{"id":145065,"date":"2008-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008"},"modified":"2014-04-16T14:30:58","modified_gmt":"2014-04-16T09:00:58","slug":"karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao&amp; Gowda<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, \n\nAT DHARVVAD.\n\nDATED THIS THE 25TH DAY  \u00e9'e;)_;3_   M' x\n\nPREs13:N?r  3\nTHE HON'BLlE-1 MR.JUSTI\u00a73E K. \n\nAND'A  kk\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. 3115 k  GOWDA\n\n \n\nKARNATAKA; N.EEi?.A'.?AE%.I NIGAM LTD\n\nREPRE'-SEN'I'ED' BY i*!'S-33\/ik'aN\"AGiNG DIRECTOR\n\nNo.1, COFFEE \u00a330--ARI3---.I3i?\ufb02.DING,\n\n4TH FLOOR, DR.B.R.,AMBEDKAR\n\nVEEDBE, BANGALORE 01  APPELLANT\n\n 1'(B\u00a7f\u00a71i;\u00a7\u00a7RiK5NTHv;f';BHAT : V.Y.KUMAR)\n\n 1.<\/pre>\n<p> S}\u00a7I&#8217;;.BHiMARAO REVAPPA HUDDAR<br \/>\nA.  Age: null<\/p>\n<p>. _ O HIRKUDI TALUK, CI-IIKODI<br \/>\n&#8216; &#8220;DISTRICT: BELGAUM<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   SR1 MAHADEV REVAPPA HUDDAR<\/p>\n<p>Age: null<br \/>\nR\/O HIRKUDI TALUK, CHIKODI<br \/>\nDISTRICF: BELGAUM<\/p>\n<p>3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER ETf e<br \/>\nHIDKAL DAM,  * I<\/p>\n<p>TALUK: IriU7\u00a3&lt;}~{ERI.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Ey 811.8 N HATE&#8217;: FOR R1 &amp;R2);   A<br \/>\n(By SR1 C.S.PA&#8217;l&#8217;1L, eovr. ADVO,(__3A&#8217;}fEe.FO&#8217;R R3&#8242;)  <\/p>\n<p>MFA EILED U\/S.54(\u00a7.)&#8221;&#8211;vE.&#8217;I:.(3:E*3&#8242; LA &#8216;ACT: f:\\C\u00a7AINs&#8217;I&#8217; THE<\/p>\n<p>JUDGMENT AND AWARD EATEI3 25\/3,&#8217;2oo6 EASSED IN<br \/>\nLAC No.12\/05 ON THE FILE&#8217; 01? THE CIV1L&#8217;JUDGE(SD)<br \/>\nCHIKODI, PARTLY  EL;Lo\\InzIN&lt;3Ij ATFHE REFERENCE<br \/>\nPE&#039;I&#039;I&#039;I&#039;I()N FOR ENHANCED COMPE NSjA&#039;_I&#039;_I.ON.<\/p>\n<p>This_  e.:n__ 3&#8243;n_g. en,  hearm g this day,<br \/>\nSREEDHAIR R39, J;-, .{I&#8217;eI:Ireree&#8211; t1*;e&#8217;fol1mviI1g: ~&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>     amen<\/p>\n<p>I.A.1&#8217;IQ.&#8217;.2.&#8217;_ie&#8221;   De1ay of 46 days in filing the<\/p>\n<p> apgciai c0z1d&lt;)\u00a71e%\u00e9.,vv&#039; _____ <\/p>\n<p>,- ..  $&quot;;Pe.til takes notice for the Government.<\/p>\n<p>H &quot;  (claimants) land acquired for the<\/p>\n<p> efyconstzmction of a canal. The LAO awarded<\/p>\n<p>V&#039; Ie em&#8211;peIIsation at the rate of Rs.25,000\/~ per acre. The<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  R\u00e9eference Court has considered the lands as having NA<\/p>\n<p>&#039;4 potential and ganted compensation at the rate of Rs.11\/&#8212;,<\/p>\n<p>3\/<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 12\/- and Rs.15\/~ per sq.\ufb01:. Toe <\/p>\n<p>Nigam Ltd. (for short, &#039;KNNL&#039;) hz_aJs,V\ufb01_1ed s;ppegu: ciaaum-mg<\/p>\n<p>the compensation granted as ejcceesive az_1d~  fcoxisiend <\/p>\n<p>that the land has no NA poiemgaz. L   A    <\/p>\n<p>2. The awarjd of VA  that the<br \/>\nopinion of the  value of the land<br \/>\nranges   135,000\/~ per acre.\n<\/p>\n<p>T115 LAC&#8217;    of the lands<br \/>\nsold  which are prior to the<br \/>\nnoti\ufb01ea\ufb01ofx.