{"id":144955,"date":"2008-04-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008"},"modified":"2018-07-24T07:14:42","modified_gmt":"2018-07-24T01:44:42","slug":"sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n
~-------A --- ------------------- -------nu. ---. u--.....-.-y..------ - ----aw--u --- -.-.-...v-.-.----r--\n\n!_i..0*-.!Q.l.|.:E\n\n1\n\nWP9353.07\n\n|i\n\nll 'PHI HIGH OOURT OI' KARIATAIIA A1' \n\nA \"ii \"F-ii' 'i\"\"\" 1'='=\n3%'\n\nmm nownm HR. ammo: D.v. \n\nW111 Pe1g'Q'm_.L_3..N -9       \n\nsm THIMMEGOWDA  ' _V\nsjo  \nAGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,  .\n\nSR1 sRmIvAsA'  _  _\n3\/0 LATE VENKA'T'Af'F'A__  \nAGED A13ou'r 43yDA3s,__ ;\nsR1sHWAR'AM   \n\ns\/o4.DA1'D;vr;NxATA:?PA _. ;  \nAGED Aaouui 40\"Y_jEA'Rs, _ \"\n\n    ~\n S\/Q L*\"53TE.VV'E\"K5'm.PP5 '\n AGED ABQUT 38 \n\nSm ESHWAR'  \u00bb--  \ns\/o\"~1.A'rI_\u00ab: VEN KATAPPA\n\n' \" ACAED 'ADQUT 3.5 YEARS,\n\n_  +:1NAx_A1_. WLLAGE,\n\n\u00a7 :5\n\n-..'\n\nI  _ ,1' _\nq  \"'4ABA_HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK\nLL .5; J\"-1'5'-F' BY THE-!R\n\nn  gino-\n\n GPA HOLDER - s K SRINIVAS\n.~S!O'..--KE.'*.'.PAlAH.\n\n AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.\nwe HOUSE 240.34.\n\n:::-A\n\n \"'A AND B BLOCK,\n\nRAlJAvnlgHlLIAMAr1AD DA V 9'13'\n\nlVll'll'|.l\\ I'-'\"1 '-r'\\.'lrII\\ I-J\u00abI'I.lJI'I I\n\nCHAMARAJA MOHALLA\n\nMYSORE  . ..-.IT!0!\\!F-R-'.3\n\nim Sri. S  ' 'ii.,i\n\n\n\nL)\n:\n\"I\nu\n6\n\n1 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA \nREP BY'  SECRET' RT TO \nURBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPAR'I'MEN'l' ' ._\nM.S.BUILDING. BANGALORE-01 .-- \"  -- \"\n\n2 SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMT\nURBAN LAND CEILING\nMYSORE  _\n\n\"i:)NERT  j; \n\n3 THE TAHASILDAR\nMYSORE TALUK__\n\nMYSORE   --   'RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
[By Sn’. ‘RJK  :Hc:\u00a7:+z\u00e9”\u00a3z\u00a7\u00a3 R1-R3]<\/p>\n
THIS wR1TPE’n:TieN is 1~.*jL\u00e9:I:1. UNE?Ei? ARTICLES 225 85 227
\nes’ THE CC_.!!\\!$I\ufb02’L!TI\u20ac.)!~!3C.iF 1:~:p1;m ‘V eaavzue T0 QUAS1-1 THE
\nNOPIFICATEON %,_n.T.2a.,:’s_,1″9ao  preonucmn A1’ ANN-C AND<\/p>\n
!*!(‘!I’IFICA:’TIO!*I”‘\u00bbLY!’.’22.4L”133’30’—-AS ?EI’-3 A.!\\!!\\!-D AS ABATE-D AND<\/p>\n
ETC… %%%%    L A
\n THIS AVIV-5E.–‘”:f!’I’lv'(L’N ‘c:6’isa1N<3.'oN FOR HEARING. THIS DAY. THE<\/p>\n
COURT  WE' :-\n<\/p>\n
A , QB_Q_l.!5_.lS
\nV  ifWr*iI.:A pefi\ufb01ehers claim to be persons who are legal<\/p>\n
 frhimmegowda, \ufb02rst petitioner being son and<\/p>\n
 7′  Ll. IIGI DUEL’ \\.aJ.l.I..I.\\.\u00abI.\u00ab|.\\.o1J. Us vsau I’ an<\/p>\n
 1 brether of Thimmegowda who it is furule’ % 1′ claim’ ‘ ed had
\n   a declaration in ForIn–1 in terms of section — 6 of the
