{"id":144340,"date":"2009-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-03-14T22:38:38","modified_gmt":"2016-03-14T17:08:38","slug":"ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\nDATED:10.02.2009\nCoram:\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA\nC.R.P.(PD)No.3765 of 2008\n and\nM.P.No.1 of 2008\n\nM\/s Bal Pharma Ltd.\nhaving its Office at No.21\/22\nBommasandra Industrial Area\nHosur Road,\nBangalore 560 099.\t\t    \t...  Petitioner\n\nvs.\n\n1. M\/s Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd.,\nhaving its office at Glenmark House,\nHDO Corporate Building, Wing - A\nB.D.Sawant Marg, Chakala, Off\nWestern Express Highway,\nAndheri East, Mumbai 400 099.\n\n2. The Deputy Registrar of Trademarks,\nOffice of the Trademarks Registry,\nBranch at Chennai, IPR Building,\nGST Road, Guindy,\nChennai 600 032.\t\t\t...  Respondents\n\t\n\tCivil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 11.07.2008 made in MP No.43 of 2008 in O.A.\/14\/2008\/TM\/CH, passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Chennai.\n\n\tFor Petitioner   : Mr.N.Ramaswami(No appearance)\n\tFor Respondents\t : Mr.T.D.Selvan Babu (for R1)\n\t\nO R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>\tInveighing the order dated 11.07.2008, passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Chennai in MP No.43 of 2008 in O.A.\/14\/2008\/TM\/CH, this civil revision petition is focussed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2. A &#8216;resume&#8217; of facts which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this revision petition would run thus:\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe first respondent\/appellant filed the O.A.14\/2008\/TM\/CH  on the file of  Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Chennai seeking the following reliefs:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t&#8220;(a) allow the appeal of the appellant, set aside the order dated 05.10.2007 of the respondent No.2 herein, the learned Deputy Registrar of Trade marks, Chennai passed in Opposition No.MAS-164028 and communicated vide Letter Serial NO.TOP\/12879 dated 22.10.2007 and allow the Opposition filed by the Appellant against the Respondent No.1 and thus render justice.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t(b) The Respondent No.1 be asked to bear the cost of this proceedings under the provisions of Rule 19 of Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003 read with paragraph (d) of sub Section (2) of Section 92 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 on the ground that (i) the Respondent No.1 has knowingly and deliberately with dishonest intention in bad faith adopted the impugned mark which is closely, confusingly and deceptively similar to the prior registered trade mark of the Appellant in relation to medicinal and\/or pharmaceutical preparations and, (ii) the Respondent No.1 filed the impugned application in total disregard to the guidelines laid down by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court with regard to registration of trade marks in relation to pharmaceutical preparations in Class 05 with a view to avoid causing any confusion\/ deception among consumers and thus render justice.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t(c) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this appeal, direct the Trade Mark Registry not to issue the registration certificate.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t(d) Pass any other further orders) as the learned Registrar may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of this case.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Whereupon, after hearing both sides, the Appellate Board passed the order as under, the operative portion of it would run thus:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t&#8220;5. &#8230;. We allow the stay petition and direct the respondent No.2 not to issue certificate of registration under application No.1057752B in class 5 to respondent No.1 till the present appeal is disposed of by the Appellate Board.  There shall be no order as to costs.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\tBeing aggrieved by and dissatisfied with such order passed in M.P.No.43 of 2008, this revision is focussed on various grounds.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3. Heard the learned counsel for the first respondent. Despite printing the name of the petitioner and repeated posting of the matter, no one represented the revision petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. However, the learned counsel for the first respondent would advance his argument to the effect that the order passed by the IPA Board is reasonable and a balanced one too, which warrants no interference in revision and the O.A. itself is ripened for hearing and time may be fixed within which the Appellate Board could dispose of the matter.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t5. A bare perusal of the order of the IPA Board would exemplify and display that it is a balanced order. The Board envisioned that by that order the revision petitioner would not in any way be affected because it could continue to use that Trade Mark pending the appeal before the IPA Board.  On the other hand, if the revision petitioner is allowed to obtain the registration certificate, certainly it would lead to complications.  The learned counsel for the first respondent would detail and delineate, express and expatiate as to how when once registration certificate is issued after making necessary entries in the register of trade marks, then even after cancelling the order concerned and directing deletion of the entry from the register, a cumbersome process should be undertaken and in the event of the respondents not willing to return the registration certificate, it would once again complicate the issue.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t6. I could see considerable force in the argument of the learned counsel for the first respondent that by the impugned order, the respondents herein would not get prejudiced significantly in any manner.  In the absence of any contra argument, I could see no merit in this revision petition.  Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed. As requested of the learned counsel for the respondents, the IPA Board is directed to dispose of the O.A. itself within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.  No costs.  Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.\n<\/p>\n<p>gms<\/p>\n<p>To<br \/>\nThe Intellectual Property Appellate Board,<br \/>\nChennai<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10.02.2009 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)No.3765 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 M\/s Bal Pharma Ltd. having its Office at No.21\/22 Bommasandra Industrial Area Hosur Road, Bangalore 560 099. &#8230; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-14T17:08:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\\\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-14T17:08:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":765,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\\\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-14T17:08:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\\\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-14T17:08:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-14T17:08:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009"},"wordCount":765,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009","name":"M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-14T17:08:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bal-pharma-ltd-vs-ms-glenmark-pharmaceutical-ltd-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Bal Pharma Ltd vs M\/S Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd on 10 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=144340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=144340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=144340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=144340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}