{"id":144502,"date":"2010-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-03-15T21:27:30","modified_gmt":"2016-03-15T15:57:30","slug":"mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010<\/div>\n
                              Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n                            Complaint\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/000832\u00a0\n                       Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0(18)\n\n\n\n\n                                                                    Dated:\u00a04\u00a0August\u00a02010\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0                 :   Shri\u00a0Jivanlal\u00a0C.\u00a0Shah\n                                             21,\u00a0Anupama\u00a0BOI\u00a0Society,\n                                             B\/H.\u00a0Polytechnic,\n                                             Ahmedabad\u00a0-\u00a0380\u00a0015.\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0           :   CPIO,\u00a0Bank\u00a0of\u00a0India,\n                                             Ahmedabad\u00a0Zonal\u00a0Office,\n                                             Ahmedabad\u00a0Zone,\u00a0Band\u00a0of\u00a0India\u00a0Building,\u00a0\n                                             Bhadra,\u00a0Ahmedabad\u00a0-\u00a0380\u00a0001.\n\n\n\n         The\u00a0Complainant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0person.\n\n         On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Krishan\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0was\u00a0present.<\/pre>\n
2.       In\u00a0our\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a015\u00a0December\u00a02009,\u00a0we\u00a0had\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
provide\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0delay.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0<\/p>\n
response,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0has\u00a0sent\u00a0his\u00a0written\u00a0comments.\u00a0\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0<\/p>\n
has\u00a0also\u00a0represented\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0yet\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0<\/p>\n
to\u00a0his\u00a0satisfaction.\u00a0\u00a0To\u00a0resolve\u00a0these\u00a0issues,\u00a0we\u00a0had\u00a0fixed\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0for\u00a0hearing\u00a0<\/p>\n
through \u00a0videoconferencing.\u00a0 \u00a0Both\u00a0the\u00a0parties\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Ahmedabad\u00a0<\/p>\n
Studio\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0NIC.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0drew\u00a0our\u00a0attention\u00a0to\u00a0our\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a015\u00a0<\/p>\n
June \u00a0 2010 \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 case \u00a0 No. \u00a0 CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/001346 \u00a0 &\u00a0<\/p>\n
CIC\/SM\/\/2010\/000142\u00a0and\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0compliance\u00a0of\u00a0our\u00a0directions,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
CPIO\u00a0had\u00a0already\u00a0provided\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0large\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0records\u00a0and\u00a0documents\u00a0<\/p>\n
relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant’s\u00a0queries.\u00a0\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0continued\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/000832
\n protest\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0correct\u00a0or\u00a0adequate.\u00a0 \u00a0To\u00a0<\/p>\n
bring\u00a0to\u00a0an\u00a0end\u00a0to\u00a0this\u00a0interminable\u00a0dispute,\u00a0we\u00a0think\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0should\u00a0<\/p>\n
arrange \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 inspection \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 relevant \u00a0 records \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Complainant.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Therefore,\u00a0we\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0assemble\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0records\u00a0having\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n
bearing\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0queries\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0and\u00a0then\u00a0to\u00a0invite\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
inspect\u00a0those\u00a0records.\u00a0 \u00a0We\u00a0direct\u00a0this\u00a0exercise\u00a0must\u00a0be\u00a0completed\u00a0within\u00a015\u00a0<\/p>\n
working \u00a0 days \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 receipt \u00a0 of \u00a0 this \u00a0 order. \u00a0 \u00a0 We \u00a0 further \u00a0 order \u00a0 that \u00a0 if \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
Complainant \u00a0 chooses \u00a0 to \u00a0 get \u00a0 photocopies \u00a0 of \u00a0 some \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 records \u00a0 after\u00a0<\/p>\n
inspection,\u00a0 he\u00a0 should\u00a0 be\u00a0 provided\u00a0 with\u00a0 such\u00a0 copies\u00a0 free\u00a0 of\u00a0 cost,\u00a0 excluding,\u00a0<\/p>\n
however,\u00a0those\u00a0records\u00a0the\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0have\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0<\/p>\n
in\u00a0the\u00a0past.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.       Now,\u00a0in\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0delay\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0in\u00a0providing\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
information,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0has\u00a0explained\u00a0in\u00a0some\u00a0detail\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
communication\u00a0dated\u00a05\u00a0January\u00a02010.\u00a0He\u00a0has\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0queries\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n
Saha\u00a0arose\u00a0from\u00a0two\u00a0complaints\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Banking\u00a0Ombudsman\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
the\u00a0main\u00a0plank\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0was\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0alleged\u00a0non\u00adfulfilment\u00a0<\/p>\n
of\u00a0the\u00a0various\u00a0commitments\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Bank.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0has\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
the\u00a0Bank\u00a0had\u00a0both\u00a0a\u00a0series\u00a0of\u00a0discussions\u00a0and\u00a0correspondences\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0Saha\u00a0<\/p>\n
regarding\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0complaints\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0so\u00adcalled\u00a0commitments\u00a0made\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n
the\u00a0Banking\u00a0Ombudsman.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.       Besides\u00a0 he \u00a0 has\u00a0 also\u00a0 submitted\u00a0 that\u00a0 within\u00a0 a \u00a0 month\u00a0 of \u00a0 receiving\u00a0 Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n
Saha’s\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0initiative\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0Saha\u00a0himself,\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
