{"id":144923,"date":"2008-04-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008"},"modified":"2018-12-29T06:34:47","modified_gmt":"2018-12-29T01:04:47","slug":"the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n
[I\n\nIn w.1='. No. esvvxjaosm\n\n       \n\n \"  Road. nijagur.\n\n111\n\nIN run nae COURI or xannamaxa Am naNaaLom5= \nDamn\u00bb razs was oi\" nu: or npnxn. 2oo\u00a7\u00a7f{= \u00e9\n\nin-vnnuru -in\n\nWX'\ufb01rI&j'I\n\n1 \"'1~.e Asst. 2.1::--\"' 'F971-'ye:-.\".v_!.ri1i*V'-~=1.-;?':= A\n\n-bl I-Illa-Q-V\n\nE111; Pandhayath Rngina\u00a7king:\" ' \n\n\ufb01uh-\ufb01iviniog;_3\u00a2n'ikaman \ufb01oadg\nBijlpux. ; ',r * MW\n\n2.. \"'1'-..e =!.-:e.\u00abi\u00e94:t$;\"; V':-i'-2~.:',;.!4.'..ee.=r.*,\n3111!: Plnch\ufb02yqtt ,.f\n\n%\n\nV \u00ab-599 S4-:;:.g%p4I. !t.en:;.n.._i,-\n\n. .vAq*ed\"vqb:imt'32 years.\n\".\ufb01aaidg\ufb01$ aivcfa a.s.raei1,\nBertha]. 'agahi, Indi Road,\n\n3i'j\u00a2{3\ufb01E \n\n\"\"\u00a7 V1LnSri;'\u00a7\u00a7Iu 8\/0 amugi Loni,\n\n\" Ag\"-'a=.'. abaat 55 3-a...-*5.\n\n\u00e9' '-_M3:l.dnnt at nlnapuna {Rahal},\n:Cio 5.3. l?o.til, i-carnival Mani,\n. . .1L'IS?ONDEN'.l'8\n\n\u00a33! 53:. Hansen 5* In\u00bb: vi\n\n'*1\n\n\n\n'this writ Potition is filed undiz\n\n.....A 60\"!\n\n\ufb01i\ufb01ielaa 226 am out at the Ca:-.:.-9.1.!-.1:.*.:i:~.:*.w~.ie.*\u00ab\u00a3*~..\nIndia, praying to quash the impugned  V.\ndated 15.12.2603 puma by the __--'.E;aa:\u00e9i:nij& \nPresiding Officoz. B-ijapur: in Ref. 1~{9.\"5.9i2i!01 ' T\n\n'lfidl annexure 'A' . _  \n\nBETIBEN :\nIn 3.1'. R0. 85707006:\n\n1. Thu ant. Eaocutiva Engingux;\niii in iancinyath V \u00a7x)gin.ai'ri._imj,\"-\u00bb __\nsub-Division, Bu1d_i??.amnn.V--aoag1,  _\nBijqpur.    \"\n\n2. The Exocut:1\ufb01:r;\u00a7'--Bngfiii\u00a7\u00a7.\u00a7z*,  V\n2111:      \n31 japuz :'nm.,y1an, ii-r5..;\u00a3\u00bbili\"=1??=iti*..  i .. .PE'1'I'I'IONERB\n\n{BY sum}. 3'!-i\"\"\"?-*._7\"(\"_J'\u00a3'i-?'4VV\"'\ufb01i.'_'a?.3\ufb01\ufb01V'J'.\"1'.'ES, \"\"\"'v'\"\"\"\"\"'.i.'E\ufb01i\n\n5:1 . lrzmir:   \n\n_.,5f:'a I-Eigjirisah i\ufb01iz\ufb01awaat,\n .V mad\" *----ube\"ut '39 yuj\u00e9i.\n':m\"\u00a2\"Jnr:p.r.og:i,.__ Hour hchur Katti,\n\nSitln\ufb01i 6:.-._ jvi-\"--.9a:i_.. _ V Eij spur . . . . RESPONDIIHT\n\n:3: am,  3. an-:.nz.n.99z~.u.=\u00ab. .9-\n\n  A' 'i*-'mic \u00ab:1: Petition in filed under\n\nT\ufb01xeiclea 226 and 227 of the Constitution of\n\n --...'I:.~.1.1,ie.. gggying :9 quggh the zlmpugnod onward\n\n\"'\u00bb..