{"id":145997,"date":"2009-12-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-14T07:43:48","modified_gmt":"2015-09-14T02:13:48","slug":"chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>3. Chikkaharuvaiah,\nS] 0 Sambaiah,\nDead by his LES.\n\n{3} Shambaiah,\nS\/'0 iatc Chikkahazuvaiah;\nAged about 54 years;\n\n(b) Raia,\nS\/0 late Ch\ufb02zkaiaaruvajz-11;;\nAged about 52 years; V =\n\n(C) Shiva,   _ \nS\/0 late C1zikka2ia'r3_1vai\u00e92\u00a5;1;_  , V \"\nAgc\u00e9 about 49 yci--\u00a7:rs; . 1 3 V '\n\n(ti) Hon_nappa,'--   \" --  '   I ..\nS\/'0 Iatc:Ch.ii{r'kaha11;\u00a7vai\u00e9h;.   ____ H\nAged aI::7\u00a2.,&gt;utf45' yea:'s;= _V \"\n\nA11areV..re\u00a3=i\u00e91ing   *\n\n1;\u00a2:sa:;:g:;kop\u00a7:a1u;Q-\n\n\u00a3)eva!apm\"a...H0b1i,.MV  - .,..\n\n]f}1\u00a7:vaEapL1ra ~!7?esf, __  V. \" \n\nNagamanga.1a'TaIuk.,b \n\nManciyja I3ist;r:ict_-w 555.2%': 432. .. RESPOHDENT8\n\n{Byf$1;11t.LSx1ma1\u00a7g3i3,__AAE\u00e9Wamy, Adv. for R-1\n\n. V.  S:nL\"B.V\u00a7'Ra:ii;ag;:, Adv. for R\"\u00bb2, R--3(a} to (C1))\n\n__ _ \"..,R.A.fi\u00e9.Ji;68\/Z\ufb02\ufb01\u00e9 on the tug of the: Civil Judge (Sr.Qn.} 35\n J:\u00a7.\u00a7F{:,, Nagamangala, aiicwing thc appeal \ufb01ittd againsi the\n\n  Jgagmg ma ijecree dated 1?.m.2905 passttd; in\n\n_M_Q%.S.N\u20ac).97\/2001 01:1 the \ufb01le cf the Civii Jildg\ufb01 (Jr.Dn.) 35\n JMF'C., Nagamangaia.\n\nA ' VV  is \ufb01led under Section 100 CPC agaiust the\nJudgm\ufb01iiii . \u00e9znd scams datad 39* 10.2097 passed in\n\n \n\n\n\n3\n\nThis appeal Coming on for admission this day, the Celirt\n\u00e9elivereei the fo\u00a7ewing:- \n\nJ UDGMEKT'\n\nThe 16' respondent ---- Muginingegowda  <\/pre>\n<p>permanent _ injenctioe agaiI1s1%&#8221;Mt;f1e \u00ab_ <\/p>\n<p>respondents-2 an\u00e9 3. According  t&#8217;c&gt;__  \u00e9jgerme11&#8217;t\u00a7;&#8217;&#8211;~VV<\/p>\n<p>suit schedule property is the   wae&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>81 pax\ufb01tion evidenced by .5. reg\u00e9\u00e9tefesi k\ufb01iyflva\u00e9\ufb02ia petra&#8217; eiated<br \/>\n12.06.1923, in terms of  were enjoyed<br \/>\nby the respee\u00a7jvee&#8217;:Vpers\u00e9\u00a7es\u00a7\u00bb   fhe piainti\ufb01, a\ufb01er<br \/>\nthe death 0?&#8217;   there was a division of<br \/>\nproperty   and they are enjoying the<\/p>\n<p>pre\u00a7tertiesV,V.2\u00a7*.1\ufb01ehVV&#8217;l14aee faiien to their respective shares. it is<\/p>\n<p> etatesi  beSe&#8211;de_e_;;\u00ab.the &#8216;vyavastha patra&#8217;, mutation was<\/p>\n<p> aeeeyteei &#8216;a2z1{i;:ls:V!1_et\u00a71a has been registered. According to him,<\/p>\n<p>es*e\ufb01-.et1iei\u00a7gh  ciefesrzdante had :10 right over the suit<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V eehei&#8217;:i1;1e.api*efper&#8217;a&#8217;ee; they macie attempts &#8216;he interfere with<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; his peseeseien and eqjeyment and alse attempted to cut and<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  re#e*{7e the tamarind \ufb02ee.