{"id":145580,"date":"2009-10-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-21T17:19:45","modified_gmt":"2016-04-21T11:49:45","slug":"the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Management Of M\/S Essar … vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Management Of M\/S Essar … vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
R\/AT' N0. 2320\/3, 'SOUGAN\ufb01HA\"\n\nSRE. NA(}ARAKANN\u00a7KA TEMPLE ROAD\n\nDEREBAIL, l{(Z}MBADi \nMANGALORE -- 575908.  RESPGNDENTS.  \n\n(BY SRL JAGADEESH M, ADV FOR R1 85 R2)\n(BY SR1. NATARAJU BALLAL, ADV FOR R8)\n\nTHIS PETETION FILED UNDER\"AR'FICE}E  ?.'3'2\u00e9%;\u00e9\"as..--,\"' 22:: V'\nOF THE CONSTITUTION OF' INmA FiRAY_IN\u00a33 TO 'ASEDE f\nTHE ORDER DATED 11.8.2008 (ANN-A} PAss=::3I3._mf 'i'_\u00a3~'i\u00abE;\n\nmo. _ _ V\nTI-HS PETi'I\"i\u20acZ)N COMING Q1~if'F.Q'R_VPRi;.m3':5R;\u00a7#G -- B\nGROUP, THIS DAY, THE.CC1UR'F MABE; THE FOLLOWING:\n\nTm-3 p_\u00a2:=.i:i1.*LiTi\u00a7\u00a7:Vt.3:1_'V:'\u20ac*:B'1';>,l:j;i_\u00a2%;o.i1; the 3rd respondent as an<\/pre>\n
Office AsSi$_\ufb01a\u00a711tV.i”1er to discharge dutics at<\/p>\n
its MVa:1gaIoreV di’j\u00a7f,\u00e9.’ T3716 3″! respondent when relieved<\/p>\n
 31.8.1999 sailed in question the<\/p>\n
 Court: irzvoking Section }{}(4–~<\/p>\n
 A) oI’ “i.h(:=\u00a7 Disputes Act, 194?, for shaft: ‘ID<\/p>\n
 to an award (it. 17.3.2003 Atmexure\ufb01,<\/p>\n
:a$ic:ie the \u00a516i”B1iI1a\u00a3i()Z} of service an\u00e9 directing<\/p>\n
“-\ufb01f\u00e9iiistatemerit with continuity of servioe and 80%<\/p>\n
 xbackwages and consequential bene\ufb01ts. The petiiioner<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
LABOUR COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE; TH_g9.R:;’A\u00a7;D’%<\/p>\n
…3..\n<\/p>\n
ques\ufb01omed the award in W.P.No.44943\/20032 H<\/p>\n
was disposed off by order dt. 9.4.2007  M<\/p>\n
award reducing the quantum of   ito <\/p>\n
40\u00b0\/o. j % X _   _ %<\/p>\n
2. In compliance with    dxe
\npetitioner by iett\u20ac:\u00a7~   A’ ‘A_\ufb01I]’\u00e9${uf'(g..(}
\nresinstated the 3″-‘*   with<\/p>\n
cdntinuity of s.~e13;i\u00a7St: as an –~ \ufb01i\u00a2*.\u00e9,”r~,]” ‘a.1.1___cV{‘ directed her to<\/p>\n
report at   Jamnagar. The
\n8rd resfzdnd\u00e9ratvivd\ufb01yv 18.6.2007 A1mexure–H<\/p>\n
welcomed   of the modi\ufb01ed award, but<\/p>\n
 V.  1}fi\u00a7dlA2fZl.i’*VV_L1I)V1Z\u00a2Af\u00a7”‘t?.:7}d..0\u00a7’ July 2007, to report for duty at<\/p>\n
deified” piacd” ‘(sf posting, as she had some personal<\/p>\n
 .  dqdapears that the 33*’ respondent reported<\/p>\n
 duty  4.8.2007 at Vadinar, marked for a day and<\/p>\n
  ” ‘?1i\ufb01Iff\u00a7ii\ufb01Z6F remained absent.<\/p>\n
3. The 3111 respondent through her \u20ac.301}.I”1S61 issued<\/p>\n
V x a notice dt. 15.8.2007 AI1nex1zre–J calling upon {he<\/p>\n
ML<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
petitianer to post: her at its Mangalore {)tI”1<::4*.:;._ ' <\/p>\n
seven days, failing which she would bc_   t\u00e9'   <\/p>\n
mauve for appropriate relief i.:1cludEi;r1g \u00a7\u00a7O\u00a3;tii:ti1pt \u00a7f  <\/p>\n
The petitiener causad a reply   V<\/p>\n
A1mex1.1re–K refuting the   to
\naccommodate the petii\ufb01tsner  in \ufb01\u00e9eingalore,<\/p>\n
as there was no busines\u00a7_a";t..t.11E;  <\/p>\n
4.    addresse\u00e9 a
\n<:o111m11I1i\u00a3:.<3.t;':i;V')I;{"   7Annexure–M to the
\nCommissio\ufb01\u00e9r'  conteriding that at the<\/p>\n
place of   VJa;n1.;.'iagar, being the only female<\/p>\n
 4, Agmpj\u00a3:)'}:eg~:_,: while \u00e9llveihers were male, it was 1:00 risky to<\/p>\n
 post and aiso that there was 116<\/p>\n
a.c\u00a3ia1fi1Vmo\u00e9.9;{j.\u00a7;ti availabie far a residance. In that view<\/p>\n