\u00a2in_tad 15.12.2005 panic!' by tho learned\n\n *.Pfiii:':'Li.W \ufb01ffi\ufb01a\ufb01p Bi-jag-:11: in Ref. 2:.-=.a2.4'2ee2\n --\u00ab ~ Vida Annexuro 'A' .\n\n\n\n' BE'1'I'I\u00a3N :\n\nIn VLF. ND. BGBGIZOOE:\n\n1. The hunt. Exucutivo Engineer,\n\n2111.: .'%a:~....*-*-.a3-at}. Br.-,-ir.ee.~:.i.-...,~,\n\nBub--D.i.1riaion. nnndikaman B;::'a;d.F.,  V\nnijapur.   1 '\n\n2. 'mo Exoc.-utivo Engimwz-,-.___\n\n9.1 1 1 I Dun:-215.:-|r.n1':I1 . -\n\nBijapuz Diviuion;  \n\n3. 'me cage: Executive7\"e:s.'i;;:;;-;'*--Tj~ \n21114: Panchnyath, _ V '  \n\ufb01ij spur \ufb01iIi:_::ig=i:. ,\ufb01i'j--a'pur..._j.__ .; \num am-.  -.\u00a7asm:Afs\u00a7%; AINDGATR3)\nmm:  %%%%      -\n\n31:1. Appa:ana.Ew..I\u00a7-,_A \ufb01ppanm . . '_'\nShctty B'.oI{.=_, AgIid_fah*a31t:. 35' years}-\nI'I;li!;l_!;l!Li.   \u00bb*In;1uatricu,\nDarya' Road. Rea: :1-I:L'11;\n\n'A Ann. 413'\n\nIn-.lJ......;...\u00a7 ;u.....I..'. .....a. ..\n . .Il.I.JI_\u00a7Mg.Lp mnxLJuEa5saf.\u00a7uugnap\n C.!q\"ari;\"L\u00bb.V;G. !tu1h;k.u:n1;  ,   '_\n\".\u00a7sd1fe\u00a2;Vatg;\u00ab.% B13 npuzr. . . \n\n Jz1\u00a7\u00e9.!.'sI1i\";*&\u00bb& 3. mman-pmuvAn,_;_ Arman-rm\n\n\"I\"ri.i.$* imi: retition is i:'i1ic'1Hi1\"nn.II\"':'rE\n\n ,\ufb01:ti<:1ea 226 and 227 of the Constitution of\n 7IEi_II_.,$' praying ta quash the iupuqnadj mud\n -.f.c.!.;;e\u00a2 ;t.\u00a7=f_lz=2t;It_3:'.s pgsgag by the learned\n"'*V..E:_:e:siding ottican. Bijapur in Rat. Na.23.f20o1\n"Vii-id: a\ufb01niiiizra 'ii' .\n\n'muse writ D-atitians earning on to:\nEnauminary Homing in 'B' .Gx:ou1_'.: this day, the\ncourt made the \u00a3o11cm:i.ng:-\n\n\n\nKai\n\n0 R D E 5\nThose three writ potitions are  V.\nagainst Ref. Na. 23. 32 and 59 of 2koo'v.1.: a....  *\n\n15.12.2005.\n\n2. It dispute was raiai-\u00a7&--~.... by ~.1':iha, _  v%\ninter-\u00ablie alleging ;__tha1:_.   as\n\n\ufb02ail? '---= wlwees  *.\u00e97.*'~.::'si".~'-.5] gs-;_g,'-u;|.L'\u00a3I;5 Lye\n\nboen tanninatggi.  illisiari\nthat they   ~   \u00e91io days at\ncontinupup   25-3 of the\n1.1).   -'to rotrenclmant and\n\ng;._n_.1m-ad issg_1ngt's-.t&Vijua::Lit..\u00bb..  9w1t:h but wages and\n\n  Claimant in Rat. No..'.'u9f2OD1 also\n\n.  that, ho had conwletud 240 day: or\n\n faontinuoua service and claimant in Rat.\n\nNo.32!2001 also worked 240 days cf continuous\n\n51!.'\n\n\n\n'[\n\nauzvice. In support of their cum. they\n\nroliad on Vouchers i::\u00a2.I\u00abI1 to M9, N10 to \n\nEx..n1 to H21 in Ref. No.32.