\n<\/p>\n<p>T &#8221; &#8220;:2; The suit was contested by the defendants by \ufb01ling the<\/p>\n<p>W\ufb02tb\ufb01\ufb02 statement Severe} pieae were raised ieeluding<\/p>\n<p>$63.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><br \/>\nmaking reference to the earlier litigating} between the<br \/>\npames. Base\u00e9 on the plezadings of the parties, frria;<\/p>\n<p>Judge raised the foliowing issties for censidcraii\u00e9z\ufb01z&#8217;   :_. A4 <\/p>\n<p>z&#8217;) Whether the plainttjfproves  is in pv:V\u00a7s3es$&#8217;i\u20ac::f\u00ab5 <\/p>\n<p>of the suit schedule  _(\u00a7\ufb01  dc zte_&#8217;:ofj_ j <\/p>\n<p>ii) Whether the plaint{if}&#8221;-.___pr0t)&#8217;e$  tha&#8221;\u00a3; &#8216;   <\/p>\n<p>interference from the Boy&#8217;  &#8220;peaceful<br \/>\nenjoyment of suit \u00a7cize&lt;;?i1&#039;iev;::\u00a7itoj:i(zr;yP \u00ab&#039; V4<\/p>\n<p>iii) Whether the plainti\ufb02&#8217;  injunction<br \/>\nas pmyesi\u00e9fn-the\ufb01plqf\ufb01gi?  &#8216; &#8221; I<\/p>\n<p>iv} Ta:#ii;2er&#8217;\u00a3\u00e93r&#8221;;.&#8211;3.~z:a&#8221;:::-ggze?  <\/p>\n<p>:3. Fiainti\ufb01&#8221; ga\u00a3&#8217;:%:;a1fse1\u00a7&#8221;&#8216;e;:amined as P.W.1 and examined<\/p>\n<p>0:13 5Mayar;fia\u00bb.,\u00a7\u00a7.s   F&#8217;or the ciefendants, defendant N32<\/p>\n<p>. .  &#8221; a\u00e9   appreciating the evidence on record<\/p>\n<p> i&amp;:&lt;it.h &#039; zicf%fe&#039;:&#039;3:&quot;e;:f1&lt;::(i:,_i~~ t0 the rival contentiens, the suit was<\/p>\n<p>dis:nis\u00a7\u00a72\u00e9 ?33%T the laarized Triai Judge. Aggrieved by this<\/p>\n<p> giismiss\ufb01fi. of the suit, tha plai\ufb02ti\ufb01 praferred an apwai in the<\/p>\n<p>Appellate Court. {:3 the First Appellate {1eurt, I.A.N0.1<\/p>\n<p>   ..V_\u00a7=\u00a7&#039;as \ufb01led under Order 41 Rule 27 CFC ta produce additional<\/p>\n<p>evid\u00e9mce. The Lower Appeiiate (301111; raised the; faiiawing<\/p>\n<p>K<\/p>\n<p>.\/<\/p>\n<p>points far its consideration:\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>izzterfc-Bring with the possession of the piaintiff ever title suit<br \/>\npmperty. Qefendant contested the suit. On an ev\u00e9itla\ufb01en<\/p>\n<p>of oral and daecizmantary evidence adduced <\/p>\n<p>the suit was decreed. Defendant prefe:&#8217;1&#8243;ed_a:\u00a7V_A\u00a3ipp\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7i1;,   question of adverse<br \/>\nVvpassesVs\u00a75:iV:&#8217; jT;g5ze}{::z:ed% by the defendant. The<br \/>\na4g\u00a7p\u00e9&#8217;I\u00a3at:\u00e9  !r\u00a7%i&amp;&#8217;,,,}&amp;;&#8217;1Tsdiction to reverse or af\ufb01mt<br \/>\n   of trial Court. First appeal is a<br \/>\n&#8221;  zg:@\u00a3u\u00a2_zbleA&#8217;\u00a7ig%:::&#8211;0f the parties and zmiess restricted<br \/>\n  \u00a7c%:1:,__ the whole case is therein epen for<br \/>\n_  &#8216;r\u00e9}L.22 a\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7:&#8221;b0th on questions cffact {md law. The<br \/>\n  of time appetfate Court m,ust, therefore,<br \/>\n. rg\ufb01ea its consciaus applicafier: of mind, and<\/p>\n<p>V A&#8217; &#8216;  r\u00e9cord findings supgyortea&#8217; by reasarzs, on am the<\/p>\n<p> issues arising (dong with the eantenti-tans put ferth,<br \/>\nand prasseci by the parties for decision of the<br \/>\nappellate Court. The task of an appeflate Ceurt<br \/>\najf\ufb01rming the f&#8217;inciz&#8217;ng.