{"id":144268,"date":"2010-10-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-09-22T05:47:26","modified_gmt":"2017-09-22T00:17:26","slug":"the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Regional Provident Fund Commr … vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Regional Provident Fund Commr … vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
Al  ,,,\n\nIN '\"I'I--IE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 28% DAY OF OCTOBER. 2010,;\n\nPRESENT\nTHE IIONBLE MR. JUSTICE \\\/fIG.SAI3IIIAI\/Iii? \u00bb \n\nAND\n\nTHE I--ION'SLE MRS JUSTICE-B.V.._VNAGARPI+fH1\u00a7IA\n\nWRIT PETITION;I2'OQ;?I'{~S-CAT).\nBETWEEN:   '  I I\n\nLTHE REGIONAL I\u00a7E'OvIDEI>I_T I.  \" \nFUND COMI\\\/\u00a7i'SSI\u00abf)I\\EE'R_~II'-{\ufb01\ufb01rnlf\ufb01}._  '\nBI-IAVISI-IYA1\\H.,IZ)HI ij3HAV'ANI;\"~G_' ..  \n\nNO. 13, RAJARAI'.\/I Ix\/IaIIAI~I. ROY \u00ab \nROAD. EANGAL::_RE 4\u00bb 560 0235.. _'\n\n2.'1'HE ASSISTANT.I\u00a7ROvII'D-E'NT\"EUND\nCOMMISSIONER, SUB 'ACCOUNTS\nOFF'ICE,..PEEN\"{A, NO.44~7, 4% PHASE,\n\n__. _ 2ND STAGE, I3EENYA,I_N_D.'DS'TRIAL AREA,\n  560 058.\n\nII3_,PiI'y{.f5L{3:Y,\u00a513.E5\u00a7 JQROVIDENT FUND\n\nOEGANISAT.ON'.~;;BY ITS CENTRAL\nPROVIDENT F'{.J'ND COMMISSIONER.\n\nI . HEAD\"OF'\u00a7?ICE. BIIAVISI---IYA NIDIII\n.  EHAVAN, No.14, BHIKAJJI CAM PLACE,\n *NEw,DEI.I>II -- I10 O66. .. }3'E\".\u00a3'I'I'IONERS\n\nI   (SR1 HARI KRIS}-\u00a3NA.S.HOLLA, ADV.)\n\nI' Ami):\n\nI SR1 V.R.PALANI.\n\nS\/O. P.V. RATHNAM.\n\nAGED ABOUT 39 YRS.\nWORKING AS DECO.\n\nSUB ACCOUNKS OFFICE.\nISI\\\/iPLOYI:?I:?S PROVII)I$N'E' FUND\nORGANISATION, PEEENYA.\n\n\n\n$9\n\nBANGALORE W 560 001. ,..R\u00a3\u00a3sP0N:)ra:N:\"_'  1\u00bb\n\n[BY SR1 ANAND M. SHOLAPURNIATH. AI)\\1-z')\n\n*$***\n\nTHIS WRIT PETITION 1s F11.1:i3 \nTHE IMPUGNED ORDERX pT.3O,\u20ac;a,';'2003\u00bb\"\"  DA\"\n\nNO889\/2002 PASSED BY  BANCALQRE \"t3F;1\u00a7Ic1{,\nBANGALORE, v1D:\u00ab:ANN1+::>;.A.  =  ~\n\nTHIS PETl'l'lOl\\E COM1'i&;G}()N E:ORf'.:v.,\u00a5I}3AR1NG THIS\nDAY, SABHAHIT ,Jj;'. __1vLApE\"TH}: .fj4'OL-I,_OW'i\u00abNG:--\n\n         \n\nThis petitit:3I'l1'l.;_i.S ~ respondents in Original<\/pre>\n
Applicat:;Qn _  the file of the Central
\nAdministr\u00e9itfwe “TI”i'[3_L’1V1″il\u00e9tl’, :_B’;;hg\u00e9ll0re (hereinafter, referred to<\/p>\n
as that ..*'[ribtir1atl’l.”tbelhgaggrieved by the order dated<\/p>\n
 .30\/4)’–:”\u00bb\u00ab3lO03 \\2ifherein,VV”t:he Tribtmal has set aside the order<\/p>\n
   app1iCat;io;:1. bearing N0.KB\/BN \/ PF\/<\/p>\n
Aowigi \/74,.g\u00a7:524’\/2o03w03 dated 1 1 \/17.10.2002<\/p>\n
 V{AImexu”re_A’3~’A~24′) and d1’1’ected the respondents~app1ican.t.<\/p>\n
  “her+..3_in””A_?\u00ab;0 continue the applicant. as ad hoc DEG against the<\/p>\n
“‘t._,T1’egTu1ar vacancy 01’ till reg’u1arisat.ion of ad hoc: DECS is<\/p>\n
 _ Vfmade. whichever is later, with co11seqL1e11tia1 benefits and<\/p>\n
ordered that the said Order he Cofllplied with within a<\/p>\n
pe1*1’0d of one month from the date of receipt. of the order.<\/p>\n
‘if<\/p>\n
2. The respondent herein filed the Original<\/p>\n
ApplicationNo.889\/2002 before the Tribunal averring <\/p>\n
was working as Lower Division Assistant and was.  _<\/p>\n
Data Entry Operator (hereinafter, referred to_-as.u  <\/p>\n
the Computer Cell of the respodndent organisation it-:by…order<\/p>\n
dated 18\/77\/1994. The applicantotialified in Spgged and
\ncorrectness test required    posted as DEC)
\non a temporary basis   recruitment
\nrules for the   The applicant<\/p>\n
was relieved frorii. the   and repatriated to<\/p>\n
Lower Division” 5di3ler1;;.Vp{Lf):C) __ by _’ order dated 14\/] 1\/2000.