\n\n4. The Labour court has-viva}.   \n\ndoaumunta round that, '1E_1_ja.po  c21V:n1,raar;:\u00a3\u00e9i._*~...11g:\u00a73o %\n\nwaged :9; 240 ginnytj of c9n\u00a3iv\ufb01uaysiQ" (your\n\n"ad th-'3; are 1*...-s'.:"'-- 5\u00a7ais'.'-  i.'-:.'l.""\u00a3\u00a3{" . '+~J-.'~..et:e:'-....*'-"'.-13::-.*.:\n\ncourmnnntion.  anti' 'TT\u00a7:-.i:'e._'j.__' .V:ar\u00a7i:"ii;1e for\n\nrains tatarag-3:.    \n\nputitio\ufb01e\ufb01s %V izhnt. in so far as\n\nclaimant \ufb01<$'.;.1._'1:;-n\u00e9':;""izo.59r2oo1 is conaonnad.\n\n5 ha\u00e9  :.not': ._ceu\ufb01\u00a71i'e\u00a7d 240 days of continuum\n\n'icLr;:Et'.."' -  to H9 t:1w_.r do not prove\n\nthis nmn;-an .sm_: 1 :11  Sill;\n\nu A provisions, all the employment: are roquir.-ad\n\nto he made in accordance with than Rules or\n\n\n\n ~ :Lu\n\n1:o<:1:u:I.tment. He further aubzrnittod that. thciisg\n\nworhuon were engaged temporarily\n\n  '  " ..\n\nparticular purpose and for short    M\n\nH\n\n9- 21;;\n\nit th-\nright created. in the  \nalas suhm:l.t1:a-:1 than':  d\u00a7\u00a7:i.V:VL"y"3Iv-iragos\nfor 1:\u00a3emp orury porig\u00e9     :    39 articular\npurpose cann-;\u00a7t':\u00a7;a;; \u00e9* cc\u00e9:\u00a7:1a?\u00a7L\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9iotf.A':\u00a7\u00bb:\ufb01L\u00e9\u00a7"~Va;.___j\u00e9\u00a7i'\u00a7'ht created\n\nn-urngg;\n\n----\n<\/pre>\n
1D\n<\/p>\n
1|’!
\nIr!<\/p>\n
I1′!
\n49<\/span>
\nI1
\n“I5
\n(I
\nI3<\/p>\n
: :3
\n31′
\n1:!’
\n1%
\nI?-‘
\n1<\/span>
\nI<\/p>\n
l
\nJ.\n<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
It
\n3.1!
\n1′!’
\nH
\nH’<\/p>\n
auhtuitt\ufb01sf  in which they are<\/p>\n
working ark’ x; ot.V’;a\u00a7na{:’i Vow:nd post and the 3.1.11:<\/p>\n
gun\ufb016\ufb01””‘\u00e9ontinua the petitioners in<\/p>\n
 It is turthu: auhrnittod that,<\/p>\n
…1’: $33.35 x<\/p>\n
 but tho cmnpannation could be an-mrand
\nagainst the noinatutomont and whon the post
\nnot in oxiatenco or post is tonuponary in<\/p>\n
nutura or the past: is for I paxtziculax pugpoao,<\/p>\n
1; gm  <\/p>\n
,9\u00bb;\n<\/p>\n
I;-V”-\n<\/p>\n
_ directing<\/p>\n
-1<\/p>\n
the reinstatement amounts<\/p>\n
etaating a post 10.1: the purpoaa._’ ‘_;V.i’\u00a7\u00a7;:\ufb01A~ <\/p>\n
reinstatement. ‘rho vouchers p\u00bbroduca__d ‘ T’ 1 ‘V<\/p>\n
pe\u00b0.:it.’ic-.:-.2.-…-5 =.-n.3,’ shag t….-9…,-3′ th-‘tr 7-.9.-.i;v.’~L\u00bb.__” <\/p>\n
daily wages for paziicuiaa
\npoint: of time the appoiniili-grit’ N4.
