{"id":143866,"date":"2004-05-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-05-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004"},"modified":"2017-06-29T23:26:21","modified_gmt":"2017-06-29T17:56:21","slug":"panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004","title":{"rendered":"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal &#8211; Delhi<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 2004 (170) ELT 21 Tri Del<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: A T V.K., P Bajaj<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>  P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)  <\/p>\n<p>1. In this appeal the correctness of the impugned order-in-original, dated 30-9-2003 has been contested by the appellants vide which the Commissioner of Customs has denied them benefit of Notification 16\/2000-Cus., dated 1-3-2000.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The learned Counsel has contended that the benefit of the above said Notification in respect of the machinery (Fermentor) imported by the appellants had been wrongly denied on the ground that it did not produce any commodity which could be traded\/ bought and sold. The wording of the Notification has been misinterpreted by the adjudicating authority. Therefore, the impugned order deserves to be set aside. On the other hand, the learned SDR has contended that the machinery imported by the appellants (Fermentor) did not produce any commodity which could be marketed as such. Therefore, the benefit of the Notification in question has been rightly denied to the appellants in respect thereof.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. We have heard both the sides and in our view the contention raised by the learned Counsel deserves to be accepted. From the record, we find that the appellants had imported machinery known as &#8216;Fermentor&#8217; from Germany. The dispute initially arose about the classification of the same, as the appellants sought classification under CTH 8419.89, while the Department wanted to classify the same under CTH 8479.89. The dispute was resolved ultimately by the Tribunal in an appeal filed by the appellants against the order of the adjudicating authority who refused to accept the classification as profounded by them, by holding the classification under sub-heading 8479.89 of the CT vide Final Order dated 8-11-2002. The Tribunal, however, remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for considering the eligibility of the machine Fermentor, to the benefit of Notification 16\/2000-Cus. which provided duty at standard rate of 25% in respect of machinery for production of commodities falling under sub-heading 8479.50 or 8479.89. The adjudicating authority has denied the benefit of this Notification on the ground that the machine Fermentor imported by the appellants did not produce any commodity which could be bought and sold in the market as such as it produced vaccine in a crude form which required further purification and bottling for marketing purposes. But we are unable to subscribe to this view of the adjudicating authority. The bare perusal of the Notification reveals that it covers machinery for production of commodities classifiable under subheading 8479.50\/8479.89. No such condition regarding the marketability of the commodities as such produced by such machinery, had been prescribed therein. Therefore, any machinery meant for production of commodities and classifiable under the above said sub-headings of the CTH, shall stand covered by this Notification. The machine Fermentor imported by the appellants is for the production of vaccine which is a commodity. Therefore, the fact that the vaccine produced by this machine is in crude form which requires purification and bottling for the purpose of marketing, is immaterial and cannot be made basis for disallowing the benefit of the above said Notification to the appellants for want of any such condition laid down therein to the appellants. Therefore, in our view, the benefit of the Notification has been wrongly denied to the appellants. The machine imported by them is meant for production of vaccine which itself is a commodity. Consequently, the impugned order cannot be sustained and is set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. In view of the discussion made above, the impugned order of the adjudicating authority denying the benefit of the Notification in question detailed above to the appellants is set aside. The appeal of the appellants accordingly stands disposed of with consequential relief if any permissible under the law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal &#8211; Delhi Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004 Equivalent citations: 2004 (170) ELT 21 Tri Del Bench: A T V.K., P Bajaj ORDER P.S. Bajaj, Member (J) 1. In this appeal the correctness of the impugned order-in-original, dated 30-9-2003 has been contested by the appellants [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[41,33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-customs-excise-and-gold-tribunal-delhi","category-tribunal"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2004-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-29T17:56:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004\",\"datePublished\":\"2004-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-29T17:56:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004\"},\"wordCount\":633,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi\",\"Tribunal\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004\",\"name\":\"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2004-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-29T17:56:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2004-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-29T17:56:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004","datePublished":"2004-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-29T17:56:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004"},"wordCount":633,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi","Tribunal"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004","name":"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2004-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-29T17:56:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panacea-biotec-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-12-may-2004#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 12 May, 2004"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}