\n Urban Land Ceiling & Regulation Act, 1976 [for short<\/p>\n
‘1976 Act’; now repealed.\n<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
\/.\n<\/p>\n
‘I-Irwin: turn uu-ans’-uuc-nu-u manque. -~—rm”.-i-.. –. .– -..-.-…_- –…_-.. -_.____- __ __ _________ ____ ___<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\n It is claimed that the authorities under tne;1976 Act
\npurporting to act on the declaration that  ‘:a.1e.–1 by<\/p>\n
I-‘VJ-‘AI I IIJLIJLLLU-\ufb02uII4-II ‘IQ’, J<\/p>\n
lafn immniah (in himmgangrdn- <\/p>\n
.3112. r\\’_….’.._.t.’..<\/p>\n
residing at No.’2’26\/’8, as C-res,  Je, <\/p>\n
Mohalla, Mysore – 12,  issued a
\n28.3.1980 under section tlte=  tact [copy at
\nAnnexure-C] maieetiiis tlie _vacant land held by<\/p>\n
eves-.s’s’*wof– eem\ufb01o rise t.a_m_i it use been<\/p>\n
a Vululi-M:\\r’ ‘ ~ – -yo-u–E’ _._.V _ _ _. _<\/p>\n
_ .. .. …\u00a3’<\/p>\n
i11dicat6<i.'t.9;;ai\u00a7e'tiI1  Jr-:e.5 11 stnt.;~e. vluagc en -xteut e.
\n8,599,_8O*'Vs;i-.–   indicated to be excess.\n<\/p>\n
3. “VIt  to  on this dee””””‘e”1 and<\/p>\n
pebneeties, the eesgpetem authority had also issued<\/p>\n
 ”    ‘  Npuneeeen dated 22.4.1930 [copy at Annexune–D]<\/p>\n
%   10(3) of the 1976 Act declaring the excess<\/p>\n
:’
\n3<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
1.\n<\/p>\n
5.’
\n3<\/span>
\n3′
\nE
\nn
\nD
\n‘P
\n3″\n<\/p>\n
b
\nn
\nn<\/p>\n
ms nu navy}; I rid indi- f<\/p>\n
}ll\\l’Id’Il’1″‘
\n‘ Iv uuu \\l-ll 1: Juan: a.-cu-.-we-av–…<\/p>\n
s.’\ufb02l.aa.l.-.I|’..  vI’J..|..|.\\.\u00ab.I.1 wan<\/p>\n
E
\nc<\/p>\n
 AA in Amaiexme-C, the earlier N”ot:i1’ication.<\/p>\n
children of either Thimmegowda or his ‘brother<\/p>\n
Venkatappa is that the excess land measuring 2 acres 5<\/p>\n
%\/  <\/p>\n
V’  4.1.- 4-\n<\/p>\n
; 01 In<\/p>\n
WPQSSLLQT<\/p>\n
1|\n<\/p>\n
-1- –.. _<\/p>\n
guntas in Sy. No.5 of I-Iinkal Village had  their<\/p>\n
possession; that the petitioners or their  in _<\/p>\n
.n.I….1— AC ‘ . ‘hut    <\/p>\n
 1976 Act determining ut  oess11,e;tt::a_tt\u00bbeut.,..tp\u00a7-s.g-5
\n\ufb01led a revision petition before
\nhaving made a request   notto
\ntake the     excess land<\/p>\n
, ,.\n<\/p>\n
—-‘-. .J<\/p>\n
du. …g L… pends<\/p>\n
having  iap\ufb01reachted thi” eotirt by
\n\ufb01ling or 1993; that these writ
\npetitions  of in terms of the order dated<\/p>\n
25.3.    Government — the revisional<\/p>\n
,  within a period of six months and not to<\/p>\n
 of the land from them during the<\/p>\n
 of the revision; that thereafter the revisions]<\/p>\n
2 ~  ‘i9.tt_ho1’ity 11.5 n_t. disposed of the matter to the knowledge<\/p>\n
4..{<\/p>\n
proceedings under the 1976 Act were still pending and in<\/p>\n
the meanwhile the Urban Land [Ceiling & Regulation] Act,<\/p>\n