\nrogulax appoint::wont}_”~V-._   the
\nLaaznad Counaej, roli\ufb01svia’   of the
\nApax court   the matter<\/p>\n
Irla _<\/p>\n
  an . .7 .. ..\n<\/p>\n
iii   su:g.i:e.a-mt, the inifzial
\nburden af \ufb01ho workman had worked<\/p>\n
2-GO dgayrau “is on the workman. Evan<\/p>\n
  rgonfiii\ufb01baa working of 240 days. if<\/p>\n
 is izmvporaxvy, the workman will<\/p>\n
 ” v,_;S5’ho further: zaiiati on a judgm” out M’:
\nx   Icoum: in 11.: 200′: III. also in the matter<\/p>\n
VaLk% :q\u00a3 na:n ulnnn nan:-an no  ‘VII<\/p>\n
..  In<\/p>\n
circutuntutcu has held that, it than<\/p>\n
appointments are short lived and  <\/p>\n
tmmpczary for a particular scheme,   <\/p>\n
gaze: gig g 4 in; 1:43;: -:a.1.’f’1::i. 33..  <\/p>\n
in ‘\ufb01hii aaia \ufb01””w.’|.i”a” V
\nthat. in one of totmdg\ufb01\ufb01ry cit
\ncontractual employmagit  to:
\nparticular pus;-nu,  _…;,,:,’v.:’;:f\u00a7.ji_.\u00a5”__\u00a2’-,4or1:EaJ: any<\/p>\n
right in tho  tr.\u00bb –:}\u00e91ai:i’1*'{–]’ra’i\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7’ta1:amant.<\/p>\n
7. shy.   :’.\u00a7’a i;;::V?5:her decision of
\nthe np\u00e9x cou\u00a7h\u00a3’Vizcsij:o:i:\u00a7ai1n (toot) 5 Ice 1:’! in<\/p>\n
tho matta:’iM%a:V  cm! unxctnr.\n<\/p>\n
-‘—5-i””=’e=”: V.’ .V%.’.-.’.-= e..– I..-..-.-. an era.-.-.3 and<\/p>\n
W_g11i:miVtt_\u00a7&_  in can an appointment made<\/p>\n
 basis and riot in town of<\/p>\n
 V .pno\u00a7i”ai\u00e9\u00a7s”‘$\u00a3 any 1111.0: remand thor.-\u00abunder, had<\/p>\n
  tight to continue in urvice.<\/p>\n
 tho appoint:-aunts _having been made all<\/p>\n
in
\nCI.\n<\/p>\n
\ufb02l
\nI-\n<\/p>\n
H
\n1<\/span>
\n\u00a3
\nH
\nII
\n‘In<\/p>\n
‘ sonic: cannot be construed to he roizuanczimont<\/p>\n
under the provisions or the net. In this<\/p>\n
  daily wage<\/p>\n
Q2’! t-“.1A.ec 21*-n:|.te th t
\n” nature and the uorimi\ufb01 iiith<\/p>\n
‘ had accepted the daily wage eraployment.<\/p>\n
sequel.’ she relied can at para: 13 of the said
\njudgment.\n<\/p>\n
She eleo relied on <\/p>\n
judgment reported in (8006! I see  T’ K <\/p>\n
abolition of project or “”a.:V:”techeuie_V_
\nitself. workmen  .’ “d;Lrected’VV to:<\/p>\n
nine teteruent . V<\/p>\n
6. Learned ..;I_.’or  P\ufb01titionere
\nrelied _c:1r1..__e “?+Irar’_viI’:1\u00a7’:’e’\u00ab-,:J__. the Apex Court<\/p>\n
as welig nan’  eubtuit that when e.<\/p>\n
‘ 1}’-\n<\/p>\n
ll<\/p>\n
4-._.i.1}r  _ 3.1.-:_:’I_r;I_.n:l__e;u.:..1_ to: I.<\/p>\n
.1—\n<\/p>\n
II-U<\/p>\n
yuayunv 13<\/p>\n
Flu
\nHI
\nfl’<\/p>\n
employee cannot<\/p>\n
 of right: for reinstatement.<\/p>\n
 It  .. tea: a particular scheme and for<\/p>\n
 ‘2;gsarti..\u00a2;uiex pun:-pane the appointments are made.<\/p>\n
cIII\u00a51u –u–u uni I<\/p>\n
also euhmitted that, no doubt in normal<\/p>\n
” ” V . Vioapofzd” xiii .<\/p>\n
circumstances, if the worhuan conducts <\/p>\n
days continuous somrico, if ha is  <\/p>\n
tunninated from service, the   <\/p>\n
I:\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
\n[J
\nIn.\n<\/p>\n
I!’
