{"id":144491,"date":"2009-06-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-17T01:14:52","modified_gmt":"2015-05-16T19:44:52","slug":"p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: H N Das<\/div>\n
 \n\n \n\n1 W.P,'}'\u20ac)43iGS\u00a5\n\nIN THE 13:13:\u00bb; comm' 4:312' KARNATgKA,  3 %   *  \nDATED THIS THE 04TH DA': OIf\"\":-4:'\u00e9I..If'J'1'\\4i';\u00a533.'.:\ufb01\u00a2f)j\u00e9\u20ac}\"' \nBEFORE .V.%  %%%A _.\nTHE HONBLE IsdR.JIIS'\u00a7'ICB3:v:v:4I:fi';-x1${I.1\\I{\u00a7(}}XI\\;I--;:)f%A\u00a7f%DAS\nWIRE'? PEYFITION  :((}.M~CPQ}\n\nBE\"I'WEEN:-- _ ____ H\nPTSHYLESH;s\/Q'%P'v*T1Vn<gRAM%.  \nAGED ABOUT 33 wgaas  _  *  \nR\/A NO.2V1'5;'V"LA;LFF}{;'\u00a7' :~JI\\'ms*'  \nBl-I.R()AI):,_ BIRUR7.     ..   %\n\nKADUR TALUK. f 1%; \nCHIKMAGALUR DIS';{'RICT _ \n\n1 P ffj%.K1R.AN S] 1? V TUKARAM\n ' . A(}E:I3%,"AI:3'(}U'I' 34"YEARS,\n A RfA 1~;o,_%2%1V5%, f'LALITHA NIVAS"\n   "BIRUR\n\n~K}?2I)UR '.I.':AL'\u20acJ1{\nCHIKK2%MAGALUR DISTRICT\n\n H PUN}T'1'HA\nx @1339 ABOUT 33 YEARS,\n   W.\/.f:i HAR:G0v1Nm RAG\n;s\u00a7LL R\/AT N0215, "LALI'FHA NIVAS"\n\n    .}3.H.ROAD, BIRUR, KADUR TALUK\n\nCLHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT.\n.., PE'\u00a7TICN.'E2}7$\n\n(BY SR1 K S NAGARAJA RAG & ASSOCMTES}\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\nI\n\n2 W.P.',?G43i'{}9\n\nAND: -\n\nSMT AMBIKAPATHI\n\nAsm ABOUT 57 YEARS\ns\/0 LATE sxr. AMBEKAR\n\nR\/AT N035, 2ND CROSS?  \n18'? MAIN ILANUMANTHANAGAR\nBANGALORE.  \n\nSR1 A BHo0MANA1S2\u00a7T _   :\nAGED A BOUT 55 YEARS,     _\nS\/O LATE s.T,Azs4BE1<;AR.    \nR\/AT NO.85,'_2"I? CEEOSS;   \n181' MAIN, \u00a5iANLIMAJaVFP{ANAGAR " \n\nBANGALQf{}i\u00a7_  ._ %\n\nSR: A ii x=1s;#iNA    %\nAGED AB'OUI'v?-2 1'EARS~, %\n3\/0 LATE S.'}'.Ai'v{BEKAi\u00a5E \nR\/AT N<:w,23\/ 1; K.R.F?,.O_AD,\nBASAVANP.GUDI'-- J \nBg;:\u00a7a;ALoRE 4 \u00a7\n\n Sui? \u00e9:3Aim_ %   A.  \n\nNO. 1.: NA'_\u00a7\"'RO}i\u00a7f3r, BASAVANAGUDI\nBANiC:ALORE:';4s_     i\n\n9 M\/S BgKE%HGIJSV\u00a7.' ,'  %\nREPERsIs:m'ED 'BY7-.SRf.RAVINDRAN.\nNQ;.1\"1,N'AT RQAD,\n\n  B.5E\u00a7A\ufb01!A:NAGUDi'''F:ANGALORE \u00bb 4,\n\n10 'V3121 N'ARAYAN1~1\n .CASS'E'\u00abP1?E 'SHOP\nNQ;I1,.N ii'RAD,\nBASVANAGUDI BANGALORE 4.\n\n '21, M\/S BALAJI SINGH AND SONS FANCY STGRES\n' -   REPRESENTEB BY SRLSURESH SINGH.\n~NQ;'1 1, NAT ROAD,\nA BASVANAGUDE BANGALCIFEE 4\n\nSWATHI TAILORS\nFIRST FLOOR\n\nQLMQV\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n.16 V\n\n4 W.P.'?{)43f()9\n\nREr>.BY SMT. RENUKA.\nNo.11 NAT Rom, BASAVANAQUDI\n\nBANGALORE 4. \n\nMg-E ALKA CREATIONS V\nF1 ST FLOOR  % _\nRERBY SR1 ASWATH1.    % ' %\nNG.11 NAT ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI\nBANGALORE. 4. .  .. \n\nM\u00e9s PRAKASH VIDEO   &\n\nF1 ST moon     % -\nRERBY SR1 $.f\u00a7:.NKAfr RAQ. _  % \nN011 NAT;R{}Al), BASA'VANA_GU'DI~~\"\nBANGALO~RE{il.._...';'. \"    A\n\nM\/S.v'INFOR'!v\u00a3ATi{;S. u_   %\n\n2ND FLOOR REPRESENFED BY PARTNERS\nSR1 RENU2{A'}?RASAD-\u00ab.__  \n\nAND SRI\"NANDA_ K:SE'1\u00a7:vR.E\n\nNo. 1.1, NA')? R;i\u00e91NT1NG\n\n REPRESNETED BY SRI. PANDU.\n\n%   GRQUND 191.003\n\n;~I<:;=.~1 1 NM' ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI\nBANGfiLO7RE 4.\n\nms mums DESIGNS TAILORS\n\n*% Na} 3., NAT RAOD,\n\n   ,\u00a73ASVANAGUDi BANGALORE 4.\n\n RESPONSENTS\nRESPONDENTS 4 TO 37 ARE DELETED<\/pre>\n