2%<\/p>\n
ad rmes.i-ned. the legality of the  iunder<\/p>\n
uaI:uu..__ ‘<\/p>\n
__._-_- __ -.__–_..__-_._– _– .’.__-_<\/p>\n
I13′:-In-nu turn cur-nun:-nu;-n-u-1 unmyqu  — .. ~..-.-.._- -.—-.- -__._-.— —- -__..___—<\/p>\n
9  indicating that such request in  ‘i’ any.<\/p>\n
2<\/span>
\nD<\/p>\n
1976 itself was repealed by Central Act 15 of 1999 with
\neffect from 22.3.1999 and in terms of   all
\nnot (1! nrnneerh V<\/p>\n
or ‘ .\n<\/p>\n
1…… ……,, ,.–__…_.g_<\/p>\n
proceedings in respect of   *f  *'”””f*<\/p>\n
their predecessors mevitehly    ‘He.-toess
\nextent of 3,599.30 sq. musgjn  in
\nposession of the petitiorterg  the petitioners have<\/p>\n
a — –.–__ – – –.._ -_.. _ _,<\/p>\n
.m. ih_.d owners i_,…po_s–session”of  extent also<\/p>\n
—>-\u00aba~ 1976 A-t 1— “pm; tn…-+<\/p>\n
after the   t;\n<\/p>\n
in       had approached
\n requesting them to change the<\/p>\n
revenue   but the revenue authorities<\/p>\n
1”…\n<\/p>\n
 =   Village measuring 2 acres 5 guntas of land<\/p>\n
  possible for the reason that the records indicated<\/p>\n
    extent of land had already been acquired under<\/p>\n
M” “f “m 19′}’6 A\ufb02 and therefere the entries<\/p>\n
cannot be altered.\n<\/p>\n
h_a.vi.ng npgeeft    <\/p>\n
.19-Pcuu  ‘1’, j<\/p>\n
–: ‘wan. ‘rd — -nun -. mu- ..– –<\/p>\n
6 ‘.3.’P9=..53.Q’.7<\/p>\n
5. Petitioners have sought for quashingfof thi
\nendorsement as also the Noti\ufb01cations at  & D<\/p>\n
nn I-I-an nmnrn can 1′ at in ha-.1″g_n_ f Qe_(\\,1’i<\/p>\n
U13 I.-..l.J.\\..-I tIL\\.r.I.I.|.1IaI.J \\~|..u.as an<\/p>\n
an
\nI
\nI
\nI
\nI
\n1<\/span>
\ni.\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
\nI<\/p>\n
_.-‘.4-.-…….\n<\/p>\n
Act, pending proceedings lapses  _t’:ie:e;_us,–._  <\/p>\n
C 8; D are of no avail .in._1aw4′ with.
\nhaving continued to    extentof
\n3,599.30 sq. mu’s,’,;::(:5f.   No.5 I-linkal Village,
\nnecessary its the authorities to
\ncompel   cum ‘1<\/p>\n
the Petitian\u00e9it\u00e9-: I  <\/p>\n
6. “\u00abPetitionerstj~have’*- relied upon the endorsement<\/p>\n
dated 1i\u00a7*.7p;2O(}6A”v[copy at Annexure-E] issued by the<\/p>\n
 it  – _  “Comtnis’sioner of Mysore District indicating that<\/p>\n
v \\-up-.4. .3 …-.-\n<\/p>\n
 1g’_}~t_I;e pendency of the proceedings under the<\/p>\n
……..1:._ Anti I-nun  In!-n fQ.v\ufb01 <\/p>\n
T”pcI:unJ.\ufb01 nu. new ….w<\/p>\n
 n  3  that no mahazar, had taken place in respect of
\n  *\u00bbesoess extent declared as contemplated under section<\/p>\n
E 10(5) of the 1976 Act; that an earlier endorsement dated<\/p>\n
9.11905 n lso been issued by the Special Land<\/p>\n
:51 V: -y——- u–..w–_<\/p>\n
. , ,,, ,1 _u_\u00a2 An. Om-” .1′ ling…-.. I T-ulnar! I’\\nunInn_r_p_Anf
\nf\u00a7\u00a7T<\/p>\n
111 ‘ U1 Ni, SUI. U U: uI:|..u wvv uavr <\/p>\n