\nll
\ndz
\n:4
\nr
\n1:?\n<\/p>\n
 -< nu <\/p>\n
I.=~
\nI5'
\n1::\n<\/p>\n
Fr
\nE-\n<\/p>\n
as
\nit-*\n<\/p>\n
-r
\nIP-\n<\/p>\n
1:\n<\/p>\n
against the   ”\n<\/p>\n
rninatatomcnt has to he itiii\ufb01ecfi Vizm\u00e9
\nat rodruitm\ufb01m;   ho
\ncontinued for ions:   pogt
\ndohoru to  14 and<\/p>\n
1!’. of t..-.: \u00a3.::~.:-.+e-;~.:,-a.i.—;:*\u00bb.;:1,.\u00e9.~sz~;i:\u00ab.ai\u00a3;::~.-:-11;;<\/p>\n
9. ’12t;:’1.._AiIe’ai\ufb01a’j:-.,\u00a7ubE\ufb01i.\u00a7’to’d-‘ that, in this can
\n1.211; sngn_g\u00a7z:,_gg1:.f;   particular period and<\/p>\n
 cwn\u00a7’e:__to an end. I-linwavar.-, the izabnuaz<\/p>\n
 ..  the ground that, ratzunctmont<\/p>\n
:  is not granted tn the<\/p>\n
if ‘4″1.;:\u00a7i:rpa;-adiiinta, has allowed the uclaim petition<\/p>\n
roiizatatamant oi! the roupondanta would amaunt<\/p>\n
to creating a post without cadre strength and<\/p>\n
 01! than 1.1:. not.\n<\/p>\n
-311a<\/p>\n
also amounts to hoping the surplus orrploam\ufb01m;<\/p>\n
in the 2111: Banal-myath, to: which <\/p>\n
sanction. She also nuhmtted t:hjI\u00a7;’v:”_’ T’   <\/p>\n
The Labour Court without ie\ufb01srrinq’ \ufb01at:<\/p>\n
hl\ufb01
\nwound that, the  completed
\n240 days o\u00a3;””\u00a3E;pg\u00a7;tir}.11os1\u00e9.”‘:  zuntnu<\/p>\n
hum<\/p>\n
 .. 239:: paid<\/p>\n
1.-nt:\u00a7:ia1jz’\u00a2:!niIIr11Vj\u00e9”‘V\u00e9e\ufb01w\u00e9h\ufb01atiun, the tupondenta
\nare ar_:1:_1t1\u00a7 d \u00a36: ‘I~zd’:3.:iii:atomont.<\/p>\n
 __caun.-.Ia1 appearing tor: tho<\/p>\n
.t’\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3#nd’i;\ufb01’I$?i\u00e9bL\u00a3k\ufb02l0n submit: that; tho<\/p>\n
 \u00abgtocuaiiii-:.11:$ . faroducad boron the Labour court<\/p>\n
 Ehnt all those respondents have washed<\/p>\n
once the workman oatahliahau<\/p>\n
that he had wound 2430 days aontinuoualy in I.<\/p>\n
uuama the c1.\u00a71m  tn’;<\/p>\n
ra\ufb01:-i\ufb01cmun*’f5fvnf1″\u00a7V:\ufb01a\ufb01’tpiaiati’6n  failure i:oA<\/p>\n
you: his termination is illegal, and $5129<\/p>\n
Norman in ontitlud tor rainutatonIi!\ufb02:_”4: <\/p>\n