  "(ff the mkg\ufb01tier, it was a\ufb02egeci that the petitioner desigxed<\/p>\n
    \ufb01x\u00e9sting at vadinav so as to harass her ints<\/p>\n
 –._ su}’:3missic)3.’1. In addition, it was coxiztended that the<\/p>\n
  \ufb01ddress of pasting, as mentioned in the Annexu;re~G<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
-5.\n<\/p>\n
ieiter was non\ufb01xistent. In the premise  <\/p>\n
allegations the petitioner sought for _ :51′  ‘ <\/p>\n
reinstatement at the Mangalore _?a’1t1iri\u00a7:Cti\u00a7 <\/p>\n
the petitioner to pay the fail wag\u00a2’$”–   \u00a30  ,<\/p>\n
perinit the prosecutitm of   fgr non
\nin1pleIne11ta1:ion of   1′ 1’? in<\/p>\n
I.D.A.Nt;>.-43\/99 of the\n<\/p>\n
5. The; \u00ab\u00a7~2a<%;tiftio1:i;er\u00a7  "cg; notice of the<\/p>\n
procee(J;.ing_s;,A A'  claim by a reply (it.<\/p>\n
:20.12.20024':'\\1mekti\u00a7\u00a2{\u00a7——\u00a7~\u00e9\ufb011ting out to the fact that<\/p>\n
V merggjwas \ufb01t; \u00a5\u00e9(\u00a7}a tioii of Sections 17–~A, 18 and 19 of<\/p>\n
     that there was total compliance of the<\/p>\n
a;m\u00a7gr1s%m  of the modi\ufb01ed award and to drop all<\/p>\n
V  _ rurtiier  In addition it was contended that<\/p>\n
H "  stxjari\u00e9fer being an incident at' sexvioe, the petitiaimr<\/p>\n
 f\ufb01\ufb01y justified in dirmting the 3% respondent H)<\/p>\n
T  f\u00e9port at the place of posting, at its Jamnagar ot\ufb01ce.<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
-6-<\/span><\/p>\n
6. It appears coriciliation proceedings  <\/p>\n
on about eight days of hearing and on  Ftteae  t <\/p>\n
Conciliation Oi\ufb01cer recorded a  <\/p>\n
award was “apparently; _4’i111;43\u00abIe.1_’1\ufb01}.t:*ntedV :1  <\/p>\n
management” and that it  emf   an
\nopportunity to the 3rd  was
\nadjourned. On the  the 3rd
\nrespondent    e\ufb02icer
\nWhere after  before the Labour
\n  authority, by or\ufb01er<\/p>\n
dt. 11.8.t2{)_O3  prosecution of the<\/p>\n
petitiq1*;er_fo1; mason er the terms of the modi\ufb01ed<\/p>\n
   Writ petition.\n<\/p>\n
  heard the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
vpaI’\u00a5Zi\u20acS,’~  the pieadings and examined the erder<\/p>\n
   undoubtedly the Commissioner for Labemr,<\/p>\n
  not consider the material on record, mere<\/p>\n
  fappropriately the factum of reinstatement of the 3rd<\/p>\n
Lei<\/p>\n
respondent, her conduct in accepting reinstatement and<\/p>\n
requesting time t9 report to duty at Jamnagar, cot;-Ja_3_led<\/p>\n
with the fact at’ reporting to duty and worked fear”<\/p>\n
on 4.8.2007, as also the opixlien formed  M<\/p>\n
Labour Commissioner on 24. 1.2Q\ufb028,”asArecQ@ed\u00a7  <\/p>\n
proceedings of the said day, that  <\/p>\n
was apparently implemente\ufb02 the   ‘I ‘he
\nLabour Commissioraer   ‘ V’ ‘ ‘ to”  certajn
\npassages in the award    recording a<\/p>\n
fmding  as   053:;-e Assistant at the
\nMangaloAre..V_O\ufb01ice    was not abolished and<\/p>\n
the  of  \u00e9fd respondent was illegal. The<\/p>\n
   :”‘Ce1 i1Isissioner concluded that reinstatement<\/p>\n
  Office the place where the 3W1<\/p>\n
 _ resp\u00e9nde\ufb01t-.\u00e9\u00e9%as working at the time ef retrenchment<\/p>\n
H H ”  net  the place of posting as set em in Annexure~G<\/p>\n
 – _1e’t_1ie”r.’<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
..8..\n<\/p>\n
8. The Apex Court in Feroz Bin —v- Statg\u00ab\u00a7;v.’; ~ V.<\/p>\n
Bengali relying on an earlier decision L” 2:;  K V’ <\/p>\n
Gukulehand Dwarkacias Morarka::?–v- R   <\/p>\n
heid thus:\n<\/p>\n
“‘I’he Judiciai eommitteefhs the 4am}
\nmentioned itself vob.eerv\u00e9e\u20ac’i” the aea1’1ci:ien
\nwould be good if it  pmgeg  that
\nit had been. i._11eC\u20acSsary
\nfacts had 3″  V pflitceii ” Sanctioning
\nautho\ufb01tf    might not have