$ of the trial Court is an easier<br \/>\n03318. The agapellate Ccrurt agreeing with the view sf<\/p>\n<p>\\\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>=\/<\/p>\n<p>the trial Cfcruri need not restate the a\ufb01ect cf<\/p>\n<p>eyidencxz or reiterate the reasons given by mg&#8217; A&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>court; expression sf general agreem\u00e9ni&#8217; &#8216; &#8221;   .<\/p>\n<p>reasons given by the Court, decision.  1   b <\/p>\n<p>under appeai, would or;&#8217;:ii%ic:ti1gg  <\/p>\n<p>Ginjanandirti Devi :2. B\ufb01endfa I&#8217;\u00a7?Ztr&#8217;ik\u00a3nTT:&#8217;?-:<br \/>\nAIR&#8217; 195? SC 1 124). .W&#8217;e.__&#8217;wou\u00a7B:\u00a3,  ..li1cV\u00a2 to %<\/p>\n<p>sauna&#8217; a note ef cautio\ufb01f;._ V&#8217;VExpre\u00e9s.idfzT  \ufb01gneral<br \/>\nagreement urith&#8221;  \u00a2jeco:&#8221;d&#8221;\u00e9d  the<br \/>\njudgment under   he a device or<br \/>\naanwu\ufb02age_ adopted :by   Court fer<br \/>\nshirking&#8221;     writing a<br \/>\njmdg\ufb02i\u00e9\ufb01&#8217;&#8212;    &#8220;fjppellate Court must<br \/>\n    V prfnmples. Firstly, the<br \/>\nfindini\u00a7S?\u00bb%&#8217;._&#8211;(~;f___&#8217; on oon\ufb02icting evidence<br \/>\nc\ufb01ui\u00e9ed Vat  ..-ciourt must weigh with the<br \/>\nappu\u00e9\u00a3\u00a3{\/itea  &#8221; rr\ufb01irese when the \ufb01ndings are<\/p>\n<p> E-eased  V._::2:\u00bbfV&#8217;a\u00a3 evidence recorded by the same<\/p>\n<p> V. Judge wha authors the judgment. This<br \/>\n   @5983 not mean that when an appeal Eies<br \/>\n &#8221; 0r\u00e9&#8217; appeliate Court is not competent to<br \/>\n rezgm\u00e9 :1 ffrtd\ufb01ng of fact arrived at by the trial<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01saige. As a matter of law if the appraiaai of the<\/p>\n<p>V evidence by the trial Court su\ufb01ezs frem :2 materiai<\/p>\n<p>H irregularity car is based on irgadmissibie evi\ufb01ence<\/p>\n<p>0?&#8217; an eergjectures and surmises, the appeila\/te<br \/>\nCourt is entitled ts interfere with the \ufb01nding offact<br \/>\n(See Mctdhusudczrz Bus V. Smt\ufb02arayanf Bax; AIR<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>.\/r&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">11<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Judge. In the circumstances, stibstan\ufb01al question 0f.~}asv is<\/p>\n<p>answem\ufb01 ii}. the a\ufb01rmative an\ufb01 it is held that <\/p>\n<p>judgment su\ufb01lars frezn I1on~app1i&lt;:ai:ioI1 of   <\/p>\n<p>facts and the iaw, by the learned Ap\u00a7}\u00e9\ufb01ate&quot;Jj&#039;udg\u00a7.ATV&#039;V:v    <\/p>\n<p>In the result, \ufb01he s\u20ac:cai1c1__  ig    ;\n<\/p>\n<p>jucigment under challenge is  a.