consequential benefits. He fuzrtharh’ u<\/p>\n
that. thl Labour: Court  <\/p>\n
” . 2 4%.’<\/p>\n
firms \u00b0i:.’::ie..’i..I:  on<\/p>\n
daily mngoa  210 days
\ncontinuouly in I.   being no
\nzotranclnnont     section
\n25-! of   fl’-i_1i;i_= ____<\/p>\n
roinni:ai:’ea:\ufb01eni:.–  ..–~cormaction, he relied<\/p>\n
on a  2-VIV;’:a\u00a2:uAAr’!’itie:?\u00a7nV in 200! 11!. our 306 in<\/p>\n
:_’j’ “E:L).’   nun nmmnnrzou s
\n ta-n., VII. nnnr.\n<\/p>\n
  d\ufb01li\ufb01\u00e9ii in question and the Qupromo court ha<\/p>\n
i.  -\u00ab. \u00a7:aii\u00a3imnd thy name.<\/p>\n
7′<\/p>\n
11. 575 iii?) a11’zic1’uit”1:id ‘\ufb01”‘f, i\ufb01 one aria ‘in<\/p>\n
Norman has been rainstntnd in pursuance at<\/p>\n
I I-135″ u<\/p>\n
3131:\n<\/p>\n
the award. However. the I-earned Counsel ‘fax<\/p>\n
the petitioner submitted that, <\/p>\n
xeinautement man in compliance   T’ ‘V<\/p>\n
interim order passed in the vh\ufb01it’peL;i.1;i.,;;;–_._ “V” I<\/p>\n
12. The only q11eation” _th..at<\/p>\n
consideration in th:i.__a  : ‘<\/p>\n
“whether the reupe\ufb01\ufb01ehf\u00e9 a:\u00e9evAA.’jefitit1ed to:
\nxeinateteraentv  up ‘_-..1_:Vr.iat;\u00ab, V they have
\ncamnpleted  2 ~\u00a7\u00a3__1r:.pn1;–ig;zie1\u00a7I\u00a7e” ‘aerviee in 1
\nyour in reepee_;i:;\u00bb’;V9f”  ‘eIu\u00a7\u00a7’\u00a7;ej,fment under the<\/p>\n
\ufb02l-Ab H’ ”\n<\/p>\n
13. !mg16:;re1envt'”‘ state is; _ a ‘public<\/p>\n
:5
\nif
\nI
\nE:\n<\/p>\n
J
\n1:.\n<\/p>\n
‘.4’
\n*2
\n5:-\n<\/p>\n
[.-0
\n{ul-\n<\/p>\n
(1
\nQ!\n<\/p>\n
-ii
\n2;’
\n“i
\nll
\nHI
\n,I
\nII
\nfl’<\/p>\n
  .i|’u:’ti\u00a2:1-D 365 of the \ufb01onstitution<\/p>\n
  Rule or Prmriuiona made in<\/p>\n
 Lrti\u00e9le  are subject to Part III at the
\n‘V’.’e \u00a7’2eens:.;t\ufb01b1on particularly articles 14 and 16<\/p>\n
  constitution at India.<\/p>\n
 It. in not in dispute mat, the petitioner<\/p>\n
is Z2111: Panchnyeth and state w:l.t;hJ.n- the<\/p>\n
2%<\/p>\n
\\_.\n<\/p>\n
c”-w<\/p>\n
-1’…\n<\/p>\n
meaning at Article 12 of the constitution.
