{"id":145260,"date":"2010-02-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010"},"modified":"2015-01-06T17:46:05","modified_gmt":"2015-01-06T12:16:05","slug":"sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 05\"' DAY or FEBRUARY, 20'i.Q::..\".'&gt;\".~V.VV\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE ARAL1 N;IG'A\"R.AIA\"I~:  E'  E'\n\nCRIMINAL PETITION NOg73\u00a7_l'&lt;3f\/2\u00ab()1I_\\()&quot;&#039; I  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n3..\n\nSri.Sadashiv __\n\nS\/0 Siddu Dhanagar\n\nAged 55 years  -  1,&#039;; I \nOcc: Agriculture\/Shepherd I  &quot; \n\nsri.Manade\u00a7;Ijj&quot; \n\nS,\/--o--~~S.i_&#039;c:idI!vI i5&#039;I:2;a.na&#039;g&#039;a  E&#039;\nAged 48.Ey.ear&#039;s_  _\n  _  \n\nS ri .  ra m  \n\n5 8\/9 Ma&quot;nadev7&#039;Dh\u00b0anagar\nI&quot;-I\u00abaAI9ed 20 vearsIII.I\n&quot; O\u00bb;rLc:Shepherd\n\n_-  \n.  S\/0 --S:aC|:E]S|&#039;1iV Dhanagar\n Aged 20 years\n\nQcczshepherd\n\n Sri.Shankar\nw  S\/0 Mahadev Dhanagar\n\nAged 18 years\nOcc:Shepherd\n\nr~\/&quot;&quot;&#039;&quot;\n\n\n\n6. Sri.Vitha| @ Vithappa\nS\/0 Siddu Dhanagar\nAged 48 years\nOcczshepherd\n\n7. Sr&#039;\u00a7.HaEappa\nS\/0 V\u00e9thal Dhanagar   \nAged 18 years \nOcczstucient\n\n8. Sr&#039;i.Vasant\nS\/0 Jyoti Dhanagar\nAged 35 years\nOccshepherd\n\n9. Smt.Bagawwa  \n\nW\/o Siddu:Dhana&#039;gar&quot;g _  \n(D\/0 eagavgwa Dhariag&quot;ar)&quot;   \nAged;-6&#039;O&quot;&#039;y_e;a.rs&#039;--_ &quot; j_    \u00bb\nOcc:HQusehoId&quot;&#039;woVri&lt;if_- &#039;_  \n\nA1! are rm. \\{a&#039;dra04r&#039;H\/ii|a_ge\n\nTq:F:a\u00a7bVagHf-~._  \nDistV;Be|gau__m-..V&quot;.     PETITIONERS\n\n(By S3ri.:E3an&#039;1uac.f1&#039;a&#039;nac.:i&#039;ra &quot;A um, Adv)\n\n&#039; The  Vofa\u00e9iarnata ka\n\nRejz;-... by&#039; Rafi-ba&#039;g&quot;PoE\u00a7ce\nNow rep. .b_y;.-State PP\nHigh&#039; Cdu&#039;rt&#039;of Karnataka Building\n\nV&#039;~-Circuit Bench, Dharwad  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>1,\ufb02.&#8221;_&#8217;A(E3y S&#8217;F\u00a7ZP.H.G0tkhindi, HCGP)<\/p>\n<p>This Crl.P is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;;&#8217;j[ray\u00a7ng to enlarge the petit\u00e9oners on bail in Raibag PS<\/p>\n<p>#1-\n<\/p>\n<p>DJ<\/p>\n<p>Crime No.285\/2009 registered for the offences punishable<br \/>\nunder Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 326, 341, 302&#8242;,_SQ4,<\/p>\n<p>506 read with 149 of IPC on any terms and cojnd.i_tio&#8217;n.s<\/p>\n<p>which this E-ion&#8217;b|e Court may deem fit.<\/p>\n<p>This Cr\u00a3.P is coming on for Orders this..da4y,.Vt&#8217;t\u00a7Ae:&#8217;C:_ourt&#8221;i  3 <\/p>\n<p>made the foilowingz <\/p>\n<p>oRoEnjT3\u00b0<\/p>\n<p>Accused Nos.1 to    ins&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Cr.No.28S\/2009 (cc No,.33\/.20-1\u00a3ui)&#8221;g&#8217;:of&#8221;&#8211;Raioag&#8217;Poiice Station<br \/>\nDistrict Beigaum pendingiiionthe:fii&#8217;e&#8221;Vc)_f:&#8217;.\u00e9t&#8217;h\u00bbeV learned JMFC,<br \/>\nRaibag have fiied;&#8217;tVh_e  p.eti.t\u00bbi&#8211;o&#8217;n..Vun;der&#8217;Section 439 of<br \/>\nCr.P.C.   prosecution by<br \/>\nfiiing   the arguments of both<\/p>\n<p>2.    3 course of arguments,<\/p>\n<p> Sri..R\u00a7ama~chandra..:_{\u00a7___.Mali, iearned Counsel for the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;pietitioi&#8217;7IV\u00e9l&#8217;S-*\ufb02:CCLiSed submit that he does not press this<\/p>\n<p>respect of petitioner Nos.1 to 5 who are<\/p>\n<p>-V resp&#8217;ect\u00a7&#8217;$1\u00abeihyxvaccused Nos.1 to 5 in the said case. In view<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;:g,o:&#8221;&#8216;ithis submission, the present petition has to be dismissed<\/p>\n<p> ha-snot pressed in respect of petitioners Nos.1 to S.<\/p>\n<p>(-~.~.S\/m\\&#8221;&#8216;.&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;\\&#8230;.