\nAggrieveddlhy’ the  (jdrderftlie respondent herein filed<\/p>\n
application Oxl5i.3t37′;’\ufb010O’l  the file of the Tribunal and the<\/p>\n
 it’sa.n1e*~\\;{ras”vdisposedlofmby order dated 4\/10\/2001 directing<\/p>\n
liiihe ‘rherein to post the applicant as an ad hoc<\/p>\n
DEO.__adgainstl  regular vacancy and if necessary by reverting<\/p>\n
 one oi” tiheli-l,DCs who was junior to the applicant. but who<\/p>\n
   ldeen posted as DEC). During the pendency of the<\/p>\n
 .._Wlafojresaid O.A., the applicant. qualified in the departmental<\/p>\n
:=exan1inai.io11 for promotion to the post oi’ Upper Division<\/p>\n
Clerk {UDC] conducted by the respondent ~ organisation.
\nThe first respondent asked the applicant to exercise his
\noption either t.o get; promoted as UDC on 21 regt.:lar basis or to<\/p>\n
x.\n<\/p>\n
sign<\/p>\n
the applicant exercised a different option altogether. What<\/p>\n
was contended by the applicant was to be reinstated  ._’<\/p>\n
on regular basis as he was appointed as DEG onlyion  V’<\/p>\n
basis till regularisation of services as\u00bb~he_had passed spleed <\/p>\n
and competency test conducted by the ‘Cen~t.r’e and W<\/p>\n
all, he had to be repatriated’iitogthe  <\/p>\n
holding on the date i.e.,  h.ebV\\Ias:nAot_enti.t1ed
\nto be repatriated to the postdofp  p<\/p>\n
4. The Tribiniai after of the
\nlearned coun_s-ei\u00bb.    by order dated
\n30\/4\/zoosvviie1.;1′::–ii\u00e9ei~  order passed by the
\nTribunalilvin  quashing of the order dated
\n14\/11\/zoosp:fepzitraeiirfi’g:.’:}ii-iii’ as LDC was not correct and,
\nthe Tribun.a1 has’~vpassed.l’ihe’ following orderg,<\/p>\n
_ h  ‘ihccordinalig, this application is dwposed of<\/p>\n
 V   \u20ac.he_.respondents to post the applicant as
\n  against the regular vacancy which<\/p>\n
  if necessary by reverting one of the<\/p>\n
n j  who is junior to the applicant’ but who has<\/p>\n
” _  “been posted as ad hoc DEO. On such posting, the
\nit ‘applioanfs pay drawn while he had functioned
\nearlier as ad hoc DEO will be protected and
\nfurther increments will be effected taking into
\naccount the earlier period he worked as ad hoc<\/p>\n
DEO. These orders to be implemented within 60<\/p>\n
‘fee<\/p>\n
days from the date of receipt of a copy of if1.is’*t””– <\/p>\n
order. No costs. ”\n<\/p>\n
5. Admittedly, the applicant\ufb02was qi-;1a’Eifi*etd.ti’i’ii the <\/p>\n
departmental exami1’1a.tio31 for promo’ti.o1i:1’to.~the,post’ <\/p>\n
as noted in office order dated   <\/p>\n
applicant who was working as ad oasis to
\ndischarge duties on pI”OvIi’~1.(‘$:i”‘}C’)l’}”_V:il’l UDHCH on long
\nterm regular basis, therefozte, Ijfas directed to
\nexercise his  iiirouidfdcoiitinue to hoid
\nthe post of  or}Vot’her\\Arise on or before
\n5\/3\/  option once exercised
\nwas to  iinal.’  further observed that the<\/p>\n
represe.ritatioh”    claimant that he should be<\/p>\n
it”postedtdaais-i.ADEQ in”t’h’e”‘regu1ar vacancy was rejected. The<\/p>\n
 observed that the applicant in his<\/p>\n
1’e};’)1’ese1’1tatioi1_ *::to the first respondent requested for<\/p>\n
xcor1tir1u~an’c,_e as DEO against regular Vacancy with his cadre<\/p>\n
‘treated as UIDC as he had passed exammation. since<\/p>\n
V’pe1\u00a7sor1s junior to him were workirlg as ad hoc D1330 were<\/p>\n
“”‘.VCOI]t.iI}1,1\u20acd as DEO, which was unfair to the applicant as<\/p>\n
admittedly the atithoriiies had ignored the applicants plea to
\nc()ntimie him as ad hoc DEO on regular basis. in View of the<\/p>\n
fiildiiig recorded by the “.l’ri.bu11ai in O\/\\.. 1.1\/17.10.2002. the<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
Tribunal set aside the same and passed the impugned order.<\/p>\n
Being aggrieved by the said order of the Trib&t\u00a7nal;Vll”thel V.<\/p>\n
respondents have preferred this writ petition.<\/p>\n
6. We have heard t.he learned leouiisellp appearin_gV’for <\/p>\n
the petitioners and the respondent.\n<\/p>\n
7. Learned counsel for the’v:peti.tionei’s_l_s1::’on1it.tledthat
\nthe respondent. had already been  tollthelpost of
\nUDC on long term   order dated
\n12\/4\/2002 not  an option
\nwas given to’ he has opted to
\neontinueas’vEir\u00a2eladlre,3   “did~not report to lJDC and
\ntherefore;-A’it’* is  respondent now to contend<\/p>\n
that he is ent.i_tle::l to  as DEO on regular basis and<\/p>\n