\nin nine not in dispute that: the
\nwere engaged on daily wages and   ‘ 1 ‘V<\/p>\n
Ann-I new emu ngnatinnnd n;-nut   2
\niwxww W ———— –1vV–r ‘-   v —    ‘V:<\/p>\n
recruitment fir\ufb01\ufb01iiiu nit  V
\ndispute that, the e\ufb01tg:’&gement_V_   Htlie
\nrespondents in  ‘ion the
\nqualification nor   but it
\nwas to: exigent\ufb01gg’ tinein’:.w~’:ee:1nfii1dae_fwene engaged-<\/p>\n
.f.e: a gaxtitninn If  es-..I.pJ.e:,-2′.-..-.2-.t is<\/p>\n
given   ‘vi\u00e9\ufb01ei -:5: teiifgierary ‘pinion taut<\/p>\n
employment   not confer: any night<\/p>\n
on the  ‘tn dleiin for reinstatement. No<\/p>\n
 undue; s.\u00a2mn 25*!’ of the LD. Act. if<\/p>\n
‘is.  nemgietea continuous service or one<\/p>\n
 :-(ta:-,i.e~.~ -. aw.<\/p>\n
ZLEF-‘G -‘–~’- in – }’$..’…’.’; – is entitled.<\/p>\n
 benefit :51′: \ufb01ection 25:-F. hU’If”‘i.f; ir*v”i–”<\/p>\n
 iien\ufb01lejgment in the state has to be in<\/p>\n
 “‘\u00ab’.’:qe:ieenence with the Rules or regulation made<\/p>\n
 Hinder Article 309 or the constitution. It in<\/p>\n
not the case of the respondents that. they ,<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
L 7<\/p>\n
were appointed against a permanent poa1: b::
\nagainst: a clan: vacancy on to the  V.<\/p>\n
post. if for oxiqoncy, the 2111;  *  K<\/p>\n
.25′<\/p>\n
confer: any right in the
\nto: z-ogulaxisntion   i:; 1′:ho'” poat
\nor * 0113″ toinatntmont  ”   Emchwnth
\ncan continue;    iinily wagon
\ny.r1n_i..t.=h its    Evan in
\n“”” H  N M   past: Is: lame:
\npo:1od.vvv”w1f;ich  ‘to filled by regular<\/p>\n
:oaxu.iJ:mn\u00a3””   Rules, it amounts to<\/p>\n
 thy .v.”\u00abHa’1V:ViiL;’L’b..-; zucruitmont and amount:<\/p>\n
 Articles 14 and 16 oi.’ than<\/p>\n
‘”~I’11 7ch.1a cure. it in not sham: by the<\/p>\n
gaagta are sanctioned<\/p>\n
O-‘In –\n<\/p>\n
unw-\n<\/p>\n
JILIII
\nVJ: –\n<\/p>\n
H schema grill in oatiatanco nor the war’: in<\/p>\n
available. Hanover. the avidonca is clean:<\/p>\n
1_:_,g garrison at   I<\/p>\n
I” .\n<\/p>\n
. ( V<\/p>\n
‘that the engagement wee for 3 were week;<\/p>\n
-several breeze. it was not aantinuoue,  2<\/p>\n
shown” that. the reepondente were   ‘ 1 H<\/p>\n
 their eenricee wax-9″ “”zV:e\u00a2.ti”.rec5L\u00ab  <\/p>\n
–e– an’. -an nun\ufb01n<\/p>\n
en’.IM1″l _ 1-: -p…._
\nl.’n:.J.J.n. relnwueuruus. 5<\/p>\n
I
\nby the petitioners, cieerife. ehauie <\/p>\n
respondents were  sgxgeageeig n-\u00a7:;VV:’itj,nuei1ci13’f.v4 but<\/p>\n
.t:he:e were eevezel   exigency<\/p>\n
the engegemnt”\u00ab\u00abT:.\u00a7;’a   Vnot center<\/p>\n
to claim<\/p>\n
“1355, ceae. .wihe\u00a3e~ ;ifjV~.i:he”=.ermegemen’c are mean’ in<\/p>\n
reepagtv oi}. _:pe\u00a7.t  is not sanctioned and<\/p>\n
  is V”Vm””Vpu:poee or: work exists:<\/p>\n
 employee would amounts to<\/p>\n
  this case, from the records it appears
\n.   temporezy puzpoee the eezvicee of the<\/p>\n
 \u00bb ufreepomdante were engaged. and 11′ the nature at<\/p>\n
engagement in team-e::e.x:y end if that purpose is<\/p>\n
 4’6n1y’:e~–\u00a7ueati9n<\/p>\n
  ~  Thais? that<\/p>\n
 rhe”:::.ofi;11ded. The said judgment<\/p>\n
  e Tnut,<\/p>\n
-31?-\n<\/p>\n
over._ no right would flow from the unis;<\/p>\n
