{"id":144347,"date":"2010-02-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010"},"modified":"2014-01-23T07:54:05","modified_gmt":"2014-01-23T02:24:05","slug":"the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
 \n\nm THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED ms THE 157 my 05* FEBRUAR2%\u00e901k:3{f% \"::.  \n\nBEFORE   \n\nTHE HOIPBLE MR. JUs*rIc:2: \n\n A   \n\nTI-IE AUTHORISED OFF'ICERl      \nDEPUTY CONSERVATOR or-' cms\ufb01fs %    & \nBANGALORE URBAN nrv:atQn,%.\u00ab%%kJ% %  \nARANYA BHA\\IA.H._I\u00a7rIALLE \nBANGALORE..3...'  %      PETITIONER\n\n[BY   ADVOCATE)\nD:  ' .   3\n\n1 FAYAZ 3\/Vo BURHAH KHAN\nAGED AI3QUT\"41\"YEARS,\n.r;:\/OM; s  NAWAX HANDICRFFS\n  31.0.15, LWIC KALANGERE 'I'A'I'TEKERE\n' - % RQAIJ,\u00a3;H.ANHAPATNA, BANGALORE DISTRICT.\n\n   \n\nAns] O.-LATE DASTAGIRI KHAH\nI'I{'3.\"15, 3RD CROSS,\n X TKASTHURBANAGAR\n\"MYSORE ROAD,\n\n  \u00abBANGALORE 25. ...RESPONDEN'l\"S\n\n f :5? srvrr. BUDRUNNISA, ADV. FOR R1)\n\nTI-HS WRIT PETI'I'ION I8 FILED UNDER' ARTICLE\n\n226 83 22'?' OF COHS'I'I'IUTION OF INDIA PRAYING 'IO\n\nQUASI-I THE ORDER PASSED BY THE FAST TRACK\nCOURT~II, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,\n\n8\n\n IJf5II..I \\l\\.lInIIL(A|uLn-u u. .u--- -- -\n\n\n\nKKRNAIAKA \n\n...... ..v..m. vr n.H.luVHIHl\\.H HIUI1 LUUKT OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURT OF-\n\nBANGALORE DT. 16.2.2006 VIDE ANNEXURE\nALLOWING THIS WRIT' PETITION.    \n\nTHIS WRIT PETI'I'ION IS COMING ON   \nHEARING THIS DAY. THE CQURT   \"V\n\nFOLLOWING:\n\nO R D E\u00ab._R\n\n--.___....._...--a......----...,...\n\nHard the     A-1;  the\npetitioner and Lem-ma   No. 1.\n\n2. The   may the following\n\n  the police,\nForest the premises belonging to\n\nthe semncl   found 27 gunny bags of\n\n V\"  d\u00e9d   ' 1800 Kgm, stored in\n\n a stake!' licence in terms of Section\n\n:  87 o\u00a3   Forest Act, 1963 (here1na.\ufb01:er'\n' \" :as the 'Act' for brevity). approximatnly valued\n   'Ihm-aa\ufb01aer, a case was  in\n  No.3412oo3 under me Provisisom of the Act and\n criminal case was registerud in C.C.Ho.19966\/2003,\n\nwhich is pending consideration. It is the case of the\n State that the sandalwood chips seized by the\n\n$\n\n \n\niHl'|t'|\"| LIAII I\n\n\n\n \n\nauthorities wore produced bcfore the \n\nO\ufb01icerl Deputy Conservator of Forests,  \nDiv'mion. for further action was    'A V'\nof the Act and Rules mede  \naajd aandalwood chips   A %\n\nrespondent within   \ufb01rst<\/pre>\n
respondent had _azi before the
\nAutlmrised    of the seized
\nmaterial.  of 3210
\n1:33.  only about 1800
\nlugs.  had \ufb01led a writ<\/p>\n
petition be\u00a3eeemie~:eeu1iew.1=. No.39405\/2003 with e<\/p>\n
to  his application before the
\n  petition was disposed of with a<\/p>\n
  his application within a month.