 not in\u00abfE3x~eeiedre post, A.\n<\/p>\n
 .8. lLe’a17rllie_\u00a3_i counsel appearing for the respondent;<\/p>\n
st:i_)rn’i–t’tedl   respondent has been working as DEO in<\/p>\n
-E ~eald1*e””an.dlhe had passed the departmental eXaminat,ion<\/p>\n
ll’ua.;1t}tiwjas promoted to the said post of UIDC on long term<\/p>\n
._&i&’_1*egi1ll:1rlbasis vide office order dated 12\/4\/2002 and since he<\/p>\n
 not report to duty, the respondent. was directed to<\/p>\n
exercise option and the option that was exercised by him<\/p>\n
\\\u00bb%”\n<\/p>\n
_,  ,,,
\nwas to Continue him as DEC) in regular vacancy and<\/p>\n
whereunder the order passed by the Tribunal is jt1stil’i_ed._i<\/p>\n
9. We have given Careful Considerati.-orii  ”<\/p>\n
Contention of the learned counsel appearing jlor lthejpa’;’ties <\/p>\n
and scrutinized the material on record\u00bb, <\/p>\n
10. The material on rec’o_rd__would Clearly sihowiithat<\/p>\n
the respondent herein iivho  aipplieani’,_:V’befxo%i’e the
\nTribunal was appointed    He was
\nappointed as DEIO,_in   iiiialisation of
\nrecruitment  heidilon 1 l \/ 1 I \/ 1999.<\/p>\n
he did not  P0511 0f mgular DB0
\nand    skill test and were
\nsuceessf1il”ir1″t.he  aP130ml1ed 011 m\u00e9iular DEG-<\/p>\n
The material o”n._:reeord in\/oiild also show that the petitioner<\/p>\n
liiad p-assed the departrnental examination for promotion to<\/p>\n
me’ :on 12\/ 7\/ 2001 and was declared successful<\/p>\n
by ‘order  24\/9\/2001 and thereafter, he had been<\/p>\n
 ‘\u00a7)i’OII101i(~f(l as UDC on 1-egular basis under the examination<\/p>\n
However, since he did not report to the duty in the<\/p>\n
 proinotional post. the respondent. herein was Called<\/p>\n
Ktipon to exercise option  to whether he would joint. duty as<\/p>\n
UEJC or eont.in1ie as i\u00a3X–eadre D130. Since the petitioner did<\/p>\n
xx<\/p>\n
W12″\n<\/p>\n
12. Accordingly. the writ petition is disposed 0I’.j'{im’\u00bbth<\/p>\n
the modification of the order passed by the <\/p>\n
referred to above.\n<\/p>\n
  I  <\/p>\n
*I7IUS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Regional Provident Fund Commr … vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010 Author: V.G.Sabhahit & B.V.Nagarathna Al ,,, IN ‘”I’I–IE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 28% DAY OF OCTOBER. 2010,; PRESENT THE IIONBLE MR. JUSTICE \\\/fIG.SAI3IIIAI\/Iii? \u00bb AND THE I–ION’SLE MRS JUSTICE-B.V.._VNAGARPI+fH1\u00a7IA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Regional Provident Fund Commr ... vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Regional Provident Fund Commr ... vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-22T00:17:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Regional Provident Fund Commr … vs V R Palani S\\\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-22T00:17:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1214,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010\",\"name\":\"The Regional Provident Fund Commr ... vs V R Palani S\\\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-22T00:17:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Regional Provident Fund Commr … vs V R Palani S\\\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Regional Provident Fund Commr ... vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Regional Provident Fund Commr ... vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-22T00:17:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Regional Provident Fund Commr … vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-22T00:17:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010"},"wordCount":1214,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010","name":"The Regional Provident Fund Commr ... vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-22T00:17:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-regional-provident-fund-commr-vs-v-r-palani-so-p-v-rathnam-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Regional Provident Fund Commr … vs V R Palani S\/O P V Rathnam on 28 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=144268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=144268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=144268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=144268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}