{"id":145887,"date":"2009-12-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009"},"modified":"2017-06-18T08:21:36","modified_gmt":"2017-06-18T02:51:36","slug":"zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Bench: A.P. Bhangale<\/div>\n
                                    1\n\n\n               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n\n\n\n\n                                                                           \n                     BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR.\n\n                       SECOND APPEAL NO.  6  \/ 1998\n\n\n\n\n                                                   \n                                                  \n         Dr. Mohd.Abdul  Aziz  s\/o Yaar Mohd.\n         (Died )  Through LRs:\n\n    1)   Zubeda Begum  wd\/o  Dr. Mohammed Abdul Aziz\n         Aged    about 78 years\n\n\n\n\n                                       \n    2)   Dr.Mohammad Abdul  Salim\n                       \n         s\/o Dr.   Mohammad Abdul Aziz\n         Aged 60 years\n                      \n    3)   Suraiyya Jabeen   w\/o  Siddique  Ali Khan Patel\n         Aged   50 years, R\/o  Aziz Manzil\n         Mominpura  nagpur.\n\n    4)   Mohammad Abdul  Wahid\n      \n\n\n         s\/o Dr.  Mohammad Abdul Aziz\n         Aged 54 years,   \n   \n\n\n\n         Appellant Nos.1 ,2 and 4    R\/o\n         Faiz  Shabbir memorial Building\n         Adjacent to Chandralok Building\n\n\n\n\n\n         Central Avenue Nagpur.               ...               ...APPELLANTS\n\n\n\n         v e r s u s\n\n\n\n\n\n    1)   Corporation of City of  Nagpur\n         Through its Municipal Commissioner\n         Nagpur.\n\n    2)   The Municipal Commissioner\n         Corporation of the City of Nagpur.\n\n    3)   The Additional Deputy Municipal\n         Corporation of the City  of \n         Nagpur.                                            ...RESPONDENTS\n\n\n\n\n                                                   ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 15:26:10 :::\n                                                                  2\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                                                   \n    ............................................................................................................................\n                        Mr J J Chandurkar ,  Advocate for appellants\n                        Mr. C S Kaptan,   Advocate for Respondents \n\n\n\n\n                                                                                     \n    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n                                                            CORAM:   A.P.BHANGALE, J.\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                    \n                                                            DATED :   17th  December,  2009\n\n\n     JUDGMENT :   \n<\/pre>\n
                       This  Second Appeal  stems  from the judgment  and decree <\/p>\n
     dated  1st April, 1997    passed by learned Joint District Judge, Nagpur <\/p>\n
     in   Regular   Civil   Appeal   No.289\/1991,       by   which   the   judgment   and <\/p>\n
     decree in Regular Civil Suit No.    994\/1975   dated 17.08.1979   was <\/p>\n
     set aside  and the  suit by the  original plaintiff-Dr    Mohammad Abdul <\/p>\n
     Aziz   s\/o  Yaar  Mohammed   was dismissed   as  also cross-objections <\/p>\n
     (Exh.8).       The   present   appellants   claim     as   legal   heirs     and <\/p>\n
     representatives  of the original plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n
    2.                The facts  in brief  are :     The suit house \/ structure  stands <\/p>\n
    on Municipal land bearing Plot No.1     at Mohammad Ali Sarai  Road, <\/p>\n
    Mominpura,     Nagpur.    It is the case of the original plaintiff that suit <\/p>\n
    house   is   a   permanent   structure   with   brick   walls           and   ceiling     of <\/p>\n
    Bagada  tile.             The   original   plaintiff   claimed     as   licensee   since <\/p>\n
    2.10.1972     at licence   fee of Rs. 65\/- per month.     It is claimed that <\/p>\n
    previous owner of the house structure had granted permanent  licence in <\/p>\n
                                                                                      ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:26:10 :::<\/span>
\n                                                3<\/span><\/p>\n
    favour of the plaintiff and he became owner    on account of transfer of <\/p>\n
    licence  by the order of the Municipal Secretary.    The original plaintiff <\/p>\n
    claimed that he is   grantee of   irrevocable   licence under section 60 of <\/p>\n
    the Easement Act.\n<\/p>\n