\n  omocr after having issued eeriee of<\/p>\n
%  e the am respondent had rejected the
\n   f\ufb02od by the first respondent since he had
\n V   to produce any material in support ofhin claim \ufb01at
\n seeking interim cuatody and had pass-ad an order of<\/p>\n
oon\ufb01acation of tin 27 bags of sandalwood white chips.\n<\/p>\n
\u00e9<\/p>\n
   -In l’f’\\.l’\\’\\ luau”. .—— –\n<\/p>\n
q  ….-… \\.n’F nun-u’\u00a2HIHt\\A mun COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH comer or= {(A1-ZNATAKA Hrs:-H”\n<\/p>\n
Awiaaveci by this, first respondent has <\/p>\n
con\ufb01acatbn order before the Fast
\nBangalore, to set-aside the ordcr gf   ” 2
\nFast Irack Court havmg’    <\/p>\n
petitioner is before this Cour 1:’, <\/p>\n
3.The Gowrnmenmdmcg:%t\u00a7\u00a7A
\ne.~ntcrta1mng’ ‘    jmisdic\ufb01on to
\npass the   out that Fast
\n    rm mm mm: in
\n in the premises of the<\/p>\n
accond. “by itself is an o\ufb01”cnc\u00a2 under<\/p>\n
    ani therefore, the Clllesticns<\/p>\n
 by tho: \ufb01rat respondent as to thy:\n<\/p>\n
‘ ”  and the \ufb01rat rcapondcnt not being made
\n   the  proceedings was outside the scope
\n fj% proceedings. Violation of Soction 37 of the Act<\/p>\n
 apparent on the face ofthe record, there was no<\/p>\n
warrant for the Fast Track Court to interfere with the<\/p>\n
con\ufb01catinn order passed by the Authorised O\ufb01icer and<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
l3’r'(\\”\\ Ll\u00a3\\lIJ Ll’\\.lI.JtI_:s kt’.\n<\/p>\n
2-\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\n4<\/span>
\n2<\/span><\/p>\n
ti:\n<\/p>\n
_;5
\n.0.\n<\/p>\n
0<\/span><\/p>\n
I-\n<\/p>\n
x
\nD
\nO
\nU
\nI
\n‘:2
\nI
\nS
\n‘-E
\nZ
\nIn
\n5<\/span>
\nu.\n<\/p>\n
0<\/span><\/p>\n
I–\n<\/p>\n
at
\nD
\nO
\nU
\nI
\n2<\/span>
\nI
\nS
\nS
\n1<\/span>
\nZ
\n1:\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
I.\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
I
\nJ
\nJ
\n1<\/span><\/p>\n
until<\/p>\n
therefore, seeks interference by this Court to <\/p>\n
ixnpugned order passed by the Fast ‘I’racI\u00a7–\n<\/p>\n
appeal.\n<\/p>\n
4. While, the counsel Tfpr  <\/p>\n
seek to justify the order  the”
\nhe haa also produea::;1..A_  \u00ab  madc
\navailable no the Fast   of the
\nappeal. It is f;ru$;\u00a7:1l’  bad in fact
\npurchased  \u00a2;*iJg%a%VJ%naa1w& –   and the second
\n    A  by the first<\/p>\n
a pc-4jn::.itA  \ufb01maued by the concerned<\/p>\n
 carriage of the purchased<\/p>\n
   chqrmmm. The sarne having been carried
\n  and having been stored in the
\nh   according to the first respondent was
\n%   _ withiout his knowledge. The fact remains that
\n  was prurcluned in accordance with law and<\/p>\n
was sought to be transported from the Government<\/p>\n
Depotunden-aval\ufb01zlpern\ufb01t. Thezsamehavingbeen<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
Linn” I-I\ufb01II.I IIl’\\.IInlll.lh|\\.II.n-no was —\n<\/p>\n
   W mmwamm :u\u00abW\u00a7~:z mam W K&\ufb01Mm”‘\ufb01a%& Wm %::mm-*” W  ‘\u00a7a\u00a7zm’mm Mm<\/p>\n
mataf\u00e9ai 3?: Em gram\ufb01m bayan\u00e9 {ha \u00a7%\u00a7.\u00a7’\u00a7?;\n<\/p>\n
mm\ufb01it\ufb01\ufb01iia \ufb01i\u00e9\u00e9 ‘Eh: \ufb01rz\ufb01zg aaf \ufb01fza azzgkzgritiagi “i::~ }g:i\u00e9;\u00a5,::   ‘V<\/p>\n
Eiwre wag \u00a7m?\ufb01g& sf <\/p>\n
$3? &\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:{\u00a71’\u00a7\u00a7 Smiifgn 3?’ af \ufb01i\u00a7&’5′—-\u00a7\u00bb:?E:\n<\/p>\n
 as: agwrtuzzig?    ?a%\u00a5\u00a7ry_\u00a7::;r_ 5af tim
\nma?g:*f;a\u00a7 aria; iii: fir\ufb01\u00e9 z**e2$\u00a7\u00a7::::\u00a7a:f::1;: \u00e9mawars af \ufb01x:
\n‘<;ig\u00a7\ufb01im\u00a7\u00a7 which ha fwmz\ufb01\u00e9; k \u00a7..eg;i*a:3s%.;;\u00a2ygsL,-anasa in am<\/p>\n
gm \u00a7:\u00a7%:$;\u00a7:s,::;\u00a7:=.  2  ' "\n<\/p>\n
Ei\u00e9\ufb01mg ‘~  g\u00a7%\u00a7\u00e9;a& ma\ufb01a ms: far<\/p>\n
  m*&:x ‘Em writ yatifuign<\/p>\n
Sd\/’4
\nEEEDQE<\/p>\n
3 ar2g%\u00a7\ufb01% ig at mg a vimia\ufb01\ufb01gz \ufb01g gags  _<\/p>\n
mmmmmmm w<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy m THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT DATED ms THE 157 my 05* FEBRUAR2%\u00e901k:3{f% “::. BEFORE THE HOIPBLE MR. JUs*rIc:2: A TI-IE AUTHORISED OFF’ICERl DEPUTY CONSERVATOR or-‘ cms\ufb01fs % & BANGALORE URBAN nrv:atQn,%.\u00ab%%kJ% % ARANYA BHA\\IA.H._I\u00a7rIALLE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-01-23T02:24:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Authorised Officer\\\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\\\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-23T02:24:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":557,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010\",\"name\":\"The Authorised Officer\\\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\\\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-23T02:24:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Authorised Officer\\\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\\\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-01-23T02:24:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-23T02:24:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010"},"wordCount":557,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010","name":"The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-23T02:24:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-authorised-officer-vs-fayaz-khan-so-burhah-khan-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Authorised Officer\/ vs Fayaz Khan S\/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=144347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144347\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=144347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=144347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=144347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}