{"id":14601,"date":"2011-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-06-12T10:00:07","modified_gmt":"2017-06-12T04:30:07","slug":"babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: S. Muralidhar<\/div>\n
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n                              W. P. (C) 1597\/1998\n\n                                             Reserved on: July 25, 2011\n                                             Decision on: August 04, 2011\n\n\n        BABU RAM JAIN                                  ..... Petitioner\n                              Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Advocate.\n\n\n                              versus\n\n\n        BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD.                     ..... Respondent\n                      Through: Mr. B. C. Pandey, Advocate.\n\n\n        CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR\n\n\n        1.   Whether Reporters of local papers may be\n             allowed to see the judgment?                            No\n        2.   To be referred to the Reporter or not?                  No\n        3.   Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest?      No\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
                               04.08.2011<\/p>\n
CM Nos. 10450\/2007, 16956\/2007 & 4115\/2008<\/p>\n
For the reasons stated therein and in light of the decision of the Supreme Court<\/p>\n
in North Delhi Power Ltd. v. GNCTD, the applications are allowed. The BSES<\/p>\n
Yamuna Power Ltd. (‘BYPL’) is impleaded as a Respondent in place of the<\/p>\n
Delhi Vidyut Board (‘DVB’), the Delhi Power Company Ltd (‘DPCL’) and the<\/p>\n
Delhi Vidyut Board Employees Provident Terminal Fund 2002 who were<\/p>\n
earlier impleaded are removed from the array of parties.<\/p>\n
W. P. (C) 1597\/1998<\/p>\n
1. The Petitioner, who was employed as a senior lineman with the DVB [which<\/p>\n
has since been substituted by BYPL] has filed this writ petition challenging the
\nW.P. (C) No. 1597\/1998                                             Page 1 of 5<\/span>
\n memorandum dated 5th March 1992 issued by the Delhi Electric Supply<\/p>\n
Undertaking (‘DESU’) and served upon him the articles of charges on the basis<\/p>\n
of which disciplinary proceedings were initiated. The Petitioner also<\/p>\n
challenges the enquiry report dated 2nd January 1996 holding the Petitioner<\/p>\n
guilty of the charges, the show cause notice dated 5th June 1996 and the<\/p>\n
consequential order dated 2nd May 1997 of the Disciplinary Authority (‘DA’)<\/p>\n
imposing the penalty of removal from service and the order dated 29th January<\/p>\n
1998 passed by the Appellate Authority (‘AA’) dismissing the Petitioner’s<\/p>\n
appeal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2. This Court has heard the submissions of Ms. Maninder Acharya, learned<\/p>\n
counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. B.C. Pandey, learned counsel<\/p>\n
appearing for the DPCL.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3. The charge against the Petitioner was that during the course of a joint<\/p>\n
inspection by the Vigilance Department along with MTD enforcement and<\/p>\n
zonal staff on 18th July 1990, one private electricity meter (not belonging to<\/p>\n
DESU) was found installed in the premises at 41-A, Shyam Nagar and the<\/p>\n
supply in use was found to be for commercial-cum-residential purposes. The<\/p>\n
investigations revealed that the said private meter was installed by the<\/p>\n
Petitioner on 13th November 1989 in connivance with Mr. Manohar Singh, a<\/p>\n
mason. It was further claimed that the above fact was confirmed by one Mr.<\/p>\n
Vasudev Walia, a neighbour, who identified the Petitioner as the person who<\/p>\n
had installed the said meter. In his written statement of defence, the Petitioner<\/p>\n
stated that during his posting at the Geeta Colony zone in October 1990, he<\/p>\n
was entrusted with the duty of maintenance of street lighting and his duty
\nW.P. (C) No. 1597\/1998                                              Page 2 of 5<\/span>
\n hours were from 2.00 pm to 10.00 pm and therefore on 13th November 1989,<\/p>\n
when he was on duty, the question of installing a private meter at 41-A, Shyam<\/p>\n
Nagar did not arise at all. He pointed out in his written statement that on 23rd<\/p>\n
July 1990 Mr. Gulshan Kumar (occupant of the premises at 41-A, Shyam<\/p>\n
Nagar) stated that one Mr. Aya Singh had told him that Mr. Manohar Lal had<\/p>\n
installed the meter after accepting a bribe of Rs. 2,000\/-. On the other hand,<\/p>\n
Mr. Aya Singh stated that he had never named Mr. Manohar Lal. The other<\/p>\n
witnesses, i.e., Mr. Sunder Lal Chawla, Mr. P.K. Mangal and Mr. Raj Kumar<\/p>\n
Dua did not name the Petitioner. He also pointed out that Mr. Vasudev Walia,<\/p>\n
whose statement was relied on by the IO, was full of contradictions. The meter<\/p>\n
inspector also had not named the Petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. In the enquiry report, the Inquiry Officer (‘IO’) noted that 11 of the 13<\/p>\n
witnesses could not be produced. It was noticed that PW-1 Mr. P.K. Warshney,<\/p>\n
