{"id":146109,"date":"2010-10-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010"},"modified":"2018-12-22T08:40:15","modified_gmt":"2018-12-22T03:10:15","slug":"new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.Billappa<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 19%! DAY OF OCTOBER,;~*'2G.1'{,1'__j:  u g\n\nBEFORE   z\nTHE HON'BLE    'A  \nM.F.A.No.e073\/gzooomc}V % 1 % \nBETWEEN:    %\n\nNew India Assurance Co. Li\"._d\".,_ _ \nHassan, Now represented by its   \nRegional Manager,   _ \nNew indla Assura1t1\u00ab:.'-5-2, Co. Ltd._., \nRegional Office, 25-:13, 57\u00b0 _. ..  \n\nUnlty Buildmg ,:Ar1r;eX'e';'?'..__   \nP.Ka1inga Rao Road. ;j_ '   \u00ab. A \nBangalore --.~'\"f\u00a2A:   ...Appellant\n\n[By Sr}: .A.N . xKri:shna-   ,]\n\nAND:\n\n \"  _  A\nA ' -. , Sv,\/_,0.Ran.ge,goWda.\n' Rf a,,Th1ni'_manaha11i Village,\nKasaba .Hoi'}1Ai,\n\nV --V HassanTaiuk.\n\n     Srr1--t,Nagarathna,\n\n- T \" ._W.\/ o,.-K.M.1\\\/Ianjegowda,\n--  Age: Major, R\/a.No.4f\/'47,\n\n   __Opp: Gowrarnma Compound,\n\nL\/r\n\n\n\nHunasinakere Road,\nHassan. .. .Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>(By Sri.Girish.B.Baladare, Adv., for R\u00ab 1]<br \/>\n(Notice to R-2 dispensed with V\/O dated 4.10.10}<\/p>\n<p>=l=*=i==I=*=l=*<\/p>\n<p>This M.F.A. is \ufb01led under Section 3D&#8221;&#8221;[l*l~:::&#8217;_0f <\/p>\n<p>against the Order dated 30.06.2009}_passed &#8216;*w&#8221;eA,!:xie\/.e:s\ufb01;-<br \/>\n96 \/2007 on the file of the Laboui&#8221; Of\ufb01.ee&#8217;r._ and b&#8217;C30ii1I:&#8217;a.issiovner.p<br \/>\nfor Workmerfs Compensation\u20ac&#8221;*~._pp Hassan, :&#8217;v_:ai5vai*ding <\/p>\n<p>compensation of ?. 101,664\/&#8211; with vVl::1&#8217;1.t_\u20ac1fl.3St at&#8221;l&#8211;2% <\/p>\n<p>This M.F.A. coming onfor  day, the Court<\/p>\n<p>delivered the following&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Heardgthe learne&#8217;d.ceon&#8217;13_s&#8217;el&#8217;_ for the appellant and also the<\/p>\n<p>learned eounse&#8217;1\u00ab.i&#8217;o1&#8242; the llitrelspondent.<\/p>\n<p>   t&#8217;appeal is directed against the judgement and<\/p>\n<p>order_  passed by the Commissioner for<\/p>\n<p> WTorkme&#8217;n&#8217;s&#8221;&#8211;Corripensation, Hassan, Sub&#8211;Division, I-lassan in<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7\u20acu,.WCA\/NF\/SR&#8211;96\/2007.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>3. By the impugned judgement and order, the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner has granted compensation of ?.1,01,664\/- with<\/p>\n<p>interest at 12% p.a. from 30 days after the accident.  <\/p>\n<p>4. Aggrieved by that, the <\/p>\n<p>Company has \ufb01led this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. In brief, the facts are; The 15fArespcndentecfairriant<\/p>\n<p>was working as a driver in the&#8217;}orryV&#8221;be&#8217;a1&#8217;ing&#8221;V1\\\u00a7oi.&#8217;1\u00ab31B;3383iC&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>belonging to the 2nd respondent.____d:}i&#8217;hat,on  the 13&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>respondent was retuming&#8221;&#8221;to&#8217; pHa.sS3&#8217;3.VI:1.uR&#8217;Qf1TB..M.ROad, in front<\/p>\n<p>of APMC Yard;  the bus bearing No.<br \/>\nKA&#8211;13-F~13&#8217;1.1&#8242;.= \u00abof that, the 1st respondent<\/p>\n<p>sustained. _ inj1i&#8217;ries=.vand Vclairned compensation. The<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;has ayifarded a sum of ?.1,01,644\/&#8211; with<\/p>\n<p>inte&#8211;reVst~  from 30 days after the accident.<\/p>\n<p>dw\ufb01ggrieyed by  the appeI1ant&#8211;Insurance Company has filed<\/p>\n<p>C it  :&#8217; 5lp33eai;&#8217;  Z <\/p>\n<p>6. The Learned Counsel for the appe1Iant&#8211;Ins_nrance<br \/>\nCompany contended that the Commissioner in<br \/>\ntaking the loss of earning capacity of the 15&#8242;<br \/>\n25%. He also submitted that the doctor..has.&#8217;_&#8221;de_poVsIed.&#8221;that<br \/>\nfirst respondent has suffered permaf1.erit_ddisabtilityyvctf<br \/>\nrespect of the Whole body and&#8217;\u00abth&#8217;erefore;__ .theVd:&#8217;Cao:m&#8217;n1&#8217;is&#8217;sionerit<br \/>\nwas not justified in takingypthe  earpning &#8216;capacity of the<br \/>\nfirst respondent at 25%}  that the<br \/>\nCommissioner   at 12% PR1.\n<\/p>\n<p>from 30 days  ;a&#8217;nd:&#8217;th&#8217;e&#8217;Commissioner shouid<\/p>\n<p>yv pppp   :&#8217;;_::w   ._  aPPz,;m;ggyt.tiI{1l~edo\u00a3e\u00b0g.<br \/>\nhave awarded interest&#8221;;Vat 1\/:;u.&#8221;% p._a. from the date o\ufb01award \ufb01\u00e9?;\ufb01#teJLea\u00a7bA.,<br \/>\nat , 9_-\/. pet annugn gw:~tfi;t&#8217;:te_fetg; atafwed ecu L, L,<\/p>\n<p>Al\/the date of 2Vpayn1ent_\u00a7V&#8217;._ &#8220;H_e&#8217;\u00bb\u00ab.therefore, submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>impugned.judgeme1it  order needs to be modified.