employment. The decision relied on  <\/p>\n
learned counsel for the zeupondente,   1 <\/p>\n
Q-I__rgg;\n<\/p>\n
:41… -..——–…’ 1.4.:-n4.:nL\ufb01<\/p>\n
-=
\ncase where the apex G0u::\u00a7J4::i1\u00aba-.5 ‘HiV:i’1Ve
\nquestion ot aonti’\u00a7au_1ng”””‘”V. ‘rages
\nemleyee in respect  the
\nState, has c\ufb01\u00e9etion an to<\/p>\n
A 1 AV  \u00a31
\neruploymen\ufb01 %V  circumstances are
\nentirely di’f!I_e:=ei1tA’ah\u00a3i’ is not epplieahlm The<\/p>\n
  w-ee considered by the Apex<\/p>\n
“‘\u00a7S: fi:o whether the delay itself is<\/p>\n
L.-\n<\/p>\n
tn –. _xaai-:d ” 36 the<\/p>\n
in case of delay the<\/p>\n
has no hearing<\/p>\n
 the facts and circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n
this court and the Apex court<\/p>\n
\u00a2.=r.=ae_i.’I_I1.= nt:_3_r<\/p>\n
\ufb01ve taken 5 Vi!!! that, adherence<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
,Q,q\u00bbE’–\n<\/p>\n
?W”v r<\/p>\n
Q1’C<\/p>\n
to the constitutional proviaidns in parmo\ufb01nt
\nconsideration in the public   <\/p>\n
View of the facts and c1JlI\u20ac3l1ll|Bt3011C:Q’p’_M;\ufb01f   ‘ <\/p>\n
direction of xeinatatouiiz\ufb01ii\u00bb _1n8’1z\u00a7\u00a7i -ihfgi i\u00e9ho
\nLabour court in    ‘rho
\nunapondontn hgvc   day: of<\/p>\n
continuous sg~t$*\u00a7\u00e9o; :1 :EiiSd”‘5;f’*:.’iva….;\u00e9oauanah1o to<\/p>\n
  \u00ab.:”~I;aataad of reinstatement, the<\/p>\n
:\u00a7iia\u00a7’\u00a2:1d\u00a7:{i:’\u00a7..  entitled for cuupunumzion o\ufb01<\/p>\n
   –1ls.56″,t..)t*iv!:JV.a’?–“‘V’aa:ch.<\/p>\n
 sd\/4<\/p>\n
-, ‘judge<\/p>\n
“= aw”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi [I In w.1=’. No. esvvxjaosm ” Road. nijagur. 111 IN run nae COURI or xannamaxa Am naNaaLom5= Damn\u00bb razs was oi” nu: or npnxn. 2oo\u00a7\u00a7f{= \u00e9 in-vnnuru -in WX’\ufb01rI&j’I 1 “‘1~.e Asst. 2.1::–“‘ ‘F971-‘ye:-.”.v_!.ri1i*V’-~=1.-;?’:= A -bl […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144923","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-29T01:04:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-29T01:04:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1737,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008\",\"name\":\"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-29T01:04:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-29T01:04:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-29T01:04:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008"},"wordCount":1737,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008","name":"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-29T01:04:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-executive-engineer-vs-sri-munir-ahamad-mujawar-on-9-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri Munir Ahamad Mujawar on 9 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=144923"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144923\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=144923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=144923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=144923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}