&#8217; iijsifgxfis\ufb01cs disciose that the lands<\/p>\n<p>are %so1d%a::% Rsokesgooeof&#8217;; to Rs.32,000\/~ per acre. The<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217;  _   The value for the registration of the<\/p>\n<p>    aix-ekudi village is \ufb01xed at Rs.33,000\/- per<\/p>\n<p> for.  &#8216;felevant year.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  The claimants, on the other hand, have<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;produced the records to Show that the lands bearing RS<\/p>\n<p>    ;:~zos.393\/3, 451\/1, 395\/2, 394\/23, 213\/3, 323\/1 and RS<\/p>\n<p>No.4()9 of Himku\u00e9i vi\ufb02age are converted for Non\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Ag&#8217;iou}turaJ purpose. The said lands adjoin the lands in<\/p>\n<p>C\u00a3X.\n<\/p>\n<p>questicn. The ciaimants have also &#8216;to<\/p>\n<p>show that RS No.388 is convsrted to  <\/p>\n<p>purpose, house sites are formed  Otis   T<\/p>\n<p>measllring 30&#8242; x 40&#8242; is sold fm:Rs.4&#8242;?,\u00a7)so masses _<\/p>\n<p>of plot No.20 dated 17.2.   Ths<br \/>\npreliminary    question<br \/>\nis issued in theyfear ::20{hi_3}.  is Withi\ufb02 the<br \/>\nvillage \ufb01mjts\ufb01c\ufb01sszver, on perusal of<br \/>\nthe  pmduced discloses<br \/>\nthat  No&#8217;.isit\ufb01zas\ufb01sixnmediately adjoining Ch&#8217;1kkodi&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Miraj rdeid_._ * T1i&lt;:_ W is nearer to Chikkodi than<\/p>\n<p> \u00abQ  *r1ies~s\u00a7a;\u00a2_&amp;1eed also recites that RS Ns.388 is<\/p>\n<p> &#039;situat&lt;::_  ___4 ms away from fiimkudi village and<\/p>\n<p>  &#8211; Miraj road. The lands in question are<\/p>\n<p> sits&#8217;ate:&#8221;V  from Chikkodi ~ Mira} Road to the North-<\/p>\n<p>  if West,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; 4. The claimants have produced records to show<\/p>\n<p>that the lands ad}&#8217;0iI1ix1g the lands in q\ufb01es\ufb01on have been<\/p>\n<p>converted to Non-Agicl\ufb01tural purpose. The said lands are<\/p>\n<p>Cg\/A<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\nalso situate to the West of Childcodi ~&#8212;- Miraj Road, quite far<\/p>\n<p>away from West of Chikkodi &#8212; Mira} Road, and they are<\/p>\n<p>almost situate in the middle between <\/p>\n<p>Chikkodi -~ Miraj Road. Considering the  <\/p>\n<p>1330.388 and the lands in questiori,iAAiVe&#8217;f}n:d  i7 A&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>has no comparison to the  Ql~.1\u20acStio\u00a7\\ <\/p>\n<p>claimants have also not pro\u00e9llced  short}<br \/>\nthat in the NA eonve1&#8243;ted. slots hai\u00e9el been formed<br \/>\nand sold. The  relied upon the<\/p>\n<p>sale deed.  to RS No.388 to determine<\/p>\n<p>the valu\u00e9j  tl1oV;\u00ab1_aid.:_&#8221;..&#8217;id0cument is excludeci, there is<\/p>\n<p> V. A&#8217; &amp;b$&#8217;L\ufb0111t\ufb01_\u00a7l}i ;1o erediiqle\u00bb material to assess the market value<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;V  of&#8217; the  question.\n<\/p>\n<p> Q&#8217;V&#8217;V&#8217;Tl?.$&#8221;3r\u20ac is no material either way to Show<\/p>\n<p>f_\u00bbwherlaer&#8217;\u00ab;_tlie NA converted lands do really have NA<\/p>\n<p>5.&#8217; or that the conversions are manipulated in<\/p>\n<p>i&#8217;   arztieipation of the acqtlisiition. There is absolutely no<\/p>\n<p> Credible material available on record for this Court to<\/p>\n<p>determine the gust and proper compensation. The<\/p>\n<p> , &#8216;_ in  ttxiatteri &#8221;  V<\/p>\n<p>ciaimants have also not let in convincing evidence\u00bb t;;q.