    3.           The original plaintiff was informed on 12.8.1975   by letter <\/p>\n
    pursuant to order by Additional  Deputy Municipal Commissioner  dated <\/p>\n
    21.07.1975 that licence allotted  to the plaintiff is canceled and he shall <\/p>\n
    remove   the   suit   structure     within     45   days,   failing   which     Municipal <\/p>\n
    Corporation would remove the same.\n<\/p>\n
    4.           The plaintiff  by notice dated 19.08.1975   claimed that it is <\/p>\n
    irrevocable     licence   and   that   the   Municipal   Corporation       can   not <\/p>\n
    transfer the land to MSEB     as it intended.   The plaintiff     challenged <\/p>\n
    proposed  municipal action  by Regular Civil Suit  No. 994\/1975  which <\/p>\n
    was heard by Joint Civil Judge,   J.D.  Nagpur    and decreed in favour <\/p>\n
    of   the   plaintiff   restraining   defendant-Municipal   Corporation   from <\/p>\n
    interfering       with   possession\/occupation   of   the   plaintiff.   The   first <\/p>\n
    Appellate Court,  however,   reversed  the decree and dismissed the suit <\/p>\n
    by judgment  and decree sought to  be impugned herein.\n<\/p>\n
    5.           The substantial questions of  law    are :\n\n                 (a)         \"Whether   licence   claimed   by   the \n                 original plaintiff was irrevocable?\n\n\n\n\n                                                              ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 15:26:10 :::<\/span>\n                                                 4<\/span>\n\n\n                 (b)          Whether present appellants as heirs and \n\n\n\n\n                                                                                       \n<\/pre>\n
                 legal representatives  are entitled to   inherit  and
\n                 remain   in   occupation   of   suit   structure         upon <\/p>\n
                 Municipal land, claiming protection of sec. 60 (b)
\n                 of the Easement Act?\n<\/p>\n
    6.           Learned Counsel      for  the  appellants    contended that their <\/p>\n
    predecessor-in-title  ( original plaintiff ) had purchased the suit house by <\/p>\n
    public auction   for Rs.11,500\/- and   sale of house was   confirmed on <\/p>\n
    6.9.1972   by   Deputy   Municipal   Commissioner,   Nagpur,       and   since <\/p>\n
    2.10.1972      licence       in respect of plot of land   was  granted  at Rs.\n<\/p>\n
    65   \/- per month as licence   fee.       Suit house is   permanent structure <\/p>\n
    and licence was irrevocable.    He did not  dispute that the suit structure <\/p>\n
    is situated on Municipal land   and the     notice dated 12.8.1975     was <\/p>\n
    received by original plaintiff for cancellation of  licence.\n<\/p>\n
    7.           The learned Advocate for respondent- Municipal Corporation <\/p>\n
    submitted that there was no documents to support  the claim in the suit <\/p>\n
    and the first Appellate Court recorded findings     of the fact which are <\/p>\n
    neither   illegal   nor   perverse.       Hence     no   interference   is   required   in <\/p>\n
    Second Appeal  as licence may be revoked    by  the grantor   unless it is <\/p>\n
    coupled   with   transfer   of   property   and   such   transfer   is   in   force.\n<\/p>\n
    Admittedly,   suit   structure     was   constructed   by   previous   occupant <\/p>\n
    licencee   and not by the plaintiff.     Hence licence was revocable     and <\/p>\n
                                                               ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:26:10 :::<\/span>
\n                                                   5<\/span><\/p>\n
    hence  revoked by notice.\n<\/p>\n
    8.            Having heard these submissions  and perusing the records, it <\/p>\n
    has to be concluded that there   was no evidence to believe that   the <\/p>\n
    respondent   had   granted   licence   in   respect   of   occupation   of     land   in <\/p>\n
    question     to   the   original   plaintiff   coupled   with     grant   of     interest   in <\/p>\n
    immovable property.   There is nothing on  record to establish that the <\/p>\n
    original plaintiff had constructed  house acting upon licence or executed <\/p>\n
    works of  permanent nature in incurring expenditure in the execution of <\/p>\n
    works. Therefore, the original plaintiff could not have claimed benefit <\/p>\n
    of Section 60 (b) of the Easement Act.\n<\/p>\n
              Substantial       questions of law   raised   above are therefore <\/p>\n
    answered as :\n<\/p>\n
                  (a)           ..  No\n                  (b)           ..  No\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
