{"id":145528,"date":"2010-03-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010"},"modified":"2017-03-15T15:13:22","modified_gmt":"2017-03-15T09:43:22","slug":"a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik &#8230; on 29 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik &#8230; on 29 March, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 10057 of 2010(F)\n\n\n1. A.R.SUJIL, THUNDIYIL HOUSE, PAI ROAD,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. AJITHAKUMARI, VELIYATH HOUSE,\n3. V.S.SUGATHAN, KAYYATHARA HOUSE,\n4. JOHN FERNANDEZ, MATTAMMAL THUNDIYIL\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE MATTANCHERRY MAHAJANIK CO-OPERATIVE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE\n\n3. THE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION,\n\n4. THE ELECTORAL OFFICER,\n\n5. THE RETURNING OFFICER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.O.D.SIVADAS\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN\n\n Dated :29\/03\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                         K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.\n                ------------------------------------------------------------\n                       W.P(C) NO: 10057 OF 2010\n                -----------------------------------------------------------\n                   Dated this the 29th March, 2010.\n\n                                    JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging Clause<\/p>\n<p>30(i) of Ext.P2 bye laws of the first respondent bank.                                The<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are members of the first respondent bank. The third<\/p>\n<p>respondent has notified elections to the managing committee of<\/p>\n<p>the first respondent as per Ext.P1. Though the petitioners want to<\/p>\n<p>contest the election as candidates, they are ineligible to do so in<\/p>\n<p>view of Clause 30(i) of the bye laws. The said clause stipulates that<\/p>\n<p>a member shall be eligible to be elected as the director only if he<\/p>\n<p>has been a shareholder member of the bank for at least two<\/p>\n<p>continuous years prior to the date of election and has maintained a<\/p>\n<p>deposit account with the bank for a continuous period of two years<\/p>\n<p>with a credit balance of not less than Rs.500\/-. According to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners this clause is in direct conflict with the provisions of the<\/p>\n<p>Co-operative Societies Act and the Rules thereunder. Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners have sought for a declaration that Clause 30(i) of Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>bye laws and a corresponding clause to the said effect in Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>notification  disentitling         the      petitioners          from       contesting as<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 10057\/2010                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>candidates at the election that has been notified is illegal and<\/p>\n<p>arbitrary.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. A reading of the clause gives an impression that it has<\/p>\n<p>been intended only for the purpose of ensuing that persons who<\/p>\n<p>have been active members of the bank for the stipulated period<\/p>\n<p>alone are permitted to contest the elections. No specific provision<\/p>\n<p>of the Act or the Rules with which the provision of the bye law is in<\/p>\n<p>direct conflict, has been brought to my notice. However, I do not<\/p>\n<p>propose to consider the merits of the claim that is made in this writ<\/p>\n<p>petition for the reason that the petitioners can raise their complains<\/p>\n<p>before the second respondent who is clothed with ample powers to<\/p>\n<p>decide the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. In the above circumstances this writ petition is disposed of<\/p>\n<p>directing the petitioners to approach the first respondent by<\/p>\n<p>submitting a proper representation detailing their grievances. If<\/p>\n<p>such a representation is submitted within a period of ten days from<\/p>\n<p>today, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance<\/p>\n<p>with law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a<\/p>\n<p>period of two weeks thereafter.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                           K. SURENDRA MOHAN<br \/>\n                                                    Judge<br \/>\njj<\/p>\n<p>      The words &#8220;first respondent&#8221; occurring in the 3rd paragraph of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 10057\/2010               3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the judgment dated 29\/3\/2010 in WP(C) 10057\/2010 are corrected<\/p>\n<p>as &#8220;second respondent&#8221; as per order dated 27\/5\/2010 in<\/p>\n<p>I.A.6563\/2010 in WP(C) 10057\/2010.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                   Sd\/- Registrar (Judicial)<\/p>\n<p>WPC 10057\/2010    4<\/p>\n<p>                      K.K.DENESAN &amp; V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>                                 M.F.A.NO:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                                 JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>                                  Dated:<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik &#8230; on 29 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 10057 of 2010(F) 1. A.R.SUJIL, THUNDIYIL HOUSE, PAI ROAD, &#8230; Petitioner 2. AJITHAKUMARI, VELIYATH HOUSE, 3. V.S.SUGATHAN, KAYYATHARA HOUSE, 4. JOHN FERNANDEZ, MATTAMMAL THUNDIYIL Vs 1. THE MATTANCHERRY MAHAJANIK CO-OPERATIVE &#8230; Respondent 2. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-15T09:43:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik &#8230; on 29 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-15T09:43:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":461,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010\",\"name\":\"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-15T09:43:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik &#8230; on 29 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-15T09:43:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik &#8230; on 29 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-15T09:43:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010"},"wordCount":461,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010","name":"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-15T09:43:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-r-sujil-vs-the-mattancherry-mahajanik-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A.R.Sujil vs The Mattancherry Mahajanik &#8230; on 29 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}