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   :against this, the Learned Counsel for the first<\/p>\n<p>:&#8221;&#8221;x,___respondent  that the Commissioner has rightly<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;taken the Iduossv of earning capacity of the \ufb01rst respondent at<br \/>\n 253:&#8217;?\/E;  therefore, it does not call for interference. He also<\/p>\n<p> &#8230;s:u&#8221;bri1p%itted that the interest may be awarded at 71\/2% from the<\/p>\n<p>L\/\/,.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>date of application till the date of award and thereafter, 12%<br \/>\nper annum from the date of the award till the date of<br \/>\npayment. &#8216; p<\/p>\n<p>8. The substantial question of law that _arise&#8217;s~._xfor<br \/>\nconsideration is: d in it<\/p>\n<p>Whether the Commissioner .wr,;i_s  d<br \/>\nin taking the loss of earning c=(,tpcz;z:it;}  4&#8242; V<br \/>\nfirst respondent at 25964&#8242; and_  1<br \/>\ninterest at 12% p.a. from <\/p>\n<p>accident?\n<\/p>\n<p>9.   first respondent has<br \/>\nsuffered injurieis  :righ&#8217;t&#8230;si;_oiiider, waist and other parts<\/p>\n<p>of the body. &#8216;IV;h-ed dvoctor Ah.as..-deposed that the first respondent<\/p>\n<p> permar1entA&#8217;disabi1ity of 18% in respect of the<\/p>\n<p>who1e&#8217;..:C&#8217;f&#8217;ommissioner has taken the loss of earning<\/p>\n<p>Vi&#8221;n&#8230;.vcapacity&#8221;at v;25&#8242;?&#8217;g&#8217;iVWhich is not correct. The Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>-4 should haveptaken the loss of earning capacity at 18% in View<\/p>\n<p>pV&#8221;the_p_d&#8217;octor&#8217;s evidence. Therefore, the loss of earning<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;fcapa_city is taken at 18%. If the loss of earning capacity is<\/p>\n<p>L\/_.\n<\/p>\n<p>taken at 18% and the relevant factor of 169.44 is applied to<br \/>\n60% of the wages 1.e., &#8216;\u20ac2,400\/~. the compensation payable<\/p>\n<p>comes to ?.?&#8217;3,198\/&#8211; and it is rounded off to \u20ac73,200\/;;c\u00ab\u00abealp&#8221;i_<\/p>\n<p>10. The Commissioner has awarded 112% 2 <\/p>\n<p>p.a. from 30 days after the accident whichplijs <\/p>\n<p>Commissioner should have awar_ded&#8221;in&#8217;terest,*a1;e.7%%\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>from the date of application   award and<br \/>\nthereafter, 12% p.a. fromithe  till the date of<br \/>\npayment as held in omsnraillp\u00e9  COMPANY<br \/>\nLTD., Vs M0HI).3._.:v1\\ll5l;-$I&#8217;_:R_l&#8217;\u00a7Nli):leihl_C)\u00e9&#8217;iffrlER&#8217;:reported in 2009<\/p>\n<p>ACJ Page 2742.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.  ,Accord1&#8217;_ngly;  appeal is allowed and the<br \/>\njudgement alndlvorder passed by the Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>for 2Wor_krne.n&#8217;s.V Compensation, Hassan Sub&#8211;DiVisior1, Hassan,<\/p>\n<p> case, Na.t&#8217;NcA\/NF\/sR&#8211;9e\/2007 is modi\ufb01ed granting<\/p>\n<p>t&#8221;l3ea:npensatioti:C of 373,200\/&#8211; instead of ?.1,01,644\/- with<\/p>\n<p> 71\/2\u00b0\/o p.a. from the date of application till the date<\/p>\n<p>l&#8217;awa}rd and thereafter. 12% pa. from the date of award till<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>h the date of payment. The first respondent is permitted to<\/p>\n<p>withdraw the amount in deposit before this Court to the<br \/>\nextent he is entitled. The balance amount shall be,re\u00bbftinded<br \/>\nto the appellantwlnsurance Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>  t <\/p>\n<p>T1<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010 Author: H.Billappa IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 19%! DAY OF OCTOBER,;~*&#8217;2G.1&#8242;{,1&#8217;__j: u g BEFORE z THE HON&#8217;BLE &#8216;A M.F.A.No.e073\/gzooomc}V % 1 % BETWEEN: % New India Assurance Co. Li&#8221;._d&#8221;.,_ _ Hassan, Now represented by its Regional Manager, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-22T03:10:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-22T03:10:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":830,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010\",\"name\":\"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-22T03:10:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-22T03:10:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-22T03:10:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010"},"wordCount":830,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010","name":"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-22T03:10:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/new-india-assuracne-co-ltd-vs-jayaram-on-19-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New India Assuracne Co.Ltd,. vs Jayaram on 19 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146109\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}