{"id":145277,"date":"2008-09-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-12-20T02:08:06","modified_gmt":"2017-12-19T20:38:06","slug":"srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n<pre>BETWEEN:\n\n1\n\n*  \" D.I{.__  \n\n-1-\n\n113 ms man OOIIRT or xamwrum AT   =\n\nDated this the 26\"' day      \n\nBEFORE  _    \nTI-IE riorrnm HR.   \n\nWrit Pe\ufb01tgon Na*'%i'1oGgFcsf;%2@  f :( GM--KEB1\n\n  A  \n3\/0 1ate4%N'a:a\u00a7?a\ufb01a'At1m11n\ufb01a3*.'   \u00bb\nAged aboui-&lt;52  &quot;   \nPost: 0d&quot;\u20ac\u00a7t:&#039;:;ia:.;XIi}l;ag\u00a5e: _ &#039;-- &quot;  \nBra!&#039; &quot; &quot;  T\u00e93.i11$    \n\n\ufb02 I $1 .&#039;\n\nSmt.   ,_  &#039;\nW10 late: \nEgiaja\u00bb;   V V\n&quot;Relf.h&#039;sm&#039;gr;\u00a7\u00a7y Tallxk\n&quot; .   ...Petitio13ers\n\nA&#039; &#039;   Commissioner\n = ._I_)_akshina Kannada\n Maugakm: -- 575 001\n\nExecutive Engineer\nK.P&#039;.&#039;I&quot;.C.L. Engineer\nHeavy Works Department\nKavoor\n\nMangalore -- 575 015 ...Respa1dents\n\n\n\n(By Smt. Asha Kmnbargclimath, HCGP fcrzii\ufb01l  L}:    \nSri N K Gupta, Advocate for R2)   &#039; &#039; \n\nThis Writ Petition is \ufb01led und{:fAw J &#039;.433 zgsmj 227 Fm  \nthe Constitution of india, praying tug  tbs; mspo\ufb02\ufb01i-zntsvi&#039;,\nto pass an order on the objections    \n\nThis Writ Peti\ufb01on c)1ni:\ufb01:':g._ c:'r:1 1:914\" amm V%%:5i\u00a7%%'aay, thc \nCourt made the fo\ufb02owing:  ' .  ._ ' fg\n\n% The    _Wfit'vPc\ufb01\ufb01on seeking a\ndirection to    an ouicr on the\n  to restrain the second\nmspondc\ufb01ut   its work on the schedule land\nwith-nut obtaiinjhg,  the fast mspondcnt.\n\n   No.1 is the owner of ma bearing Sy.\n  66 meats and Sy. No. 136] 28\n\nT V VV  aituatnd at Odilnala Vike of Bclthangady\nH 'T\u00a7;'ii:1k._.  $1 respondent hm issued a letter dated<\/pre>\n<p> :$;4;m\u00a3)2 to the seeond pe\ufb01tioncr informing that a double<\/p>\n<p>   _&#8217; 1; it distribution Iinc is to be drawn fmm Guzruvayanakcm of<\/p>\n<p>  Bclthangmy Taluk to Ncttahnudnoor and the fme pmsca<\/p>\n<p>through a portion of the land of the petitioners and, thcmfonez,<\/p>\n<p>k\/<\/p>\n<p>they have to cut and ncmavc some: trees 4.&#8217;.<br \/>\npctiisioncm and the forest and horfjcultme.<br \/>\ndetermine the ooznpcnsatzion   <\/p>\n<p>petitioners opposed the    of the<br \/>\nbees. Petitioners \ufb01led   the Deputy<br \/>\nCommission&#8217; &#8216; er    man of the<br \/>\nrespondents  which they would<br \/>\nof the  The grievance of the<br \/>\n    is \ufb01led, even before<\/p>\n<p>v&#8217;v&#8221;&#8230;.4.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; 11;;  igzicazetlzaitiafaxtatt&#8217;, me respondent &#8216;w going ahead with the<br \/>\nAvhfaxni\ufb01\ufb01on  the structunm and drawing afhigh<br \/>\n V  the petitioners have preferred tlfm<\/p>\n<p> %  reliefs.\n<\/p>\n<p>_ _ ~    This Court while entertaining the Writ Petition on<br \/>\nd &#8221; gmnted an interim alder  the respondents<\/p>\n<p>4&#8242;&#8221;&lt;.\u00bb.\ufb01ot to pwcipitatc any \ufb02ush ac\ufb01ozn pending further orders.\n<\/p>\n<p>hi\/.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>a-\n<\/p>\n<p>Today a memo is \ufb01led by the mspondcnts    <\/p>\n<p>land belonging to the petitioner in %syt.uq.192]23itt;;&#8217;edy.atg&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>Village, Bclthangady Taluk, a tower at<br \/>\ncmetud as the petitioner<br \/>\nbearing Sy.No.136 at  to rm<br \/>\npctitziazmer two Tawcirs    Nos. 14 and<br \/>\n15 am   been aheaay<br \/>\nstringed as   The conductor is to<br \/>\nremoving tht\u00e9&#8217;  the annexumd evaluation<\/p>\n<p>list \ufb0111m&#8217;s_ht_3d  \u00a3)1:ecto1&#8217;A.