\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>\u00a2~I:&#8217;Z&#8221;&#8216;\u00b0\n<\/p>\n<p>3. On careful reading of the avermentSin.__ the<\/p>\n<p>complaint filed by one Smt.SavEtha) the wife-&#8216;j&#8221;o\u00a7f&#8221;*r.the<\/p>\n<p>deceased Ramu Puthane, it could be\u00abseen4&#8217;::&#8221;thafV&#8217;ihiilf&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>specifically alleged therein that<br \/>\n8.00 pm. while the complainant,a\u00e9\ufb02\u00bb&#8221;h_e&#8217;r sore _Rake.srs_,:&#8221;&#8216;hue&#8217;r.._<\/p>\n<p>deceased husband Rama ahd.t__an_othei .deceav-se&#8221;df&#8217;lvialappa &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Shivappa Puthane, the.eldera_.l9rot.her.?AoF &#8216;deceas.e\u00a7d Ramu,<br \/>\nand also one Shivappa &#8216;Gang&#8217;a_pjpa PuthaVn&#8217;e.,V the father&#8212;-in-<br \/>\nlaw of the compiainarjt w&#8217;ez:e.a~l.lf~.iV_n the-i&#8217;r land, can the<\/p>\n<p>.r<\/p>\n<p>accused Nos..i._ fee.-16 4.fq_rmed-.&#8221; themselves into unlawful<br \/>\nassemaiy&#8212;-.heidilri\u00e9l&#8217;I::,axes.;-.i?vood&#8211;en.&#8221;\u00a7clubs and stones and<\/p>\n<p>attacked the  and the deceased Mallappa<br \/>\nwith the \u00e9;3:JI4said._w&#8217;.eapo&#8217;:1s. It is further alleged in the<br \/>\n* V ..,..:*-T&#8217;  Nu-f, \u00ab-f&#8221;&#8221;:-7&#8242;<\/p>\n<p> said&#8217;~icori&#8221;i;1laint&#8221;tha_tTog1, 2, 4 and 8 namely Sadashiva,<\/p>\n<p> *lVlai1.ade_v&#8217;a,Eeerappa and Jyothiba together assaulted the<\/p>\n<p>udeceasedV&#8217;\u00abRLart2:=tz&#8221;\u00bband thereby caused his death and pa, 5, 6<br \/>\n.  &#8216; A.\n<\/p>\n<p> andhlllllz&#8221;&#8221;tes&#8217;oectively Sidram @ Siddu, Shankar, iNEngappa<\/p>\n<p> if.and-~._\\\/ijallya together assaulted the deceased Mallappa and<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  lthgelreby caused his death. It is further alleged in the said<\/p>\n<p>.\u00abrt&#8217;.&#8221; \/}r:_\u00a24.sJK.a;&gt;{ !\\lg~,,3_ c-\u00a2:&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>it &#8220;complaint that 57, 9 to 11, 13 to 15 together assaulted the<br \/>\nrx<\/p>\n<p>&lt;*&quot;*&#8212;-fF\\&quot;&#039;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&#039;\\\u00ab-&#039;<\/p>\n<p>injured Shivappa, the father-in&#8211;law of the comp|ainan,t__and<\/p>\n<p>thereby infiicted on him severai grievous injuries. 1jt&#039;is&quot;&#039;aViso<\/p>\n<p>aiieged in the said compiaint that A16 <\/p>\n<p>,_r&quot;&#039;.&#039;\u00bb&quot;&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>r-&#8220;&#8221;.&#8221;~&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>restrained the compiainantw and  i\u00a7ai_\u00e9_&lt;esh,<\/p>\n<p>when they tried to rescue the said icece_ased;iit&quot;     <\/p>\n<p>4. Thus it is clear fromthe above&#8211;.aiiegati&#8217;or1gof the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">     1<\/span><br \/>\ncompiainant that the case against \u00bbpeti&#8217;tioner\u00a7 6 to 8 who<\/p>\n<p>are respectiveiy\ufb02a\ufb02, 9 and .11v&#8217;V__is:th&#8217;atV.&#8217;A.?1vX!-ithai\u00bbassaulted<br \/>\nthe injured shsv&#8217;;e;.tg%;pa.&#8221;~:vit%ij~ha&#8217;nd:&#8217;ai&#8217;n&#8217;Vdt._..:egs, A11 Vasanth<\/p>\n<p>assauited vi-_\u00a7Vth:\ufb01_44_&#8221;\u00a2\u00a3_uVb&#8217;s&#8217; vi~ia|&#8217;ap&#8217;pa assauited the said<\/p>\n<p>injureciwith  t.hVereby infiioted grievous injuries on<br \/>\nthe person&#8221; of &#8216;the &#8216;:.?js=a&gt;id~..g:i&#8217;nju&#8221;red. Further, the allegation<\/p>\n<p>againstgA3&#8217;.E6 is doetitioner No.9 herein namely<\/p>\n<p>  y  uuuuu  \u00ab~r-.