cru-\n<\/p>\n
It\u00e9\u00e9nun wu u–1-uu-w.-.–‘-:- un-<\/p>\n
  factual ‘posit? 1 in 1- s<\/p>\n
7 <\/span><\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nAuthority, Mysore, [copy at Annexure-F] that in
\nrespect of the information sought for from  to<\/p>\n
\ufb02u-nil-n fl-an nnru alfinn AI’ land<\/p>\n
l.Ll.ll.J.l.S:u.l. I-.u.\\.a I’4Iu\\.i|..I.:\\:’LulIJ1L vs. Ann; 11′} ‘ Jo t~–‘r,’_g”‘.Vaan.n.r~a.-was-.-. <\/p>\n
measuring :2 acres 5 gmitas,1,the,re(:o1xis._do’not__’ ii<\/p>\n
such acquisition of   the
\nThimmegowda and vemcatapfpaek who  said to be in<\/p>\n
physical possessiori\u00ab.oi’-    _<\/p>\n
7.  of Sri. Nagaraja,
\nlearned   has veiy vehemently<\/p>\n
section 4  ing Act, all pending proceed!’  8<\/p>\n
under  _:’19.’7.6 iAot”:Vlapses and further the petitioners<\/p>\n
  _   possession of the extent of 8,599.80<\/p>\n
–V._ .9…’ V’<\/p>\n
    mt  _…r_:ess  in Sy. No.5 and admittedly such<\/p>\n
_. .. 44-. A
\n“‘ “””” eu\ufb01 ei’1uGI”‘u6″”‘su63′.ll’.c’%<\/p>\n
A4′
\n1<\/span><\/p>\n
 AA issued by the revenue authorities and the other civic
\n  *\u00bbaiiitho1ities, the endorsement at Annexure-G as well as<\/p>\n
F Noti\ufb01cations at Annexures- C & D should be quashed and<\/p>\n
direc\ufb01<\/p>\n
unsra :-\n<\/p>\n
i . I to the resmnde- 1.: n_t to ixhpiement the<\/p>\n
u.rI.rI-an-\u00abmu – — -ml—–….–. _ .. _ V<\/p>\n
A\/<\/p>\n
3′<\/p>\n
Illluannwnuwruwnnu urn: ——.’……__- .<\/p>\n
‘Authorir; indicates  they<\/p>\n
8 WP9353.0’7<\/p>\n
further follow up action pursuant to Annexures C 8: D<\/p>\n
etc…\n<\/p>\n
a. writ petition had been admitted. as<\/p>\n
issued to the respondents.   ”<\/p>\n
IJUIIIIIL DIA’4l.I-‘U-1.1.: ‘ ‘en. .._ .. , __.<\/p>\n
L’  N V?\n<\/p>\n
tu stuteinents % not<\/p>\n
statement are all \ufb01led.\n<\/p>\n
consistent, particularly,’   it to the aspect as to
\nwhether the;  had taken over
\n;xessess\u00a7’onT.o\u00a3:  and determined by<\/p>\n
1′ the 1976 Act.\n<\/p>\n
 Pnuv nuns: ; -er .__<\/p>\n
I—1-9;’<\/p>\n
While one statetaent:’i’says that the authorities had u:uLci’i<\/p>\n
mesessionpof later on they have come up with a<\/p>\n
. it  ” _   had not taken possession. Even the<\/p>\n
‘V V I’-V’V’-i*3v?\u00a7*’e!=%-=”‘?V-3-\u00b0n~~ i.,s1.I.-_ by the Mysore Urban Development<\/p>\n
‘.\\.y.|lI.l.I.’ ,’l I-.’\\I&s.1V\\-I Vg.-u<\/p>\n
are not initiated aequi.-;it.i…n<\/p>\n
 .. , proceedings against the subject land of 2 acres 5 guntas
\n‘   Sy. No.5 of Hinkal Village.<\/p>\n
9. Sri. Hatti, learned Government Pleader submits that<\/p>\n
in terms of the latest information made available to the<\/p>\n
A .:u_1 eee. ‘additional.\n<\/p>\n
LUIJKI LII’ l\ufb02\ufb02tlll\ufb01l-\\llHI\\H I1IUI”I \\-\\glU!I’i<l""|.Il' I\\1-uuu-u.nn.n ru-urn \\..uun- we n.–.n.'.-.