&#8221; : of Horticulture amassing the<\/p>\n<p>  trans to be cut and removed.\n<\/p>\n<p>S1;;.&#8217;V*.-;_&#8217;g;,&#8217;.      Department also has furnished the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; Vt   the compensation payable: in Inspect<\/p>\n<p>  be used only as \ufb01n: wood. The total<\/p>\n<p> asst;-ased by both the Departments is in a sum of<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; and a communication datmi 27\/3\/2008 has been<\/p>\n<p>.  V   the petitioner to mm-,Ivr:&#8217; the compensation by fum1shm&#8217; &#8216; g<\/p>\n<p> the mquimd docmncnts. The petitioner has acknowledged the<\/p>\n<p>it\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;of W~&#8217;\u00a7'&#8221;P5A\u00b0t<\/p>\n<p> of the respondents contend, when once the<br \/>\n_  have objected to the laying arm\u00bb. chctrjoal \ufb01nes, the<br \/>\n  Magistmic has to consider the same and pass<br \/>\n &#8216;gppmprsatc orders. Ewan bcibm such ordcm we passed the<\/p>\n<p>same, but has not In-spondcd. it is categorically<br \/>\nscocmd respondent has not taken an3\u00bb(mac11Ton_&#8211;&#8216;is:-\u00bb  &#8216;V<br \/>\nas apprehended by the<br \/>\nsecond respondent under law is apt     2<br \/>\nform any  That: is no mad&#8217;     when:\n<\/p>\n<p>towers have been at    and 15.\n<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, they undexmkethat fags}  any road in<br \/>\nthe land bcaring     except removing<br \/>\nthe trees  .;.1~m. of Horticultural and<br \/>\nFomst   be recorded in the<br \/>\ninterest {tag ;um.%  Vic\u00bb. the petitioner to mcxzivc the<br \/>\noompcnsatittn-\u00ab  and approach the area <\/p>\n<p>z  ed counsel for the putt&#8217; &#8216; assa1l1n&#8217; &#8216; g the<\/p>\n<p>U&#8217;\/..\n<\/p>\n<p>  to  notice to all persons interested and give<\/p>\n<p>_t_h\u00a2..v:; an  to state their objections, ifany.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;   that, after service of notice as per Annex1ue-D on<br \/>\n the petitioners did not object to the laying of the<\/p>\n<p>-5,<\/p>\n<p>respondents have no jurisdiction to install ll<br \/>\ninstallation. Therefore, he contends the  VV 9\u00bb<br \/>\nto the relief sought for. In<br \/>\non a judgment of a Division       o I<br \/>\nzmzmaa an we in    rut&#8217;<br \/>\neoxronmmxam   4164] where it<br \/>\nhas been held any of Section 15<br \/>\nis to be    by the person who<br \/>\nhas \ufb01led   antltoiitles are bound to refer<br \/>\nthe matter -tlzze. under Section 16(1) of the<br \/>\nTelegraph    for the appellant to physically<br \/>\n  of  &#8216;transmission lines. Before passing an<br \/>\n  16(1), the District Mwswz-ate has<\/p>\n<p> ll  contra, the learned oounsel for the respondents<\/p>\n<p>E4\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>thy:  &#8216;c\ufb01\ufb02tclpetitioncr and meet inataliations<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216; . Nemiy for \ufb01ve yczars them<br \/>\n no me said notice. Even m this day no<\/p>\n<p>%   with the mm Icspondcnt. Themfmc, the<br \/>\n  has no application to the theta ofthis mac.