{"id":14381,"date":"2009-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-06-21T00:15:00","modified_gmt":"2018-06-20T18:45:00","slug":"baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur<\/div>\n
Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009<\/div>\n
                                        1\n                                                  S.B.Criminal Appeal No.440\/88\n                                                 (Baksa v. The State of Rajasthan)\n\n\n\n\n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.\n\n                           J U D G M E N T.\n\n\n\n                BAKSA         V.    THE STATE OF RAJASHAN.\n\n\n\n\n              S. B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.440\/88.\n              against the judgment dt.31.5.89,\n              passed by Shri P.S.Shukla, Sessions\n              Judge, Jalore in Sessions Case No.64\/87.\n\n\n\nDATE OF JUDGMENT                   :::                23.07.2009\n\n\n\n\n                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. TOTLA\n\n\nMr. P.N.Mohnani, for Appellant (s).\nMr. Anil Upadhyay, PP, for the State.\n\n\nBY THE COURT :<\/pre>\n
       Appellant challenges his conviction for the offence of Section 436<\/p>\n
IPC and sentence awarded two years’ rigorous imprisonment and fine of<\/p>\n
Rs.100\/- as per judgment dated 4.11.88 in Sessions Case No.64\/87.<\/p>\n
       Heard learned counsel and Public Prosecutor.\n<\/p>\n
       Alleged facts and events leading to appellant’s prosecution are that<\/p>\n
on 10.9.87 at 8 pm, Pahlad PW 1 presenting typed report Ex.P1 at Police<\/p>\n
Station, Sanchore informed that in night between 9.9.87 and 10.9.87 at 3<\/p>\n
O’clock (Baksa) appellant accused came to his house and liting by a<\/p>\n
match, set to fire his (complainant’s) Chhapra, ran away and the Chhapra<\/p>\n
(residence Kuchcha) burnt. Mentioned in the report that observing fire
\n                                      2<\/span>
\n                                                  S.B.Criminal Appeal No.440\/88
\n                                                 (Baksa v. The State of Rajasthan)<\/p>\n
from nearby, came Ganesha, Bhikha and Parsa who observed Baksa<\/p>\n
running away, and with help of others,      controlled fire. In the report,<\/p>\n
further also mention that complainant himself was away to village Akoli<\/p>\n
and getting opportunity in his absence, appellant did so who when asked<\/p>\n
in presence of Ganesha and Bhikha, accepted mistake but resiled before<\/p>\n
Panchayat. On this report, FIR No.91\/87 was registered and in course of<\/p>\n
investigation, inspecting site on 11.9.87 prepared memos Exs. P2 and<\/p>\n
P5   appellant       arrested and after usual investigation, charge-sheet<\/p>\n
submitted.\n<\/p>\n
      Appellant charged for the offence of Section 436 IPC that – he in<\/p>\n
night falling between 9th & 10th September, 87 at village Hariyali,<\/p>\n
mischievously    and to cause loss and damage to Pahlad, did put his<\/p>\n
jhumpa on fire, denied.\n<\/p>\n
      On behalf of the prosecution examined in addition to complainant<\/p>\n
PW 1 are Ganesha PW 2, Bhikha PW 3, Parsa PW 5 who all are named in<\/p>\n
the FIR.     PW 4 Akhe Singh, is motbir of site inspection etc. Swaroop<\/p>\n
Singh PW 6 SHO registered FIR, whereas ASI Lakh Singh PW 7 is IO.<\/p>\n
According to appellant, witnesses telling lie      falsely implicated him<\/p>\n
because of his enmity with Pahlad. No defence evidence led.<\/p>\n
      Learned counsel for the appellant argued that the complainant<\/p>\n
Pahlad himself admittedly was not present on the night alleged incident<\/p>\n
happened – witness PW 2 Ganesha considering his deposition could not<\/p>\n
have seen litting by any one – evidence of all the witnesses read together<\/p>\n
lead to inference that none of them was present at the time of incident<\/p>\n
and they, if arrived at the place of incident, it was only after the said<\/p>\n
incident of fire –     witnesses relatives to each other, but complainant<\/p>\n
denies the same. Thrustly submitted that evidence do not lead to
\n                                     3<\/span>
\n                                                  S.B.Criminal Appeal No.440\/88