Superintendent (T) had deposited that the statements of Mr. Sunder Lal<\/p>\n
Chabra, Mr. P.K. Mangal, Mr. Raj Kumar Dua, Mr. Vasudev Walia and Mr.<\/p>\n
Gulshan Kumar were recorded in his presence. Consequently, the IO<\/p>\n
concluded that it could not be said that the said statements were false. PW-2<\/p>\n
Mr. V.K. Mittal, Senior Clerk ACA (CPF) also stated that the statements of the<\/p>\n
above private witnesses were recorded in his presence. According to the IO,<\/p>\n
even if the makers of the statements could not be produced, reliance could be<\/p>\n
placed on the record produced by the vigilance department which contained<\/p>\n
‘corroborative’ evidence. It was accordingly held that on preponderance of<\/p>\n
probabilities the charge stood proved against the Petitioner.<\/p>\n
5. The DA while accepting the report of the IO imposed the penalty of removal
\nW.P. (C) No. 1597\/1998                                             Page 3 of 5<\/span>
\n from service on the Petitioner. The DA does not appear to have given any<\/p>\n
reasons for doing so. Likewise, the AA has merely stated that it finds no<\/p>\n
infirmity in the order of the DA.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6. Ms. Maninder Acharya, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner referred<\/p>\n
to the statements made by two witnesses during the enquiry and submitted that<\/p>\n
without examining Mr. Vasudev Walia, who alone named the Petitioner, the<\/p>\n
finding returned by the IO against the Petitioner was based on no evidence.<\/p>\n
7. Having examined the impugned order of the IO and the documents placed<\/p>\n
on record, this Court finds that the only witness who is supposed to have<\/p>\n
named the Petitioner, i.e., Vasudev Walia, was not produced. There was<\/p>\n
therefore no other evidence even of a ‘corroborative’ nature which could bring<\/p>\n
home the guilt of the Petitioner. The finding that the Petitioner was guilty of<\/p>\n
the charge of installing a private meter was, therefore, not based on any<\/p>\n
acceptable evidence. The Petitioner could not have been guilty of the charge.<\/p>\n
8. Neither the DA nor the AA has appreciated the fact that the report of the IO<\/p>\n
is based on no evidence whatsoever.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9. Consequently, the report of the IO dated 2nd January 1996, the order dated<\/p>\n
2nd May 1997 of the DA imposing a major penalty on the Petitioner and the<\/p>\n
order dated 29th January 1998 of the AA dismissing the Petitioner’s appeal are<\/p>\n
hereby set aside.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
10. The Petitioner has superannuated during the pendency of the present
\nW.P. (C) No. 1597\/1998                                             Page 4 of 5<\/span>
\n petition and, therefore, the question of his reinstatement does not arise. The<\/p>\n
liability for payment of the consequential benefits to the Petitioner is, in terms<\/p>\n
of the decision of the Supreme Court in North Delhi Power Limited v. BSES<\/p>\n
Rajdhani Power Limited AIR 2010 SC 2302 that of the BYPL.<\/p>\n
11. It is accordingly directed that within a period of eight weeks from today,<\/p>\n
the Respondent BYPL will pay to the Petitioner all his consequential benefits<\/p>\n
by way of arrears of salary and other retiral benefits. It will also pass orders<\/p>\n
granting him the notional promotions to which he may be entitled to within the<\/p>\n
same period and calculate and pay him the consequential monetary benefits, if<\/p>\n
any. In addition BYPL will pay the Petitioner costs of Rs. 5,000\/- within the<\/p>\n
same period.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
12. The petition and the pending applications are disposed of in the above<\/p>\n
terms.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                         S. MURALIDHAR, J.\n<\/p>\n
AUGUST 04, 2011
\nrk<\/p>\n
W.P. (C) No. 1597\/1998                                               Page 5 of 5<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011 Author: S. Muralidhar IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W. P. (C) 1597\/1998 Reserved on: July 25, 2011 Decision on: August 04, 2011 BABU RAM JAIN ….. Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Advocate. versus BSES YAMUNA POWER […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBabu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-12T04:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-12T04:30:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1119,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-12T04:30:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-12T04:30:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-12T04:30:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011"},"wordCount":1119,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011","name":"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-12T04:30:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babu-ram-jain-vs-bses-yamuna-power-ltd-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14601"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14601\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}