\n<\/p>\n<p>clectlical Jim. In fact it is with their consent they<br \/>\nthe hansmission line and in fact tpey ha?:\u00abb&#8221;&#8216;ej\u00a3.j1;t:[5i\u00a7:ted {1ie~<br \/>\ninstallation in an respects. No    <\/p>\n<p>second respondent. The    miiiance<\/p>\n<p>is placed is \ufb01led \ufb01ve years   \ufb01atrict<br \/>\nMa\ufb01stratc by which    &#8216;work was<br \/>\ncompleted. Thelezibm.   of tht;\n<\/p>\n<pre>aforesaid    V\n\nclear as    mspondecnt has issued\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>Annaxure-D wiisc-1;; s;~m awaA,%1sAk%4.2oc2 *m::in;atsng the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01\u00a7r._ hyiagf  Bang. The said letter is duly<\/p>\n<p>E&#8217;\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>   and the compensation they me<\/p>\n<p>  to  are paid proper market value. That is a<br \/>\n  be taken into ocmsidemtion at the time of<\/p>\n<p>u   or damages. So there is no impediment<br \/>\n  to the laying of the \ufb01ne itself and Section 16 has<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;7. In so far as the obligation cast on<br \/>\nissue notice, consider the objec1io.:_iWis_<br \/>\nrequirement is to be complied Wi1&#8243;.h:&#8217;\u00bbj)y<br \/>\nwhen then: is an  of<br \/>\neempla&#8217;mt by the second   that is a<br \/>\nprovision which enables   as laying of<br \/>\nthe line. Once ts:  of removal of<br \/>\nobstruction we\ufb02It\u00a7},:e\ufb01&#8217;iot   &#8216;Iiiii\\*evvV:&#8217;gone through the<\/p>\n<p>representation     to the Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Co1mn1ssm&#8217; &#8216;_&#8217;1V1erV. &#8221; is   &#8216;  not that the second<br \/>\n net   line. If the line is laid they<br \/>\nhave to   the  the entire gbeneath that<\/p>\n<p> is &#8216;net   value and, the-xefore, their request<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-19-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the question whether the on-mpensa\ufb02on paid<br \/>\nand mmoved is proper, in addition to that, {if , <\/p>\n<p>       Sd\/~&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>% Judge<\/p>\n<p>ekl<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008 Author: N.Kumar BETWEEN: 1 * &#8221; D.I{.__ -1- 113 ms man OOIIRT or xamwrum AT = Dated this the 26&#8243;&#8216; day BEFORE _ TI-IE riorrnm HR. Writ Pe\ufb01tgon Na*&#8217;%i&#8217;1oGgFcsf;%2@ f \ud83d\ude41 GM&#8211;KEB1 A 3\/0 1ate4%N&#8217;a:a\u00a7?a\ufb01a&#8217;At1m11n\ufb01a3*.&#8217; \u00bb Aged aboui-&lt;52 &quot; Post: 0d&quot;\u20ac\u00a7t:&#039;:;ia:.;XIi}l;ag\u00a5e: _ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-19T20:38:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-19T20:38:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":812,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-19T20:38:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-19T20:38:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-19T20:38:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008"},"wordCount":812,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008","name":"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-19T20:38:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srinivasa-ammunnaya-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-26-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Srinivasa Ammunnaya vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145277\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}