\n                                                 (Baksa v. The State of Rajasthan)<\/p>\n
inference of appellant’s involvement. Submitted that only the “chhapra”<\/p>\n
that too a roof portion made of dry grass was burnt which not used as<\/p>\n
residence and no other article damaged – the act cannot come within<\/p>\n
purview of Section 436. Reliance placed on 2000 (2) R.C.C.1163 Narain<\/p>\n
Lal v. State of Rajasthan. Also submitted that appellant remained in<\/p>\n
custody for about five months and incident 22 years older and appellant<\/p>\n
who then was above 45, now around 70.\n<\/p>\n
      Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that named witnesses in FIR<\/p>\n
PWs 2, 3 and 5 are neighbour or residing nearby state of litting the hut by<\/p>\n
appellant.\n<\/p>\n
      Thoughtfully considering arguments perused record and judgment<\/p>\n
impugned.\n<\/p>\n
      As per lodged report Ex.P1 and also testimony of complainant PW<\/p>\n
1, at the time of incident he was not there and out to village Akoli, about<\/p>\n
20 km from the village.\n<\/p>\n
      ASI PW 7 who inspected the place of on 11.8.97 states that above<\/p>\n
roof like hut made of grass and wood like material was burnt and coat<\/p>\n
mattresses etc. lying in the hut were not burnt, neither was any sign of<\/p>\n
any damage to articles. Thus, the inference is that only dry grass like<\/p>\n
visitation were destroyed. It also transpires from the evidence that it was<\/p>\n
of height not more than 7-8 ft.\n<\/p>\n
      Complainant Pahlad PW 1 deposed that he was out to village Akoli,<\/p>\n
where in morning came Sardara and told him of litting by Baksa, so he<\/p>\n
soon came and then with Ganesha and Bhika went to Baksa and asked<\/p>\n
him fot it   who, first denied, then accepted and then denied before<\/p>\n
village Panchayat, so he lodged report at police station in evening. PW 1<\/p>\n
says that his mother who unable to hear and younger brothers of little
\n                                     4<\/span>
\n                                                  S.B.Criminal Appeal No.440\/88
\n                                                 (Baksa v. The State of Rajasthan)<\/p>\n
age    were home at the time of incident and that the coats and other<\/p>\n
house hold goods valuing Rs.400-500\/- were also destroyed. PW 1 denies<\/p>\n
that father of appellant is brother-in-law of father of complainant, but so<\/p>\n
seems to have been accepted by PW 2. PW 1 also denies of PW 2 being<\/p>\n
son of co-brother of father which is straightly accepted by PW 2. PW            1<\/p>\n
admits that house of appellant is 7-8 houses after his house and in<\/p>\n
cross-examination, states that no house-hold articles burnt or destroyed.<\/p>\n
Ganesha PW 2 depose that when he sleeping in side house, on hearing<\/p>\n
barking of dogs, woke up saw that appellant was litting and setting the<\/p>\n
“chhapra” by a match box ran way then on his shouting came Bhikha,<\/p>\n
Parsa & Ghewa and          others   from village who all pouring water,<\/p>\n
extinguished       fire, otherwise entire house-hold would have been<\/p>\n
destroyed. PW 2 states that he narrated the entire incident to Pahlad who<\/p>\n
came in early morning, then he (Ganesha), Bhikha and Pahlad went to<\/p>\n
house of Baksa, where appellant was not and Bag Singh who was there<\/p>\n
told   them that he will make understand Baksa. As per PW 2, as the<\/p>\n
appellant even after telling of Bag Singh, did not understand obey heed<\/p>\n
so the complainant reported matter to police. In cross-examination, PW 2<\/p>\n
stating ignorance of Gewa the father of appellant being brother-in-law of<\/p>\n
father of complainant and that the coat and bed were also burnt. PW 2<\/p>\n
clearly states that waking up, he observed appellant running away and in<\/p>\n
between house of this witness and complainant is a chest high wall. If<\/p>\n
the witness observed appellant running, then obviously, he did not see<\/p>\n
him setting hut to fire.\n<\/p>\n
       Bhikha PW 3 deposed that he in night was out to house of Bhuta<\/p>\n
for getting ginjected and when coming back, saw appellant running away<\/p>\n