$_idet..    1}x1atter is<br \/>\nremitted back to the   time appeal<br \/>\nafresh, both on facts ami. .Lii1j1.1a\u00a7%\u00a7;%&#8217;  View the ratio<br \/>\nlaid down b\u00a7f_VCc3_1ii:1: &#8216;.\u00a7:i;::Vvt\u00a7.\u00e9\u00e9&#8221;&#8216;c&#8217;\u00a7&lt;i$cision referred to<br \/>\nsupra. Ali    are left open for<br \/>\nco:1si(:1.e3&#039;\u00e9ti(.\u00a7\u00abv1&quot;;A1AAb;\u00a7*  Sizzce the appeai is<br \/>\n{if the ytE&#039;!&#039;Ae&amp;&#039;3 1&#039;__ 42{)i}6,._. the Case Flow Manag\ufb01ment<\/p>\n<p>Rules ;\ufb01&#039;21med&#039; \u00a53j;&#039; j:1E1iS C\u00e9ui\ufb01, in order to enahle the Appellate<\/p>\n<p>  Ce1;gi&quot;t   of the appeai, the parties are<\/p>\n<p>   &#039;mfere the First Appellate Court on<\/p>\n<p>  j\u00e9afzd receive: fmrther Grder\ufb01 from the \u00a7G&#039;W6I&#039;<\/p>\n<p> It is ma\ufb01a clear that, any 0b$fii&quot;\u20ac&#039;\u00a3iti\u20ac)I1S<\/p>\n<p>  i\ufb01a&#039;-:13  this judgment, being @1113? limited for the purpcse ccf<\/p>\n<p>  \u00e9\ufb01giggigu an the substantial questiszm 61&#039; Law under<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab (:GI1Si(1\u20acI&#039;\u20aci&#039;Ci{\u00a7}I&#039;1, shali not be treated as an expression of<\/p>\n<p>E<\/p>\n<p>\/,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">12<\/span><br \/>\nQpinian on the merits cf the matter, wlilich is now required<\/p>\n<p>to be decided by the Appellate Court.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9318<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda 3. Chikkaharuvaiah, S] 0 Sambaiah, Dead by his LES. {3} Shambaiah, S\/&#8217;0 iatc Chikkahazuvaiah; Aged about 54 years; (b) Raia, S\/0 late Ch\ufb02zkaiaaruvajz-11;; Aged about 52 years; V = (C) Shiva, _ S\/0 late C1zikka2ia&#8217;r3_1vai\u00e92\u00a5;1;_ , V &#8221; Agc\u00e9 about 49 yci&#8211;\u00a7:rs; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145997","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-14T02:13:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-14T02:13:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":996,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-14T02:13:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-14T02:13:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-14T02:13:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009"},"wordCount":996,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009","name":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-14T02:13:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-muginingegowda-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Muginingegowda on 4 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145997","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145997"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145997\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145997"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145997"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145997"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}