invited\u00a0for\u00a0discussions\u00a0on\u00a0these\u00a0issues\u00a0on\u00a027\u00a0February\u00a02009\u00a0and\u00a0they\u00a0were\u00a0<\/p>\n
given\u00a0to\u00a0understand\u00a0that\u00a0Shri\u00a0Saha\u00a0was\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0discussion.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0<\/p>\n
CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/000832
\n background,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0has\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0felt\u00a0necessary\u00a0to\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
him\u00a0separately.\u00a0\u00a0Although\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0desirable\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0<\/p>\n
to\u00a0 respond\u00a0 to \u00a0 Shri\u00a0 Saha’s\u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0 in \u00a0 a\u00a0 formal\u00a0 manner\u00a0 with\u00a0 specific\u00a0<\/p>\n
information,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0background\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0submissions\u00a0and\u00a0especially\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
Shri\u00a0Saha\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0seeking\u00a0more\u00a0or\u00a0less\u00a0similar\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Bank\u00a0<\/p>\n
through\u00a0various\u00a0RTI\u00adapplications,\u00a0we\u00a0would\u00a0accept\u00a0the\u00a0explanation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0<\/p>\n
this\u00a0time\u00a0as\u00a0reasonable\u00a0and\u00a0not\u00a0impose\u00a0any\u00a0penalty\u00a0on\u00a0him.\u00a0 \u00a0However,\u00a0we\u00a0<\/p>\n
would\u00a0like\u00a0to\u00a0make\u00a0it\u00a0clear\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adapplications\u00a0must\u00a0be\u00a0dealt\u00a0with\u00a0seriously\u00a0<\/p>\n
and\u00a0not\u00a0mixed\u00a0up\u00a0with\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0pending\u00a0issues\u00a0between\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
and\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0seeker.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.       The\u00a0final\u00a0objective\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0(RTI)\u00a0Act\u00a0is\u00a0to\u00a0ensure\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
the\u00a0citizen\u00a0gets\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0he\u00a0desires\u00a0and\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0prescribed\u00a0time\u00a0limit.\u00a0<\/p>\n
In\u00a0this\u00a0particular\u00a0case,\u00a0much\u00a0time\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0lost.\u00a0\u00a0We\u00a0hope\u00a0that\u00a0by\u00a0inspecting\u00a0all\u00a0<\/p>\n
the\u00a0relevant\u00a0records,\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0would\u00a0finally\u00a0get\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0replies\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0<\/p>\n
had\u00a0been\u00a0seeking.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.       The\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0thus\u00a0disposed\u00a0off.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7.       Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n
                                                               (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)
\n                                                       Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n
        Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy.\u00a0\u00a0Additional\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0against\u00a0
\napplication\u00a0and\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0prescribed\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0
\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n
CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/000832
\n                              (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)
\n                       Assistant\u00a0Registrar\u00a0<\/p>\n
CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/000832\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission Complaint\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/000832\u00a0 Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0(18) Dated:\u00a04\u00a0August\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0 : Shri\u00a0Jivanlal\u00a0C.\u00a0Shah 21,\u00a0Anupama\u00a0BOI\u00a0Society, B\/H.\u00a0Polytechnic, Ahmedabad\u00a0–\u00a0380\u00a0015. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0Bank\u00a0of\u00a0India, Ahmedabad\u00a0Zonal\u00a0Office, Ahmedabad\u00a0Zone,\u00a0Band\u00a0of\u00a0India\u00a0Building,\u00a0 Bhadra,\u00a0Ahmedabad\u00a0–\u00a0380\u00a0001. The\u00a0Complainant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0person. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Krishan\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0was\u00a0present. 2. In\u00a0our\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a015\u00a0December\u00a02009,\u00a0we\u00a0had\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0 provide\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0delay.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0 response,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0has\u00a0sent\u00a0his\u00a0written\u00a0comments.\u00a0\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0 has\u00a0also\u00a0represented\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0yet\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0 to\u00a0his\u00a0satisfaction.\u00a0\u00a0To\u00a0resolve\u00a0these\u00a0issues,\u00a0we\u00a0had\u00a0fixed\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0for\u00a0hearing\u00a0 through \u00a0videoconferencing.\u00a0 \u00a0Both\u00a0the\u00a0parties\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Ahmedabad\u00a0 Studio\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0NIC.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0drew\u00a0our\u00a0attention\u00a0to\u00a0our\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a015\u00a0 June \u00a0 2010 \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 case […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-15T15:57:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-15T15:57:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":686,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-15T15:57:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-15T15:57:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-15T15:57:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010"},"wordCount":686,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010","name":"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-15T15:57:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jivanlal-chunilal-shah-vs-bank-of-india-on-4-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Jivanlal Chunilal Shah vs Bank Of India on 4 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=144502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144502\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=144502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=144502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=144502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}