from house of complainant Pahlad. PW 3 further says that on shouting of
\n                                       5<\/span>
\n                                                    S.B.Criminal Appeal No.440\/88
\n                                                   (Baksa v. The State of Rajasthan)<\/p>\n
Ganesha, 50-60 persons assembled and doused fire. As per PW 3                   he<\/p>\n
takes injection in a month or two and no medicine shop is in the village<\/p>\n
and when he reached there, Ganesha was shouting and “chhapra” was on<\/p>\n
fire. If this be so, then evidence as given by Ganesha is shattered. Again,<\/p>\n
strangely PW 2 though taking injection in a month or two, was out for this<\/p>\n
well beyond mid-night with no particular reason. PW 3 further says that<\/p>\n
Ganesha told and asked him running away of Baksa. For the reason<\/p>\n
mentioned above, testimony of PW 3 Bhika canot be believed and it also<\/p>\n
questions veracity of PW 2. Parsa PW 5, named person in the FIR, state<\/p>\n
that he     sleeping in house and waking        up on shouting of Ganesha<\/p>\n
observed that appellant running away from there. In cross-examination,<\/p>\n
state that first arrived Ganesha, then he arrived after 20 minutes, by that<\/p>\n
time fire was doused by assembled 15-20 persons of village. PW 5 in<\/p>\n
cross-examination says that when he was going towards hut, he observed<\/p>\n
appellant running away. Paras PW 5 further says that next day he did not<\/p>\n
have any conversation with complainant.\n<\/p>\n
       Per depositions of witnesses, seems that Ganesha reached after<\/p>\n
arrival of his   and Bhikha – PW 3 was much away from the place of<\/p>\n
incident.   Complainant   and   PW    2   are   co-brothers.     According       to<\/p>\n
complainant, he with Ganesha and Bhikha went to Baksa but – Bhikha<\/p>\n
denies going to appellant. It also appears that panchayat was held and<\/p>\n
the appellant did not accept any such act by him.\n<\/p>\n
       Evidence, as above, is not confidence inspiring one. It cannot be<\/p>\n
held as proved that it was the appellant who lit the hut. No one definitely<\/p>\n
did see appellant doing so or spontaneously running.           As is observed,<\/p>\n
burnt was “chhapra” of dry grass etc.<\/p>\n
       For the reasons above,        no offence is proved to have been<\/p>\n
committed by the appellant and he deserves to be acquitted.
\n                                     6<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
                                                 S.B.Criminal Appeal No.440\/88
\n                                                (Baksa v. The State of Rajasthan)<\/p>\n
      Allowing the appeal (against the judgment dated 4.11.88            in SC<\/p>\n
No.64\/87), conviction and sentence of appellant for the offence of Section<\/p>\n
436 IPC is set aside. Appellant’s bail bonds are discharged.<\/p>\n
                                              (C. M. TOTLA), J.\n<\/p>\n
scd\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009 1 S.B.Criminal Appeal No.440\/88 (Baksa v. The State of Rajasthan) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. J U D G M E N T. BAKSA V. THE STATE OF RAJASHAN. S. B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.440\/88. against the judgment dt.31.5.89, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"\nBaksa vs State on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-20T18:45:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-20T18:45:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1409,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-20T18:45:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-20T18:45:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-20T18:45:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009"},"wordCount":1409,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009","name":"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-20T18:45:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/baksa-vs-state-on-27-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Baksa vs State on 27 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14381\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}