\n'' -' ITUIVIT<\/p>\n
….i\/
\nV<\/p>\n
'I-VIII': 'urn IIl'Il\\l'll'IIl.l'IuI-I .-q-u. -.-.y_A."…';_ -. ._…._- __-___ __.____ ________ __ ______ ___V_ W___<\/p>\n
9 — i w1=9353.o7<\/p>\n
counsel, it appears that Sy. No.5 measures 3"~–.acI'es 5<\/p>\n
guntas in all and in this survey is a<\/p>\n
d "r 1*'-"a'u"\ufb01\ufb01e  t* "".'f"?* '""<\/p>\n
terms of Annexure-R 1.\n<\/p>\n
10. Though records  tow.\n<\/p>\n
Hatti, learned not in a position to
\nplace before;t_i1e   or proceeding<\/p>\n
  of any land which was<\/p>\n
11. \\.KH.r.J.1-_’r_lVie_  is very clear and without any<\/p>\n
?\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
\n2<\/span><\/p>\n
anibigiiity,  faetuai position is de\ufb01r-duet, Lzut clear. . ie<\/p>\n
F<\/p>\n
‘ ifnot  as to whether the authorities had in fact<\/p>\n
H ” iiifioeeeeeion of the land or had not taken possession<\/p>\n
 .. are blowing hot an cold and coming up with<\/p>\n
n  If the matter is<\/p>\n
ukyvnauauuxua Elias!-In-a’ -2 – – …..- a__ _<\/p>\n
-Ina. I-‘In<\/p>\n
 to be viewed with  degree of eei\u00b0’u:3″sncss, “1115 or u…<\/p>\n
other a\ufb02idavit filed by the authorltiee is clearly a mis-<\/p>\n
statement or incorrect statement so made even in the<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
 lorry    <\/p>\n
 \u00bbynu:I.l.u. 8l.a__<\/p>\n
–_ __-_. _– ….— ——r— —v- —-.-‘u-.-…-.–_ …. —-.\u00a7___ .__ -._<\/p>\n
‘\u00ab_-‘<iuuum-u. new-o In-V -.-:- —-<\/p>\n
whovere can the legal heirs ete., who can claim uuue – tu<\/p>\n
10 '-'u'P9353.G7
\naf\ufb02davit amounting to perjury. But, the fact of thei.matter<\/p>\n
is that such af\ufb02davits \ufb01led by the  <\/p>\n
do not necessarily correlate  tfnei   not, i<\/p>\n
inspire the con\ufb01dence of the cotnt,  act on
\nand information given by  per\ufb02cularly, to<\/p>\n
pass orders in writ' "  _<\/p>\n
12. While.    owner related<\/p>\n
to  Sy. No.5, 6 and 205\/4,<\/p>\n
1 uegf sowglelt for in this v’n_…'”‘ “I.u.I.\\.u.I is any in res”-“,.wt of<\/p>\n
Sy. z’No’.5  extent of excess determina’ tion’ ,<\/p>\n
namely, 43,599.80 <\/p>\n
  jolt ‘is  clear ‘as to what is the precise<\/p>\n
– h ” lginiiof the pe.._ti-n,.rs _o   declarant and<\/p>\n
___ . -…. .1 4….\n<\/p>\n
1……\n<\/p>\n
C<\/p>\n
 ..  declarant, as to whether the original declarant
\nit  rests in fact the owner of the land which was the subject<\/p>\n
 matter of declaration. Even in terms of the law declared<\/p>\n
by Lug nnn nan i nrnoeedina w_l_’1_1(_311 1131;: Q91;<\/p>\n
vv |..a|-I. log 1:-uuu–so-ngg run —‘—-‘—-_._D–<\/p>\n
__..1’I_- I-..\n<\/p>\n
culminated under the  Act neeessamy see ‘:1 \u00ab
\n\u00ab*2<\/p>\n
‘I-\\I|Unl ‘Jr I’IlllIl’l’l|Il’lI’Il’l unsung  wu –<\/p>\n
 direcizions for alter-irg the erime<\/p>\n
1 1 ‘.l!P9-353%-?\n<\/p>\n
and after the repealing Act has come into  what
\nis saved is only such proceedings which <\/p>\n
s.er’\ufb02 s 11 t- 14<\/p>\n
sauna-.r.-.-\n<\/p>\n
I-lulu<\/p>\n
 not reached that s” p _
\nexcess land had not
\nwhen the repealing Act [imp foroe,’A_V’:t’rie 1976 Act does
\nnot affect the    eirtent of land
\n.1: .a_ re,   erstwhile owners<\/p>\n
4.’ an ‘-15 ‘ch<\/p>\n
rt er’ \u00bb as Lu. ree\ufb01t<\/p>\n
who      ‘
\nof    declarant or his legal
\nheirs  possession and as to any other
\n   are also involved.\n<\/p>\n
1′<\/p>\n
L?\n<\/p>\n
145. ‘I1 ‘.:}1i”~ =mr.a=rie we p.erAeu!ar.|.y in the wa__|r.. –<\/p>\n