AS PER ORDER OF THIS COURT DATED
\n68.04.2009.\n<\/p>\n
7 W.Pf\u00a7'{)43iO9<\/p>\n
3. Heard arguments on both the side and   <\/p>\n
Writ papers.\n<\/p>\n
4. ::x.1;>2 is the will dated 1ai;n9.’:l%937 gaggle m hax=ei’eheenlk<\/p>\n
executed l)y S.T.Ambekar. The   elf’<\/p>\n
S.T.Ambel<ar on the will   ltlie"atte:sters to the
\nwill deposed that in their   his signature on
\nEx.D2.  Vtlielleliefendants relying 0:1
\nR.Sa.raswathy's  of appointment of a
\nhandwritiizg i'e;\u00a7ert iwill result in con\ufb02icting ef
\nversions belimfel' fhe V  lherefore there is no need for<\/p>\n
appeimzlnent of 3% {Xe-u\ufb01 C0mii:liesl~<\u00a7i\ufb01er, I decline to accept this conteaiion<\/p>\n
vuf the le,;ltlze<i__ee11nsel fer tee-\u00abdefendants. Under See.68, 69 & 71 of the<\/p>\n
}l:X?iLd'enee =;'\\g\u00a3,v.,;i 'pfeeed:1re is laid dewn with regard to admission of a will<\/p>\n
 evitiexice. 'l'li'je_ evidence of attesting witness is not necessarily<\/p>\n
 f.}'()i'}C\u00a7l{lSlV8 proef of the will. It is always open to give other evidence to<\/p>\n
'[_"'\u00abre\u00a5::i:t the "evide:2ce ef attesting witnesses or \u00a30 digprove their evidence.<\/p>\n
V' l–'if*.?v_fefelj,l#T% because the scribe and attesting witness t0 the will have<\/p>\n
 edeeosed that in their presence, the atitestor affixed his<\/p>\n
signature in their presence \u00a33 not the cenclusive presfef<\/p>\n
I70 W.P.'?i)43fE}9<\/p>\n
eircunzstanees, the Court has the power it}   A'
\ndisputed signature with the undisptued  t ''
\nwider Sec 7.3 Gfthe Act".    ''  ' Vt  '<\/p>\n
Further learned single Judi\u00a7g.V..of   <\/p>\n
of Sri.Achyut and uzzotfzer -~vs.+:Sntt,_Nati:zTci.  others<\/p>\n
reported in JLR 2009 I{ARIV2″\u00a7\u00a7?TAICz\u00e91VV2%’\u00a7’  under\u00bb
\n ‘Vthe:-_ suitjiie\ufb01  ‘the..;i\u00a7Iaintij_’f is far<\/p>\n
partitirm c:zidV\u00bb.s\u00a7–e;5ti:9{;te ‘ptxs\u00e9es\u00e9iefgof. the suit schedule<\/p>\n
prGpetf\u00b0tieS;’\/A ihe:”~z;\u00a7t:=..<,:e  ptaintzff as also
\ndefefidantt ' tizeet ttfiiegiizzg\u00e9erties are their ancestrat
\npropertiestt tyeu-eve:  N03,} and 2 contend
\nthastt thereauis  py\u00e9orttgadttttion of the properties as per
\n tlzfei.  partition W Ex.DI dated
\n\u00bb  __Defenda:nt H33 in her evidence has
\n 'V  :'it;eVrVs\u00a7figtature en the said document, Whether
\n  in dispute is the sigtuztum of defendant<\/p>\n
V.    has to be answered by an expert after
\nV  * czatrtp\ufb01tftng the same with the admitted signature. This
\n  "qr\/terstiort has to be scientg\ufb01oally analyzed examined
\n considered by an emert and then, he has to give<\/p>\n
H his opinion after sczienti\ufb01oally testing the same. The
\nburden is an defendant N05. 1 and 2 to establish that<\/p>\n
the disputed signature is of defendant I'Ic:.3.<\/p>\n
1 1 W.P,'?I343.?'G\u00a7<\/p>\n
Therefore, the Gear: befow was not righi in rejee\u00e9$\ufb019,,<\/p>\n