\nbeen eeta’fe{i’efz;Aihe”-face caaf’-tl1e=eaI1ctioI1 itseif. it
\ntile;-a:fef<2revv—mat the sanction in the<\/p>\n
presen__t"case=i_S 2.iAnQ4bjet:i.i"onabie."<\/p>\n
   \ufb01\u00e9fi for gent of prosecution is after<\/p>\n
 1  facts into eonsidemtion. In the<\/p>\n
  inste\ufb01t  the Qfd\ufb01i' impugieci directing the<\/p>\n
 "'.__'};;etiti<}Iier'\u00e97's: presecutjon makes reference to certain<\/p>\n
VA  re'?;ser\u00a79a\ufb01en of the Labour Court in the award and not<\/p>\n
 '11'  fame noticed supra, more appropriately the<\/p>\n
'Am 1%() SC 353 <\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
reinstatement, the conduct of the 3m’ respon<1er3ij'\u00ab–.<\/p>\n
reporting to report to ciuty at Jamnagar and   "<\/p>\n
formed by the Asst. Labour {3ommis$ioI;ger'Vv'\u00a3f1et  it;i1e:;re " V'<\/p>\n
was "apparent compiiance of of<\/p>\n
This in my opinion were re1era:rxtV_facrS  riot
\nbe eschewed in the deeisron "p\u00bbrecees;"–it'-r\u00a711ay be
\nthat the petitioner is    the plea of
\ncomplianm of    proceedings,<\/p>\n
but that "  tire authority directing<\/p>\n
prosecugiozg T'\u00a2:;:;mn  .cc=nsideratiox1 of relevant<\/p>\n
materia}. "  'In  the matter, the er\u00e9er<\/p>\n
i331pu4g;'1ec.\u00a5.. sufTers_ frbmV'ar1 error apparent on the face of<\/p>\n
 ' rhe .  unsxistamable.\n<\/p>\n
 *   the petiiien is aliewed. The erder \ufb01t.<\/p>\n
‘:.Am1exu.re–A ef the 15* respondent is quashed<\/p>\n
   proceedings remitted fer consideration afresh<\/p>\n
  extending reasenable opportunity 61’ hearing to the<\/p>\n
  , :.”parties concerned and to pass erders strictly in<\/p>\n
UK<\/p>\n
.30.\n<\/p>\n
accordance with Law and in the light of the ” <\/p>\n
supra.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Management Of M\/S Essar … vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy R\/AT’ N0. 2320\/3, ‘SOUGAN\ufb01HA” SRE. NA(}ARAKANN\u00a7KA TEMPLE ROAD DEREBAIL, l{(Z}MBADi MANGALORE — 575908. RESPGNDENTS. (BY SRL JAGADEESH M, ADV FOR R1 85 R2) (BY SR1. NATARAJU BALLAL, ADV FOR R8) THIS PETETION FILED UNDER”AR’FICE}E […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Management Of M\/S Essar ... vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Management Of M\/S Essar ... vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-21T11:49:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Management Of M\\\/S Essar … vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-21T11:49:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1118,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009\",\"name\":\"The Management Of M\\\/S Essar ... vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-21T11:49:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Management Of M\\\/S Essar … vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Management Of M\/S Essar ... vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Management Of M\/S Essar ... vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-21T11:49:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Management Of M\/S Essar … vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-21T11:49:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009"},"wordCount":1118,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009","name":"The Management Of M\/S Essar ... vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-21T11:49:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-essar-vs-the-labour-commissioner-on-27-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Management Of M\/S Essar … vs The Labour Commissioner on 27 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145580"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145580\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}