{"id":145922,"date":"2010-11-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010"},"modified":"2015-05-17T13:49:01","modified_gmt":"2015-05-17T08:19:01","slug":"saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 20715 of 2010(Q)\n\n\n1. SAJI SAMUEL, AGED 46 YEARS, S\/O.SAMUEL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,\n\n3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS\n\n4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n\n5. DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BUREAU OF\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.SURESH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.V.S.NAMBOOTHIRY,SC, C.B.I.\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :02\/11\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n          ===========================\n          W.P.(C).No. 20715   OF 2010\n          ===========================\n\n    Dated this the 2nd day of November,2010\n\n                   JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>    This petition is filed under Article 226 of<\/p>\n<p>the Constitution of India praying for a writ of<\/p>\n<p>mandamus or any other appropriate direction<\/p>\n<p>commanding third respondent to consider the<\/p>\n<p>grievance of the petitioner before issuing any<\/p>\n<p>direction based on the request of the interpol<\/p>\n<p>to extradit him and to issue a writ of mandamus<\/p>\n<p>commanding the fifth respondent to keep in<\/p>\n<p>abeyance any proceeding initiated against the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner  for  extradition     until    third<\/p>\n<p>respondent   makes   any    order   on   merits<\/p>\n<p>considering the grievance of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>    2.    Petitioner  contended   that  he  was<\/p>\n<p>working in Dubai and while so he as   nominee a<\/p>\n<p>hotel business was started by name and style<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Pappy Corner Restaurant\/L.L.C along with his<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)20715\/\/2010            2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>wife,         one   Ajith  Kumar  and Mr.Jayadevan   and<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was entrusted with the management of<\/p>\n<p>hotel.      In July 2008, he decided to have a short<\/p>\n<p>visit     to    India  and  at  that  time Ajith   Kumar<\/p>\n<p>requested        to  have  a  signed  cheque  from   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to borrow money in case of          emergency<\/p>\n<p>for business by giving the cheque.        Accordingly he<\/p>\n<p>issued a signed cheque to Ajithkumar.          The said<\/p>\n<p>Ajithkukumar told the petitioner that if a fixed<\/p>\n<p>amount is written and so much amount is not with<\/p>\n<p>the borrower, the cheque amount be used              and<\/p>\n<p>therefore the amount       was not written and an entry<\/p>\n<p>was made not over 25000\/- (AED).        It is contended<\/p>\n<p>that the said cheque was misused and to avoid jail<\/p>\n<p>sentence         petitioner   issued   a   cheque    for<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,75,000\/- AED encashable after three months and<\/p>\n<p>another cheque for Rs.25,000\/- AED encashable on<\/p>\n<p>8.10.2008 to Dubai police.       As the dispute is over<\/p>\n<p>in January 2009,        he returned to India and before<\/p>\n<p>his entry to Dubai,        cheque for Rs.1,75,000\/- was<\/p>\n<p>presented before the bank and got it returned back<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)20715\/\/2010            3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>by Ajithkumar and a fresh case was ignited before<\/p>\n<p>the Dubai Police and it was a trap       set up to book<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner as and when he lands in Dubai.        It<\/p>\n<p>is contended that subsequent to the registration of<\/p>\n<p>the    Crime,     Ajithkumar arrived in India and he was<\/p>\n<p>granted bail by Judicial First Class Magistrate-II,<\/p>\n<p>Mavelikara in Crime No.400\/2009 of Nooranad Police<\/p>\n<p>and    as     a   counterblast,    he  initiated   crime<\/p>\n<p>No.351\/2009 for the offence under section 420 read<\/p>\n<p>with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. Even the wife<\/p>\n<p>of the petitioner, who is now in Dubai,         was not<\/p>\n<p>spared     and    on  a  request  from  Abudabi   Police<\/p>\n<p>forwarded to Central Bureau of Investigation, New<\/p>\n<p>Delhi to locate the petitioner,       Inspector General<\/p>\n<p>of Police Crime Branch, Thiruvananthapuram        who is<\/p>\n<p>also the State Interpol Liason Officer, based on<\/p>\n<p>the request of CBI       directed  the Superintendent of<\/p>\n<p>Police, Pathanamthitta to locate the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>Superintendent of Police, Pathanamthitta        made an<\/p>\n<p>inquiry by Special Branch police and       located   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner        and  forwarded  the  report   to   the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)20715\/\/2010            4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Inspector         General   of   Police.      