00a0was\u00a0approved.\u00a0\u00a0DGAIR\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        also\u00a0been\u00a0requested\u00a0to\u00a0locate\u00a0their\u00a0file\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0de\u00adreservation\u00a0was\u00a0approved\u00a0and\u00a0DPC\u00a0for\u00a0STS\u00a0grade\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        was\u00a0convened.\u00a0\u00a0Their\u00a0reply\u00a0is\u00a0awaited.\u00a0\u00a0As\u00a0soon\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0file\u00a0is\u00a0found,\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0will\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        be\u00a0examined\u00a0and\u00a0decided\u00a0in\u00a0consultation\u00a0with\u00a0DoP&amp;T\u00a0etc.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0original\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        DPC\u00a0of\u00a01990\u00ad91,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0considered\u00a0as\u00a0he\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0figure\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0consideration\u00a0zone\u00a0at\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        that \u00a0 point \u00a0 of \u00a0 time. \u00a0 \u00a0 But \u00a0 the \u00a0 reserved \u00a0 vacancies \u00a0 in \u00a0 that\u00a0 DPC\u00a0 could \u00a0 not\u00a0 be\u00a0 filled \u00a0 up \u00a0 for \u00a0 want \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        availability\u00a0of\u00a0candidates\u00a0from\u00a0reserved\u00a0categories.\u00a0\u00a0But\u00a0subsequently\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0was\u00a0taken\u00a0to\u00a0fill\u00a0up\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0vacant\u00a0posts\u00a0subject\u00a0to\u00a0de\u00adreservation.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0DPC,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant&#8217;s\u00a0name\u00a0was\u00a0considered\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        that\u00a0panel\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0treated\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0separate\u00a0panel\u00a0and\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0kept\u00a0below\u00a0the\u00a0original\u00a0panel\u00a0of\u00a01990\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>        91.\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0is,\u00a0thus,\u00a0not\u00a0clear\u00a0whether\u00a0de\u00adreservation\u00a0was\u00a0actually\u00a0approved\u00a0by\u00a0DoP&amp;T\u00a0or\u00a0not.\u00a0\u00a0Hence\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        RTI\u00a0application\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0finally\u00a0replied\u00a0only\u00a0when\u00a0the\u00a0old\u00a0records\u00a0are\u00a0traced\u00a0out.\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        reply, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dt.12.10.09 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        information\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0CPIO\u00a0is\u00a0incomplete,\u00a0incorrect\u00a0and\u00a0irrelevant\u00a0and\u00a0requested\u00a0for\u00a0point\u00a0wise\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        information.\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0 \u00a0reply,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.31.12.09\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0April\u00a026,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        2010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.       Shri\u00a0S.P.Sharma,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0V.K.Bhardwaj,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0by\u00a0audio\u00a0conferencing.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0old\u00a0records,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         almost\u00a020\u00a0years\u00a0old\u00a0\u00a0are\u00a0missing\u00a0and\u00a0giving\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0their\u00a0non\u00adavailability.\u00a0The\u00a0Commission,\u00a0\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0powers\u00a0vested\u00a0on\u00a0it\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(2)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0absence\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         records,\u00a0to\u00a0enquire\u00a0into\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0of\u00a0de\u00adreservation\u00a0and\u00a0provide\u00a0\u00a0a\u00a0suitable\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a05\u00a0June,\u00a02010.\u00a0.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                      Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy.\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0P.P.Baby<br \/>\n         All\u00a0India\u00a0Radio<br \/>\n         Port\u00a0Blair<br \/>\n         Andaman\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Nicobar\u00a0Islands<br \/>\n         Port\u00a0Blair<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n         M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting<br \/>\n         (BA\u00adE\u00a0Section)<br \/>\n         A\u00adWing,\u00a0Shastri\u00a0Bhawan<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting<br \/>\n         (BA\u00adE\u00a0Section)<br \/>\n         A\u00adWing,\u00a0Shastri\u00a0Bhawan<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.       Officer\u00a0incharge,\u00a0NIC\n<\/p>\n<p> 5.   Press\u00a0E\u00a0Group,\u00a0CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000279 Dated\u00a0April\u00a026,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0P.P.Baby Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.24.8.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting\u00a0 seeking\u00a0information\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0seniority.\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.K.Garg,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a023.9.09\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant&#8217;s \u00a0 earlier \u00a0 representation\u00a0 regarding\u00a0 fixation\u00a0 of\u00a0 seniority\u00a0 in \u00a0 STS\u00a0 grade\u00a0 of \u00a0 IB(E)S\u00a0 was\u00a0 received\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0referred\u00a0to\u00a0DoP&amp;T\u00a0for\u00a0advice\u00a0but,\u00a0in\u00a0turn,\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0 desired \u00a0 to \u00a0 know \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143733","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-12T12:20:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-12T12:20:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":573,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-12T12:20:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-12T12:20:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-12T12:20:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010"},"wordCount":573,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010","name":"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-12T12:20:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-p-baby-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-26-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.P P Baby vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143733"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143733\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143733"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}