~:~  ~&#8221;r<br \/>\n&#8220;~Smt&#8211;.Ba&#8217;g&#8217;aw&#8217;wa is oniy that she restrained the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;s&#8230;Co.rnpira,i_h&#8211;a_n&#8217;t and her son when they tried to intervene and<\/p>\n<p> reissue th~e&#8217;_d&#8211;et:eased. Therefore, I am of the opinion that<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  9,&#8221; if and 16 who are respectiveiy petitioner Nos.6 to 9<\/p>\n<p>A  r.yyheregi.;i1 are not alieged to have committed any overtact on<\/p>\n<p>K<\/p>\n<p>pf&#8221;\/\ufb02&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>either of the deceased but they are aiieged to have<br \/>\n\u00abii-L<\/p>\n<p>inflicted grievous injuries on the person of injured.<br \/>\n1&#8217;\\.,<\/p>\n<p>5. Whether these petitioners-accused  iii <\/p>\n<p>furtherance of common object of unlawful avssembi\ufb02yis _ <\/p>\n<p>fact to be found during triai of thehicase.&#8217; \u00ab.vT&#8221;herefofre.,VV~I:&#8217;ho|d7<br \/>\nthat ends of justice would beyomet w&#8217;i-t_h;..if the,SC&#8211;;.pet&#8217;itioinei&#8221;;<br \/>\nNos.6 to 9 who are respectivie.ly\u00bbr5&#8211;7, 9,11.-iarad: 16 are<\/p>\n<p>granted bail subject co_n,c|iit.iyons. H'&#8221;Hence, the<\/p>\n<p>foilowing:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;2_*VheiV flied&#8217; under Section 439 of<br \/>\nCr.P.C. isudismiss_e&#8217;d?fas&#8221;not&#8217;pressed in respect of petitioner<\/p>\n<p>Nos.:1-to 5  are respectively accused Nos.1 to S in the<\/p>\n<p>. .\u00b0-sai&#8221;d-  &#8220;i&#8217;E&#8217;yurthevr;&#8221;&#8216;thVe present petition is hereby allowed<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;oVti&#8217;a~.p_etitioner Nos.6 to 9 who are respectively<\/p>\n<p>acAc.:4J__sec_\u00a3,~~i\\i&#8217;_o;&lt;,.;.7, 9, 11 and 16 in the said case. These\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; &#8212; .-9. Nos.6 to 9 shall be enlarged<\/p>\n<p> on each of them furnishing a self bond for a sum of<\/p>\n<p>__R\u00a7s.30,00D\/~ aiongwith one surety for the Iikesum to the<\/p>\n<p>&lt;&#8212;-r\u00bbv&#039;\\\u00abw&quot;&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>C:-I&#8221;&#8216;7&#8243;_~<br \/>\nsatisfaction of the committal Court subject to it-&#8220;e<\/p>\n<p>conditions that:\n<\/p>\n<p>a) they shall not threaten the pro&#8217;Seeo:t;on<\/p>\n<p>witnesses.\n<\/p>\n<p>b) they shait attend the:&#8212;T&#8221;ri\u00bbal\u00ab Cour&#8217;_t4 on4_ail\u00bb:\/_jth\u00e9,A Vt<\/p>\n<p>dates of hearing  <\/p>\n<p>attendance is disoe.n&#8221;s~e%d wit&#8217;r~..__for.\u00a7}a]id&#8217;~&#8211;;f\u00e9&#8217;a&#8217;sons.<br \/>\nA COPY of this order sbaai&#8217;%-hbiett\u00e9ent r\u00a2e::\u00bb;w:t5 to the<\/p>\n<p>Triai Court for information and-c5mpi.iatnfce.&#8221;&#8216; <\/p>\n<p>         sd\/-2<br \/>\n       t   JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 05&#8243;&#8216; DAY or FEBRUARY, 20&#8217;i.Q::..&#8221;.&#8217;&gt;&#8221;.~V.VV BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE ARAL1 N;IG&#8217;A&#8221;R.AIA&#8221;I~: E&#8217; E&#8217; CRIMINAL PETITION NOg73\u00a7_l'&lt;3f\/2\u00ab()1I_\\()&quot;&#039; I BETWEEN: 3.. Sri.Sadashiv __ S\/0 Siddu Dhanagar Aged 55 years [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-06T12:16:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-06T12:16:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":925,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-06T12:16:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-06T12:16:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-06T12:16:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010"},"wordCount":925,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010","name":"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-06T12:16:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadashiv-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-5-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sadashiv vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}