In   such<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, a writ of mandamus as prayed for was<\/p>\n<p>sought.      It is contended that under Article 6(2)(c)<\/p>\n<p>of the India -United Arab Emirates Extradition<\/p>\n<p>Treaty,      if a person whose extradition is sought is<\/p>\n<p>being investigated or tried in the        State for the<\/p>\n<p>same     offence      for  which   his  extradition  is<\/p>\n<p>requested,        the  authority  can refuse  the  said<\/p>\n<p>request made through INTERPOL.        It is the case of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner that as          cases are pending    in<\/p>\n<p>respect of the same offence in India           Union of<\/p>\n<p>India could refuse to extradit the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>therefore direction is to be issued.<\/p>\n<p>     3.         A  statement  is  filed  by  the  fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent, Central Bureau of Investigation stating<\/p>\n<p>that the National Central Bureau-India which is a<\/p>\n<p>part of Central Bureau of Investigation,        acts as<\/p>\n<p>an    interface      between  various  law  enforcement<\/p>\n<p>agencies of India and National Central Bureau of<\/p>\n<p>other countries for mutual co-operation to combat<\/p>\n<p>crime     and     trace  fugitives.   National  Central<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)20715\/\/2010            5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Bureau, New Delhi received a request from the NCB-<\/p>\n<p>Abu Dhabi to locate the petitioner in India, who is<\/p>\n<p>wanted by the authorities of United Arab Emirates<\/p>\n<p>for the offence of issuing in bad faith,       a cheque<\/p>\n<p>dishonoured for Rs.1,75,000\/- and the address of<\/p>\n<p>the accused was also provided           which was   in<\/p>\n<p>Kerala.          NCB, New Delhi requested the Inspector<\/p>\n<p>General of Police, Crime Branch CID, Kerala only to<\/p>\n<p>locate the accused. Petitioner was located and on<\/p>\n<p>the basis of the report of Inspector General of<\/p>\n<p>Police, CBCID, Kerala NCB-India      informed  Interpol<\/p>\n<p>Abu Dhabi that petitioner       is occasionally staying<\/p>\n<p>in Kanukumpallil, Koodal, Pathanamthitta District<\/p>\n<p>in connection with the construction of his house at<\/p>\n<p>Koodal and other times he is staying in lodges.      It<\/p>\n<p>is    also      stated   that  NCB  has  not   received<\/p>\n<p>extradition request\/papers      from the authorities of<\/p>\n<p>Interpol-Abu Dhabi so far.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4. In the light of the statement of the fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent,       it  is  clear  that  no  request  for<\/p>\n<p>extradition of the petitioner was received from<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)20715\/\/2010            6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>UAE.     In such circumstances,     I find no reason to<\/p>\n<p>issue any direction as sought for.       Once a request<\/p>\n<p>is received from Interpol, Union of India can act<\/p>\n<p>only as provided under the provisions       United Arab<\/p>\n<p>Emirates         Extradition Treaty executed with the<\/p>\n<p>United Arab Emirates.        Union of India is entitled<\/p>\n<p>to   proceed      as  provided  under the  United  Arab<\/p>\n<p>Emirates Extradition Treaty. If any representation<\/p>\n<p>is made by the petitioner to the Union of India, it<\/p>\n<p>shall also be considered.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Petition is disposed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                    M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR<br \/>\n                                            JUDGE<br \/>\ntpl\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>      W.P.(C).NO. \/06\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>     SEPTEMBER,2006<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 20715 of 2010(Q) 1. SAJI SAMUEL, AGED 46 YEARS, S\/O.SAMUEL, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, 3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-17T08:19:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-17T08:19:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":919,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-17T08:19:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-17T08:19:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-17T08:19:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010"},"wordCount":919,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010","name":"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-17T08:19:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saji-samuel-vs-the-inspector-general-of-police-on-2-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Saji Samuel vs The Inspector General Of Police on 2 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145922"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145922\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}