‘ Lffacts writ petitioners have approached this court<\/p>\n
H *   rs of the repea\ufb02ng Act coming into force, I<\/p>\n
do .. not.’  con\ufb01dent to pass any orders in the writ<\/p>\n
-I
\n* -s in the revenue …..–.,-<\/p>\n
can only be ifthere is in law a change in ownership of the<\/p>\n
subject lands and I do not \ufb01nd it very proper to declare<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
1′ the repealed Act.\n<\/p>\n
‘a 1 i’1:’!\\-ray ‘  ‘\u00b0. 1-“.-
\n~  t..e__<\/p>\n
._… .,’–~e, ..- -_ _.– .- — _._ _<\/p>\n
; LUBUJ<\/p>\n
12 WP9353.07<\/p>\n
ownership of the petitioners in respect of  in
\nwrit Jurisdiction. _ 1no1.:\u00b0._r so  the. u:.a1#e
\ncmjmm as legal heirs of the original  *    T  ht<\/p>\n
15. Though an application’  for’. *1<\/p>\n
i.m_p.eedn;ent of Mysore
\nhf’-id t..’~~t it is amt   ” ‘hrtt;rVpV.Vft_h_is espeet,
\nparticularly, as the __disptited’ is oniy one 01
\npossession;   examine in
\nwrit  etppmpnam that a civil court<\/p>\n
‘M’r\u00e9””‘*Mn”i’f J\u00e9i “1”:I.”;=\u00bb;a-f;’.L.  is for this reason. the<\/p>\n
l\\.l\\.l’l.F.|J an. .;v\u00ab.–g — ‘ up<\/p>\n
appiication for i’ 1 t Bu tuumu.<\/p>\n
\u00bb person who was the owner ‘f tn s ujwt m<\/p>\n
 ‘–  land had remained in the ownership of<\/p>\n
 private persons and the repealed Act had not<\/p>\n
 V.   their ownership if the proceedings had not<\/p>\n
us\ufb01 ‘I<\/p>\n
ted in an\ufb02uisitsien ef the excess land t-  $9.1’ a<\/p>\n
” such ineifrntal r*}i””\n<\/p>\n
nn<\/p>\n
declaration of their title and 11*<\/p>\n
before the eompetent civil court to redress their anee. 2<\/p>\n
1 3 WP9353.07<\/p>\n
17. Reserving such liberty, this writ  is
\ndismissed.  s  <\/p>\n
An]-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar ~——-A — ——————- ——-nu. —. u–…..-.-y..—— – —-aw–u — -.-.-…v-.-.—-r– !_i..0*-.!Q.l.|.:E 1 WP9353.07 |i ll ‘PHI HIGH OOURT OI’ KARIATAIIA A1′ A “ii “F-ii’ ‘i””” 1’=’= 3%’ mm nownm HR. ammo: D.v. W111 Pe1g’Q’m_.L_3..N -9 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Thimmegowda S\/O Late ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-24T01:44:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Thimmegowda S\\\/O Late … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-24T01:44:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2092,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Thimmegowda S\\\/O Late ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-24T01:44:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Thimmegowda S\\\/O Late … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-24T01:44:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-24T01:44:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008"},"wordCount":2092,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008","name":"Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-24T01:44:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-thimmegowda-so-late-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Thimmegowda S\/O Late … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144955","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=144955"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144955\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=144955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=144955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=144955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}