    9.            There is no reason to believe that Municipal   Secretary  had <\/p>\n
    power to grant irrevocable licence. Assuming that  licence  was granted <\/p>\n
    by Municipal  Secretary,  the   Executive  Municipal   Secretary in   law can <\/p>\n
    only grant such licence which can be revoked or withdrawn,  in view  of <\/p>\n
    statutory  powers  to evict  person from Corporation  premises.   Clause <\/p>\n
    (a) and (b)  of Section 60 of the Easement Act will have no application <\/p>\n
    to licence   even if     granted by Municipal Secretary under the   City of <\/p>\n
                                                                  ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:26:10 :::<\/span>
\n                                               6<\/span><\/p>\n
    Nagpur   Municipal   Corporation   Act,   being       a   special   Act  qua  the <\/p>\n
    Easement   Act   for   licence     granted   by   or     on   behalf   of   Municipal <\/p>\n
    Corporation. Special Act excludes the provisions of General Act.   Hence <\/p>\n
    licence  granted by or on behalf of  Municipal Corporation is revocable.\n<\/p>\n
    No one can by   merely   purchasing   a structure   upon Municipal land <\/p>\n
    claim   “irrevocable licence”   without   grant of   interest in the land or <\/p>\n
    permission   to   construct   permanent   house   on     the   land.           Even <\/p>\n
    otherwise,       mere   licence   does   not   create   any   interest   in   immovable <\/p>\n
    property in view of Section  52   of the Easement Act. The first Appellate <\/p>\n
    Court has considered the  fact on record and applied the legal principles <\/p>\n
    correctly and decided the first Appeal as  last court of facts.     No ground <\/p>\n
    is made out for interference in Second Appeal by this Court as there was <\/p>\n
    no documentary evidence whatsoever to establish  grant of   permission <\/p>\n
    or licence to occupy  the  site and putting up permanent  construction of <\/p>\n
    house thereon in favour of  the original plaintiff. Therefore,  no shelter <\/p>\n
    can be taken by legal heirs  or representatives of original plaintiff under <\/p>\n
    section 60 (b)     of the Easement Act. I do not     find any   reason to <\/p>\n
    exercise  jurisdiction under section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code,  to <\/p>\n
    take a different view     than that of the first Appellate Court as there is <\/p>\n
    no merit in the appeal.       Appeal is dismissed.     The appellants    are <\/p>\n
    granted three months time   from today,   to vacate the suit     site and <\/p>\n
                                                             ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:26:10 :::<\/span>
\n                                               7<\/span><\/p>\n
    handing   over   vacant   possession   to   Respondents.       Unconditional <\/p>\n
    undertaking     be   filed   accordingly   within   a   week,     failing   which <\/p>\n
    appellants   shall   be   liable   to   be   dispossessed   of   the   suit   structure <\/p>\n
    forthwith.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                             JUDGE<\/p>\n
    sahare<\/p>\n
                                                             ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:26:10 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009 Bench: A.P. Bhangale 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. SECOND APPEAL NO. 6 \/ 1998 Dr. Mohd.Abdul Aziz s\/o Yaar Mohd. (Died ) Through LRs: 1) Zubeda Begum wd\/o Dr. Mohammed Abdul […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145887","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nZubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-18T02:51:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-18T02:51:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1008,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-18T02:51:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-18T02:51:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-18T02:51:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009"},"wordCount":1008,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009","name":"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-18T02:51:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zubeda-begum-w-vs-corporation-of-city-of-nagpur-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Zubeda Begum W vs Corporation Of City Of Nagpur on 17 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145887","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145887"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145887\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}