the appliocztion\ufb01fed by defendant N031 and 2'? <\/p>\n
6. In View of the law declared b;5%:!’??e ‘S1iprem”eV:\u20ac..’pu?’t<\/p>\n
and this Court, the report 01’   <\/p>\n
cenclusive evidence. The rep0ri;_u’\u00a7;f_ i1\u00a2a1nd\\\u00a7x%1*iti;j3TgVA_expeI’t is
\nsubject to objections and  -cifzyee-iz\ufb01ie\ufb01ixi\ufb01ation. Further it
\nis ebiigatory on  pared?  V_”t0 consider the<\/p>\n
report cf the    wwitl1 ether evidence<\/p>\n
evaiiable ell ree{‘; :\ufb01.._\u00abVV_  impugned order, the trite}<\/p>\n
Ceurt has ii-@;_%: etated   compare the disputed arid<\/p>\n
edmittegi si$1a’eu:re_V ef’ S.”I’.Ambekar by exercising its power<\/p>\n
“:1:’1c}.e: _’:See.?f;~3 _ef…the Evidence Act is erroneous. In View of<\/p>\n
the”   between the parties, denial aed<\/p>\n
edmieeien ‘die Signature of S.’\u00a5’.Am}:>ekar en the dispute<\/p>\n
 VE\u00a7;,.D2 the will, the appointment of an handwriting<\/p>\n
 expegrf ie necessary’ in the facts eed cimmnetamees ef this<\/p>\n
“eeee. After eonclueien of evicierzee on both the side and<\/p>\n
 ivhen the matter was set down for arguments, the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
c7’\\w<\/p>\n
1.4 W.P\u00bb?(3%3J{?\u00a7r<\/p>\n
Ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
dh”‘<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009 Author: H N Das 1 W.P,’}’\u20ac)43iGS\u00a5 IN THE 13:13:\u00bb; comm’ 4:312′ KARNATgKA, 3 % * DATED THIS THE 04TH DA’: OIf””:-4:’\u00e9I..If’J’1’\\4i’;\u00a533.’.:\ufb01\u00a2f)j\u00e9\u20ac}”‘ BEFORE .V.% %%%A _. THE HONBLE IsdR.JIIS’\u00a7’ICB3:v:v:4I:fi’;-x1${I.1\\I{\u00a7(}}XI\\;I–;:)f%A\u00a7f%DAS WIRE’? PEYFITION :((}.M~CPQ} BE”I’WEEN:– _ ____ H PTSHYLESH;s\/Q’%P’v*T1Vn<gRAM%. AGED ABOUT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nP T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-16T19:44:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P T Shylesh S\\\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-16T19:44:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":643,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009\",\"name\":\"P T Shylesh S\\\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-16T19:44:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P T Shylesh S\\\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-16T19:44:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-16T19:44:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009"},"wordCount":643,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009","name":"P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-16T19:44:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-shylesh-so-p-v-tukaram-vs-smt-ambikapathi-on-4-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P T Shylesh S\/O P V Tukaram vs Smt Ambikapathi on 4 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=144491"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144491\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=144491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=144491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=144491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}