~ o~;\u00a2<\/p>\n<p>the market value. Only one witness   <\/p>\n<p>heavy reliance is placed on Ex.P. ;saie*  at<\/p>\n<p>in RS No. 388. In View of t}&#8217;1e__.pat1&#8217;ci;ty of e$.&#8217;it}ef1ce,   *&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>not feel that it is just and    the<br \/>\nmarket value of the     taterests of<br \/>\njustice and inte1fests_.\u00bb~ef It is just and<br \/>\nnecessary   Court is to be set<br \/>\naside,    to the Reference Court<br \/>\nfor   disposal in accordance with<br \/>\nlaw.   to adduce further evidence<\/p>\n<p>    K\u00e9tipilig in View the fact that a considerable<\/p>\n<p> and that the parties are denied of the<\/p>\n<p> cointpeiisation, We direct that as an interim measure,<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; &#8216;(f  &#8220;shall deposit compensation at the rate of<\/p>\n<p>t  \u00a7\u20acs.1,50,000\/- per acre inclusive of the award made by the<\/p>\n<p>LAO in each case. The deposit to be made Within four<\/p>\n<p>weeks. Claimants are perrnitte\u00e9 to Withdraw the amount<\/p>\n<p>deposited. It is directed that the RefereI1ceV&#8221;&#8216;(\u00a7\u00a3}&#8217;g:;.t\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;VV\u00ab&#8217;:~;::1:ia}i<\/p>\n<p>dispese of the case within three months. _. ~   V ix&#8221; 4<\/p>\n<p>It is clari\ufb01ed that the Rereremxg  e<\/p>\n<p>in\ufb02uenced by any of the -4fact1Aia:1_&#8221;&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>regarding the locatien of   market<br \/>\npotential. All the contefifier\ufb01e  open. H &#8216;A<br \/>\nIt is fmtherv  of each case if<br \/>\nKNNL has    Rs. 150,000\/&#8211; per<br \/>\nacre,<br \/>\n12\u00a2-.i:*;;nde<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/~<br \/>\nTudge<\/p>\n<p>nvb. 2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao&amp; Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARVVAD. DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY \u00e9&#8217;e;)_;3_ M&#8217; x PREs13:N?r 3 THE HON&#8217;BLlE-1 MR.JUSTI\u00a73E K. AND&#8217;A kk THE HONBLE MR. 3115 k GOWDA KARNATAKA; N.EEi?.A&#8217;.?AE%.I NIGAM LTD REPRE&#8217;-SEN&#8217;I&#8217;ED&#8217; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145065","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-16T09:00:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-16T09:00:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":930,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-16T09:00:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-16T09:00:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-16T09:00:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008"},"wordCount":930,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008","name":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-16T09:00:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-bhimarao-revappa-huddar-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Bhimarao Revappa Huddar on 25 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145065","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145065"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145065\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}